From: Richard Palethorpe Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 10:51:46 +0100 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v6] Add test for CVE-2017-7308 on a raw socket's ring buffer In-Reply-To: <20171101154943.GE11108@rei.lan> References: <20171013111932.28671-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com> <20171101154943.GE11108@rei.lan> Message-ID: <87inetj9e5.fsf@rpws.prws.suse.cz> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hello, Cyril Hrubis writes: > > Also I wonder if we should put it under syscalls/setsockopt(). Maybe we > should adopt a rule that if it's reasonably clear which syscall the test > belongs to we would put it into the syscalls/ directory and use the cve > directory as a fallback for all the rest of the cve reproducers. What do > you think? I'm happy with that. I like having all the CVE tests in one place, but the runtest file appears to do a good enough job of that. -- Thank you, Richard.