Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxB8n-0002Ut-UR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:27:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxB8j-0001Pm-UK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:27:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49888) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxB8j-0001Pi-Fy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:27:13 -0400 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4Q9RCiT024738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:27:12 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1432294585-5984-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1432294585-5984-11-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <555FABC7.90701@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:27:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <555FABC7.90701@redhat.com> (Eric Blake's message of "Fri, 22 May 2015 16:20:55 -0600") Message-ID: <87617feljl.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/20] monitor: Propagate errors through qmp_check_input_obj() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com Eric Blake writes: > On 05/22/2015 05:36 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >> --- >> monitor.c | 19 ++++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> > >> @@ -4948,27 +4948,27 @@ static QDict *qmp_check_input_obj(QObject *input_obj) > >> } >> } else if (!strcmp(arg_name, "id")) { >> /* FIXME: check duplicated IDs for async commands */ > > Is this comment dead, now that you killed async commands? If so, should > it be nuked earlier in the series? I figure you're right. I'll kill the comment together with asynchronous commands. > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Thanks!