Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:44:31 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <zajec5@gmail.com>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Justin Chen <justinpopo6@gmail.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
        linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <rafal@milecki.pl>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's
 WDT to the json-schema
Message-ID: <Ya+BX1X7/YqmfCU8@google.com>
References: <Ya3SU6U6YT6mlFu8@google.com>
 <f5745952-9e3c-ed7a-cced-ce42d3da2276@gmail.com>
 <Ya5ctkIU+jNzDfBc@google.com>
 <f4af4971-7047-80c9-69ae-e6587979ecd5@roeck-us.net>
 <e1fa1683-a0a6-8ee0-9da5-8e97dd9c820a@gmail.com>
 <432664af-5660-aaad-bf75-81e4d61cb078@roeck-us.net>
 <46a88b40-6d92-727c-7adc-5723921d08e3@gmail.com>
 <20211206195115.GC3759192@roeck-us.net>
 <Ya8xhUR5GbTxVE8w@google.com>
 <a86d5998-8d84-7afe-e34e-a632aa890683@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <a86d5998-8d84-7afe-e34e-a632aa890683@roeck-us.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 07 Dec 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> On 12/7/21 2:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > > It sounded to me like Lee wanted an immutable branch for that
> > 
> > Not exactly, I said:
> > 
> >    "> Suppose we should take patch #2 via [Watchdog] as well.
> > 
> >     If that happens, I would like a PR to an immutable branch."
> > 
> > The alternative is that I take the patch and provide an immutable
> > branch to you, which I am in a position to do.
> > 
> 
> I understand, only I am not in a position to take it since my tree
> isn't the official watchdog-next tree, and it doesn't show up in -next.
> If Wim takes it into the official watchdog-next tree or not would be
> completely up to him.
> 
> I personally don't care if the bindings check is clean in my inofficial
> tree, so maybe this is a non-issue.

That doesn't help, sadly.

I think the best course of action is for Wim to let me know when this
patch makes it into his tree.  I'll take the MFD one at the same time
and the two shall meet in -next.

Honestly, this is all such a faff.

Just to keep a script happy that 3 people care about.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog