From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix the traced mt-exec deadlock Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 14:06:30 -0600 Message-ID: <87tw7aunuh.fsf@xmission.com> References: <20170213141452.GA30203@redhat.com> <20170224160354.GA845@redhat.com> <87shmv6ufl.fsf@xmission.com> <20170303173326.GA17899@redhat.com> <87tw7axlr0.fsf@xmission.com> <87d1dyw5iw.fsf@xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87d1dyw5iw.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Fri, 03 Mar 2017 12:59:19 -0600") Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Andrew Morton , Aleksa Sarai , Andy Lutomirski , Attila Fazekas , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , Michal Hocko , Ulrich Obergfell , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > >> The big lesson for me, and what was not obvious from your change >> description is that we are changing the user space visible semantics >> of exec+ptrace and that cred_guard_mutex is not at all the problem (as >> we always take cred_guard_mutex in a killable or interruptible way). > > Just to follow up. > > Because the cred_guard_mutex is fine as is we don't need to move > de_thread out from under cred_guard_mutex. We just need to change > de_thread to wait until all of the other threads are zombies. > Which should remove about half your proposed patch. > > The other key thing is that knowning it isn't cred_guard_mutex let's us > know that this kind of deadlock goes all of the way back to when > CLONE_THREAD was merged into the kernel. > > Insteresingly enough looking at zap_other_threads and notify_count I > have found a second bug. When a multi-threaded processes becomes a > zombie we don't send the notification to the parent process until the > non-leader threads have been reaped. Which means ptrace can mess up > sending SIGCHLD to the parent. Bah. I was misreading the code. Nothing but exec uses notify_count and group_exit_task. Eric