Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B78606A332 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 14:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=V3XZpoRs Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xPL7H-0000eV-67; Fri, 06 Nov 2026 09:40:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xPL74-0000Vr-De for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2026 09:40:22 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xPL72-0000wy-JW for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2026 09:40:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1793976015; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=e6q9H0dXikw0971/jYe5CJRTJzhkje9QEBXZ9FEn4/c=; b=V3XZpoRsw8vYlsK4rQjGYFrw3vjbfeXVuHGQZjseHvuJUbU1KGpvO5k9buQCbbL4T9y7BR cbgbtJa1DuH//07rhugDxAdyTP7odx3Vi7axQKCVBCf6LkjNtbQJHvTjbV79G9SIjtPxrR 9+jqWr7FI8vZ4yTwJTZauamJ+jN+k+w= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-222-YUxgZLwzPVy0inJW6nxf4Q-1; Fri, 06 Nov 2026 09:40:09 -0500 X-MC-Unique: YUxgZLwzPVy0inJW6nxf4Q-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: YUxgZLwzPVy0inJW6nxf4Q_1793976007 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2CFC1800622; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 14:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (headnet04.pony-001.prod.iad2.dc.redhat.com [10.2.32.116]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3AD4187C368; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 14:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 14:40:00 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau Cc: Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/28] hw: mark all remaining virtio object types as secure Message-ID: References: <20261029131241.2275706-1-berrange@redhat.com> <20261029131241.2275706-5-berrange@redhat.com> X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.4.3 (2026-10-09) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: 7WQrbv4A_7jNQzCA1s7xyA5_9vX-QJAf0Jv4gQr9E1M_1793976007 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Sender: qemu-arm-bounces+qemu-arm=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 06:35:29PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2026 at 3:53 PM Thomas Huth wrote: > > > > On 29/10/2026 14.12, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > These are all intended for use in a virtualization scenario and must > > > provide a security boundary. > > > > > > Acked-by: Marc-André Lureau > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé > > > --- > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth > > > > I have a second thought about this, I'd like to exclude all > gpu-accelerated paths for now. virgl/mesa/rutabaga expose a very large > attack surface, so I'd like to drop them from the secure boundary Rather than repost, please see my response for patch 2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2026-11/msg01530.html TL;DR: we have already promised anything virtio related is in scope for security handling for a long time, as they are all unambiguously "virtualization use case". With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com ~~ https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :| |: https://libvirt.org ~~ https://entangle-photo.org :| |: https://pixelfed.art/berrange ~~ https://fstop138.berrange.com :|