Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i19FhVa29505 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:43:31 -0500 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Message-ID: References: <4027A8D6.7000103@oppositelock.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM2 on top of RAID1? (x86_64) Sender: linux-lvm-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@redhat.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Feb 9 10:43:02 2004 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Douglas Kilpatrick writes: > I'm trying to setup a new box the same way my current box is > setup. I've split the drives into two sections, one of which I'm > combining into a RAID0 stripe, the other a RAID1 mirror set. (sorry > for the redundancy.) > > lvm pvs > > complains about seeing 3 extra instances of the id, and decides that > the PV is actually on /dev/sda (or /dev/sdb, depending on boot), not > /dev/md1. I have a similar setup and ran into the same problem. I solved it by placing this in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf: devices { filter = [ "r,hd," ] } That tells lvm to never look at a block device with "hd" in the name. You should probably change "hd" to "sd". -- M�ns Rullg�rd mru@kth.se