From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:12:56 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] iptables: add upstream patch fixing the message 'connlabel.conf not found' In-Reply-To: (Thomas De Schampheleire's message of "Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:05:47 +0200") References: <1445257360-31923-1-git-send-email-patrickdepinguin@gmail.com> <87vba27vhz.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <87zize3c5j.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas De Schampheleire writes: Hi, >> Do you see this with mainline buildroot? We do pass --disable-static for >> !BR2_STATIC_LIBS builds, so I'm not sure how it could trigger for your? >> >> But the fix does make sense for completely static builds. > We noticed this problem after upgrading to a newer buildroot version a > few releases back (but never sent that patch to buildroot until now). > We are not using a static build, nor did we make changes to > iptables.mk here. > I don't really know why the author of the patch mentioned static in > the commit message. Maybe he is not referring to 'static' in the sense > that Buildroot does. As far as I read the mail it is about configuring iptables with --enable-static > Anyway, we were thus seeing this message with standard iptables calls > on a standard system. But with a Buildroot version not including: commit 9f13ddf3bab51ae762b82ce9f767ac1abcdb7b2e Author: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Tue Oct 21 13:58:14 2014 -0300 iptables: disable static for dynamic builds It leads to ugly runtime warnings, see: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/386215/ It's also required for xtables-addons. Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni Right? -- Venlig hilsen, Peter Korsgaard