Cosmetic JFFS patch.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line · Olaf Hering
kde.o. 2.5?
Good idea! Graphics needs to be in the kernel to be fast. Windows proved that.
thought SGI proved that :-)
Martin
Signature · 5 lines
------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch | email: [email protected] TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309 C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759
Is Graphics really in the Windows kernel? I think GDI.EXE runs in user mode.
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line · Olaf Hering
kde.o. 2.5?
Good idea! Graphics needs to be in the kernel to be fast. Windows proved that.
thought SGI proved that :-)
Martin
Signature · 10 lines
------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch | email: [email protected] TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309 C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-> From Martin Knoblauch <[email protected]> :
GDI.EXE was moved into the kernel in winNT 4.0 and has been there ever since. M$ released a white paper about this claiming the "performance boost". worked great for me, but was one more thing to go wrong in kernel space, although they touched on that as well.
it'd take me a bit to find a refernce or link for you, but i remember it well.. ;)
-greg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hua Zhong" <[email protected]>
Is Graphics really in the Windows kernel? I think GDI.EXE runs in user mode.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line · Olaf Hering
kde.o. 2.5?
Good idea! Graphics needs to be in the kernel to be fast. Windows proved that.
thought SGI proved that :-)
Martin