race condition on looking up inodes
Hi,
I had post a simillar message before.
Thanks for the replay from Albert D. Cahalan. But i found some results
confusing me.
For example, process 1 and process 2 run concurrently and execute the
following system calls.
rename("/usr/hybrid/cfg/data","/usr/mytemp/data1"); /*for process 1*/----------------------------------------------------------------
rename("/usr/mytemp/data1","/usr/test");/* for process 2*/
----------------------------------------------------------------
It is possible that context switch happens when process 1 is look ing up
the inode for "/usr/mytemp/data1" or the inode for "/usr/hybrid/cfg/data".
It will result in diffrent behaviour for process 2 and confuses the
application.
If so,how does Linux solve?
Thanks.
Warren
Quoted 15 lines · warren
Hi,
I had post a simillar message before.
Thanks for the replay from Albert D. Cahalan. But i found some results
confusing me.
For example, process 1 and process 2 run concurrently and execute the
following system calls.rename("/usr/hybrid/cfg/data","/usr/mytemp/data1"); /*for process 1*/----------------------------------------------------------------rename("/usr/mytemp/data1","/usr/test");/* for process 2*/
Quoted 8 lines
----------------------------------------------------------------
It is possible that context switch happens when process 1 is look ing up
the inode for "/usr/mytemp/data1" or the inode for "/usr/hybrid/cfg/data".It will result in diffrent behaviour for process 2 and confuses the
application.If so,how does Linux solve?
Solves what, precisely? Result depends on the order of these calls. If you don't provide any serialization - you get timing-dependent results you were asking for. What's the problem and what behaviour do you expect?
Besides, what's the difference caused by the moment of context switch?
Quoted 2 lines · In article <000201c0c0a4$eb5c7b10$321ea8c0@saturn> you wrote:
rename("/usr/hybrid/cfg/data","/usr/mytemp/data1"); /*for process 1*/rename("/usr/mytemp/data1","/usr/test");/* for process 2*/
Rename syscall is expected to be atomic on unixoid systems. And I dont know of a case where a problem is, besides if you use some network file system, where nobody can realy gurantee anything (well kidding, but it is harder than on a local one).
The second rename may see the result of the first rename or the original state before the first rename. It will not see any half-state or locked nodes.
Greetings
Bernd