Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48745) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uethb-0006Jz-Kk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 17:02:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UethW-0005C9-3X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 17:02:35 -0400 Received: from usindpps03.hds.com ([207.126.252.16]:41007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UethV-0005C2-VA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 17:02:30 -0400 From: Tomoki Sekiyama Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 21:02:25 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <519BA696.2060605@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 04/11] qemu-ga: Add an configure option to specify path to Windows VSS SDK List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: "mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "lcapitulino@redhat.com" , "vrozenfe@redhat.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , Seiji Aguchi , "areis@redhat.com" On 5/21/13 12:53 , "Eric Blake" wrote: >On 05/21/2013 09:33 AM, Tomoki Sekiyama wrote: >> To enable VSS support in qemu-ga for Windows, header files included in >> VSS SDK is required. >> The VSS support is enabled when the option like below: >> ./configure --with-vss-sdk=3D"/pass/to/VSS SDK" >>=20 >> VSS SDK is available from: >> http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=3D23490 >>=20 >> To cross-compilie using mingw32 for Linux, you need to setup the SDK on > >s/compilie/compile/ > >There are two mingw projects: mingw (older, 32-bit only) and mingw64 >(newer, both 32- and 64-bit support). The name 'mingw32' is misleading, >as neither project uses it. Fedora uses mingw64. Ah, I should say just mingw here. >> Windows environments to extract headers. You can also extract the SDK >> headers using scripts/extract-vss-headers, written by Paolo Bonzini. > >I haven't downloaded the sdk to check for myself; are we breaking any >licensing restrictions by compiling against those files? I believe it is ok while the SDK is used for development of software running on Windows, and while the SDK is not redistributed.