PATCH: Update U-Boot EXT2 Filesystem to support dynamic inode size and optimize ext2 read function to fasten read speed!
Description:
The patch updates /fs/ext2/ext2fs.c file. There are two aims:
1. Make U-Boot could support the EXT2 dynamic version that ext2_inode_size beyond 128bytes. One new feature be involved: CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV
Refer to: linux-2.6.24.3 source code.
2. Make EXT2 read more fast.
One new feature be involved: CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
commit f4120b0f4f06cd1a382bb562d7fe33ea554a1982
Parent: 699f05125509249072a0b865c8d35520d97cd501 Author: Ryan Chen <[email protected]> Date: Tue Jul 29 11:57:11 2008 -0400
modified: fs/ext2/ext2fs.c
fs/ext2/ext2fs.c +121 -2
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@#include <ext2fs.h> #include <malloc.h> #include <asm/byteorder.h> +#define CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV extern int ext2fs_devread (int sector,int byte_offset,int byte_len,char *buf);
@@ -66,6 +67,17 @@ extern int ext2fs_devread (int sector, int byte_offset, int byte_len,/* The size of an ext2 block in bytes. */ #define EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data) (1 << LOG2_BLOCK_SIZE(data)) +#ifdef CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV +/* +* Revision levels +*/ +#define EXT2_GOOD_OLD_REV 0/* The good old (original) format */ +#define EXT2_DYNAMIC_REV 1/* V2 format w/ dynamic inode sizes */ + +#define EXT2_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE 128 +uint32_t ext2_inode_size =EXT2_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE ; +#endif +/* The ext2 superblock. */ struct ext2_sblock {uint32_t total_inodes;
@@ -217,7 +229,11 @@ static int ext2fs_read_inodeif (status ==0 ) {return (0 ); } +#ifdef CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV + inodes_per_block =EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data) / ext2_inode_size; +#else inodes_per_block =EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data) /128 ; +#endif blkno = (ino %__le32_to_cpu (sblock->inodes_per_group)) / inodes_per_block; blkoff = (ino % __le32_to_cpu (sblock->inodes_per_group)) %
@@ -226,10 +242,17 @@ static int ext2fs_read_inodeprintf ("ext2fs read inode blkno %d blkoff %d\n" , blkno, blkoff);#endif /* Read the inode. */ +#ifdef CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV + status =ext2fs_devread (((__le32_to_cpu (blkgrp.inode_table_id) + + blkno) <<LOG2_EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data)), + ext2_inode_size * blkoff, +sizeof (struct ext2_inode ), (char *) inode); +#else status =ext2fs_devread (((__le32_to_cpu (blkgrp.inode_table_id) + blkno) <<LOG2_EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data)),sizeof (struct ext2_inode ) * blkoff,sizeof (struct ext2_inode ), (char *) inode); +#endif if (status ==0 ) {return (0 ); }
@@ -243,8 +266,13 @@ void ext2fs_free_node (ext2fs_node_t node, ext2fs_node_t currroot) { } } +#define CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ +#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ +static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node,int fileblock,int *stream) { +#else static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node,int fileblock) { +#endif struct ext2_data *data = node->data;struct ext2_inode *inode = &node->inode;int blknr;
@@ -252,9 +280,20 @@ static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node, int fileblock) {int log2_blksz =LOG2_EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data);int status; +#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ + *stream =1 ;/* itself */ +#endif +/* Direct blocks. */ if (fileblock <INDIRECT_BLOCKS ) { blknr =__le32_to_cpu (inode->b.blocks.dir_blocks[fileblock]); +#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ +while (((inode->b.blocks.dir_blocks[fileblock +1 ] - + inode->b.blocks.dir_blocks[fileblock]) ==1 ) && (fileblock <INDIRECT_BLOCKS -1 )) { + fileblock++; + *stream +=1 ; + } +#endif }/* Indirect. */ else if (fileblock < (INDIRECT_BLOCKS + (blksz /4 ))) {
@@ -294,6 +333,13 @@ static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node, int fileblock) { } blknr =__le32_to_cpu (indir1_block [fileblock -INDIRECT_BLOCKS ]); +#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ +while (((__le32_to_cpu (indir1_block[fileblock -INDIRECT_BLOCKS +1 ]) - \ +__le32_to_cpu (indir1_block[fileblock -INDIRECT_BLOCKS ])) ==1 ) && (fileblock < (blksz -1 ))) { + fileblock++; + *stream +=1 ; + } +#endif }/* Double indirect. */ else if (fileblock <
@@ -301,6 +347,9 @@ static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node, int fileblock) {unsigned int perblock = blksz /4 ;unsigned int rblock = fileblock - (INDIRECT_BLOCKS + blksz /4 ); +#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ +int rbcnt =0 ; +#endif if (indir1_block ==NULL ) { indir1_block = (uint32_t *)malloc (blksz);
@@ -370,6 +419,14 @@ static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node, int fileblock) {__le32_to_cpu (indir1_block[rblock / perblock]) << log2_blksz; } blknr =__le32_to_cpu (indir2_block[rblock % perblock]); +#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ + rbcnt = rblock % perblock; +while (((__le32_to_cpu (indir2_block[rbcnt +1 ]) - \ +__le32_to_cpu (indir2_block[rbcnt])) ==1 ) && (rbcnt < (blksz -1 ))) { + rbcnt++; + *stream +=1 ; + } +#endif }/* Tripple indirect. */ else {
@@ -382,7 +439,57 @@ static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node, int fileblock) {return (blknr); } +#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ +int ext2fs_read_file + (ext2fs_node_t node,int pos,unsigned int len,char *buf) { +int log2blocksize =LOG2_EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (node->data); +int blocksize =1 << (log2blocksize +DISK_SECTOR_BITS ); +unsigned int filesize =__le32_to_cpu (node->inode.size); +int blknr; +int blockend; +int status; +int remain = len; +char *buffer = buf; +int stream =0 ; +int cur = pos / blocksize; +int blockoff = pos % blocksize; + +/* Adjust len so it we can't read past the end of the file. */ +if (len > filesize) { + len = filesize; + } +while (remain >0 ) { + blknr =ext2fs_read_block (node, cur, &stream); +if (blknr <0 ) { +return (-1 ); + } + blknr = blknr << log2blocksize; + +if (remain < blocksize * stream) { + blockend = remain; + }else { + blockend = blocksize * stream; + } + + status =ext2fs_devread (blknr, blockoff, blockend, buffer); +if (status ==0 ) { +return (-1 ); + } + + remain -= blockend; + buffer += blockend; + cur += stream; + blockoff =0 ; + +if (remain ==0 ) +return (len); +else if (remain <0 ) +return (-1 ); + } +return (len); +} +#else int ext2fs_read_file (ext2fs_node_t node,int pos,unsigned int len,char *buf) {int i;
@@ -390,7 +497,7 @@ int ext2fs_read_fileint log2blocksize =LOG2_EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (node->data);int blocksize =1 << (log2blocksize +DISK_SECTOR_BITS );unsigned int filesize =__le32_to_cpu (node->inode.size); - +/* Adjust len so it we can't read past the end of the file. */ if (len > filesize) { len = filesize;
@@ -409,7 +516,7 @@ int ext2fs_read_filereturn (-1 ); } blknr = blknr << log2blocksize; - +/* Last block. */ if (i == blockcnt -1 ) { blockend = (len + pos) % blocksize;
@@ -442,6 +549,7 @@ int ext2fs_read_file }return (len); } +#endif static int ext2fs_iterate_dir (ext2fs_node_t dir,char *name,ext2fs_node_t * fnode,int *ftype)
@@ -854,6 +962,17 @@ int ext2fs_mount (unsigned part_length) {if (__le16_to_cpu (data->sblock.magic) !=EXT2_MAGIC ) { goto fail; } +#ifdef CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV +#ifdef DEBUG +printf ("revision_level = 0x%x, inode_size = 0x%x\n" , data->sblock.revision_level, data->sblock.inode_size); +#endif +if (__le32_to_cpu (data->sblock.revision_level) ==EXT2_GOOD_OLD_REV ) { + ext2_inode_size =EXT2_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE ; + }else { + ext2_inode_size =__le16_to_cpu (data->sblock.inode_size); + } +#endif + data->diropen.data = data; data->diropen.ino =2 ; data->diropen.inode_read =1 ;
Best Regards,
Ryan Chen
Quoted 7 lines · Ryan CHEN
Description:
The patch updates /fs/ext2/ext2fs.c file. There are two aims:
1. Make U-Boot could support the EXT2 dynamic version thatext2_inode_sizebeyond 128bytes. One new feature be involved:CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV
Refer to: linux-2.6.24.3 source code.
2. Make EXT2 read more fast.
One new feature be involved:CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
Does it significantly increase code size, or is there any other reason why these need to be conditionalized?
-Scott
Hi Scott,
For sure, the modification will increase code size, but I think it is reasonable.
1. Make U-Boot could support the EXT2 dynamic version that ext2_inode_size beyond 128bytes.
According to Linux kernel source code, now EXT2 filesystem could support two revision:
EXT2_GOOD_OLD_REV
EXT2_DYNAMIC_REVext2_inode_size be fixed as 128bytes in the first revision while it could beyond 128bytes in another revision. In the past, the first revision is the default option for mkfs.ext2 command. But now there are some OSes like Mandriva Linux 2008.1 for STLS want to use new revision option to format disk. I have tested it and our current U-Boot couldn't support it. So I think it is time to do it.
2. Make EXT2 read more fast.
I have tested our U-Boot to access EXT2 filesystem on USB disk. It's quite slow and it takes about 200 seconds to read a file that its size is 8MB. Our USB host controller is NEC upd720101 OHCI host controller and operation mode is 'bulk'. I think its width is enough. I have analyzed our ext2fs.c file and found it only read 4KB(512B/block * 8blocks, I format EXT2 filesystem with default options) once time. One time is a USB timing slot - 100ms. So it is so slow.
Now I mainly modified ext2fs_read_block() function to detect how many seriate blocks and read them in one time. The modification fasten read opertion a lot especially big file.
Best Regards,
Ryan Chen
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottwood at freescale.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:11 AM
To: Ryan CHEN
Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net; Antonio Maria BORNEO
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] PATCH: Update U-Boot EXT2 Filesystem to support dynamic inode size and optimize ext2 read function to fasten read speed!
Quoted 3 lines · Ryan CHEN
Description:
The patch updates /fs/ext2/ext2fs.c file. There are two aims:
1. Make U-Boot could support the EXT2 dynamic version thatext2_inode_size
beyond 128bytes.
Quoted 4 lines
One new feature be involved:
CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REVRefer to: linux-2.6.24.3 source code.
2. Make EXT2 read more fast.
One new feature be involved:CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
Does it significantly increase code size, or is there any other reason why these need to be conditionalized?
-Scott
Quoted 7 lines · In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
Description:
The patch updates /fs/ext2/ext2fs.c file. There are two aims:
1. Make U-Boot could support the EXT2 dynamic version thatext2_inode_sizebeyond 128bytes. One new feature be involved:CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV
Refer to: linux-2.6.24.3 source code.
2. Make EXT2 read more fast.
One new feature be involved:CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
Do we really need new config options and #ifdeffery for these?
Quoted 1 line
+++
b/fs/ext2/ext2fs.c
...
fs/ext2/ext2fs.c int ext2fs_read_file · line 519
Quoted 6 lines
fs/ext2/ext2fs.c +1
-1@@ -409,7 +516,7 @@ int ext2fs_read_filereturn (-1 ); } blknr = blknr << log2blocksize; - +
You're adding trailing white space here. Please don't.
fs/ext2/ext2fs.c int ext2fs_mount (unsigned part_length) { · line 968
Quoted 3 lines
fs/ext2/ext2fs.c +3
-0+#ifdef DEBUG +printf ("revision_level = 0x%x, inode_size = 0x%x\n" , data->sblock.revision_level, data->sblock.inode_size); +#endif
Use debug() instead of #ifdef
And mind the maximum line length.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Signature · 5 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de Certainly there are things in life that money can't buy, but it's very funny - Did you ever try buying them without money? - Ogden Nash
Hi Wolfgang,
I have modified my patch according to your suggestion. The only question is that use debug() because I found all debug print msg lines are written as :
#ifdef DEBUG
printf(......);
#endif
Are you sure I need change my debug print to debug()?
commit 4e638f2b97cea8b256eca7eb098d4da45015e10d
Parent: 699f05125509249072a0b865c8d35520d97cd501 Author: Ryan Chen <[email protected]> Date: Wed Jul 30 05:48:16 2008 -0400
modified: fs/ext2/ext2fs.c
fs/ext2/ext2fs.c +1 -0
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@#include <ext2fs.h> #include <malloc.h> #include <asm/byteorder.h> +#define CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV extern int ext2fs_devread (int sector,int byte_offset,int byte_len,char *buf);
@@ -66,6 +67,17 @@ extern int ext2fs_devread (int sector, int byte_offset,
int byte_len,
/* The size of an ext2 block in bytes. */
#define EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE(data) (1 << LOG2_BLOCK_SIZE(data))
+#ifdef CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV
+/*
+ * Revision levels
+ */
+#define EXT2_GOOD_OLD_REV 0 /* The good old (original) format
*/
+#define EXT2_DYNAMIC_REV 1 /* V2 format w/ dynamic inode sizes
*/
+
+#define EXT2_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE 128
+uint32_t ext2_inode_size = EXT2_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE;
+#endif
+
/* The ext2 superblock. */
struct ext2_sblock {
uint32_t total_inodes;
@@ -217,7 +229,11 @@ static int ext2fs_read_inode
if (status == 0) {
return (0);
}
+#ifdef CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV
+ inodes_per_block = EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data) / ext2_inode_size;
+#else
inodes_per_block = EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data) / 128;
+#endif
blkno = (ino % __le32_to_cpu (sblock->inodes_per_group)) /
inodes_per_block;
blkoff = (ino % __le32_to_cpu (sblock->inodes_per_group)) %
@@ -226,10 +242,17 @@ static int ext2fs_read_inode
printf ("ext2fs read inode blkno %d blkoff %d\n", blkno, blkoff);
#endif
/* Read the inode. */
+#ifdef CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV
+ status = ext2fs_devread (((__le32_to_cpu (blkgrp.inode_table_id) +
+ blkno) << LOG2_EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data)),
+ ext2_inode_size * blkoff,
+ sizeof (struct ext2_inode), (char *)
inode);
+#else
status = ext2fs_devread (((__le32_to_cpu (blkgrp.inode_table_id) +
blkno) << LOG2_EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data)),
sizeof (struct ext2_inode) * blkoff, sizeof (struct ext2_inode), (char *)
inode);
+#endif
if (status == 0) {
return (0);
}
@@ -243,8 +266,13 @@ void ext2fs_free_node (ext2fs_node_t node, ext2fs_node_t currroot) {
}
}
+#define CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
+#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
+static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node, int fileblock, int *stream) {
+#else
static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node, int fileblock) {
+#endif
struct ext2_data *data = node->data;
struct ext2_inode *inode = &node->inode;
int blknr;
@@ -252,9 +280,21 @@ static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node, int fileblock) {
int log2_blksz = LOG2_EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data);
int status;
+#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
+ *stream = 1;/* itself */
+#endif
+
/* Direct blocks. */
if (fileblock < INDIRECT_BLOCKS) {
blknr = __le32_to_cpu
(inode->b.blocks.dir_blocks[fileblock]);
+#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
+ while(((inode->b.blocks.dir_blocks[fileblock + 1] -
+ inode->b.blocks.dir_blocks[fileblock]) == 1) && \
+ (fileblock < INDIRECT_BLOCKS - 1)) {
+ fileblock++;
+ *stream += 1;
+ }
+#endif
}
/* Indirect. */
else if (fileblock < (INDIRECT_BLOCKS + (blksz / 4))) {
@@ -294,6 +334,14 @@ static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node, int fileblock) {
}
blknr = __le32_to_cpu (indir1_block
[fileblock - INDIRECT_BLOCKS]);
+#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
+ while(((__le32_to_cpu (indir1_block[fileblock -INDIRECT_BLOCKS + 1]) - \
+ __le32_to_cpu (indir1_block[fileblock -INDIRECT_BLOCKS])) == 1) && \
+ (fileblock < (blksz - 1))) {
+ fileblock++;
+ *stream += 1;
+ }
+#endif
}
/* Double indirect. */
else if (fileblock <
@@ -301,6 +349,9 @@ static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node, int fileblock) {
unsigned int perblock = blksz / 4;
unsigned int rblock = fileblock - (INDIRECT_BLOCKS
+ blksz / 4);
+#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
+ int rbcnt = 0;
+#endif
if (indir1_block == NULL) {
indir1_block = (uint32_t *) malloc (blksz);
@@ -370,6 +421,15 @@ static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node, int fileblock) {
__le32_to_cpu (indir1_block[rblock /
perblock]) << log2_blksz;
}
blknr = __le32_to_cpu (indir2_block[rblock % perblock]);
+#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
+ rbcnt = rblock % perblock;
+ while(((__le32_to_cpu (indir2_block[rbcnt + 1]) - \
+ __le32_to_cpu (indir2_block[rbcnt])) == 1) \
+ && (rbcnt < (blksz - 1))) {
+ rbcnt++;
+ *stream += 1;
+ }
+#endif
}
/* Tripple indirect. */
else {
@@ -382,7 +442,57 @@ static int ext2fs_read_block (ext2fs_node_t node, int fileblock) {
return (blknr);
}
+#ifdef CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
+int ext2fs_read_file
+ (ext2fs_node_t node, int pos, unsigned int len, char *buf) {
+ int log2blocksize = LOG2_EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (node->data);
+ int blocksize = 1 << (log2blocksize + DISK_SECTOR_BITS);
+ unsigned int filesize = __le32_to_cpu(node->inode.size);
+ int blknr;
+ int blockend;
+ int status;
+ int remain = len;
+ char *buffer = buf;
+ int stream = 0;
+ int cur = pos / blocksize;
+ int blockoff = pos % blocksize;
+
+ /* Adjust len so it we can't read past the end of the file. */
+ if (len > filesize) {
+ len = filesize;
+ }
+ while (remain > 0) {
+ blknr = ext2fs_read_block (node, cur, &stream);
+ if (blknr < 0) {
+ return (-1);
+ }
+ blknr = blknr << log2blocksize;
+
+ if(remain < blocksize * stream) {
+ blockend = remain;
+ } else {
+ blockend = blocksize * stream;
+ }
+
+ status = ext2fs_devread (blknr, blockoff, blockend, buffer);
+ if (status == 0) {
+ return (-1);
+ }
+
+ remain -= blockend;
+ buffer += blockend;
+ cur += stream;
+ blockoff = 0;
+
+ if(remain == 0)
+ return (len);
+ else if(remain < 0)
+ return (-1);
+ }
+ return (len);
+}
+#else
int ext2fs_read_file
(ext2fs_node_t node, int pos, unsigned int len, char *buf) { int i;
@@ -442,6 +552,7 @@ int ext2fs_read_file
}
return (len);
}
+#endif
static int ext2fs_iterate_dir (ext2fs_node_t dir, char *name, ext2fs_node_t
* fnode, int *ftype)
@@ -854,6 +965,18 @@ int ext2fs_mount (unsigned part_length) {
if (__le16_to_cpu (data->sblock.magic) != EXT2_MAGIC) {
goto fail;
}
+#ifdef CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV
+#ifdef DEBUG
+ printf("revision_level = 0x%x, inode_size = 0x%x\n",data->sblock.revision_level, \
+ data->sblock.inode_size);
+#endif
+ if (__le32_to_cpu (data->sblock.revision_level) ==EXT2_GOOD_OLD_REV) {
+ ext2_inode_size = EXT2_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE;
+ } else {
+ ext2_inode_size = __le16_to_cpu (data->sblock.inode_size);
+ }
+#endif
+
data->diropen.data = data;
data->diropen.ino = 2;
data->diropen.inode_read = 1;
Best Regards,
Ryan Chen
Best Regards,
Ryan Chen
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:wd at denx.de]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 7:17 AM
To: Ryan CHEN
Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net; Antonio Maria BORNEO
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] PATCH: Update U-Boot EXT2 Filesystem to support dynamic inode size and optimize ext2 read function to fasten read speed!
Quoted 3 lines · In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
Description:
The patch updates /fs/ext2/ext2fs.c file. There are two aims:
1. Make U-Boot could support the EXT2 dynamic version thatext2_inode_size
beyond 128bytes.
Quoted 4 lines
One new feature be involved:
CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REVRefer to: linux-2.6.24.3 source code.
2. Make EXT2 read more fast.
One new feature be involved:CFG_OPTIMIZE_EXT2_READ
Do we really need new config options and #ifdeffery for these?
Quoted 1 line
+++
b/fs/ext2/ext2fs.c
...
Review int ext2fs_read_file · line 519
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-1@@ -409,7 +516,7 @@ int ext2fs_read_file return (-1); } blknr = blknr << log2blocksize; - +
You're adding trailing white space here. Please don't.
Review int ext2fs_read_file · line 522
Quoted 3 lines
(quoted diff) +3
-0+#ifdef DEBUG + printf("revision_level = 0x%x, inode_size = 0x%x\n", +data->sblock.revision_level, data->sblock.inode_size); #endif
Use debug() instead of #ifdef
And mind the maximum line length.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Signature · 5 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de Certainly there are things in life that money can't buy, but it's very funny - Did you ever try buying them without money? - Ogden Nash
Hi Ryan,
Quoted 6 lines
I have modified my patch according to your suggestion. The only question is that use
debug()because I found all debug print msg lines are written as :
#ifdef DEBUG
printf(......);
#endif
Are you sure I need change my debug print todebug()?
Yes, please. We introduced the macro especially for this to make the code more readable.
If you find other instances of the macro not being used, feel free to send a patch changing it ;)
Cheers
Detlev
Signature · 6 lines
Multiple exclamation marks, the sure sign of an insane mind.
-- Terry Pratchett
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: dzu at denx.deDear Ryan CHEN,
Quoted 7 lines · In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
I have modified my patch according to your suggestion. The only question is that usedebug()because I found all debug print msg lines are written as :
#ifdef DEBUG
printf(......);
#endif
Are you sure I need change my debug print todebug()?
Since all the other code is like that I agree to leave it unchanged.
But:
Review extern int ext2fs_devread (int sector, int byte_offset, · line 67
Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -66,6 +67,17 @@ extern int ext2fs_devread (int sector, int byte_offset, int byte_len,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Review static int ext2fs_read_inode · line 250
Quoted 10 lines
(quoted diff) +5
-0@@ -226,10 +242,17 @@ static int ext2fs_read_inode printf ("ext2fs read inode blkno %d blkoff %d\n", blkno, blkoff); #endif /* Read the inode. */ +#ifdef CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV + status = ext2fs_devread (((__le32_to_cpu (blkgrp.inode_table_id) + + blkno) << LOG2_EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data)), + ext2_inode_size * blkoff, + sizeof (struct ext2_inode), (char *) inode);
^^^^^^^^^
Review static int ext2fs_read_inode · line 256
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-0+#else status = ext2fs_devread (((__le32_to_cpu (blkgrp.inode_table_id) + blkno) << LOG2_EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE (data)), sizeof (struct ext2_inode) * blkoff, sizeof (struct ext2_inode), (char *) inode);
^^^^^^^^^
Review void ext2fs_free_node (ext2fs_node_t node, · line 266
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-0+#endif if (status == 0) {(quoted diff) +0
-0return (0); }@@ -243,8 +266,13 @@ void ext2fs_free_node (ext2fs_node_t node, ext2fs_node_t currroot) {
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
etc.
Your patch is corrupted because your mailer wrapped long lines.
Please fix your mailer and repost (with a nice commit message, please).
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Signature · 6 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de In a survey taken several years ago, all incoming freshmen at MIT were asked if they expected to graduate in the top half of their class. Ninety-seven percent responded that they did.