From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Re: c/s 21118: Magny-Coure breakage
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:24:36 +0100
Message-ID: <C7E8DDA4.FC7C%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <4BC31CA8.9030404@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BC31CA8.9030404@amd.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 12/04/2010 14:14, "Andre Przywara" <andre.przywara@amd.com> wrote:

>> I'd hope that Xen could follow their lead on this rather
>> than forge new ground, which may result in an incompatible
>> implementation.
> Until c/s 21118 Xen was just fine, reporting 8 nodes, 4 sockets and 48
> cores. It is just this socket per node (which got removed some years
> ago), which is doing harm. (BTW: I already complained about that last
> year, when Nitin's patch first appeared on the ML).

Okay, well I will revert the patch if we reach no further consensus.

 -- Keir