From: Filip Sneppe Subject: Re: [PATCH] bring ct_sync up-to-date with 2.4.30 Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 15:04:01 +0200 Message-ID: <9151ac2a05052606041b4e6bfb@mail.gmail.com> References: <1116877042.1848.9.camel@xbox> <1117109883.4551.4.camel@nienna.balabit> Reply-To: Filip Sneppe Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: To: KOVACS Krisztian , netfilter-devel In-Reply-To: <1117109883.4551.4.camel@nienna.balabit> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On 5/26/05, KOVACS Krisztian wrote: > > Thanks a lot for the patch, I'll try to commit this to the Netfilter > SVN tree. BTW, the Linux 2.4 version of ct_sync has been abandoned, and > currently we're working on the 2.6 version only. It's available from the > Netfilter SVN repository: >=20 > http://svn.netfilter.org/netfilter/branches/netfilter-ha/linux-2.6 >=20 > Snapshots in an easy-to-apply form are available here: >=20 > http://people.netfilter.org/hidden/ct_sync/snapshots/ >=20 > Thanks a lot for trying out ct_sync and providing an updated patch. OK, I only found out about 2.6 support yesterday when going through the=20 netfilter-failover list archives (I now realize I should have sent the patc= h to this list too), but will give it a try asap. Two small questions though: - Are there currently major differences between 2.4 and 2.6 ct_sync ? - Is the TODO issue about conntrack/nat helpers and expected connections and ct_sync currently blocked because noone knows how to solve the problem yet, or do you know how to tackle the problem, but haven't found = the time to write the code yet ? Thanks! Regards, Filip