From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:47:12 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: dts: DRA7: Add timer12 node In-Reply-To: <1444087704-1429-4-git-send-email-s-anna@ti.com> References: <1444087704-1429-1-git-send-email-s-anna@ti.com> <1444087704-1429-4-git-send-email-s-anna@ti.com> Message-ID: <87y4fgesbz.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Suman Anna writes: > Add the DT node for Timer12 present on DRA7 family of > SoCs. Timer12 is present in PD_WKUPAON power domain, and > has the same capabilities as the other timers, except for > the fact that it serves as a secure timer on HS devices > and is clocked only from the secure 32K clock. > > The node is marked disabled for now, and the kernel should > refrain from using this secure timer on HS devices. > > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > index e289c706d27d..37d632dad576 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > @@ -762,6 +762,16 @@ > ti,hwmods = "timer11"; > }; > > + timer12: timer at 4ae20000 { > + compatible = "ti,omap5430-timer"; > + reg = <0x4ae20000 0x80>; > + interrupts = ; > + ti,hwmods = "timer12"; > + ti,timer-alwon; > + ti,timer-secure; > + status = "disabled"; according to Tony we should avoid using status at all for in-SoC devices. Tony, can you confirm I understood you correctly ? -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 818 bytes Desc: not available URL: