References: <20180608052017.6696-1-a@...2181...> <20180613141213.5962-1-a@...2181...> <20180620155301.GY57262@...1296...> <20180622094635.GI57262@...1296...> From: Antonio Quartulli Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 17:49:57 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180622094635.GI57262@...1296...> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mGJsnOz7HPA8qJ98traFKEMVEONGLsJX1" Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH v3 2/8] windows: properly configure TAP driver when no IPv4 is configured List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gert Doering Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --mGJsnOz7HPA8qJ98traFKEMVEONGLsJX1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="7TsWCyOW6KYhx3GZQz3io5A8PbJa5IzLQ"; protected-headers="v1" From: Antonio Quartulli To: Gert Doering Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH v3 2/8] windows: properly configure TAP driver when no IPv4 is configured References: <20180608052017.6696-1-a@...2181...> <20180613141213.5962-1-a@...2181...> <20180620155301.GY57262@...1296...> <20180622094635.GI57262@...1296...> In-Reply-To: <20180622094635.GI57262@...1296...> --7TsWCyOW6KYhx3GZQz3io5A8PbJa5IzLQ Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 22/06/18 17:46, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 03:27:02PM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote: >> Fri Jun 22 13:43:51 2018 us=3D116232 PUSH: Received control message: 'PU= SH_REPLY,redirect-gateway !ipv4 ipv6,tun-ipv6,ping 10,ping-restart 120,ifco= nfig-ipv6 2002::1001/112 2002::2,peer-id 0,cipher AES-256-GCM' >=20 > As an afterthought - the error could be totally unrelated to the changes, > and the win32 API refusing 2002:: addresses because it knows that they > are not "free for grabs"... (6to4, normally auto-configured unless > disabled, with 2002::: being the prefix that a host on or > a network behind a router on can use - but that's old stuff and > should no longer be used in any case). After changing the prefix to 2001:db8:cafe::/112 the error is gone. However, the assert at the end of the log in argv.c:299 is still there. This might be some argv_new()/reset() that has been misplaced (maybe?). Cheers, --=20 Antonio Quartulli --7TsWCyOW6KYhx3GZQz3io5A8PbJa5IzLQ-- --mGJsnOz7HPA8qJ98traFKEMVEONGLsJX1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEERdCuyFSHc3WdqS4EB6U8WA7yzXQFAlssxkUACgkQB6U8WA7y zXTJ2hAAjMNUKC1MNSrhcxwF0SCJPd382Nb3SU5DrpaE8ifAjqhakCmJM969fJVv KzqQs2+2TYGmMocWeKapm5fW2R/YJQu605z1ylO9GcHZrHYtTe/rC93dMOPOps69 LqMTBpIfpj+dN3e6kUTC3epRc4/2HD+Xu3vgUn9QcuvJQRi0KY5y0NzXQwX6aj5z JhP9r83yq8p8KSnrJbjU/7qVZpnzPyOmqiX6co/xpaPsv6xcfFpb0qgZcVJvhN7Y r52wCmzeBi065x8Nmb9QdfhqAMsVslHacfoWOG4q/WLRW+30v7y6g8GgBvkFiT1S 6S/u1DlTqd1ohzVzsDamb5FNJmy7egRnImHcA9C7RvuyjkYTrCVmZnmKMlT+BVlf HuvFxc8LrLqnkEaCrQOsxs90aGUyADGjsMccQU+ZwFu5nsZngU5+Fh3+g23SVMjT tGQOhHJXEIjaya/4f+yN5IWmnvr9MydFTp0j7sAIAW1OebxS1VBKDU2bVA3/5hpy MvjRBJ7ESBANF/QCDmM5Fju9hCNNo3ccez0uMOhLSPkreCxP1D+4G81vmxXMobDM jaa43gYfctOB5AWLQRxovNeNdNK7jLJaverQ0gkBo6Rd+jnzJx5c4Fs/HHsX+WYC dhhHnh2ME69brq86v/F/sSyc382/JP4+eSybWn7wm+wNmYlx/AM= =Safo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mGJsnOz7HPA8qJ98traFKEMVEONGLsJX1--