From: jdl@jdl.com (Jon Loeliger)
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:32:28 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fix segfault in DTC
In-Reply-To: <5065F4FD.4010807@wwwdotorg.org>
References: <1348526885-2113-1-git-send-email-mmayer@broadcom.com>
 <1348595889-6495-1-git-send-email-mmayer@broadcom.com>
 <1348595889-6495-2-git-send-email-mmayer@broadcom.com>
 <20120925233054.GL9800@truffula.fritz.box> <50624393.30607@broadcom.com>
 <20120926003508.GB31993@truffula.fritz.box> <50632F78.4030709@broadcom.com>
 <5065D9C7.40906@wwwdotorg.org> <E1THfgr-0006Fg-KT@jdl.com>
 <5065F4FD.4010807@wwwdotorg.org>
Message-ID: <E1THhEa-0006SB-5x@jdl.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

> > 
> > I think you should just smack the PowerPC guys. :-)
> 
> For the record in this thread, it was a regression I introduced into dtc
> - the patch I just sent was for this.

Ah, ok.

I'll apply the DTC patch, but I think you should
still smack the PowerPC guys on general principle. :-)

jdl