Return-Path: Received: from omoikane.mc.pp.se (ua-85-227-1-9.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.227.1.9]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FE767B32 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:06:02 +1000 (EST) To: "Gerhard Pircher" Subject: Re: [PATCH] EHCI Oops on CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE system References: <20060829150759.269420@gmx.net> From: Marcus Comstedt Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:04:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20060829150759.269420@gmx.net> (Gerhard Pircher's message of "Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:07:59 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , "Gerhard Pircher" writes: > Hi Marcus, > > I guess this message should also be forwarded to linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net. I hope the developers there can make some comments. > > Gerhard Well, I figured the first thing to do would be to reach a consensus here on whether or not atomic_t:s in DMA memory should be ruled as unallowed. Judging from the massive silence, there doesn't seem to be any strong opinions either way though... // Marcus