From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30 of 38] xen: implement io_apic_ops
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:02:58 -0800
Message-ID: <m1bpw4g4tp.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
References: <patchbomb.1226603398@abulafia.goop.org>
	<d103c0da2fa147ac31af.1226603428@abulafia.goop.org>
	<20081120093506.GB6885@elte.hu> <492597B9.8070506@goop.org>
	<m1y6ze87w6.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org> <4925D762.6040406@goop.org>
	<m1prkpj3nl.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org> <49260BE7.1080909@goop.org>
	<m1tza1hffa.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org> <492AFDFC.1020305@goop.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1753837AbYKXWGV@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <492AFDFC.1020305@goop.org> (Jeremy Fitzhardinge's message of
	"Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:18:20 -0800")
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> writes:

> Notwithstanding the possibility that there'll be general changes to x86
> interrupt handing in the future, do you have any objection to my patches as they
> stand?  Ingo would like to see your and/or hpa's ack before accepting them.
>
> Should I repost them?

I couldn't track down the first set.  So if you could repost them with me on
the cc I can review them, and tell you if I have specific objections.
My apologies for the trouble.

Eric