kernel BUG at security/keys/keyring.c:LINE!
Subsystems (2)
syzbot
syzbotHello,
syzbot found the following crash on:
HEAD commit: befad944e231 Merge tag 'drm-fixes-2018-10-05' of git://ano.. git tree: upstream console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x1fc976400000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?xŔaf03fe452b65fb dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extidě24e95ea483de0a24da compiler: gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180413 (experimental) syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x160e3a400000 C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x995491400000
IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at security/keys/keyring.c:1214! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 5807 Comm: syz-executor226 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc6+ #268 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:__key_link_begin+0x23a/0x300 security/keys/keyring.c:1214 Code: fe 48 c7 c7 20 ae 67 89 e8 b3 36 23 fe eb ac e8 ec 64 42 fe 48 c7 c7 20 ae 67 89 e8 30 73 73 04 e9 e3 fe ff ff e8 d6 64 42 fe <0f> 0b e8 cf 64 42 fe 48 8d bb ce 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc RSP: 0018:ffff8801bbdc7b10 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffff8801d924e2c0 RBX: ffff8801d4e7e080 RCX: ffffffff833c4ebf RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff833c50aa RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: ffff8801bbdc7b40 R08: ffff8801d924e2c0 R09: fffffbfff12cf4a4 R10: fffffbfff12cf4a4 R11: ffffffff8967a523 R12: ffff8801bbdc7c48 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8801d4e7e200 R15: ffff8801d4e7e080 FS: 0000000001ce9880(0000) GS:ffff8801dae00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020cab000 CR3: 00000001d829a000 CR4: 00000000001406f0 Call Trace: construct_alloc_key security/keys/request_key.c:389 [inline] construct_key_and_link security/keys/request_key.c:480 [inline] request_key_and_link+0x737/0x17a0 security/keys/request_key.c:593 __do_sys_request_key security/keys/keyctl.c:213 [inline] __se_sys_request_key security/keys/keyctl.c:158 [inline] __x64_sys_request_key+0x305/0x400 security/keys/keyctl.c:158 do_syscall_64+0x1b9/0x820 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x440169 Code: 18 89 d0 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7
48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 fb 13 fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007ffd70324808 EFLAGS: 00000217 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000f9
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004002c8 RCX: 0000000000440169
RDX: 00000000200001c0 RSI: 0000000020000180 RDI: 00000000200000c0
RBP: 00000000006ca018 R08: 00000000004002c8 R09: 00000000004002c8
R10: 00000000111522d3 R11: 0000000000000217 R12: 00000000004019f0
R13: 0000000000401a80 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 40815c4a8f1e2472 ]--- RIP: 0010:__key_link_begin+0x23a/0x300 security/keys/keyring.c:1214 Code: fe 48 c7 c7 20 ae 67 89 e8 b3 36 23 fe eb ac e8 ec 64 42 fe 48 c7 c7 20 ae 67 89 e8 30 73 73 04 e9 e3 fe ff ff e8 d6 64 42 fe <0f> 0b e8 cf 64 42 fe 48 8d bb ce 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc RSP: 0018:ffff8801bbdc7b10 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffff8801d924e2c0 RBX: ffff8801d4e7e080 RCX: ffffffff833c4ebf RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff833c50aa RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: ffff8801bbdc7b40 R08: ffff8801d924e2c0 R09: fffffbfff12cf4a4 R10: fffffbfff12cf4a4 R11: ffffffff8967a523 R12: ffff8801bbdc7c48 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8801d4e7e200 R15: ffff8801d4e7e080 FS: 0000000001ce9880(0000) GS:ffff8801dae00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020cab000 CR3: 00000001d829a000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
---
This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. syzbot engineers can be reached at [email protected].
syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bug-status-tracking for how to communicate with syzbot.
syzbot can test patches for this bug, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
PATCH 1/1 KEYS: always initialize keyring_index_key::desc_len
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
syzbot hit the 'BUG_ON(index_key->desc_len = 0);' in __key_link_begin() called from construct_alloc_key() during sys_request_key(), because the length of the key description was never calculated.
The problem is that we rely on ->desc_len being initialized by search_process_keyrings(), specifically by search_nested_keyrings(). But, if the process isn't subscribed to any keyrings that never happens.
Fix it by always initializing keyring_index_key::desc_len as soon as the description is set, like we already do in some places.
The following program reproduces the BUG_ON() when it's run as root and no session keyring has been installed. If it doesn't work, try removing pam_keyinit.so from /etc/pam.d/login and rebooting.
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <keyutils.h>
int main(void)
{
int id = add_key("keyring", "syz", NULL, 0, KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING);
keyctl_setperm(id, KEY_OTH_WRITE);
setreuid(5000, 5000);
request_key("user", "desc", "", id);
}--- security/keys/keyring.c | 4 +--- security/keys/proc.c | 1 + security/keys/request_key.c | 1 + security/keys/request_key_auth.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
security/keys/keyring.c +1 -3
@@ -661,9 +661,6 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring,BUG_ON ((ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =0 || (ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =STATE_CHECKS ); -if (ctx->index_key.description) - ctx->index_key.desc_len =strlen (ctx->index_key.description); -/* Check to see if this top-level keyring is what we are looking for * and whether it is valid or not. */
@@ -914,6 +911,7 @@ key_ref_t keyring_search(key_ref_t keyring,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,
security/keys/proc.c +1 -0
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static int proc_keys_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = key->type, .index_key.description = key->description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (key->description), .cred = m->file->f_cred, .match_data.cmp = lookup_user_key_possessed, .match_data.raw_data = key,
security/keys/request_key.c +1 -0
@@ -545,6 +545,7 @@ struct key *request_key_and_link(struct key_type *type,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,
security/keys/request_key_auth.c +1 -1
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ struct key *key_get_instantiation_authkey(key_serial_t target_id)struct key *authkey;key_ref_t authkey_ref; -sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); + ctx.index_key.desc_len =sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); authkey_ref =search_process_keyrings (&ctx);
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
Re: [PATCH] KEYS: always initialize keyring_index_key::desc_len
Quoted 68 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
syzbot hit the '
BUG_ON(index_key->desc_len = 0);' in__key_link_begin()called fromconstruct_alloc_key()duringsys_request_key(), because the length of the key description was never calculated.The problem is that we rely on ->desc_len being initialized by
search_process_keyrings(), specifically bysearch_nested_keyrings(). But, if the process isn't subscribed to any keyrings that never happens.Fix it by always initializing
keyring_index_key::desc_lenas soon as the description is set, like we already do in some places.The following program reproduces the
BUG_ON()when it's run as root and no session keyring has been installed. If it doesn't work, try removing pam_keyinit.so from/etc/pam.d/loginand rebooting.#include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <keyutils.h> int main(void) { int id = add_key("keyring", "syz", NULL, 0, KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING); keyctl_setperm(id, KEY_OTH_WRITE); setreuid(5000, 5000); request_key("user", "desc", "", id); }Reported-by [email protected]Fixes b2a4df200d57 ("KEYS: Expand the capacity of a keyring")Cc <[email protected]> # v3.13+Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>--- security/keys/keyring.c | 4 +--- security/keys/proc.c | 1 + security/keys/request_key.c | 1 + security/keys/request_key_auth.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)security/keys/keyring.c +1
-3@@ -661,9 +661,6 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring,BUG_ON ((ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =0 || (ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =STATE_CHECKS ); -if (ctx->index_key.description) - ctx->index_key.desc_len =strlen (ctx->index_key.description); -/* Check to see if this top-level keyring is what we are looking for * and whether it is valid or not. */ @@ -914,6 +911,7 @@ key_ref_t keyring_search(key_ref_t keyring,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,security/keys/proc.c +0
-0
security/keys/proc.c static int proc_keys_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) · line 174
Quoted 7 lines
security/keys/proc.c +1
-0@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static int proc_keys_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = key->type, .index_key.description = key->description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (key->description), .cred = m->file->f_cred, .match_data.cmp = lookup_user_key_possessed, .match_data.raw_data = key,
It's actually possible to just set '.index_key = key->index_key' here. I'll send v2 with that instead.
- Eric
PATCH v2 1/1 KEYS: always initialize keyring_index_key::desc_len
In reply to syzbotFrom: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
syzbot hit the 'BUG_ON(index_key->desc_len = 0);' in __key_link_begin() called from construct_alloc_key() during sys_request_key(), because the length of the key description was never calculated.
The problem is that we rely on ->desc_len being initialized by search_process_keyrings(), specifically by search_nested_keyrings(). But, if the process isn't subscribed to any keyrings that never happens.
Fix it by always initializing keyring_index_key::desc_len as soon as the description is set, like we already do in some places.
The following program reproduces the BUG_ON() when it's run as root and no session keyring has been installed. If it doesn't work, try removing pam_keyinit.so from /etc/pam.d/login and rebooting.
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <keyutils.h>
int main(void)
{
int id = add_key("keyring", "syz", NULL, 0, KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING);
keyctl_setperm(id, KEY_OTH_WRITE);
setreuid(5000, 5000);
request_key("user", "desc", "", id);
}---
v2: In proc_keys_show(), assign index_key directly
security/keys/keyring.c | 4 +--- security/keys/proc.c | 3 +-- security/keys/request_key.c | 1 + security/keys/request_key_auth.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
security/keys/keyring.c +1 -3
@@ -661,9 +661,6 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring,BUG_ON ((ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =0 || (ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =STATE_CHECKS ); -if (ctx->index_key.description) - ctx->index_key.desc_len =strlen (ctx->index_key.description); -/* Check to see if this top-level keyring is what we are looking for * and whether it is valid or not. */
@@ -914,6 +911,7 @@ key_ref_t keyring_search(key_ref_t keyring,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,
security/keys/proc.c +1 -2
@@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ static int proc_keys_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)int rc;struct keyring_search_context ctx = { - .index_key.type = key->type, - .index_key.description = key->description, + .index_key = key->index_key, .cred = m->file->f_cred, .match_data.cmp = lookup_user_key_possessed, .match_data.raw_data = key,
security/keys/request_key.c +1 -0
@@ -545,6 +545,7 @@ struct key *request_key_and_link(struct key_type *type,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,
security/keys/request_key_auth.c +1 -1
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ struct key *key_get_instantiation_authkey(key_serial_t target_id)struct key *authkey;key_ref_t authkey_ref; -sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); + ctx.index_key.desc_len =sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); authkey_ref =search_process_keyrings (&ctx);
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: always initialize keyring_index_key::desc_len
Quoted 108 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
syzbot hit the '
BUG_ON(index_key->desc_len = 0);' in__key_link_begin()called fromconstruct_alloc_key()duringsys_request_key(), because the length of the key description was never calculated.The problem is that we rely on ->desc_len being initialized by
search_process_keyrings(), specifically bysearch_nested_keyrings(). But, if the process isn't subscribed to any keyrings that never happens.Fix it by always initializing
keyring_index_key::desc_lenas soon as the description is set, like we already do in some places.The following program reproduces the
BUG_ON()when it's run as root and no session keyring has been installed. If it doesn't work, try removing pam_keyinit.so from/etc/pam.d/loginand rebooting.#include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <keyutils.h> int main(void) { int id = add_key("keyring", "syz", NULL, 0, KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING); keyctl_setperm(id, KEY_OTH_WRITE); setreuid(5000, 5000); request_key("user", "desc", "", id); }Reported-by [email protected]Fixes b2a4df200d57 ("KEYS: Expand the capacity of a keyring")Cc <[email protected]> # v3.13+Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>---
v2: In
proc_keys_show(), assignindex_keydirectlysecurity/keys/keyring.c | 4 +--- security/keys/proc.c | 3 +-- security/keys/request_key.c | 1 + security/keys/request_key_auth.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)security/keys/keyring.c +1
-3@@ -661,9 +661,6 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring,BUG_ON ((ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =0 || (ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =STATE_CHECKS ); -if (ctx->index_key.description) - ctx->index_key.desc_len =strlen (ctx->index_key.description); -/* Check to see if this top-level keyring is what we are looking for * and whether it is valid or not. */ @@ -914,6 +911,7 @@ key_ref_t keyring_search(key_ref_t keyring,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,security/keys/proc.c +1
-2@@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ static int proc_keys_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)int rc;struct keyring_search_context ctx = { - .index_key.type = key->type, - .index_key.description = key->description, + .index_key = key->index_key, .cred = m->file->f_cred, .match_data.cmp = lookup_user_key_possessed, .match_data.raw_data = key,security/keys/request_key.c +1
-0@@ -545,6 +545,7 @@ struct key *request_key_and_link(struct key_type *type,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,security/keys/request_key_auth.c +1
-1@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ struct key *key_get_instantiation_authkey(key_serial_t target_id)struct key *authkey;key_ref_t authkey_ref; -sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); + ctx.index_key.desc_len =sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); authkey_ref =search_process_keyrings (&ctx);Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
Ping. David, are you planning to apply this?
- Eric
Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: always initialize keyring_index_key::desc_len
Quoted 106 lines · Eric Biggers
Quoted 105 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
syzbot hit the '
BUG_ON(index_key->desc_len = 0);' in__key_link_begin()called fromconstruct_alloc_key()duringsys_request_key(), because the length of the key description was never calculated.The problem is that we rely on ->desc_len being initialized by
search_process_keyrings(), specifically bysearch_nested_keyrings(). But, if the process isn't subscribed to any keyrings that never happens.Fix it by always initializing
keyring_index_key::desc_lenas soon as the description is set, like we already do in some places.The following program reproduces the
BUG_ON()when it's run as root and no session keyring has been installed. If it doesn't work, try removing pam_keyinit.so from/etc/pam.d/loginand rebooting.#include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <keyutils.h> int main(void) { int id = add_key("keyring", "syz", NULL, 0, KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING); keyctl_setperm(id, KEY_OTH_WRITE); setreuid(5000, 5000); request_key("user", "desc", "", id); }Reported-by [email protected]Fixes b2a4df200d57 ("KEYS: Expand the capacity of a keyring")Cc <[email protected]> # v3.13+Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>---
v2: In
proc_keys_show(), assignindex_keydirectlysecurity/keys/keyring.c | 4 +--- security/keys/proc.c | 3 +-- security/keys/request_key.c | 1 + security/keys/request_key_auth.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)security/keys/keyring.c +1
-3@@ -661,9 +661,6 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring,BUG_ON ((ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =0 || (ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =STATE_CHECKS ); -if (ctx->index_key.description) - ctx->index_key.desc_len =strlen (ctx->index_key.description); -/* Check to see if this top-level keyring is what we are looking for * and whether it is valid or not. */ @@ -914,6 +911,7 @@ key_ref_t keyring_search(key_ref_t keyring,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,security/keys/proc.c +1
-2@@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ static int proc_keys_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)int rc;struct keyring_search_context ctx = { - .index_key.type = key->type, - .index_key.description = key->description, + .index_key = key->index_key, .cred = m->file->f_cred, .match_data.cmp = lookup_user_key_possessed, .match_data.raw_data = key,security/keys/request_key.c +1
-0@@ -545,6 +545,7 @@ struct key *request_key_and_link(struct key_type *type,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,security/keys/request_key_auth.c +1
-1@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ struct key *key_get_instantiation_authkey(key_serial_t target_id)struct key *authkey;key_ref_t authkey_ref; -sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); + ctx.index_key.desc_len =sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); authkey_ref =search_process_keyrings (&ctx);
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1Ping. David, are you planning to apply this?
- Eric
Ping.
Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: always initialize keyring_index_key::desc_len
In reply to Eric BiggersQuoted 106 lines · Eric Biggers
Quoted 105 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
syzbot hit the '
BUG_ON(index_key->desc_len = 0);' in__key_link_begin()called fromconstruct_alloc_key()duringsys_request_key(), because the length of the key description was never calculated.The problem is that we rely on ->desc_len being initialized by
search_process_keyrings(), specifically bysearch_nested_keyrings(). But, if the process isn't subscribed to any keyrings that never happens.Fix it by always initializing
keyring_index_key::desc_lenas soon as the description is set, like we already do in some places.The following program reproduces the
BUG_ON()when it's run as root and no session keyring has been installed. If it doesn't work, try removing pam_keyinit.so from/etc/pam.d/loginand rebooting.#include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <keyutils.h> int main(void) { int id = add_key("keyring", "syz", NULL, 0, KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING); keyctl_setperm(id, KEY_OTH_WRITE); setreuid(5000, 5000); request_key("user", "desc", "", id); }Reported-by [email protected]Fixes b2a4df200d57 ("KEYS: Expand the capacity of a keyring")Cc <[email protected]> # v3.13+Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>---
v2: In
proc_keys_show(), assignindex_keydirectlysecurity/keys/keyring.c | 4 +--- security/keys/proc.c | 3 +-- security/keys/request_key.c | 1 + security/keys/request_key_auth.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)security/keys/keyring.c +1
-3@@ -661,9 +661,6 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring,BUG_ON ((ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =0 || (ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =STATE_CHECKS ); -if (ctx->index_key.description) - ctx->index_key.desc_len =strlen (ctx->index_key.description); -/* Check to see if this top-level keyring is what we are looking for * and whether it is valid or not. */ @@ -914,6 +911,7 @@ key_ref_t keyring_search(key_ref_t keyring,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,security/keys/proc.c +1
-2@@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ static int proc_keys_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)int rc;struct keyring_search_context ctx = { - .index_key.type = key->type, - .index_key.description = key->description, + .index_key = key->index_key, .cred = m->file->f_cred, .match_data.cmp = lookup_user_key_possessed, .match_data.raw_data = key,security/keys/request_key.c +1
-0@@ -545,6 +545,7 @@ struct key *request_key_and_link(struct key_type *type,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,security/keys/request_key_auth.c +1
-1@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ struct key *key_get_instantiation_authkey(key_serial_t target_id)struct key *authkey;key_ref_t authkey_ref; -sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); + ctx.index_key.desc_len =sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); authkey_ref =search_process_keyrings (&ctx);
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1Ping. David, are you planning to apply this?
- Eric
Signature · 4 lines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-bugs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/20181128231940.GB131170%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Ping.
Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: always initialize keyring_index_key::desc_len
Quoted 115 lines · Eric Biggers
Quoted 114 lines · Eric Biggers
Quoted 108 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
syzbot hit the '
BUG_ON(index_key->desc_len = 0);' in__key_link_begin()called fromconstruct_alloc_key()duringsys_request_key(), because the length of the key description was never calculated.The problem is that we rely on ->desc_len being initialized by
search_process_keyrings(), specifically bysearch_nested_keyrings(). But, if the process isn't subscribed to any keyrings that never happens.Fix it by always initializing
keyring_index_key::desc_lenas soon as the description is set, like we already do in some places.The following program reproduces the
BUG_ON()when it's run as root and no session keyring has been installed. If it doesn't work, try removing pam_keyinit.so from/etc/pam.d/loginand rebooting.#include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <keyutils.h> int main(void) { int id = add_key("keyring", "syz", NULL, 0, KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING); keyctl_setperm(id, KEY_OTH_WRITE); setreuid(5000, 5000); request_key("user", "desc", "", id); }Reported-by [email protected]Fixes b2a4df200d57 ("KEYS: Expand the capacity of a keyring")Cc <[email protected]> # v3.13+Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>---
v2: In
proc_keys_show(), assignindex_keydirectlysecurity/keys/keyring.c | 4 +--- security/keys/proc.c | 3 +-- security/keys/request_key.c | 1 + security/keys/request_key_auth.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)security/keys/keyring.c +1
-3@@ -661,9 +661,6 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring,BUG_ON ((ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =0 || (ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =STATE_CHECKS ); -if (ctx->index_key.description) - ctx->index_key.desc_len =strlen (ctx->index_key.description); -/* Check to see if this top-level keyring is what we are looking for * and whether it is valid or not. */ @@ -914,6 +911,7 @@ key_ref_t keyring_search(key_ref_t keyring,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,security/keys/proc.c +1
-2@@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ static int proc_keys_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)int rc;struct keyring_search_context ctx = { - .index_key.type = key->type, - .index_key.description = key->description, + .index_key = key->index_key, .cred = m->file->f_cred, .match_data.cmp = lookup_user_key_possessed, .match_data.raw_data = key,security/keys/request_key.c +1
-0@@ -545,6 +545,7 @@ struct key *request_key_and_link(struct key_type *type,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,security/keys/request_key_auth.c +1
-1@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ struct key *key_get_instantiation_authkey(key_serial_t target_id)struct key *authkey;key_ref_t authkey_ref; -sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); + ctx.index_key.desc_len =sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); authkey_ref =search_process_keyrings (&ctx);Signature · 1 line
2.19.1Ping. David, are you planning to apply this?
- Eric
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Signature · 4 lines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-bugs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/20181128231940.GB131170%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.Ping.
Ping. David, are you planning to apply this?
- Eric
Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: always initialize keyring_index_key::desc_len
Quoted 122 lines · Eric Biggers
Quoted 121 lines · Eric Biggers
Quoted 119 lines · Eric Biggers
Quoted 108 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
syzbot hit the '
BUG_ON(index_key->desc_len = 0);' in__key_link_begin()called fromconstruct_alloc_key()duringsys_request_key(), because the length of the key description was never calculated.The problem is that we rely on ->desc_len being initialized by
search_process_keyrings(), specifically bysearch_nested_keyrings(). But, if the process isn't subscribed to any keyrings that never happens.Fix it by always initializing
keyring_index_key::desc_lenas soon as the description is set, like we already do in some places.The following program reproduces the
BUG_ON()when it's run as root and no session keyring has been installed. If it doesn't work, try removing pam_keyinit.so from/etc/pam.d/loginand rebooting.#include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <keyutils.h> int main(void) { int id = add_key("keyring", "syz", NULL, 0, KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING); keyctl_setperm(id, KEY_OTH_WRITE); setreuid(5000, 5000); request_key("user", "desc", "", id); }Reported-by [email protected]Fixes b2a4df200d57 ("KEYS: Expand the capacity of a keyring")Cc <[email protected]> # v3.13+Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>---
v2: In
proc_keys_show(), assignindex_keydirectlysecurity/keys/keyring.c | 4 +--- security/keys/proc.c | 3 +-- security/keys/request_key.c | 1 + security/keys/request_key_auth.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)security/keys/keyring.c +1
-3@@ -661,9 +661,6 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring,BUG_ON ((ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =0 || (ctx->flags &STATE_CHECKS ) =STATE_CHECKS ); -if (ctx->index_key.description) - ctx->index_key.desc_len =strlen (ctx->index_key.description); -/* Check to see if this top-level keyring is what we are looking for * and whether it is valid or not. */ @@ -914,6 +911,7 @@ key_ref_t keyring_search(key_ref_t keyring,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,security/keys/proc.c +1
-2@@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ static int proc_keys_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)int rc;struct keyring_search_context ctx = { - .index_key.type = key->type, - .index_key.description = key->description, + .index_key = key->index_key, .cred = m->file->f_cred, .match_data.cmp = lookup_user_key_possessed, .match_data.raw_data = key,security/keys/request_key.c +1
-0@@ -545,6 +545,7 @@ struct key *request_key_and_link(struct key_type *type,struct keyring_search_context ctx = { .index_key.type = type, .index_key.description = description, + .index_key.desc_len =strlen (description), .cred =current_cred (), .match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp, .match_data.raw_data = description,security/keys/request_key_auth.c +1
-1@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ struct key *key_get_instantiation_authkey(key_serial_t target_id)struct key *authkey;key_ref_t authkey_ref; -sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); + ctx.index_key.desc_len =sprintf (description,"%x" , target_id); authkey_ref =search_process_keyrings (&ctx);Signature · 1 line
2.19.1Ping. David, are you planning to apply this?
- Eric
Signature · 4 lines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-bugs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/20181128231940.GB131170%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Ping.
Ping. David, are you planning to apply this?
- Eric
Hi James, can you please apply this for v5.1? This has been ignored by David for over 3 months with repeated pings.
- Eric