x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally removed 'CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig. This commit reverts the change.
---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1 -0
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=y
Signature · 1 line
1.8.2.1
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
Hi Simon,
Quoted 15 lines · Bin Meng
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally removed '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig. This commit reverts the change.Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +0
-0
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig
Quoted 6 lines
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-1@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=y --
Please apply this patch after commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
and before commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc.
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch with insertion of this patch.
Regards,
Bin
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
Hi Bin,
Quoted 23 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 20 lines · Bin Meng
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally removed '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig. This commit reverts the change.Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-0@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=y
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
--
Please apply this patch after commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
and before commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc.
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch with insertion of this patch.
This should be squashed as part of
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc
You need to remember to run savedefconfig when changing Kconfig or defconfig.
Cheers,
-Joe
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
Hi Joe,
Quoted 35 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 23 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 20 lines · Bin Meng
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally removed '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig. This commit reverts the change.Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-0@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=yQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
--
Please apply this patch after commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
and before commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc.
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch with insertion of this patch.
Quoted 5 lines
This should be squashed as part of
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbcYou need to remember to run savedefconfig when changing
Kconfigor defconfig.
I still don't get it. commit 65c4ac0 introduced 'CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' and was applied before your commit bd328eb to clean up the defconfig. I suspect there was something wrong with 'savedefconfig'?
Regards,
Bin
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
Hi Bin,
Quoted 42 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Joe,
Quoted 38 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 23 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 20 lines · Bin Meng
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally removed '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig. This commit reverts the change.Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-0@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=yQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
--
Please apply this patch after commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
and before commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc.
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch with insertion of this patch.This should be squashed as part of
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
You need to remember to run savedefconfig when changing
Kconfigor defconfig.I still don't get it. commit 65c4ac0 introduced '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' and was applied before your commit bd328eb to clean up the defconfig. I suspect there was something wrong with 'savedefconfig'?
No, savedefconfig is doing exactly what it should. Before your patch, CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT was the default, explicitly in the Kconfig. Therefore savedefconfig sees it as redundant to specify that in the defconfig as well, so it removed it. When you change that explicit default to something else, it is up to you to change the defconfigs of the old and new default boards.
Your other option is to stop defining a default in the Kconfig and instead mark the choice as "optional" (like I did for many other selections like this that had no default explicitly - Kconfig otherwise treats the first entry as default in that case) in which case all defconfigs must have a specified vendor.
Cheers,
-Joe
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
Hi,
Quoted 61 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 42 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Joe,
Quoted 38 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 23 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 20 lines · Bin Meng
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally removed '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig. This commit reverts the change.Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-0@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=yQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
--
Please apply this patch after commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
and before commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc.
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch with insertion of this patch.This should be squashed as part of
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbcQuoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
You need to remember to run savedefconfig when changing
Kconfigor defconfig.I still don't get it. commit 65c4ac0 introduced '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' and was applied before your commit bd328eb to clean up the defconfig. I suspect there was something wrong with 'savedefconfig'?No, savedefconfig is doing exactly what it should. Before your patch,
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOTwas the default, explicitly in theKconfig. Therefore savedefconfig sees it as redundant to specify that in the defconfig as well, so it removed it. When you change that explicit default to something else, it is up to you to change the defconfigs of the old and new default boards.
Quoted 5 lines
Your other option is to stop defining a default in the
Kconfigand instead mark the choice as "optional" (like I did for many other selections like this that had no default explicitly -Kconfigotherwise treats the first entry as default in that case) in which case all defconfigs must have a specified vendor.
OK I've squashed that in and pushed to u-boot-x86/testing. If it looks OK I'll pull it into master.
Regards,
Simon
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
Hi Simon,
Quoted 64 lines · Simon Glass
Hi,
Quoted 61 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 42 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Joe,
Quoted 38 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 23 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 20 lines · Bin Meng
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally removed '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig. This commit reverts the change.Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-0@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=yQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
--
Please apply this patch after commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
and before commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc.
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch with insertion of this patch.This should be squashed as part of
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbcQuoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
You need to remember to run savedefconfig when changing
Kconfigor defconfig.I still don't get it. commit 65c4ac0 introduced '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' and was applied before your commit bd328eb to clean up the defconfig. I suspect there was something wrong with 'savedefconfig'?No, savedefconfig is doing exactly what it should. Before your patch,
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOTwas the default, explicitly in theKconfig. Therefore savedefconfig sees it as redundant to specify that in the defconfig as well, so it removed it. When you change that explicit default to something else, it is up to you to change the defconfigs of the old and new default boards.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Your other option is to stop defining a default in the
Kconfigand instead mark the choice as "optional" (like I did for many other selections like this that had no default explicitly -Kconfigotherwise treats the first entry as default in that case) in which case all defconfigs must have a specified vendor.OK I've squashed that in and pushed to u-boot-x86/testing. If it looks OK I'll pull it into master.
It should also include removing the (now) redundant CONFIG_VENDOR_EMULATION from that defconfig. That is best done by running savedefconfig on that defconfig after applying the "x86: Make QEMU the default vendor" patch.
Bin, are you in the middle of this?
Cheers,
-Joe
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
Hi Joe,
Quoted 67 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Simon,
Quoted 64 lines · Simon Glass
Hi,
Quoted 61 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 42 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Joe,
Quoted 38 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 23 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 20 lines · Bin Meng
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally removed '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig. This commit reverts the change.Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-0@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=yQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
--
Please apply this patch after commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
and before commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc.
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch with insertion of this patch.This should be squashed as part of
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbcQuoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
You need to remember to run savedefconfig when changing
Kconfigor defconfig.I still don't get it. commit 65c4ac0 introduced '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' and was applied before your commit bd328eb to clean up the defconfig. I suspect there was something wrong with 'savedefconfig'?No, savedefconfig is doing exactly what it should. Before your patch,
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOTwas the default, explicitly in theKconfig. Therefore savedefconfig sees it as redundant to specify that in the defconfig as well, so it removed it. When you change that explicit default to something else, it is up to you to change the defconfigs of the old and new default boards.
Thanks for the explanation. Now it is clear to me.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Your other option is to stop defining a default in the
Kconfigand instead mark the choice as "optional" (like I did for many other selections like this that had no default explicitly -Kconfigotherwise treats the first entry as default in that case) in which case all defconfigs must have a specified vendor.OK I've squashed that in and pushed to u-boot-x86/testing. If it looks OK I'll pull it into master.
Quoted 7 lines
It should also include removing the (now) redundant
CONFIG_VENDOR_EMULATIONfrom that defconfig. That is best done by running savedefconfig on that defconfig after applying the "x86: Make QEMU the default vendor" patch.Bin, are you in the middle of this?
Yes, now we should remove CONFIG_VENDOR_EMULATION from configs/qemu-x86_defconfig. But if removing this, I feel this is inconsistent with other x86 boards' defconfig. Is this really a must-have to replace the defconfig with the one generated by 'savedefconfig'? If so, can we make it part of checkpatch.pl so that each time we submit the patch which contains modifications to the defconfig we can make sure the file is clean?
Regards,
Bin
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
In reply to Simon GlassHi Simon,
Quoted 64 lines · Simon Glass
Hi,
Quoted 61 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 42 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Joe,
Quoted 38 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 23 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 20 lines · Bin Meng
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally removed '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig. This commit reverts the change.Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-0@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=yQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
--
Please apply this patch after commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
and before commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc.
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch with insertion of this patch.This should be squashed as part of
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbcQuoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
You need to remember to run savedefconfig when changing
Kconfigor defconfig.I still don't get it. commit 65c4ac0 introduced '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' and was applied before your commit bd328eb to clean up the defconfig. I suspect there was something wrong with 'savedefconfig'?No, savedefconfig is doing exactly what it should. Before your patch,
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOTwas the default, explicitly in theKconfig. Therefore savedefconfig sees it as redundant to specify that in the defconfig as well, so it removed it. When you change that explicit default to something else, it is up to you to change the defconfigs of the old and new default boards.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Your other option is to stop defining a default in the
Kconfigand instead mark the choice as "optional" (like I did for many other selections like this that had no default explicitly -Kconfigotherwise treats the first entry as default in that case) in which case all defconfigs must have a specified vendor.OK I've squashed that in and pushed to u-boot-x86/testing. If it looks OK I'll pull it into master.
It looks OK. Another thing, I noticed this patch [1] is not in the testing branch. Did you apply it to somewhere else?
[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/472988/
Regards,
Bin
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
HI Bin,
Quoted 7 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 3 lines · Simon Glass
Hi,
On 27 May 2015 at 10:27, Joe Hershberger <[email protected]>
Quoted 11 lines · wrote:
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Hi Bin,
Quoted 7 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Joe,
Quoted 3 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Bin Meng <[email protected]>
Quoted 3 lines · wrote:
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Hi Simon,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Bin Meng <[email protected]>
Quoted 1 line · wrote:
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig"
accidentally
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
removed '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Review
Quoted 9 lines
This commit reverts the change.
Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)(quoted diff) +0
-0
b/configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
index 66f94d0..799853f 100644
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +0
-0@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig
Quoted 5 lines
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-1+CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=y --Please apply this patch after commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
and before commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc
.
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch
with
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
insertion of this patch.
This should be squashed as part of
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
You need to remember to run savedefconfig when changing
Kconfigor
defconfig.
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
I still don't get it. commit 65c4ac0 introduced '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' and was applied before your commit bd328eb to clean up the defconfig. I suspect there was something wrong with 'savedefconfig'?No, savedefconfig is doing exactly what it should. Before your patch,
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOTwas the default, explicitly in theKconfig. Therefore savedefconfig sees it as redundant to specify that in the defconfig as well, so it removed it. When you change that explicit default to something else, it is up to you to change the defconfigs of the old and new default boards.Your other option is to stop defining a default in the
Kconfigand instead mark the choice as "optional" (like I did for many other selections like this that had no default explicitly -Kconfigotherwise treats the first entry as default in that case) in which case all defconfigs must have a specified vendor.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
OK I've squashed that in and pushed to u-boot-x86/testing. If it looks OK I'll pull it into master.
It looks OK. Another thing, I noticed this patch [1] is not in the testing branch. Did you apply it to somewhere else?
I was worried that it was submitted after the merge window and affects other code.
Quoted 5 lines
[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/472988/
Regards,
Bin
Regards,
Simon
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
Hi Simon,
Quoted 92 lines · Simon Glass
HI Bin,
Quoted 89 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 84 lines · Simon Glass
Hi,
Quoted 71 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 51 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Joe,
Quoted 47 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 31 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 18 lines · Bin Meng
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally
removed 'CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig.
This commit reverts the change.Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +0
-0configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig
Quoted 6 lines
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-1@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=y --Please apply this patch after commit
Quoted 7 lines
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
and before commithttp://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc.
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch with
insertion of this patch.This should be squashed as part of
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
You need to remember to run savedefconfig when changing
Kconfigor defconfig.I still don't get it. commit 65c4ac0 introduced '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' and was applied before your commit bd328eb to clean up the defconfig. I suspect there was something wrong with 'savedefconfig'?No, savedefconfig is doing exactly what it should. Before your patch,
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOTwas the default, explicitly in theKconfig. Therefore savedefconfig sees it as redundant to specify that in the defconfig as well, so it removed it. When you change that explicit default to something else, it is up to you to change the defconfigs of the old and new default boards.Quoted 5 lines
Your other option is to stop defining a default in the
Kconfigand instead mark the choice as "optional" (like I did for many other selections like this that had no default explicitly -Kconfigotherwise treats the first entry as default in that case) in which case all defconfigs must have a specified vendor.OK I've squashed that in and pushed to u-boot-x86/testing. If it looks OK I'll pull it into master.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
It looks OK. Another thing, I noticed this patch [1] is not in the testing branch. Did you apply it to somewhere else?
I was worried that it was submitted after the merge window and affects other code.
OK, understood. But I think it is safe to remove given no board is using it.
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Regards,
Bin
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
In reply to Simon GlassHi Simon, Hi Joe,
Quoted 64 lines · Simon Glass
Hi,
Quoted 61 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 42 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Joe,
Quoted 38 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 23 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 20 lines · Bin Meng
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally removed '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig. This commit reverts the change.Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-0@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=yQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
--
Please apply this patch after commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
and before commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc.
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch with insertion of this patch.This should be squashed as part of
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbcQuoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
You need to remember to run savedefconfig when changing
Kconfigor defconfig.I still don't get it. commit 65c4ac0 introduced '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' and was applied before your commit bd328eb to clean up the defconfig. I suspect there was something wrong with 'savedefconfig'?No, savedefconfig is doing exactly what it should. Before your patch,
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOTwas the default, explicitly in theKconfig. Therefore savedefconfig sees it as redundant to specify that in the defconfig as well, so it removed it. When you change that explicit default to something else, it is up to you to change the defconfigs of the old and new default boards.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Your other option is to stop defining a default in the
Kconfigand instead mark the choice as "optional" (like I did for many other selections like this that had no default explicitly -Kconfigotherwise treats the first entry as default in that case) in which case all defconfigs must have a specified vendor.OK I've squashed that in and pushed to u-boot-x86/testing. If it looks OK I'll pull it into master.
I just found u-boot.rom created from u-boot-x86/testing branch does not have working network any more on QEMU. It is working on the u-boot-x86/master branch.
=> set serverip 10.10.0.100;set ipaddr 10.10.0.108;set netmask 255.255.255.0;set gatewayip 10.10.0.100
=> run ramboot
*** ERROR: `serverip' not set
*** ERROR: `serverip' not set
But 'print' says the env indeed has the 'serverip'. I think there should be something in the upstream that caused this after the u-boot-x86/testing branch rebase. Do you know where might be the problem?
Regards,
Bin
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
Hi Bin,
Quoted 10 lines
I just found u-boot.rom created from u-boot-x86/testing branch does not have working network any more on QEMU. It is working on the u-boot-x86/master branch.
=> set serverip 10.10.0.100;set ipaddr 10.10.0.108;set netmask 255.255.255.0;set gatewayip 10.10.0.100
=> run ramboot
*** ERROR: `serverip' not set
*** ERROR: `serverip' not set
Quoted 4 lines
But 'print' says the env indeed has the 'serverip'. I think there should be something in the upstream that caused this after the u-boot-x86/testing branch rebase. Do you know where might be the problem?
This looks very similar to an issue that got patched on the i.MX6 yesterday by Stefano which said:
commit fd3056337e6fcc140f400e11edd33f6f1cb37de1
"Use env callbacks for net variables" has a side effect on i.MX6 boards because they do not set CONFIG_NET: the ip address results not set, but it is stored in the environment."
Might be something to check...
Regards,
Andy.
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
In reply to Bin MengHi Bin,
Quoted 87 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon, Hi Joe,
Quoted 64 lines · Simon Glass
Hi,
Quoted 61 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 42 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Joe,
Quoted 38 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 23 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 20 lines · Bin Meng
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally removed '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig. This commit reverts the change.Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-0@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=yQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
--
Please apply this patch after commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
and before commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc.
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch with insertion of this patch.This should be squashed as part of
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbcQuoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
You need to remember to run savedefconfig when changing
Kconfigor defconfig.I still don't get it. commit 65c4ac0 introduced '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' and was applied before your commit bd328eb to clean up the defconfig. I suspect there was something wrong with 'savedefconfig'?No, savedefconfig is doing exactly what it should. Before your patch,
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOTwas the default, explicitly in theKconfig. Therefore savedefconfig sees it as redundant to specify that in the defconfig as well, so it removed it. When you change that explicit default to something else, it is up to you to change the defconfigs of the old and new default boards.Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Your other option is to stop defining a default in the
Kconfigand instead mark the choice as "optional" (like I did for many other selections like this that had no default explicitly -Kconfigotherwise treats the first entry as default in that case) in which case all defconfigs must have a specified vendor.OK I've squashed that in and pushed to u-boot-x86/testing. If it looks OK I'll pull it into master.
I just found u-boot.rom created from u-boot-x86/testing branch does not have working network any more on QEMU. It is working on the u-boot-x86/master branch.
=> set serverip 10.10.0.100;set ipaddr 10.10.0.108;set netmask 255.255.255.0;set gatewayip 10.10.0.100
=> run ramboot
*** ERROR: `serverip' not set
*** ERROR: `serverip' not set
Quoted 4 lines
But 'print' says the env indeed has the 'serverip'. I think there should be something in the upstream that caused this after the u-boot-x86/testing branch rebase. Do you know where might be the problem?
I'll hold off pushing to master for now.
Regards,
Simon
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
Hi Simon,
Quoted 90 lines · Simon Glass
Hi Bin,
Quoted 87 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon, Hi Joe,
Quoted 64 lines · Simon Glass
Hi,
Quoted 61 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 42 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Joe,
Quoted 38 lines · Joe Hershberger
Hi Bin,
Quoted 23 lines · Bin Meng
Hi Simon,
Quoted 20 lines · Bin Meng
Commit bd328eb "Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig" accidentally removed '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' from configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig. This commit reverts the change.Signed-off-by Bin Meng <[email protected]>---
configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)configs/coreboot-x86_defconfig +1
-0@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_TARGET_COREBOOT=y CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y CONFIG_DM_PCI=yQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
--
Please apply this patch after commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=3506805839e14a67b0971b02c7784e37b85d5fbf
and before commit
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbc.
I've verified the build with buildman on a new 'testing' branch with insertion of this patch.This should be squashed as part of
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-x86.git;a=commit;h=05cab1d6da2a84911fa0ec0ffa8fa038adef4dbcQuoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
You need to remember to run savedefconfig when changing
Kconfigor defconfig.I still don't get it. commit 65c4ac0 introduced '
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOT=y' and was applied before your commit bd328eb to clean up the defconfig. I suspect there was something wrong with 'savedefconfig'?No, savedefconfig is doing exactly what it should. Before your patch,
CONFIG_VENDOR_COREBOOTwas the default, explicitly in theKconfig. Therefore savedefconfig sees it as redundant to specify that in the defconfig as well, so it removed it. When you change that explicit default to something else, it is up to you to change the defconfigs of the old and new default boards.Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Your other option is to stop defining a default in the
Kconfigand instead mark the choice as "optional" (like I did for many other selections like this that had no default explicitly -Kconfigotherwise treats the first entry as default in that case) in which case all defconfigs must have a specified vendor.OK I've squashed that in and pushed to u-boot-x86/testing. If it looks OK I'll pull it into master.
I just found u-boot.rom created from u-boot-x86/testing branch does not have working network any more on QEMU. It is working on the u-boot-x86/master branch.
=> set serverip 10.10.0.100;set ipaddr 10.10.0.108;set netmask 255.255.255.0;set gatewayip 10.10.0.100
=> run ramboot
*** ERROR: `serverip' not set
*** ERROR: `serverip' not set
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
But 'print' says the env indeed has the 'serverip'. I think there should be something in the upstream that caused this after the u-boot-x86/testing branch rebase. Do you know where might be the problem?
I'll hold off pushing to master for now.
You may need to wait for Joe to submit a patch to fix this networking issue. Please see
http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/PATCH-imx-missing-CONFIG-NET-after-consolidation-patches-td215762.html
for the discussion.
Regards,
Bin
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
PATCH 1/1 x86: Fix regression build issue of coreboot-x86_defconfig
Hi Andy,
Quoted 20 lines · Andy Pont
Hi Bin,
Quoted 10 lines
I just found u-boot.rom created from u-boot-x86/testing branch does not have working network any more on QEMU. It is working on the u-boot-x86/master branch.
=> set serverip 10.10.0.100;set ipaddr 10.10.0.108;set netmask 255.255.255.0;set gatewayip 10.10.0.100
=> run ramboot
*** ERROR: `serverip' not set
*** ERROR: `serverip' not setQuoted 4 lines
But 'print' says the env indeed has the 'serverip'. I think there should be something in the upstream that caused this after the u-boot-x86/testing branch rebase. Do you know where might be the problem?
This looks very similar to an issue that got patched on the i.MX6 yesterday by Stefano which said:
Quoted 7 lines
commit
fd3056337e6fcc140f400e11edd33f6f1cb37de1
"Use env callbacks for net variables" has a side effect on i.MX6 boards because they do not setCONFIG_NET: the ip address results not set, but it is stored in the environment."Might be something to check...
Thanks for the hint! Indeed there are something wrong in the upstream which broke the networking on several x86 boards.
Regards,
Bin