From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:46:07 -0800 Subject: [PATCHV2 REPOST 5/7] ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO Daisychain support via hwmod mux In-Reply-To: <1323878477-21122-6-git-send-email-vishwanath.bs@ti.com> (Vishwanath BS's message of "Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:31:15 +0530") References: <1323878477-21122-1-git-send-email-vishwanath.bs@ti.com> <1323878477-21122-6-git-send-email-vishwanath.bs@ti.com> Message-ID: <8739bnsb6o.fsf@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Vishwanath BS writes: > IO Daisychain feature has to be triggered whenever there is a change in > device's mux configuration (See section 3.9.4 in OMAP4 Public TRM vP). ...in addition to the triggering still happening in the idle path, right? IIUC, after this series, there's still a call in omap_sram_idle(). > Now devices can idle independent of the powerdomain, there can be a window where device > is idled and corresponding powerdomain can be ON/INACTIVE state. In such situations, > since both module wake up is enabled at padlevel as well as io daisychain sequence is > triggered, there will be 2 PRCM interrupts (Module async wake up via swakeup and IO Pad > interrupt). But as PRCM Interrupt handler clears the Module Padlevel WKST bit in the > first interrupt, module specific interrupt handler will not triggered for the second time > > Also look at detailed explanation given by Rajendra at > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg04480.html > > Signed-off-by: Vishwanath BS > Tested-by: Govindraj.R [...] > +void omap_trigger_wuclk_ctrl(void) > +{ > + if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) > + omap3_trigger_wuclk_ctrl(); > + > + if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) > + omap4_trigger_wuclk_ctrl(); > +} cpu_is_* usage is only acceptable at init time. Please use a function pointer initialized at init time for this. Kevin