Return-Path: <glkdd-dm-crypt@m.gmane.org>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BF5949C
	for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Sat,  8 Aug 2009 18:24:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id lC2kBW4dStaj for <dm-crypt@saout.de>;
	Sat,  8 Aug 2009 18:24:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Sat,  8 Aug 2009 18:23:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MZoi4-0008J2-OU
	for dm-crypt@saout.de; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:23:56 +0000
Received: from 84-119-57-140.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at ([84.119.57.140])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:23:56 +0000
Received: from gebi by 84-119-57-140.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at with local
	(Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:23:56 +0000
From: Michael Gebetsroither <gebi@sbox.tugraz.at>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 18:23:45 +0200
Message-ID: <h5k8qj$291$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20090808132614.GA29656@fancy-poultry.org>
	<4A7D91A8.5080902@gmx.de> <h5k4qm$nog$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<20090808154052.GB31434@fancy-poultry.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] LUKS/dm-crypt vulnerable?
List-Id: <dm-crypt.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/options/dm-crypt>,
	<mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-crypt@saout.de>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>,
	<mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=subscribe>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de

* Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org> wrote:
> On 08.08.2009, Michael Gebetsroither wrote: 

>> The real solution would be TXT from new intel chips.
>
> I'm not going to buy such hardware ever. It could be misused to a bunch of
> "evil things", too, e.g. forcing the use of special software on me. 
> There was a  discussion on the topic at the lkml going on about 2 months ago.

No one can force you to use this software on _your_ hardware.

michael
-- 
It's already too late!