From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ALSA: hda: Fix forget to free resource in error handling code path in hda_codec_driver_probe Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 17:34:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170904151709.GA19742@udknight> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A202526708E for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 17:34:37 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20170904151709.GA19742@udknight> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Wang YanQing Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, 04 Sep 2017 17:17:09 +0200, Wang YanQing wrote: > > When hda_codec_driver_probe meet error and return failure, we need > to free resource with patch_ops.free, or we will get resource leak. > > Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing > --- > Changes v1-v2: > 1: Fix calling patch_ops.free after module_put, reported by Takashi Iwai. > > Hi! Takashi Iwai > Because the only one calling site of patch_ops.free is in > hda_codec_driver_remove, and if hda_codec_driver_probe return > failure, we will no chance to call the hda_codec_driver_remove, > so I think we don't need to care below case: > "Or, for safety, we may put an internal flag to indicate that the codec > free got already called, and check it at before calling > patch_ops.free, too." Fair enough, applied now. I found patch_ca0132.c still misses the free at the error path in its probe function, so I'll fix it. thanks, Takashi