References: <1490527279-31426-1-git-send-email-chipitsine@...277...> <12987e8a-1873-fc96-3b4f-0576939773fb@...1856...> <7e470072-787c-c7c3-39cb-b9338720b79c@...1856...> From: David Sommerseth Message-ID: <57b33706-7042-d65a-0269-ba7d5ac932e8@...2080...> Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 23:44:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lONhP81bDB78bX54d8v4aJOc8jKrC6JVg" Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] travis-ci: add 2 mingw "build only configurations" Reply-To: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?0JjQu9GM0Y8g0KjQuNC/0LjRhtC40L0=?= Cc: "openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --lONhP81bDB78bX54d8v4aJOc8jKrC6JVg Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="fWiBHVUSr5HT9vTRKiSexR9E6gefxEooQ"; protected-headers="v1" From: David Sommerseth Reply-To: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: =?UTF-8?B?0JjQu9GM0Y8g0KjQuNC/0LjRhtC40L0=?= Cc: "openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" Message-ID: <57b33706-7042-d65a-0269-ba7d5ac932e8@...2080...> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] travis-ci: add 2 mingw "build only configurations" References: <1490527279-31426-1-git-send-email-chipitsine@...277...> <12987e8a-1873-fc96-3b4f-0576939773fb@...1856...> <7e470072-787c-c7c3-39cb-b9338720b79c@...1856...> In-Reply-To: --fWiBHVUSr5HT9vTRKiSexR9E6gefxEooQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/04/17 15:31, =D0=98=D0=BB=D1=8C=D1=8F =D0=A8=D0=B8=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=86= =D0=B8=D0=BD wrote: >=20 > how did you came to conclusion that it means poor code quality? > is it written somewhere on the https://openvpn.net on how to write bash > scripts ? Steffan have given a good reasoning, and I completely agree with him. Further, it is impossible to write a documentation which is 100% perfect on coding style, good coding practice and related subjects. If you insist on that, I recommend you to visit http://shop.oreilly.com/ or Amazon and find some good books about it (the review ratings on those sites are usually fairly good in this regard). So there are no reasons for us to try to duplicate the work of other writers. I would even dare to claim that programming isn't just a science with only one way to do things properly. But it is a science which requires you to think thoroughly of what you try to solve, how to solve it and how to make it easy and understandable for others. In fact, the real science part of programming (to solve a real and concrete issue) is just one little part of the whole picture. And this makes me think of Reuven Lerner and his weekly newsletter. He pulls up a lot of these things there too, perhaps consider to sign up for that too can be a good idea? --=20 kind regards, David Sommerseth OpenVPN Technologies, Inc --fWiBHVUSr5HT9vTRKiSexR9E6gefxEooQ-- --lONhP81bDB78bX54d8v4aJOc8jKrC6JVg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY6qtHAAoJEIbPlEyWcf3yi0IP/18GjeXTO8METTYyvxow5vuj 2ca7vBYc8YrBrzqlTOS3WAO5XeRtWLId2XT3cjWasoXJcd12KRvakrp6LJhi+bcG Q4bjaV14koFV58fu9a+8sQn/fzWi8gZByNq9PDiNZ9nPhkAHlT8PV4GHPBjamGT5 KbnzPGZHutb+fwtm4TXDH74uVbcIqSssptJNTf0ynzAxk+jCQFJ1heBo+hUsh3J3 CqifEa0x1POj3+v7N4MOxlJAEecDGJ9q0cJOzMKSfDJXwhsV1bbRY0KoKV8eTse7 cleTxRb8Mz2IQuOtZOzSQY4cOy10Qc19mZFikcqh3pKVrGtCkgUuwXYc34I5iksa xtlnMJN1R2Ka11IfxXYFaDJnbPmMpMtvulZBFaCNb1zNzpObkKbpQw2n5G6s/oFd MupjOBGzmqNr1nFnYSq9uzeHOPmMaxMFtwJ+c5lzGpVm2omKgnb+aMVH7Ul1TLYi GKsva88d8BrZ9T4RYYAd3LADwysXLCFIlI9vO6sDIoYdRMRPqHMjSkNMYM5xKGJ1 HcFFpCTypjyXNAJ0yPRA22iBua21WxKiIzdoNB8XNMjhD0ZGyasDs3xLfrFDK0Cj TD12t9GNGgAdbntnFpyMfMM8CkG1mkOpeDGRNj/cjnilTPuH7DlTKDnqWNwRBKCf s1N9H4qmj73BIk5e5MlO =4BxT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lONhP81bDB78bX54d8v4aJOc8jKrC6JVg--