Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.4 03/27] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not return -EINTR
In-Reply-To: <20140424215552.041408348@linuxfoundation.org> (Greg
	Kroah-Hartman's message of "Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:55:37 -0700")
References: <20140424215551.942390050@linuxfoundation.org>
	<20140424215552.041408348@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 23:01:54 +0100
Message-ID: <874n1i8jzh.fsf@sable.mobileactivedefense.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> 3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me
> know.

Since this is a machine generated bulk e-mail (as far as I understand
this) which is specifically not intended to be sent to me as person, as
per Eric Dumazet earlier statements, I object to being on the recipient
list without an opportunity to be removed from it as I have repeatedly
requested.

Insofar my understanding of European spam legislation goes, this is
illegal.