Received: from mail-pj1-f50.google.com (mail-pj1-f50.google.com [209.85.216.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 044DB881F for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 09:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-26fb8225268so1226322a91.1 for ; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 02:42:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693561350; x=1694166150; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:cc:to:content-language :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=SxbsY73eqE9chY2EX3xsnlO4/jof06x9cIh9+N32rEY=; b=V+iq+R2VYDejLa28dRUbjtO2heFz/xA8BsMWCF2ukkFcuQkBYBunwdM0yyksohdRiR rMtNWjY3cth26z/Y0wSw2KdxpgwGVc8DRaU7DLS1b42VVDfBlHf6ouGEZWJCy3QGlPkc dNQv7O3D1pZWy3jkQKuViEuK2BH6L7AXCbloSOTYQLv99NhGwkNAfi64vX/9M16KaUOb YAbF+Lrr+f1QdVGFqEsOCHT/3QCrax8PtkRklgaLLQq2PpPnxw+kkxNZEM8BTJgFUAjt TWoFsFYiSGO3Ei8KKm+wDUaPYASAdB6EqsiSuJTX8RF3HXW8EsrsyiRFDrbL5P+XuNQX k9oQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693561350; x=1694166150; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:cc:to:content-language :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SxbsY73eqE9chY2EX3xsnlO4/jof06x9cIh9+N32rEY=; b=BASPMv2+bVvrrKjBa+eAKpyq275JbmShZWKHQgbD2R8+IxhgAsrHYnslAAi8iyNQLu Auyp6BGWP3q6TUxKb2frDPqInRBPcVQIikyFwNKsQo4dMJy724lpMx6/XgaHsduJMlew hRGeatKODNqzF3hxKz3ZOkLSFnDaLVHwxC8+FV3Wgi8F1hCGQ8e6GInvVWmpxrLeL6QR hgd28XHO0pth7lQKFoOmP/5CFHDLnx02dx8JWokXxonB/sptBp7y+mJs6MLC2DGIsl0T vAw0V3PTk+Fljh1fIocTsbTFuBg0wyGr/fwjJ3iLeiPnLJNyr21yQ+4wiWBwcObSjRKt HTqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyhd00lMNLOz846lEu4RlVJso4nSrU+WhrTmdJh5Z9HDp6xD7bB zLYOS7GAm2d+CDagswOS0lI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEZzAhARyVFBvaiXDdpznBROrWDzsHD5p0QeHfBpniT6ccOViVKaS0K8DiuKFWyEJKOr2ZJpw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bf8a:b0:268:b682:23da with SMTP id d10-20020a17090abf8a00b00268b68223damr1677995pjs.34.1693561350349; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 02:42:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.105] ([103.124.138.83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 30-20020a17090a199e00b0026b4decfe59sm2856220pji.31.2023.09.01.02.42.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Sep 2023 02:42:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 16:42:22 +0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Huang Rui , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Michele Della Guardia Cc: Linux Power Management , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Regressions From: Bagas Sanjaya Subject: Fwd: Abnormal battery drain with kernel 6.5 (Ryzen 5500u) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1] that have been already handled there. Quoting from it: > After switching from 6.4.x kernel to 6.5 I experienced an abnormal battery drain since my laptop is actually never idle. > I accepted default CPUfreq to schedutil and AMD Processor P-State mode is 3 (active). > > I expected a different behaviour, but am I missing something? > In my boot configuration I had "amd_pstate.shared_mem=1" and tried to remove this switch, but did not affect my power consuption. > > Is there something changed from 6.4.x to 6.5 that requires a different configuration to get an optimal power consumption? > > Thanks a lot for your attention See Bugzilla for the full thread. Anyway, I'm adding it to regzbot: #regzbot introduced: v6.4..v6.5 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217853 Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara