Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43959 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752730AbcAVLdX (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 06:33:23 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aMZxw-0000l5-Dx for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:33:20 +0100 Received: from 87-127-115-15.static.enta.net ([87.127.115.15]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:33:20 +0100 Received: from 6401e46d by 87-127-115-15.static.enta.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:33:20 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Al <6401e46d@opayq.com> Subject: Re: Why is dedup inline, not delayed (as opposed to offline)? Explain like I'm five pls. Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <56A0956B.7060706@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: With respect Chris, if you intentionally ignore all of the other context clues ("keep up the great work", "looking forward to using it"), you could come to that conclusion. You'd have to try really really hard. I wasn't criticising your buddy in anyway, quite the opposite. Can we move on, now? There are better ways of spending our time.