Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A805401A01 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 15:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789401079; cv=none; b=ucMIYjKe1B/wsCwpjltcOli0avRZtxqY5l2OLnejZkcxpg9MySvB/mWU54L6bh7G0/xfddqJVFBrhyQQ9RxIJWt9IaNzw+zvotPacMCIFEt+07Mahs/G/6jnBeDwR9cSvBC8HRFUMQciux1Siq6sEmpoF1h1o4aQBRud9zpPkIQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789401079; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rVfAhaMRwZYiEpg6dw/fmsfziMwKNFHeaO2+oHPAsqk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VH9HFv2+sfhr2cyMdZ4xe2hHYb/qa7UQYamkSi0Om4joH7LX7YqXmPEuSc9PQtjva0y7BxUr/82sK7sshOwDCyoLOclY8DL4HBkScjyq3uMlfLSbQKM6u3amzeA4baw32BfgycVipQpVBuS+Yroc1U2D6R9SQB3vgQ3f611vfZA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bvkEjmam; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bvkEjmam" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1789401077; x=1820937077; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=rVfAhaMRwZYiEpg6dw/fmsfziMwKNFHeaO2+oHPAsqk=; b=bvkEjmamEAGiSn2WPDjH8SKb9VsGO3eN8L+5lYmm7Bf31eXra+baTs6T TgAOR8xB1fVJRPzabbO+wOM+gEyB9Bhwuvt2/Ix5EBUBFmLgQFAneJiKS cjfi85T6w5Wbxyx0kXPA85U2+Kh1zEXLp4t23/q7zjxOSYtKxoBA5/aCl X43shRJuwMS36oYoRO/51zYdms3Fkp25hZ3BzRyUgXOTLJMEgcyRvQNCq 1VA3H0olypZ8C8dcNjM1BtKJOtyPgfh3hyEqrAUcszi/dZBiA2yxx8qDi 5Li27O75onPEKBqZE6nIg7VHJsCcB6P/CTwHRbmZvvFDLDcF4M1jcvuf1 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hu6OOQKsRRucRTgkN8q+lA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: entndaM5QDWH6HSQkwdjmg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11905"; a="100418145" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,103,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="100418145" Received: from fmviesa013.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.153]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2026 08:51:07 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: EEFOzE9iQEq7bHmWCZ1/0Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: M4Bub+T8SaqqaHzsGTJAeg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,103,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="1072035" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo) ([10.54.38.190]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2026 08:51:07 -0700 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:51:05 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, James Clark , Ian Rogers , Colin Ian King , Howard Chu , Weilin Wang , Ilya Leoshkevich , Thomas Richter , Dapeng Mi , Athira Jajeev , Michael Petlan , Veronika Molnarova , Namhyung Kim , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 1009/1376] perf test: Display number of active running tests Message-ID: References: <20260912065607.535295758@linuxfoundation.org> <20260912065630.052286725@linuxfoundation.org> <2026091402-eccentric-curry-66f6@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2026091402-eccentric-curry-66f6@gregkh> On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 11:51:19AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2026 at 11:39:23AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2026 at 08:57:15AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > 6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > It's hard to see how these 6 perf test patches are stable material. > > > > They seem at best be nice to have. > > They were needed because of: > > > > Stable-dep-of: 44e82c4d2ff3 ("perf test: Fix skiplist leak in cmd_test") > > thanks, It's same there, I don't think anything perf test is stable material. It's just a test suite after all. -Andi