Return-Path: <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.8])
	by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:00:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from liesel.fancy-poultry.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by liesel.fancy-poultry.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0716418CD903C
	for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:03:28 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:03:28 +0200
Message-ID: <87tz0ac1xb.wl%htd@fancy-poultry.org>
From: Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.14.1 - "Choanoflagellata")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: [dm-crypt] Slowdown with latest cvs version
List-Id: <dm-crypt.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/options/dm-crypt>,
	<mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-crypt@saout.de>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>,
	<mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=subscribe>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de

Hi,

thought to give the latest cvs code a try. Nice to see that libgcrypt
integration finally made it into LUKS/dm-crypt.

However, I noticed that opening an encrypted partition now takes about 20-30x
more time compared to the official 1.0.7. And there's an occasional line in my
logs which complains on misbehaving BUFFER I/O. Version 1.0.7 (latest official
stable) is completely fine.

I'm totally aware of that this is the "bleeding edge", and I hope that this is
the right place to report the issue. Feel free to contact me for further
testing, if this should be neccessary.