Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44692) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlK9o-0007XV-G4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 11:07:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlK9i-0003k2-Cc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 11:07:04 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59455) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlK9i-0003jv-5T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 11:06:58 -0500 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sA3G6u8o023910 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 11:06:56 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1414947218-7618-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <87bnoouxqn.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <20141103151955.GA14401@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:06:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20141103151955.GA14401@redhat.com> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message of "Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:19:55 +0200") Message-ID: <87ioiwuv36.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-char: fix tcp_get_fds List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:09:36PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: >> >> > tcp_get_fds API discards fds if there's more than 1 of these. >> >> s/tcp_get_fds/tcp_get_msgfds/ (subject as well) > > Right. Too late as I sent this upstream :( Why not simply respin with a fixed commit message? Or ask the maintainer to fix it up on commit? >> What exactly doesn't work without this patch? > > It's only used by vhost test. It works by chance because > it's only using 512m ram. Would be a nice addition to the commit message. > I tweaked vhost user test > to use more memory (3900 instead of 512 M) and it started failing > because it needs 3 fds then. > > Not yet upstreaming the test change itself, looking > for ways to avoid using huge pages for this. Okay :) [...]