Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBwtA-000321-5C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 02:29:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBwt9-0005WS-DD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 02:29:48 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1521452376-25099-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <87in8qf2w3.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <62dba5cf-b497-1a98-0af5-971e169a3458@redhat.com> <877eou2nek.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <099d2af4-8fe3-f80c-693f-495accb26a17@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:29:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <099d2af4-8fe3-f80c-693f-495accb26a17@redhat.com> (Thomas Huth's message of "Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:06:48 +0200") Message-ID: <87sh7huppw.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qom-test List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu?= =?utf-8?Q?-Daud=C3=A9?= , Eduardo Habkost , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Thomas Huth writes: > On 26.04.2018 13:54, Markus Armbruster wrote: > [...] >> Actually, a worse offender in the "waste everybody's time via redunancy" >> department could be qom-test. > > Shall we change qom-test to also only test with the "none" machine in > the normal "make check" mode and only do the full test with all machines > in "make check SPEED=slow" ? I suggest you give it a try and see how much time it saves on "make check" without SPEED=slow. If you like the result, find out which devices this no longer tests, if any.