Support ROHM BD96801 scalable PMIC
Subsystems (6)
Matti Vaittinen
maintainercover Support ROHM BD96801 scalable PMIC
Support ROHM BD96801 "scalable" PMIC.
The ROHM BD96801 is automotive grade PMIC, intended to be usable in multiple solutions. The BD96801 can be used as a stand-alone, or together with separate 'companion PMICs'. This modular approach aims to make this PMIC suitable for various use-cases.
This RFC series is a product of a _long_ process. The product has been re-designed a few times and this series has been sitting in my git forgotten for long periods of time, then been re-worked when new design has been available, after which it has again been forgotten. Last week I finally received the word that this product should've been stabilized, digged up my last set of patches (from Nov 2021 - cover letter reminding me the driver development had been done during 3 years...)
I think this is valid information for reviewers as it's good to keep an eye on obsoleted practices - even though I tried updating this series.
This is sent as an RFC because of the regulator features which can be configured only when the PMIC is in STBY state. This is described more detailed in the regulator patch.
Another "oddity" is that the PMIC has two physical IRQ lines. When I last wrote this patch in 2021 I had some naming collison in debugfs for the IRQ domains. Back then I used:irq_domain_update_bus_token(intb_domain, DOMAIN_BUS_WIRED); to work-around the issue. Now, when rebasing to v6.9-rc1 the naming collision was gone and things seemed to work. However, it'd be great if the IRQ code in MFD driver was reviewed by greater minds :)
Rest of the series ought to be business as usual.
Matti Vaittinen (6):
dt-bindings: ROHM BD96801 PMIC regulators
dt-bindings: mfd: bd96801 PMIC core
mfd: support ROHM BD96801 PMIC core
regulator: bd96801: ROHM BD96801 PMIC regulators
watchdog: ROHM BD96801 PMIC WDG driver
MAINTAINERS: Add ROHM BD96801 'scalable PMIC' entries
.../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd96801-pmic.yaml | 155 ++ .../regulator/rohm,bd96801-regulator.yaml | 69 + MAINTAINERS | 4 + drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c | 454 ++++ drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 12 + drivers/regulator/Makefile | 2 + drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c | 2109 +++++++++++++++++ drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 1 + drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c | 375 +++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h | 212 ++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 1 + 14 files changed, 3421 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd96801-pmic.yaml create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/rohm,bd96801-regulator.yaml create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c create mode 100644 drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c create mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h
base-commit: 4cece764965020c22cff7665b18a012006359095
Signature · 14 lines
2.43.2 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerRFC PATCH 1/6 dt-bindings: ROHM BD96801 PMIC regulators
ROHM BD96801 is a highly configurable automotive grade PMIC. Introduce DT bindings for the BD96801 regulators.
--- .../regulator/rohm,bd96801-regulator.yaml | 69 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/rohm,bd96801-regulator.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/rohm,bd96801-regulator.yaml new file +69 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/regulator/rohm,bd96801-regulator.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: ROHM BD96801 Power Management Integrated Circuit regulators + +maintainers: + - Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]> + +description: | + This module is part of the ROHM BD96801 MFD device. For more details + see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd96801-pmic.yaml. + + The regulator controller is represented as a sub-node of the PMIC node + on the device tree. + + Regulator nodes should be named to BUCK_<number> and LDO_<number>. + The valid names for BD96801 regulator nodes are + BUCK1, BUCK2, BUCK3, BUCK4, LDO5, LDO6, LDO7 + +patternProperties: + "^LDO[5-7]$": + type: object + description: + Properties for single LDO regulator. + $ref: regulator.yaml# + + properties: + regulator-name: + pattern: "^ldo[5-7]$" + description: + Name of the regulator. Should be "ldo5", ..., "ldo7" + rohm,initial-voltage-microvolt: + description: + Initial voltage for regulator. Voltage can be tuned +/-150 mV from + this value. NOTE, This can be modified via I2C only when PMIC is in + STBY state. + minimum: 300000 + maximum: 3300000 + + "^BUCK[1-4]$": + type: object + description: + Properties for single BUCK regulator. + $ref: regulator.yaml# + + properties: + regulator-name: + pattern: "^buck[1-4]$" + description: + should be "buck1", ..., "buck4" + rohm,initial-voltage-microvolt: + description: + Initial voltage for regulator. Voltage can be tuned +/-150 mV from + this value. NOTE, This can be modified via I2C only when PMIC is in + STBY state. + minimum: 500000 + maximum: 3300000 + rohm,keep-on-stby: + description: + Keep the regulator powered when PMIC transitions to STBY state. + type: boolean + + required: + - regulator-name + additionalProperties: false +additionalProperties: false
Signature · 14 lines
2.43.2 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerRFC PATCH 2/6 dt-bindings: mfd: bd96801 PMIC core
In reply to Matti VaittinenROHM BD96801 is a highly configurable automotive grade PMIC. Introduce DT bindings for the BD96801 core.
--- .../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd96801-pmic.yaml | 155 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 155 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd96801-pmic.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd96801-pmic.yaml new file +155 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/rohm,bd96801-pmic.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: ROHM BD96801 Scalable Power Management Integrated Circuit + +maintainers: + - Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]> + +description: | + BD96801 is an automotive grade single-chip power management IC. + It integrates 4 buck converters and 3 LDOs with safety features like + over-/under voltage and over current detection and a watchdog. + +properties: + compatible: + const: rohm,bd96801 + + reg: + description: + I2C slave address. + maxItems: 1 + + interrupts: + description: + The PMIC provides intb and errb IRQ lines. The errb IRQ line is used + for fatal IRQs which will cause the PMIC to shut down power outputs. + In many systems this will shut down the SoC contolling the PMIC and + connecting/handling the errb can be omitted. However, there are cases + where the SoC is not powered by the PMIC. In that case it may be + useful to connect the errb and handle errb events. + minItems: 1 + maxItems: 2 + + interrupt-names: + minItems: 1 + items: + - enum: [intb, errb] + - const: errb + + regulators: + $ref: ../regulator/rohm,bd96801-regulator.yaml + description: + List of child nodes that specify the regulators. + +required: + - compatible + - reg + - interrupts + - interrupt-names + - regulators + +additionalProperties: false + +examples: + - | + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> + #include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h> + i2c { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + pmic: pmic@60 { + reg = <0x60>; + compatible = "rohm,bd96801"; + interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>; + interrupts = <29 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>, <6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + interrupt-names = "intb", "errb"; + + regulators { + buck1: BUCK1 { + regulator-name = "buck1"; + regulator-ramp-delay = <1250>; + /* 0.5V min INITIAL - 150 mV tune */ + regulator-min-microvolt = <350000>; + /* 3.3V + 150mV tune */ + regulator-max-microvolt = <3450000>; + + /* These can be set only when PMIC is in STBY */ + rohm,initial-voltage-microvolt = <500000>; + regulator-ov-error-microvolt = <230000>; + regulator-uv-error-microvolt = <230000>; + regulator-temp-protection-kelvin = <1>; + regulator-temp-warn-kelvin = <0>; + }; + buck2: BUCK2 { + regulator-name = "buck2"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <350000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <3450000>; + + rohm,initial-voltage-microvolt = <3000000>; + regulator-ov-error-microvolt = <18000>; + regulator-uv-error-microvolt = <18000>; + regulator-temp-protection-kelvin = <1>; + regulator-temp-warn-kelvin = <1>; + }; + buck3: BUCK3 { + regulator-name = "buck3"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <350000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <3450000>; + + rohm,initial-voltage-microvolt = <600000>; + regulator-ov-warn-microvolt = <18000>; + regulator-uv-warn-microvolt = <18000>; + regulator-temp-protection-kelvin = <1>; + regulator-temp-error-kelvin = <0>; + }; + buck4: BUCK4 { + regulator-name = "buck4"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <350000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <3450000>; + + rohm,initial-voltage-microvolt = <600000>; + regulator-ov-warn-microvolt = <18000>; + regulator-uv-warn-microvolt = <18000>; + regulator-temp-protection-kelvin = <1>; + regulator-temp-error-kelvin = <0>; + }; + ldo5: LDO5 { + regulator-name = "ldo5"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <300000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>; + + rohm,initial-voltage-microvolt = <500000>; + regulator-ov-error-microvolt = <36000>; + regulator-uv-error-microvolt = <34000>; + regulator-temp-protection-kelvin = <1>; + regulator-temp-warn-kelvin = <0>; + }; + ldo6: LDO6 { + regulator-name = "ldo6"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <300000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>; + + rohm,initial-voltage-microvolt = <300000>; + regulator-ov-error-microvolt = <36000>; + regulator-uv-error-microvolt = <34000>; + regulator-temp-protection-kelvin = <1>; + regulator-temp-warn-kelvin = <0>; + }; + ldo7: LDO7 { + regulator-name = "ldo7"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <300000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>; + + rohm,initial-voltage-microvolt = <500000>; + regulator-ov-error-microvolt = <36000>; + regulator-uv-error-microvolt = <34000>; + regulator-temp-protection-kelvin = <1>; + regulator-temp-warn-kelvin = <0>; + }; + }; + }; + };
Signature · 14 lines
2.43.2 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerRFC PATCH 3/6 mfd: support ROHM BD96801 PMIC core
In reply to Matti VaittinenThe ROHM BD96801 PMIC is highly customizable automotive grade PMIC which integrates regulator and watchdog funtionalities.
Provide IRQ and register accesses for regulator/watchdog drivers.
--- drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c | 454 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h | 212 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 681 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +13 -0
@@ -2089,6 +2089,19 @@ config MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF BD9573MUF Power Management ICs. BD9576 and BD9573 are primarily designed to be used to power R-Car series processors. +config MFD_ROHM_BD96801 + tristate "ROHM BD96801 Power Management IC" + depends on I2C=y + depends on OF + select REGMAP_I2C + select REGMAP_IRQ + select MFD_CORE + help + Select this option to get support for the ROHM BD96801 Power + Management IC. The ROHM BD96801 is a highly scalable power management + IC for industrial and automotive use. The BD96801 can be used as a + master PMIC in a chained PMIC solutions with suitable companion PMICs. + config MFD_STM32_LPTIMER tristate "Support for STM32 Low-Power Timer" depends on (ARCH_STM32 && OF) || COMPILE_TEST
drivers/mfd/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RAVE_SP_CORE) += rave-sp.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD71828) += rohm-bd71828.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD718XX) += rohm-bd718x7.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF) += rohm-bd9576.o +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD96801) += rohm-bd96801.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_STMFX) += stmfx.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_KHADAS_MCU) += khadas-mcu.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ACER_A500_EC) += acer-ec-a500.o
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +454 -0
454 lines not on this page · raw message
include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h new file +212 -0
212 lines not on this page · raw message
include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h +1 -0
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ enum rohm_chip_type {ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71828 ,ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71837 ,ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71847 , +ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD96801 , ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_AMOUNT };
Signature · 14 lines
2.43.2 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
Lee Jones
maintainerRe: [RFC PATCH 3/6] mfd: support ROHM BD96801 PMIC core
Quoted 24 lines · Matti Vaittinen
The ROHM BD96801 PMIC is highly customizable automotive grade PMIC which integrates regulator and watchdog funtionalities.
Provide IRQ and register accesses for regulator/watchdog drivers.
Signed-off-by Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>--- drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c | 454 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h | 212 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 681 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.hdrivers/mfd/Kconfig +0
-0@@ -2089,6 +2089,19 @@ config MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF BD9573MUF Power Management ICs. BD9576 and BD9573 are primarily designed to be used to power R-Car series processors.
drivers/mfd/Kconfig config MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF · line 2101
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +10
-0+config MFD_ROHM_BD96801 + tristate "ROHM BD96801 Power Management IC" + depends on I2C=y + depends on OF + select REGMAP_I2C + select REGMAP_IRQ + select MFD_CORE + help + Select this option to get support for the ROHM BD96801 Power + Management IC. The ROHM BD96801 is a highly scalable power management
Power Management
drivers/mfd/Kconfig config MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF · line 2103
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +2
-0+ IC for industrial and automotive use. The BD96801 can be used as a + master PMIC in a chained PMIC solutions with suitable companion PMICs.
solution
Quoted 22 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +1
-0+ config MFD_STM32_LPTIMER tristate "Support for STM32 Low-Power Timer" depends on (ARCH_STM32 && OF) || COMPILE_TESTdrivers/mfd/Makefile +1
-0@@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RAVE_SP_CORE) += rave-sp.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD71828) += rohm-bd71828.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD718XX) += rohm-bd718x7.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF) += rohm-bd9576.o +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD96801) += rohm-bd96801.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_STMFX) += stmfx.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_KHADAS_MCU) += khadas-mcu.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ACER_A500_EC) += acer-ec-a500.odrivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +0
-0
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c line 3
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +3
-0@@ -0,0 +1,454 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +// +// Copyright (C) 2022 ROHM Semiconductors
No updates for 2 years?
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c line 5
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +2
-0+// +// ROHM BD96801 PMIC driver
Only the SPDX should have C++ style comments.
Quoted 317 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +317
-0+#include <linux/i2c.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/mfd/core.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/property.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/types.h> + +#include <linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h> +#include <linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h> + +static const struct resource regulator_errb_irqs[] = { +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_OTP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-otp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_DBIST_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-dbist-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_EEP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-eep-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_ABIST_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-abist-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_PRSTB_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-prstb-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_DRMOS1_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-drmoserr1" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_DRMOS2_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-drmoserr2" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_SLAVE_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-slave-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_VREF_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-vref-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_TSD_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-tsd" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_UVLO_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-uvlo-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_OVLO_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ovlo-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_OSC_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-osc-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_PON_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-pon-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_POFF_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-poff-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_CMD_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-cmd-shdn-err" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_INT_PRSTB_WDT_ERR ,"bd96801-prstb-wdt-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_INT_CHIP_IF_ERR ,"bd96801-chip-if-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_INT_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-int-shdn-err" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK1_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck1-pvin-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK1_OVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck1-ovp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK1_UVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck1-uvp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK1_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck1-shdn-err" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK2_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck2-pvin-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK2_OVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck2-ovp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK2_UVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck2-uvp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK2_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck2-shdn-err" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK3_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck3-pvin-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK3_OVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck3-ovp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK3_UVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck3-uvp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK3_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck3-shdn-err" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK4_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck4-pvin-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK4_OVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck4-ovp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK4_UVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck4-uvp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK4_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-buck4-shdn-err" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO5_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo5-pvin-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO5_OVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo5-ovp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO5_UVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo5-uvp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO5_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo5-shdn-err" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO6_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo6-pvin-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO6_OVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo6-ovp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO6_UVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo6-uvp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO6_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo6-shdn-err" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO7_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo7-pvin-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO7_OVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo7-ovp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO7_UVP_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo7-uvp-err" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO7_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo7-shdn-err" ), +}; + +static const struct resource regulator_intb_irqs[] = { +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_TW_STAT ,"bd96801-core-thermal" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK1_OCPH_STAT ,"bd96801-buck1-overcurr-h" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK1_OCPL_STAT ,"bd96801-buck1-overcurr-l" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK1_OCPN_STAT ,"bd96801-buck1-overcurr-n" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK1_OVD_STAT ,"bd96801-buck1-overvolt" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK1_UVD_STAT ,"bd96801-buck1-undervolt" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK1_TW_CH_STAT ,"bd96801-buck1-thermal" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK2_OCPH_STAT ,"bd96801-buck2-overcurr-h" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK2_OCPL_STAT ,"bd96801-buck2-overcurr-l" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK2_OCPN_STAT ,"bd96801-buck2-overcurr-n" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK2_OVD_STAT ,"bd96801-buck2-overvolt" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK2_UVD_STAT ,"bd96801-buck2-undervolt" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK2_TW_CH_STAT ,"bd96801-buck2-thermal" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK3_OCPH_STAT ,"bd96801-buck3-overcurr-h" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK3_OCPL_STAT ,"bd96801-buck3-overcurr-l" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK3_OCPN_STAT ,"bd96801-buck3-overcurr-n" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK3_OVD_STAT ,"bd96801-buck3-overvolt" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK3_UVD_STAT ,"bd96801-buck3-undervolt" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK3_TW_CH_STAT ,"bd96801-buck3-thermal" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK4_OCPH_STAT ,"bd96801-buck4-overcurr-h" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK4_OCPL_STAT ,"bd96801-buck4-overcurr-l" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK4_OCPN_STAT ,"bd96801-buck4-overcurr-n" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK4_OVD_STAT ,"bd96801-buck4-overvolt" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK4_UVD_STAT ,"bd96801-buck4-undervolt" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_BUCK4_TW_CH_STAT ,"bd96801-buck4-thermal" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO5_OCPH_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo5-overcurr" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO5_OVD_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo5-overvolt" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO5_UVD_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo5-undervolt" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO6_OCPH_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo6-overcurr" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO6_OVD_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo6-overvolt" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO6_UVD_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo6-undervolt" ), + +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO7_OCPH_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo7-overcurr" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO7_OVD_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo7-overvolt" ), +DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED (BD96801_LDO7_UVD_STAT ,"bd96801-ldo7-undervolt" ), +}; + +enum { +WDG_CELL =0 , +REGULATOR_CELL , +}; + +static struct mfd_cell bd96801_mfd_cells[] = { + [WDG_CELL ] = { .name ="bd96801-wdt" , }, + [REGULATOR_CELL ] = { .name ="bd96801-pmic" , }, +}; + +static const struct regmap_range bd96801_volatile_ranges[] = { +/* Status regs */ +regmap_reg_range (BD96801_REG_WD_FEED ,BD96801_REG_WD_FAILCOUNT ), +regmap_reg_range (BD96801_REG_WD_ASK ,BD96801_REG_WD_ASK ), +regmap_reg_range (BD96801_REG_WD_STATUS ,BD96801_REG_WD_STATUS ), +regmap_reg_range (BD96801_REG_PMIC_STATE ,BD96801_REG_INT_LDO7_INTB ), +/* Registers which do not update value unless PMIC is in STBY */ +regmap_reg_range (BD96801_REG_SSCG_CTRL ,BD96801_REG_SHD_INTB ), +regmap_reg_range (BD96801_REG_BUCK_OVP ,BD96801_REG_BOOT_OVERTIME ), +/* +* LDO control registers have single bit (LDO MODE) which does not +* change when we write it unless PMIC is in STBY. It's safer to not +* cache it. +*/ +regmap_reg_range (BD96801_LDO5_VOL_LVL_REG ,BD96801_LDO7_VOL_LVL_REG ), +}; + +static const struct regmap_access_table volatile_regs = { + .yes_ranges = bd96801_volatile_ranges, + .n_yes_ranges =ARRAY_SIZE (bd96801_volatile_ranges), +}; + +/* +* For ERRB we need main register bit mapping as bit(0) indicates active IRQ +* in one of the first 3 sub IRQ registers, For INTB we can use default 1 to 1 +* mapping. +*/ +static unsigned int bit0_offsets[] = {0 ,1 ,2 };/* System stat, 3 registers */ +static unsigned int bit1_offsets[] = {3 };/* Buck 1 stat */ +static unsigned int bit2_offsets[] = {4 };/* Buck 2 stat */ +static unsigned int bit3_offsets[] = {5 };/* Buck 3 stat */ +static unsigned int bit4_offsets[] = {6 };/* Buck 4 stat */ +static unsigned int bit5_offsets[] = {7 };/* LDO 5 stat */ +static unsigned int bit6_offsets[] = {8 };/* LDO 6 stat */ +static unsigned int bit7_offsets[] = {9 };/* LDO 7 stat */ + +static struct regmap_irq_sub_irq_map errb_sub_irq_offsets[] = { +REGMAP_IRQ_MAIN_REG_OFFSET (bit0_offsets), +REGMAP_IRQ_MAIN_REG_OFFSET (bit1_offsets), +REGMAP_IRQ_MAIN_REG_OFFSET (bit2_offsets), +REGMAP_IRQ_MAIN_REG_OFFSET (bit3_offsets), +REGMAP_IRQ_MAIN_REG_OFFSET (bit4_offsets), +REGMAP_IRQ_MAIN_REG_OFFSET (bit5_offsets), +REGMAP_IRQ_MAIN_REG_OFFSET (bit6_offsets), +REGMAP_IRQ_MAIN_REG_OFFSET (bit7_offsets), +}; + +static const struct regmap_irq bd96801_errb_irqs[] = { +/* Reg 0x52 Fatal ERRB1 */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_OTP_ERR_STAT ,0 ,BD96801_OTP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_DBIST_ERR_STAT ,0 ,BD96801_DBIST_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_EEP_ERR_STAT ,0 ,BD96801_EEP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_ABIST_ERR_STAT ,0 ,BD96801_ABIST_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_PRSTB_ERR_STAT ,0 ,BD96801_PRSTB_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_DRMOS1_ERR_STAT ,0 ,BD96801_DRMOS1_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_DRMOS2_ERR_STAT ,0 ,BD96801_DRMOS2_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_SLAVE_ERR_STAT ,0 ,BD96801_SLAVE_ERR_MASK ), +/* 0x53 Fatal ERRB2 */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_VREF_ERR_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_VREF_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_TSD_ERR_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_TSD_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_UVLO_ERR_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_UVLO_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_OVLO_ERR_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_OVLO_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_OSC_ERR_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_OSC_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_PON_ERR_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_PON_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_POFF_ERR_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_POFF_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_CMD_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_CMD_SHDN_ERR_MASK ), +/* 0x54 Fatal INTB shadowed to ERRB */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_INT_PRSTB_WDT_ERR ,2 ,BD96801_INT_PRSTB_WDT_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_INT_CHIP_IF_ERR ,2 ,BD96801_INT_CHIP_IF_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_INT_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,2 ,BD96801_INT_SHDN_ERR_MASK ), +/* Reg 0x55 BUCK1 ERR IRQs */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK1_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,3 ,BD96801_OUT_PVIN_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK1_OVP_ERR_STAT ,3 ,BD96801_OUT_OVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK1_UVP_ERR_STAT ,3 ,BD96801_OUT_UVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK1_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,3 ,BD96801_OUT_SHDN_ERR_MASK ), +/* Reg 0x56 BUCK2 ERR IRQs */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK2_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,4 ,BD96801_OUT_PVIN_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK2_OVP_ERR_STAT ,4 ,BD96801_OUT_OVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK2_UVP_ERR_STAT ,4 ,BD96801_OUT_UVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK2_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,4 ,BD96801_OUT_SHDN_ERR_MASK ), +/* Reg 0x57 BUCK3 ERR IRQs */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK3_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,5 ,BD96801_OUT_PVIN_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK3_OVP_ERR_STAT ,5 ,BD96801_OUT_OVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK3_UVP_ERR_STAT ,5 ,BD96801_OUT_UVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK3_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,5 ,BD96801_OUT_SHDN_ERR_MASK ), +/* Reg 0x58 BUCK4 ERR IRQs */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK4_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,6 ,BD96801_OUT_PVIN_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK4_OVP_ERR_STAT ,6 ,BD96801_OUT_OVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK4_UVP_ERR_STAT ,6 ,BD96801_OUT_UVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK4_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,6 ,BD96801_OUT_SHDN_ERR_MASK ), +/* Reg 0x59 LDO5 ERR IRQs */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO5_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,7 ,BD96801_OUT_PVIN_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO5_OVP_ERR_STAT ,7 ,BD96801_OUT_OVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO5_UVP_ERR_STAT ,7 ,BD96801_OUT_UVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO5_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,7 ,BD96801_OUT_SHDN_ERR_MASK ), +/* Reg 0x5a LDO6 ERR IRQs */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO6_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,8 ,BD96801_OUT_PVIN_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO6_OVP_ERR_STAT ,8 ,BD96801_OUT_OVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO6_UVP_ERR_STAT ,8 ,BD96801_OUT_UVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO6_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,8 ,BD96801_OUT_SHDN_ERR_MASK ), +/* Reg 0x5b LDO7 ERR IRQs */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO7_PVIN_ERR_STAT ,9 ,BD96801_OUT_PVIN_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO7_OVP_ERR_STAT ,9 ,BD96801_OUT_OVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO7_UVP_ERR_STAT ,9 ,BD96801_OUT_UVP_ERR_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO7_SHDN_ERR_STAT ,9 ,BD96801_OUT_SHDN_ERR_MASK ), +}; + +static const struct regmap_irq bd96801_intb_irqs[] = { +/* STATUS SYSTEM INTB */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_TW_STAT ,0 ,BD96801_TW_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_WDT_ERR_STAT ,0 ,BD96801_WDT_ERR_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_I2C_ERR_STAT ,0 ,BD96801_I2C_ERR_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_CHIP_IF_ERR_STAT ,0 ,BD96801_CHIP_IF_ERR_STAT_MASK ), +/* STATUS BUCK1 INTB */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK1_OCPH_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_BUCK_OCPH_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK1_OCPL_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_BUCK_OCPL_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK1_OCPN_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_BUCK_OCPN_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK1_OVD_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_BUCK_OVD_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK1_UVD_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_BUCK_UVD_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK1_TW_CH_STAT ,1 ,BD96801_BUCK_TW_CH_STAT_MASK ), +/* BUCK 2 INTB */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK2_OCPH_STAT ,2 ,BD96801_BUCK_OCPH_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK2_OCPL_STAT ,2 ,BD96801_BUCK_OCPL_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK2_OCPN_STAT ,2 ,BD96801_BUCK_OCPN_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK2_OVD_STAT ,2 ,BD96801_BUCK_OVD_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK2_UVD_STAT ,2 ,BD96801_BUCK_UVD_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK2_TW_CH_STAT ,2 ,BD96801_BUCK_TW_CH_STAT_MASK ), +/* BUCK 3 INTB */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK3_OCPH_STAT ,3 ,BD96801_BUCK_OCPH_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK3_OCPL_STAT ,3 ,BD96801_BUCK_OCPL_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK3_OCPN_STAT ,3 ,BD96801_BUCK_OCPN_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK3_OVD_STAT ,3 ,BD96801_BUCK_OVD_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK3_UVD_STAT ,3 ,BD96801_BUCK_UVD_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK3_TW_CH_STAT ,3 ,BD96801_BUCK_TW_CH_STAT_MASK ), +/* BUCK 4 INTB */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK4_OCPH_STAT ,4 ,BD96801_BUCK_OCPH_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK4_OCPL_STAT ,4 ,BD96801_BUCK_OCPL_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK4_OCPN_STAT ,4 ,BD96801_BUCK_OCPN_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK4_OVD_STAT ,4 ,BD96801_BUCK_OVD_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK4_UVD_STAT ,4 ,BD96801_BUCK_UVD_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_BUCK4_TW_CH_STAT ,4 ,BD96801_BUCK_TW_CH_STAT_MASK ), +/* LDO5 INTB */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO5_OCPH_STAT ,5 ,BD96801_LDO_OCPH_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO5_OVD_STAT ,5 ,BD96801_LDO_OVD_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO5_UVD_STAT ,5 ,BD96801_LDO_UVD_STAT_MASK ), +/* LDO6 INTB */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO6_OCPH_STAT ,6 ,BD96801_LDO_OCPH_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO6_OVD_STAT ,6 ,BD96801_LDO_OVD_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO6_UVD_STAT ,6 ,BD96801_LDO_UVD_STAT_MASK ), +/* LDO7 INTB */ +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO7_OCPH_STAT ,7 ,BD96801_LDO_OCPH_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO7_OVD_STAT ,7 ,BD96801_LDO_OVD_STAT_MASK ), +REGMAP_IRQ_REG (BD96801_LDO7_UVD_STAT ,7 ,BD96801_LDO_UVD_STAT_MASK ), +}; + +static struct regmap_irq_chip bd96801_irq_chip_errb = { + .name ="bd96801-irq-errb" , + .main_status =BD96801_REG_INT_MAIN , + .num_main_regs =1 , + .irqs = &bd96801_errb_irqs[0 ], + .num_irqs =ARRAY_SIZE (bd96801_errb_irqs), + .status_base =BD96801_REG_INT_SYS_ERRB1 , + .mask_base =BD96801_REG_MASK_SYS_ERRB , + .ack_base =BD96801_REG_INT_SYS_ERRB1 , + .init_ack_masked = true, + .num_regs =10 , + .irq_reg_stride =1 , + .sub_reg_offsets = &errb_sub_irq_offsets[0 ], +}; + +static struct regmap_irq_chip bd96801_irq_chip_intb = { + .name ="bd96801-irq-intb" , + .main_status =BD96801_REG_INT_MAIN , + .num_main_regs =1 , + .irqs = &bd96801_intb_irqs[0 ], + .num_irqs =ARRAY_SIZE (bd96801_intb_irqs), + .status_base =BD96801_REG_INT_SYS_INTB , + .mask_base =BD96801_REG_MASK_SYS_INTB , + .ack_base =BD96801_REG_INT_SYS_INTB , + .init_ack_masked = true, + .num_regs =8 , + .irq_reg_stride =1 , +}; + +static const struct regmap_config bd96801_regmap_config = { + .reg_bits =8 , + .val_bits =8 , + .volatile_table = &volatile_regs, + .cache_type =REGCACHE_RBTREE , +}; + +static int bd96801_i2c_probe (struct i2c_client *i2c) +{ +int i, ret, intb_irq, errb_irq, num_regu_irqs, num_intb, num_errb =0 ;
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c line 333
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +10
-0+struct regmap_irq_chip_data *intb_irq_data, *errb_irq_data; +struct irq_domain *intb_domain, *errb_domain; +const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; +struct resource *regulator_res; +struct regmap *regmap; + + fwnode =dev_fwnode (&i2c->dev); +if (!fwnode) { +dev_err (&i2c->dev,"no fwnode\n" ); +return -EINVAL ;
Why not dev_err_probe() here for uniformity?
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c line 339
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +6
-0+ } + + intb_irq =fwnode_irq_get_byname (fwnode,"intb" ); +if (intb_irq <0 ) +return dev_err_probe (&i2c->dev, intb_irq, +"No INTB IRQ configured\n" );
This function would look nicer if you expanded to 100-chars.
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +13
-0+ num_intb =ARRAY_SIZE (regulator_intb_irqs); + +/* ERRB may be omitted if processor is powered by the PMIC */ + errb_irq =fwnode_irq_get_byname (fwnode,"errb" ); +if (errb_irq <0 ) + errb_irq =0 ; + +if (errb_irq) + num_errb =ARRAY_SIZE (regulator_errb_irqs); + + num_regu_irqs = num_intb + num_errb; + + regulator_res = kcalloc(num_regu_irqs, sizeof(*regulator_res),
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c line 363
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +10
-0+ GFP_KERNEL); +if (!regulator_res) +return -ENOMEM ; + + regmap =devm_regmap_init_i2c (i2c, &bd96801_regmap_config); +if (IS_ERR (regmap)) { + ret =dev_err_probe (&i2c->dev,PTR_ERR (regmap), +"regmap initialization failed\n" ); + goto free_out; + }
No need to clump these together - '\n' here please.
Quoted 37 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +37
-0+ ret =devm_regmap_add_irq_chip (&i2c->dev, regmap, intb_irq, +IRQF_ONESHOT ,0 , &bd96801_irq_chip_intb, + &intb_irq_data); +if (ret) { +dev_err_probe (&i2c->dev, ret,"Failed to add INTB irq_chip\n" ); + goto free_out; + } + +/* +* MFD core code is built to handle only one IRQ domain. BD96801 +* has two domains so we do IRQ mapping here and provide the +* already mapped IRQ numbers to sub-devices. +*/ + intb_domain =regmap_irq_get_domain (intb_irq_data); + +for (i =0 ; i < num_intb; i++) { +struct resource *res = ®ulator_res[i]; + + *res = regulator_intb_irqs[i]; + res->start = res->end =irq_create_mapping (intb_domain, + res->start); + } + +if (num_errb) { + ret =devm_regmap_add_irq_chip (&i2c->dev, regmap, errb_irq, +IRQF_ONESHOT ,0 , + &bd96801_irq_chip_errb, + &errb_irq_data); +if (ret) { +dev_err_probe (&i2c->dev, ret, +"Failed to add ERRB (%d) irq_chip\n" , + errb_irq); + goto free_out; + } + errb_domain =regmap_irq_get_domain (errb_irq_data); + +for (i =0 ; i < num_errb; i++) {
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c line 410
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +10
-0+struct resource *res = ®ulator_res[num_intb + i]; + + *res = regulator_errb_irqs[i]; + res->start = res->end =irq_create_mapping (errb_domain, + res->start); + } + } + + bd96801_mfd_cells[REGULATOR_CELL ].resources = regulator_res; + bd96801_mfd_cells[REGULATOR_CELL ].num_resources = num_regu_irqs;
'\n' here.
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +6
-0+ ret =devm_mfd_add_devices (&i2c->dev,PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO , + bd96801_mfd_cells, +ARRAY_SIZE (bd96801_mfd_cells),NULL ,0 ,NULL ); +if (ret) +dev_err_probe (&i2c->dev, ret,"Failed to create subdevices\n" ); +
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c line 426
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +10
-0+free_out: +kfree (regulator_res); + +return ret; +} + +static const struct of_device_id bd96801_of_match[] = { + { + .compatible ="rohm,bd96801" , + },
Should be on a single line.
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +6
-0+ { } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, bd96801_of_match); + +static struct i2c_driver bd96801_i2c_driver = { + .driver = {
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c line 442
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +10
-0+ .name = "rohm-bd96801", + .of_match_table = bd96801_of_match, + }, + .probe = bd96801_i2c_probe, +}; + +static int __init bd96801_i2c_init (void ) +{ +return i2c_add_driver (&bd96801_i2c_driver); +}
'\n'
Quoted 18 lines
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c new file +12
-0+/* Initialise early so consumer devices can complete system boot */ +subsys_initcall (bd96801_i2c_init); + +static void __exit bd96801_i2c_exit(void) +{ +i2c_del_driver (&bd96801_i2c_driver); +} +module_exit (bd96801_i2c_exit); + +MODULE_AUTHOR ("Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("ROHM BD96801 Power Management IC driver" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" );include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h new file +0
-0
include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h line 5
Quoted 5 lines
include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h new file +5
-0@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ +/* Copyright (C) 2020 ROHM Semiconductors */ + +#ifndef __LINUX_MFD_BD96801_H__ +#define __LINUX_MFD_BD96801_H__
Drop the LINUX_ part.
Quoted 233 lines
include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h new file +206
-0+#define BD96801_REG_SSCG_CTRL 0x09 +#define BD96801_REG_SHD_INTB 0x20 +#define BD96801_LDO5_VOL_LVL_REG 0x2c +#define BD96801_LDO6_VOL_LVL_REG 0x2d +#define BD96801_LDO7_VOL_LVL_REG 0x2e +#define BD96801_REG_BUCK_OVP 0x30 +#define BD96801_REG_BUCK_OVD 0x35 +#define BD96801_REG_LDO_OVP 0x31 +#define BD96801_REG_LDO_OVD 0x36 +#define BD96801_REG_BOOT_OVERTIME 0x3a +#define BD96801_REG_WD_TMO 0x40 +#define BD96801_REG_WD_CONF 0x41 +#define BD96801_REG_WD_FEED 0x42 +#define BD96801_REG_WD_FAILCOUNT 0x43 +#define BD96801_REG_WD_ASK 0x46 +#define BD96801_REG_WD_STATUS 0x4a +#define BD96801_REG_PMIC_STATE 0x4f +#define BD96801_REG_EXT_STATE 0x50 + +#define BD96801_STATE_STBY 0x09 + +/* IRQ register area */ +#define BD96801_REG_INT_MAIN 0x51 + +/* +* The BD96801 has two physical IRQ lines, INTB and ERRB. +* For now we just handle the INTB. +* +* The 'main status register' is located at 0x51. +* The ERRB status registers are located at 0x52 ... 0x5B +* INTB status registers are at range 0x5c ... 0x63 +*/ +#define BD96801_REG_INT_SYS_ERRB1 0x52 +#define BD96801_REG_INT_SYS_INTB 0x5c +#define BD96801_REG_INT_LDO7_INTB 0x63 + +/* MASK registers */ +#define BD96801_REG_MASK_SYS_INTB 0x73 +#define BD96801_REG_MASK_SYS_ERRB 0x69 + +#define BD96801_MAX_REGISTER 0x7a + +#define BD96801_OTP_ERR_MASK BIT(0) +#define BD96801_DBIST_ERR_MASK BIT(1) +#define BD96801_EEP_ERR_MASK BIT(2) +#define BD96801_ABIST_ERR_MASK BIT(3) +#define BD96801_PRSTB_ERR_MASK BIT(4) +#define BD96801_DRMOS1_ERR_MASK BIT(5) +#define BD96801_DRMOS2_ERR_MASK BIT(6) +#define BD96801_SLAVE_ERR_MASK BIT(7) +#define BD96801_VREF_ERR_MASK BIT(0) +#define BD96801_TSD_ERR_MASK BIT(1) +#define BD96801_UVLO_ERR_MASK BIT(2) +#define BD96801_OVLO_ERR_MASK BIT(3) +#define BD96801_OSC_ERR_MASK BIT(4) +#define BD96801_PON_ERR_MASK BIT(5) +#define BD96801_POFF_ERR_MASK BIT(6) +#define BD96801_CMD_SHDN_ERR_MASK BIT(7) +#define BD96801_INT_PRSTB_WDT_ERR_MASK BIT(0) +#define BD96801_INT_CHIP_IF_ERR_MASK BIT(3) +#define BD96801_INT_SHDN_ERR_MASK BIT(7) +#define BD96801_OUT_PVIN_ERR_MASK BIT(0) +#define BD96801_OUT_OVP_ERR_MASK BIT(1) +#define BD96801_OUT_UVP_ERR_MASK BIT(2) +#define BD96801_OUT_SHDN_ERR_MASK BIT(7) + +/* ERRB IRQs */ +enum { +/* Reg 0x52, 0x53, 0x54 - ERRB system IRQs */ +BD96801_OTP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_DBIST_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_EEP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_ABIST_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_PRSTB_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_DRMOS1_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_DRMOS2_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_SLAVE_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_VREF_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_TSD_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_UVLO_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_OVLO_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_OSC_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_PON_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_POFF_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_CMD_SHDN_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_INT_PRSTB_WDT_ERR , +BD96801_INT_CHIP_IF_ERR , +BD96801_INT_SHDN_ERR_STAT , + +/* Reg 0x55 BUCK1 ERR IRQs */ +BD96801_BUCK1_PVIN_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK1_OVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK1_UVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK1_SHDN_ERR_STAT , + +/* Reg 0x56 BUCK2 ERR IRQs */ +BD96801_BUCK2_PVIN_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK2_OVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK2_UVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK2_SHDN_ERR_STAT , + +/* Reg 0x57 BUCK3 ERR IRQs */ +BD96801_BUCK3_PVIN_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK3_OVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK3_UVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK3_SHDN_ERR_STAT , + +/* Reg 0x58 BUCK4 ERR IRQs */ +BD96801_BUCK4_PVIN_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK4_OVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK4_UVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK4_SHDN_ERR_STAT , + +/* Reg 0x59 LDO5 ERR IRQs */ +BD96801_LDO5_PVIN_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_LDO5_OVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_LDO5_UVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_LDO5_SHDN_ERR_STAT , + +/* Reg 0x5a LDO6 ERR IRQs */ +BD96801_LDO6_PVIN_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_LDO6_OVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_LDO6_UVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_LDO6_SHDN_ERR_STAT , + +/* Reg 0x5b LDO7 ERR IRQs */ +BD96801_LDO7_PVIN_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_LDO7_OVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_LDO7_UVP_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_LDO7_SHDN_ERR_STAT , +}; + +/* INTB IRQs */ +enum { +/* Reg 0x5c (System INTB) */ +BD96801_TW_STAT , +BD96801_WDT_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_I2C_ERR_STAT , +BD96801_CHIP_IF_ERR_STAT , + +/* Reg 0x5d (BUCK1 INTB) */ +BD96801_BUCK1_OCPH_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK1_OCPL_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK1_OCPN_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK1_OVD_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK1_UVD_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK1_TW_CH_STAT , + +/* Reg 0x5e (BUCK2 INTB) */ +BD96801_BUCK2_OCPH_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK2_OCPL_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK2_OCPN_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK2_OVD_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK2_UVD_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK2_TW_CH_STAT , + +/* Reg 0x5f (BUCK3 INTB)*/ +BD96801_BUCK3_OCPH_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK3_OCPL_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK3_OCPN_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK3_OVD_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK3_UVD_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK3_TW_CH_STAT , + +/* Reg 0x60 (BUCK4 INTB)*/ +BD96801_BUCK4_OCPH_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK4_OCPL_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK4_OCPN_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK4_OVD_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK4_UVD_STAT , +BD96801_BUCK4_TW_CH_STAT , + +/* Reg 0x61 (LDO5 INTB) */ +BD96801_LDO5_OCPH_STAT ,//bit [0] +BD96801_LDO5_OVD_STAT ,//bit [3] +BD96801_LDO5_UVD_STAT ,//bit [4] + +/* Reg 0x62 (LDO6 INTB) */ +BD96801_LDO6_OCPH_STAT ,//bit [0] +BD96801_LDO6_OVD_STAT ,//bit [3] +BD96801_LDO6_UVD_STAT ,//bit [4] + +/* Reg 0x63 (LDO7 INTB) */ +BD96801_LDO7_OCPH_STAT ,//bit [0] +BD96801_LDO7_OVD_STAT ,//bit [3] +BD96801_LDO7_UVD_STAT ,//bit [4] +}; + +/* IRQ MASKs */ +#define BD96801_TW_STAT_MASK BIT(0) +#define BD96801_WDT_ERR_STAT_MASK BIT(1) +#define BD96801_I2C_ERR_STAT_MASK BIT(2) +#define BD96801_CHIP_IF_ERR_STAT_MASK BIT(3) + +#define BD96801_BUCK_OCPH_STAT_MASK BIT(0) +#define BD96801_BUCK_OCPL_STAT_MASK BIT(1) +#define BD96801_BUCK_OCPN_STAT_MASK BIT(2) +#define BD96801_BUCK_OVD_STAT_MASK BIT(3) +#define BD96801_BUCK_UVD_STAT_MASK BIT(4) +#define BD96801_BUCK_TW_CH_STAT_MASK BIT(5) + +#define BD96801_LDO_OCPH_STAT_MASK BIT(0) +#define BD96801_LDO_OVD_STAT_MASK BIT(3) +#define BD96801_LDO_UVD_STAT_MASK BIT(4) + +#endif include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h +1
-0@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ enum rohm_chip_type {ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71828 ,ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71837 ,ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71847 , +ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD96801 , ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_AMOUNT };Signature · 14 lines
2.43.2 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
Signature · 1 line
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerRe: [RFC PATCH 3/6] mfd: support ROHM BD96801 PMIC core
Hi deee Ho Lee!
Thanks a ton for taking a look at this :) I already sent the V2 yesterday, briefly before receiving your comments. I think all of the comments are relevant for the V2 as well, I will fix them for the V3 when I get to that. If you find the time to take a look at V2, then the major things are addition of a watchdog IRQ + a work-around for the debugFS name collision for IRQ domains.
Quoted 26 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 24 lines · Matti Vaittinen
The ROHM BD96801 PMIC is highly customizable automotive grade PMIC which integrates regulator and watchdog funtionalities.
Provide IRQ and register accesses for regulator/watchdog drivers.
Signed-off-by Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>--- drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c | 454 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h | 212 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 681 insertions(+)create mode 100644
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.ccreate mode 100644include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.hdrivers/mfd/Kconfig +0
-0@@ -2089,6 +2089,19 @@ config MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF BD9573MUF Power Management ICs. BD9576 and BD9573 are primarily designed to be used to power R-Car series processors.
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig config MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF · line 2101
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +10
-0+config MFD_ROHM_BD96801 + tristate "ROHM BD96801 Power Management IC" + depends on I2C=y + depends on OF + select REGMAP_I2C + select REGMAP_IRQ + select MFD_CORE + help + Select this option to get support for the ROHM BD96801 Power + Management IC. The ROHM BD96801 is a highly scalable power managementPower Management
Out of the curiosity, why is the "Power Management IC" written with capitals, when speaking of a class of devices instead of a model? (I am 100% fine with the change, just curious).
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +2
-0+ IC for industrial and automotive use. The BD96801 can be used as a + master PMIC in a chained PMIC solutions with suitable companion PMICs
...
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +3
-0+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +// +// Copyright (C) 2022 ROHM SemiconductorsNo updates for 2 years?
The year should be updated - thanks. But, now that you asked... Almost no updates. The patches have rotten in my outbox, waiting for the permisson to be sent out... But yeah, I've sure added some changes before sending the series - I'll update the copyright :)
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +8
-0+ +static int bd96801_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c) +{ + int i, ret, intb_irq, errb_irq, num_regu_irqs, num_intb, num_errb = 0; + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *intb_irq_data, *errb_irq_data; + struct irq_domain *intb_domain, *errb_domain; + const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; + struct resource *regulator_res;
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +6
-0+ struct regmap *regmap; + + fwnode = dev_fwnode(&i2c->dev); + if (!fwnode) { + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "no fwnode\n"); + return -EINVAL;Why not
dev_err_probe()here for uniformity?
I can change it to dev_err_probe() if it's strongly preferred. It just feels silly to use dev_err_probe() when the return value is hardcoded. Intentionally writing code like
err = -EINVAL;
if (err == ...)
just makes me feel a bit sick.
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +6
-0+ } + + intb_irq = fwnode_irq_get_byname(fwnode, "intb"); + if (intb_irq < 0) + return dev_err_probe(&i2c->dev, intb_irq, + "No INTB IRQ configured\n");This function would look nicer if you expanded to 100-chars.
The reason why I still prefer the good old 80-chars for files I work with, is that I am often having 3 terminal windows parallel on my laptop screen. (Or, when I have my wide mofnitor connected it is 3 editor windows + minicom). I need to keep the terminals small enough. Besides... I hate to admit this, but the time is finally taking it's toll. My eyes aren't quite the same they were 2 years ago...
So, same old story, I can change this if it is important enough for others, but personally I rather work with the short lines.
...
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h new file +3
-0@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ +/* Copyright (C) 2020 ROHM Semiconductors */ +
...
Quoted 6 lines
include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h line 33
Quoted 6 lines
include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h new file +6
-0+/* IRQ register area */ +#define BD96801_REG_INT_MAIN 0x51 + +/* +* The BD96801 has two physical IRQ lines, INTB and ERRB. +* For now we just handle the INTB.
Note to self, this comment is no longer true.
Thanks for the review!
Yours,
-- Matti
Signature · 5 lines
Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerRe: [RFC PATCH 3/6] mfd: support ROHM BD96801 PMIC core
Quoted 3 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Hi deee Ho Lee!
Thanks a ton for taking a look at this :) I already sent the V2 yesterday, briefly before receiving your comments.
It's not completely unusual I don't know what I am doing. BUT, it's not that common I don't know what I did... Seems like the V2 is still in my outbox, so I will add the fixes to your comments prior sending it! :)
Sorry for the added confusion!
Yours,
-- Matti
Signature · 5 lines
Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Lee Jones
maintainerRe: [RFC PATCH 3/6] mfd: support ROHM BD96801 PMIC core
In reply to Matti VaittinenQuoted 48 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Hi deee Ho Lee!
Thanks a ton for taking a look at this :) I already sent the V2 yesterday, briefly before receiving your comments. I think all of the comments are relevant for the V2 as well, I will fix them for the V3 when I get to that. If you find the time to take a look at V2, then the major things are addition of a watchdog IRQ + a work-around for the debugFS name collision for IRQ domains.
Quoted 29 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 27 lines · Matti Vaittinen
The ROHM BD96801 PMIC is highly customizable automotive grade PMIC which integrates regulator and watchdog funtionalities.
Provide IRQ and register accesses for regulator/watchdog drivers.
Signed-off-by Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>--- drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c | 454 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h | 212 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 681 insertions(+)create mode 100644
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.ccreate mode 100644include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.hdrivers/mfd/Kconfig +4
-0@@ -2089,6 +2089,19 @@ config MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF BD9573MUF Power Management ICs. BD9576 and BD9573 are primarily designed to be used to power R-Car series processors. +config MFD_ROHM_BD96801 + tristate "ROHM BD96801 Power Management IC" + depends on I2C=y + depends on OFQuoted 8 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig config MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF · line 2101
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +6
-0+ select REGMAP_I2C + select REGMAP_IRQ + select MFD_CORE + help + Select this option to get support for the ROHM BD96801 Power + Management IC. The ROHM BD96801 is a highly scalable power managementPower Management
Quoted 3 lines
Out of the curiosity, why is the "Power Management IC" written with capitals, when speaking of a class of devices instead of a model? (I am 100% fine with the change, just curious).
It's no different to how its expressed in the tristate section above.
Power Management IC or PMIC.
"provides power management capabilities" describes its function?
"is a scalable Power Management IC", describes the device?
But actually, it just looks odd when both are used in the same section.
/me likes uniformity and consistency.
Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +2
-0+ IC for industrial and automotive use. The BD96801 can be used as a + master PMIC in a chained PMIC solutions with suitable companion PMICs...
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +3
-0+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +// +// Copyright (C) 2022 ROHM SemiconductorsNo updates for 2 years?
The year should be updated - thanks. But, now that you asked... Almost no updates. The patches have rotten in my outbox, waiting for the permisson to be sent out... But yeah, I've sure added some changes before sending the series - I'll update the copyright :)
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +8
-0+ +static int bd96801_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c) +{ + int i, ret, intb_irq, errb_irq, num_regu_irqs, num_intb, num_errb = 0; + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *intb_irq_data, *errb_irq_data; + struct irq_domain *intb_domain, *errb_domain; + const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; + struct resource *regulator_res;Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +6
-0+ struct regmap *regmap; + + fwnode = dev_fwnode(&i2c->dev); + if (!fwnode) { + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "no fwnode\n"); + return -EINVAL;Why not
dev_err_probe()here for uniformity?
Quoted 2 lines
I can change it to
dev_err_probe()if it's strongly preferred. It just feels silly to usedev_err_probe()when the return value is hardcoded.
Not at all:
git grep dev_err_probe | grep "\-[A-Z]"
Quoted 6 lines
Intentionally writing code like
err =
-EINVAL;
if (err == ...)just makes me feel a bit sick.
Why would you want to do that?
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +6
-0+ } + + intb_irq = fwnode_irq_get_byname(fwnode, "intb"); + if (intb_irq < 0) + return dev_err_probe(&i2c->dev, intb_irq, + "No INTB IRQ configured\n");This function would look nicer if you expanded to 100-chars.
Quoted 6 lines
The reason why I still prefer the good old 80-chars for files I work with, is that I am often having 3 terminal windows parallel on my laptop screen. (Or, when I have my wide mofnitor connected it is 3 editor windows + minicom). I need to keep the terminals small enough. Besides... I hate to admit this, but the time is finally taking it's toll. My eyes aren't quite the same they were 2 years ago...
Upgrade your 14" CRT monitor to something more modern. :)
I have a 32" 4k monitor with a good sized font and each of my 3 terminals (per i3 workspace) are ~150 chars wide.
Quoted 2 lines
So, same old story, I can change this if it is important enough for others, but personally I rather work with the short lines.
It's not a showstopper.
Signature · 1 line
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerRe: [RFC PATCH 3/6] mfd: support ROHM BD96801 PMIC core
Quoted 58 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 48 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Hi deee Ho Lee!
Thanks a ton for taking a look at this :) I already sent the V2 yesterday, briefly before receiving your comments. I think all of the comments are relevant for the V2 as well, I will fix them for the V3 when I get to that. If you find the time to take a look at V2, then the major things are addition of a watchdog IRQ + a work-around for the debugFS name collision for IRQ domains.
Quoted 29 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 27 lines · Matti Vaittinen
The ROHM BD96801 PMIC is highly customizable automotive grade PMIC which integrates regulator and watchdog funtionalities.
Provide IRQ and register accesses for regulator/watchdog drivers.
Signed-off-by Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>--- drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c | 454 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h | 212 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 681 insertions(+)create mode 100644
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.ccreate mode 100644include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.hdrivers/mfd/Kconfig +4
-0@@ -2089,6 +2089,19 @@ config MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF BD9573MUF Power Management ICs. BD9576 and BD9573 are primarily designed to be used to power R-Car series processors. +config MFD_ROHM_BD96801 + tristate "ROHM BD96801 Power Management IC" + depends on I2C=y + depends on OFQuoted 8 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig config MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF · line 2101
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +6
-0+ select REGMAP_I2C + select REGMAP_IRQ + select MFD_CORE + help + Select this option to get support for the ROHM BD96801 Power + Management IC. The ROHM BD96801 is a highly scalable power managementPower Management
Quoted 3 lines
Out of the curiosity, why is the "Power Management IC" written with capitals, when speaking of a class of devices instead of a model? (I am 100% fine with the change, just curious).
It's no different to how its expressed in the tristate section above.
Power Management IC or PMIC.
Quoted 7 lines
"provides power management capabilities" describes its function?
"is a scalable Power Management IC", describes the device?
But actually, it just looks odd when both are used in the same section.
/me likes uniformity and consistency.
It's okay, thanks for the explanation :)
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +2
-0+ IC for industrial and automotive use. The BD96801 can be used as a + master PMIC in a chained PMIC solutions with suitable companion PMICs...
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +13
-0+static int bd96801_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c) +{ + int i, ret, intb_irq, errb_irq, num_regu_irqs, num_intb, num_errb = 0; + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *intb_irq_data, *errb_irq_data; + struct irq_domain *intb_domain, *errb_domain; + const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; + struct resource *regulator_res; + struct regmap *regmap; + + fwnode = dev_fwnode(&i2c->dev); + if (!fwnode) { + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "no fwnode\n"); + return -EINVAL;Why not
dev_err_probe()here for uniformity?
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I can change it to
dev_err_probe()if it's strongly preferred. It just feels silly to usedev_err_probe()when the return value is hardcoded.Not at all:
git grep
dev_err_probe| grep "\-[A-Z]"
Yes, I know people do use the dev_err_probe() with hardcoded errors but it does not make me feel any better about it :)
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Intentionally writing code like
err =
-EINVAL;
if (err == ...)just makes me feel a bit sick.
Why would you want to do that?
This is what the dev_err_probe() with a hardcoded err does, right?
int dev_err_probe(const struct device *dev, int err, const char *fmt, ...)
{
...
if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER) {
dev_err(dev, "error %pe: %pV", ERR_PTR(err), &vaf);
} else {
device_set_deferred_probe_reason(dev, &vaf);
dev_dbg(dev, "error %pe: %pV", ERR_PTR(err), &vaf);
}
...
}Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +6
-0+ } + + intb_irq = fwnode_irq_get_byname(fwnode, "intb"); + if (intb_irq < 0) + return dev_err_probe(&i2c->dev, intb_irq, + "No INTB IRQ configured\n");This function would look nicer if you expanded to 100-chars.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
The reason why I still prefer the good old 80-chars for files I work with, is that I am often having 3 terminal windows parallel on my laptop screen. (Or, when I have my wide mofnitor connected it is 3 editor windows + minicom). I need to keep the terminals small enough. Besides... I hate to admit this, but the time is finally taking it's toll. My eyes aren't quite the same they were 2 years ago...
Upgrade your 14" CRT monitor to something more modern. :)
But those things were built to last! And throwing away perfectly working stuff... :)
Quoted 8 lines
I have a 32" 4k monitor with a good sized font and each of my 3 terminals (per i3 workspace) are ~150 chars wide.
Quoted 2 lines
So, same old story, I can change this if it is important enough for others, but personally I rather work with the short lines.
It's not a showstopper.
I'll revise the line lengths for next version. I think this one still won't go much over 80 chars, which may still fit on my terminals. I'll change it if it fits, keep it if it wont. Thanks for pointing it out :)
Yours,
-- Matti
Signature · 5 lines
Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Lee Jones
maintainerRe: [RFC PATCH 3/6] mfd: support ROHM BD96801 PMIC core
Quoted 92 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Quoted 58 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 48 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Hi deee Ho Lee!
Thanks a ton for taking a look at this :) I already sent the V2 yesterday, briefly before receiving your comments. I think all of the comments are relevant for the V2 as well, I will fix them for the V3 when I get to that. If you find the time to take a look at V2, then the major things are addition of a watchdog IRQ + a work-around for the debugFS name collision for IRQ domains.
Quoted 29 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 27 lines · Matti Vaittinen
The ROHM BD96801 PMIC is highly customizable automotive grade PMIC which integrates regulator and watchdog funtionalities.
Provide IRQ and register accesses for regulator/watchdog drivers.
Signed-off-by Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>--- drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c | 454 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h | 212 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 681 insertions(+)create mode 100644
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.ccreate mode 100644include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.hdrivers/mfd/Kconfig +4
-0@@ -2089,6 +2089,19 @@ config MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF BD9573MUF Power Management ICs. BD9576 and BD9573 are primarily designed to be used to power R-Car series processors. +config MFD_ROHM_BD96801 + tristate "ROHM BD96801 Power Management IC" + depends on I2C=y + depends on OFQuoted 8 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig config MFD_ROHM_BD957XMUF · line 2101
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +6
-0+ select REGMAP_I2C + select REGMAP_IRQ + select MFD_CORE + help + Select this option to get support for the ROHM BD96801 Power + Management IC. The ROHM BD96801 is a highly scalable power managementPower Management
Quoted 3 lines
Out of the curiosity, why is the "Power Management IC" written with capitals, when speaking of a class of devices instead of a model? (I am 100% fine with the change, just curious).
It's no different to how its expressed in the tristate section above.
Power Management IC or PMIC.
Quoted 7 lines
"provides power management capabilities" describes its function?
"is a scalable Power Management IC", describes the device?
But actually, it just looks odd when both are used in the same section.
/me likes uniformity and consistency.
It's okay, thanks for the explanation :)
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +2
-0+ IC for industrial and automotive use. The BD96801 can be used as a + master PMIC in a chained PMIC solutions with suitable companion PMICs...
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +7
-0+static int bd96801_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c) +{ + int i, ret, intb_irq, errb_irq, num_regu_irqs, num_intb, num_errb = 0; + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *intb_irq_data, *errb_irq_data; + struct irq_domain *intb_domain, *errb_domain; + const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; + struct resource *regulator_res;Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +6
-0+ struct regmap *regmap; + + fwnode = dev_fwnode(&i2c->dev); + if (!fwnode) { + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "no fwnode\n"); + return -EINVAL;Why not
dev_err_probe()here for uniformity?I can change it to
dev_err_probe()if it's strongly preferred. It just feels silly to usedev_err_probe()when the return value is hardcoded.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Not at all:
git grep
dev_err_probe| grep "\-[A-Z]"Yes, I know people do use the
dev_err_probe()with hardcoded errors but it does not make me feel any better about it :)
<look into my swirling eyes> Uniformity within the function!
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Intentionally writing code like
err =
-EINVAL;
if (err == ...)just makes me feel a bit sick.
Why would you want to do that?
This is what the
dev_err_probe()with a hardcoded err does, right?int
dev_err_probe(const struct device *dev, int err, const char *fmt, ...)
Quoted 10 lines
{
...
if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER) {
dev_err(dev, "error %pe: %pV", ERR_PTR(err), &vaf);
} else {
device_set_deferred_probe_reason(dev, &vaf);
dev_dbg(dev, "error %pe: %pV", ERR_PTR(err), &vaf);
}
...
}Attempt to purge this info from you brain!
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +6
-0+ } + + intb_irq = fwnode_irq_get_byname(fwnode, "intb"); + if (intb_irq < 0) + return dev_err_probe(&i2c->dev, intb_irq, + "No INTB IRQ configured\n");This function would look nicer if you expanded to 100-chars.
The reason why I still prefer the good old 80-chars for files I work with, is that I am often having 3 terminal windows parallel on my laptop screen. (Or, when I have my wide mofnitor connected it is 3 editor windows + minicom). I need to keep the terminals small enough. Besides... I hate to admit this, but the time is finally taking it's toll. My eyes aren't quite the same they were 2 years ago...
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Upgrade your 14" CRT monitor to something more modern. :)
But those things were built to last! And throwing away perfectly working stuff... :)
Can't argue with that! Maybe put 2 side-by-side or 4 in a matrix!
Signature · 1 line
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerRFC PATCH 4/6 regulator: bd96801: ROHM BD96801 PMIC regulators
In reply to Matti VaittinenThe ROHM BD96801 "Scalable PMIC" is an automotive grade PMIC which can scale to different applications by allowing chaining of PMICs. The PMIC also supports various protection features which can be configured either to fire IRQs - or to shut down power outputs when failure is detected.
The driver supports the basic control of BUCKs and LDOs and configuring Over/Under-voltage, over-current, over-temperature protections via device-tree. Following constrains are worth noting:
The voltages can be enabled/disabled and protections configured only when the PMIC is in STANDBY state.
The protections can't be disabled. UVP limit can't be configured. OVP and OCP limits can be configured.
OVD and UVD for a regulator have common limit.
OCP and thermal protections are implemented by turning all INTB notifications fatal. This means that OVD/UVD can not be used together with OCP and thermal protection.
Thermal limits can't be configured. TSD is fixed to 175 Celsius, and thermal warning is fixed close to 140 Celsius.
LDO's do not have own temperature monitor. The LDO limits use PMIC core temperature.
---
Note. This patch implements controls which can only be done when the BD96801 PMIC is in a 'standby' state. These controls include the protection settings and 'initial' voltage settings.
The PMIC has a STBY pin which is used to control the PMIC power-state.
I don't have visibility to the design process or to most of the customer use cases - so following is speculation:
- Original idea seems to have been that, when the PMIC goes to STBY state, controlling processor will be powered-off. In the original DS1 version all power outputs from the PMIC were turned off when PMIC entered STBY.
- Someone somewhere needed to be able to keep the controlling processor and some peripherials powered on when the PMIC is in STBY. A very potential reason is to be able to do the initial voltage / protection configurations by software. A configuration option to keep desired power outputs enabled when PMIC is in STBY was added.
- Current PMIC state can be read from the PMIC registers.
Obvious(?) dilemma for these 'STBY only' configurations is that it is difficult to design generic way for the PMIC driver to synchronize the configurations with the state changes. Designing it would at least require knowledge on:
- What is the PMIC STBY-state used for? Is it intended to be a power-off (or other low-power) state for the system? Or, is it intended to be used just a state where some of the configurations are done?
- How is the hardware designed to control the STBY pin?
We *could* assume the STBY pin is controlled by a GPIO. We could grab the GPIO here, and export functions to toggle the STBY state. We could then 'lock' the state for the duration of config changes. But problem is, I don't know what is the right thing to do.
So, this version of the patch just checks the PMIC state - and attempts to write the configs if PMIC is in STBY state. This is racy unless the entity controlling the STBY-pin is somehow (external to this driver) synchronized. We could send a notification when configurations are completed to help building such synchronization but this is not done as I don't have a real-world user for it.
I am unsure if these 'STBY-only' controls should be just dropped, or if they should be kept here to serve as an example / basis to build on. If they are removed, it will be very hard for anyone using this PMIC to implement those controls. OTOH, if they are kept here, it may potentially encourage 'works on my machine' designs - although, I believe that those who really need to do 'STBY-only' configs at run-time will find a way to toggle the STBY-pin in a way that is synchronized with the configs here.
--- drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 12 + drivers/regulator/Makefile | 2 + drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c | 2109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 2123 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c
drivers/regulator/Kconfig +12 -0
@@ -268,6 +268,18 @@ config REGULATOR_BD957XMUF This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will be called bd9576-regulator. +config REGULATOR_BD96801 + tristate "ROHM BD96801 Power Regulator" + depends on MFD_ROHM_BD96801 + select REGULATOR_ROHM + help + This driver supports voltage regulators on ROHM BD96801 PMIC. + This will enable support for the software controllable buck + and LDO regulators. + + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module + will be called bd96801-regulator. + config REGULATOR_CPCAP tristate "Motorola CPCAP regulator" depends on MFD_CPCAP
drivers/regulator/Makefile +2 -0
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_BD718XX) += bd718x7-regulator.o obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_BD9571MWV) += bd9571mwv-regulator.o obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_BD957XMUF) += bd9576-regulator.o obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA903X) += da903x-regulator.o +obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_BD96801) += bd96801-regulator.o +obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA903X) += da903x.o obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9052) += da9052-regulator.o obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9055) += da9055-regulator.o obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9062) += da9062-regulator.o
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +2109 -0
2,109 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 14 lines
2.43.2 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] regulator: bd96801: ROHM BD96801 PMIC regulators
Quoted 5 lines · Matti Vaittinen
The ROHM BD96801 "Scalable PMIC" is an automotive grade PMIC which can scale to different applications by allowing chaining of PMICs. The PMIC also supports various protection features which can be configured either to fire IRQs - or to shut down power outputs when failure is detected.
...
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +12
-0+ +static int initialize_pmic_data (struct device *dev, +struct bd96801_pmic_data *pdata) +{ +int r, i; + + *pdata = bd96801_data; + +/* +* Allocate and initialize IRQ data for all of the regulators. We +* wish to modify IRQ information independently for each driver +* instance.
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c line 1807
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +10
-0+*/ +for (r =0 ; r <BD96801_NUM_REGULATORS ; r++) { +const struct bd96801_irqinfo *template; +struct bd96801_irqinfo *new; +int num_infos; + + template = pdata->regulator_data[r].irq_desc.irqinfo; + num_infos = pdata->regulator_data[r].irq_desc.num_irqs; + + new =devm_kzalloc (dev, num_infos *sizeof (*new),GFP_KERNEL );
Aren't you open coding devm_kcalloc?
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +12
-0+if (!new) +return -ENOMEM ; + + pdata->regulator_data[r].irq_desc.irqinfo = new; + +for (i =0 ; i < num_infos; i++) + new[i] = template[i]; + } + +return 0 ; +} +
...
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +7
-0+static int bd96801_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +struct device *parent; +int i, ret, irq; +void *retp; +struct regulator_config config = {}; +struct bd96801_regulator_data *rdesc;
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c line 1924
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +10
-0+struct bd96801_pmic_data *pdata; +struct regulator_dev *ldo_errs_rdev_arr[BD96801_NUM_LDOS ]; +int ldo_errs_arr[BD96801_NUM_LDOS ]; +int temp_notif_ldos =0 ; +struct regulator_dev *all_rdevs[BD96801_NUM_REGULATORS ]; +bool use_errb; + + parent = pdev->dev.parent; + + pdata =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (bd96801_data),GFP_KERNEL );
This and assignment in initialize_pmic_data() could be probably devm_kmemdup() which would be a bit more obvious for the reader.
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +10
-0+if (!pdata) +return -ENOMEM ; + +if (initialize_pmic_data (&pdev->dev, pdata)) +return -ENOMEM ; + + pdata->regmap =dev_get_regmap (parent,NULL ); +if (!pdata->regmap) { +dev_err (&pdev->dev,"No register map found\n" ); +return -ENODEV ;
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c line 1944
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +10
-0+ } + + rdesc = &pdata->regulator_data[0 ]; + + config.driver_data = pdata; + config.regmap = pdata->regmap; + config.dev = parent; + + ret =of_property_match_string (pdev->dev.parent->of_node, +"interrupt-names" ,"errb" );
This does not guarantee that interrupts are properly set up. Don't you have some state shared between parent and this device where you could mark that interrupts are OK?
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +5
-0+if (ret <0 ) + use_errb = false; +else + use_errb = true; +
...
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +11
-0+ +if (use_errb) +return bd96801_global_errb_irqs (pdev, all_rdevs, +ARRAY_SIZE (all_rdevs)); + +return 0 ; +} + +static struct platform_driver bd96801_regulator = { + .driver = { + .name ="bd96801-pmic"
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c line 2109
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +10
-0+ }, + .probe = bd96801_probe, +}; + +module_platform_driver (bd96801_regulator); + +MODULE_AUTHOR ("Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("BD96801 voltage regulator driver" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" ); +MODULE_ALIAS ("platform:bd96801-pmic" );
Just add platform device ID table with MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(). You should not need MODULE_ALIAS() in normal cases. MODULE_ALIAS() is not a substitute for incomplete ID table.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerRe: [RFC PATCH 4/6] regulator: bd96801: ROHM BD96801 PMIC regulators
Hi dee Ho Krzysztof,
Heading to the Seattle? If so - Enjoy! It's a bummer I'm not able to share a beer with you in ELC this time.
Quoted 25 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 5 lines · Matti Vaittinen
The ROHM BD96801 "Scalable PMIC" is an automotive grade PMIC which can scale to different applications by allowing chaining of PMICs. The PMIC also supports various protection features which can be configured either to fire IRQs - or to shut down power outputs when failure is detected.
...
Quoted 16 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +16
-0+ +static int initialize_pmic_data (struct device *dev, +struct bd96801_pmic_data *pdata) +{ +int r, i; + + *pdata = bd96801_data; + +/* +* Allocate and initialize IRQ data for all of the regulators. We +* wish to modify IRQ information independently for each driver +* instance. +*/ +for (r =0 ; r <BD96801_NUM_REGULATORS ; r++) { +const struct bd96801_irqinfo *template; +struct bd96801_irqinfo *new;
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c line 1807
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +6
-0+int num_infos; + + template = pdata->regulator_data[r].irq_desc.irqinfo; + num_infos = pdata->regulator_data[r].irq_desc.num_irqs; + + new =devm_kzalloc (dev, num_infos *sizeof (*new),GFP_KERNEL );Aren't you open coding
devm_kcalloc?
I think yes. Thanks.
Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +12
-0+if (!new) +return -ENOMEM ; + + pdata->regulator_data[r].irq_desc.irqinfo = new; + +for (i =0 ; i < num_infos; i++) + new[i] = template[i]; + } + +return 0 ; +} +...
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +12
-0+static int bd96801_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +struct device *parent; +int i, ret, irq; +void *retp; +struct regulator_config config = {}; +struct bd96801_regulator_data *rdesc; +struct bd96801_pmic_data *pdata; +struct regulator_dev *ldo_errs_rdev_arr[BD96801_NUM_LDOS ]; +int ldo_errs_arr[BD96801_NUM_LDOS ]; +int temp_notif_ldos =0 ; +struct regulator_dev *all_rdevs[BD96801_NUM_REGULATORS ];
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c line 1924
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +5
-0+bool use_errb; + + parent = pdev->dev.parent; + + pdata =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (bd96801_data),GFP_KERNEL );This and assignment in
initialize_pmic_data()could be probablydevm_kmemdup()which would be a bit more obvious for the reader.
I think you're right.
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +13
-0+if (!pdata) +return -ENOMEM ; + +if (initialize_pmic_data (&pdev->dev, pdata)) +return -ENOMEM ; + + pdata->regmap =dev_get_regmap (parent,NULL ); +if (!pdata->regmap) { +dev_err (&pdev->dev,"No register map found\n" ); +return -ENODEV ; + } + + rdesc = &pdata->regulator_data[0 ];
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c line 1944
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +7
-0+ + config.driver_data = pdata; + config.regmap = pdata->regmap; + config.dev = parent; + + ret =of_property_match_string (pdev->dev.parent->of_node, +"interrupt-names" ,"errb" );This does not guarantee that interrupts are properly set up.
Hmm. Yes, you're right. I'm not sure if I did think of this.
Quoted 3 lines
Don't you
have some state shared between parent and this device where you could mark that interrupts are OK?
There is currently no need to share/allocate any private data from the MFD. We get the regmap using dev_get_regmap, and interrupts using the platform_get_irq_byname(). Nothing else is shared between the MFD and sub-devices.
Considering the use of platform_get_irq_byname() - and how failures to get 'errb' IRQs are silently ignored in bd96801_global_errb_irqs() and
in bd96801_rdev_errb_irqs() - this check is just a slight optimization to not even try registering the errb IRQs if they're not found from the device tree. So, I think things do not really go south even if we go to "errb route" when the "errb" IRQs aren't successfully registered.
Whether this warrants a comment, or if this check is just unnecessarily complex can be pondered. Personally I think the purpose is pretty clear and thus the complexity is not added that much - but yes, a comment above call(s) to the platform_get_irq_byname() saying errb IRQs are not guaranteed to be populated might be justified.
Quoted 26 lines
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +5
-0+if (ret <0 ) + use_errb = false; +else + use_errb = true; +...
Quoted 17 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +17
-0+ +if (use_errb) +return bd96801_global_errb_irqs (pdev, all_rdevs, +ARRAY_SIZE (all_rdevs)); + +return 0 ; +} + +static struct platform_driver bd96801_regulator = { + .driver = { + .name ="bd96801-pmic" + }, + .probe = bd96801_probe, +}; + +module_platform_driver (bd96801_regulator); +
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c line 2109
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +4
-0+MODULE_AUTHOR ("Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("BD96801 voltage regulator driver" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" ); +MODULE_ALIAS ("platform:bd96801-pmic" );Just add platform device ID table with
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(). You should not needMODULE_ALIAS()in normal cases.MODULE_ALIAS()is not a substitute for incomplete ID table.
I guess I have something to learn here. Thanks. :)
Take care
-- Matti
Signature · 5 lines
Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] regulator: bd96801: ROHM BD96801 PMIC regulators
Quoted 4 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Hi dee Ho Krzysztof,
Heading to the Seattle? If so - Enjoy! It's a bummer I'm not able to share a beer with you in ELC this time.
Second chance, I hope, will be Vienna in September.
...
Quoted 29 lines
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c line 1944
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c new file +9
-0+ + rdesc = &pdata->regulator_data[0 ]; + + config.driver_data = pdata; + config.regmap = pdata->regmap; + config.dev = parent; + + ret =of_property_match_string (pdev->dev.parent->of_node, +"interrupt-names" ,"errb" );This does not guarantee that interrupts are properly set up.
Hmm. Yes, you're right. I'm not sure if I did think of this.
Quoted 3 lines
Don't you
have some state shared between parent and this device where you could mark that interrupts are OK?There is currently no need to share/allocate any private data from the MFD. We get the regmap using
dev_get_regmap, and interrupts using theplatform_get_irq_byname(). Nothing else is shared between the MFD and sub-devices.Considering the use of
platform_get_irq_byname()- and how failures to get 'errb' IRQs are silently ignored inbd96801_global_errb_irqs()and inbd96801_rdev_errb_irqs()- this check is just a slight optimization to not even try registering the errb IRQs if they're not found from the device tree. So, I think things do not really go south even if we go to "errb route" when the "errb" IRQs aren't successfully registered.
Quoted 6 lines
Whether this warrants a comment, or if this check is just unnecessarily complex can be pondered. Personally I think the purpose is pretty clear and thus the complexity is not added that much - but yes, a comment above call(s) to the
platform_get_irq_byname()saying errb IRQs are not guaranteed to be populated might be justified.
Fine with me.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerRFC PATCH 5/6 watchdog: ROHM BD96801 PMIC WDG driver
In reply to Matti VaittinenIntroduce driver for WDG block on ROHM BD96801 scalable PMIC.
This driver only supports watchdog with I2C feeding and delayed response detection. Whether the watchdog toggles PRSTB pin or just causes an interrupt can be configured via device-tree.
The BD96801 PMIC HW supports also window watchdog (too early feeding detection) and Q&A mode. These are not supported by this driver.
--- drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 13 ++ drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 1 + drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c | 375 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 389 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c
drivers/watchdog/Kconfig +13 -0
@@ -181,6 +181,19 @@ config BD957XMUF_WATCHDOG watchdog. Alternatively say M to compile the driver as a module, which will be called bd9576_wdt. +config BD96801_WATCHDOG + tristate "ROHM BD96801 PMIC Watchdog" + depends on MFD_ROHM_BD96801 + select WATCHDOG_CORE + help + Support for the watchdog in the ROHM BD96801 PMIC. Watchdog can be + configured to only generate IRQ or to trigger system reset via reset + pin. + + Say Y here to include support for the ROHM BD96801 watchdog. + Alternatively say M to compile the driver as a module, + which will be called bd96801_wdt. + config CROS_EC_WATCHDOG tristate "ChromeOS EC-based watchdog" select WATCHDOG_CORE
drivers/watchdog/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_WDT) += xen_wdt.o # Architecture Independent obj-$(CONFIG_BD957XMUF_WATCHDOG) += bd9576_wdt.o +obj-$(CONFIG_BD96801_WATCHDOG) += bd96801_wdt.o obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_WATCHDOG) += cros_ec_wdt.o obj-$(CONFIG_DA9052_WATCHDOG) += da9052_wdt.o obj-$(CONFIG_DA9055_WATCHDOG) += da9055_wdt.o
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +375 -0
375 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 14 lines
2.43.2 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] watchdog: ROHM BD96801 PMIC WDG driver
Quoted 7 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Introduce driver for WDG block on ROHM BD96801 scalable PMIC.
This driver only supports watchdog with I2C feeding and delayed response detection. Whether the watchdog toggles PRSTB pin or just causes an interrupt can be configured via device-tree.
The BD96801 PMIC HW supports also window watchdog (too early
...
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c line 375
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +13
-0+ +static struct platform_driver bd96801_wdt = { + .driver = { + .name ="bd96801-wdt" + }, + .probe = bd96801_wdt_probe, +}; +module_platform_driver (bd96801_wdt); + +MODULE_AUTHOR ("Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("BD96801 watchdog driver" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" ); +MODULE_ALIAS ("platform:bd96801-wdt" );
Same comment on alias. Please use ID table.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Guenter Roeck
maintainerRe: [RFC PATCH 5/6] watchdog: ROHM BD96801 PMIC WDG driver
In reply to Matti VaittinenQuoted 352 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Introduce driver for WDG block on ROHM BD96801 scalable PMIC.
This driver only supports watchdog with I2C feeding and delayed response detection. Whether the watchdog toggles PRSTB pin or just causes an interrupt can be configured via device-tree.
The BD96801 PMIC HW supports also window watchdog (too early feeding detection) and Q&A mode. These are not supported by this driver.
Signed-off-by Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>--- drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 13 ++ drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 1 + drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c | 375 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 389 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.cdrivers/watchdog/Kconfig +13
-0@@ -181,6 +181,19 @@ config BD957XMUF_WATCHDOG watchdog. Alternatively say M to compile the driver as a module, which will be called bd9576_wdt. +config BD96801_WATCHDOG + tristate "ROHM BD96801 PMIC Watchdog" + depends on MFD_ROHM_BD96801 + select WATCHDOG_CORE + help + Support for the watchdog in the ROHM BD96801 PMIC. Watchdog can be + configured to only generate IRQ or to trigger system reset via reset + pin. + + Say Y here to include support for the ROHM BD96801 watchdog. + Alternatively say M to compile the driver as a module, + which will be called bd96801_wdt. + config CROS_EC_WATCHDOG tristate "ChromeOS EC-based watchdog" select WATCHDOG_COREdrivers/watchdog/Makefile +1
-0@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_WDT) += xen_wdt.o # Architecture Independent obj-$(CONFIG_BD957XMUF_WATCHDOG) += bd9576_wdt.o +obj-$(CONFIG_BD96801_WATCHDOG) += bd96801_wdt.o obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_WATCHDOG) += cros_ec_wdt.o obj-$(CONFIG_DA9052_WATCHDOG) += da9052_wdt.o obj-$(CONFIG_DA9055_WATCHDOG) += da9055_wdt.odrivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +292
-0@@ -0,0 +1,375 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* +* Copyright (C) 2022 ROHM Semiconductors +* +* ROHM BD96801 watchdog driver +*/ + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h> +#include <linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/watchdog.h> + +static bool nowayout; +module_param (nowayout, bool,0 ); +MODULE_PARM_DESC (nowayout, +"Watchdog cannot be stopped once started (default=\"false\")" ); + +#define BD96801_WD_TMO_SHORT_MASK 0x70 +#define BD96801_WD_RATIO_MASK 0x3 +#define BD96801_WD_TYPE_MASK 0x4 +#define BD96801_WD_TYPE_SLOW 0x4 +#define BD96801_WD_TYPE_WIN 0x0 + +#define BD96801_WD_EN_MASK 0x3 +#define BD96801_WD_IF_EN 0x1 +#define BD96801_WD_QA_EN 0x2 +#define BD96801_WD_DISABLE 0x0 + +#define BD96801_WD_ASSERT_MASK 0x8 +#define BD96801_WD_ASSERT_RST 0x8 +#define BD96801_WD_ASSERT_IRQ 0x0 + +#define BD96801_WD_FEED_MASK 0x1 +#define BD96801_WD_FEED 0x1 + +/* units in uS */ +#define FASTNG_MIN 3370 +#define BD96801_WDT_DEFAULT_MARGIN 6905120 +/* Unit is seconds */ +#define DEFAULT_TIMEOUT 30 + +/* +* BD96801 WDG supports window mode so the TMO consists of SHORT and LONG +* timeout values. SHORT time is meaningfull only in window mode where feeding +* period shorter than SHORT would be an error. LONG time is used to detect if +* feeding is not occurring within given time limit (SoC SW hangs). The LONG +* timeout time is a multiple of (2, 4, 8 0r 16 times) the SHORT timeout. +*/ + +struct wdtbd96801 { +struct device *dev; +struct regmap *regmap; +bool always_running; +struct watchdog_device wdt; +}; + +static int bd96801_wdt_ping (struct watchdog_device *wdt) +{ +struct wdtbd96801 *w =watchdog_get_drvdata (wdt); + +return regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_FEED , +BD96801_WD_FEED_MASK ,BD96801_WD_FEED ); +} + +static int bd96801_wdt_start (struct watchdog_device *wdt) +{ +struct wdtbd96801 *w =watchdog_get_drvdata (wdt); +int ret; + + ret =regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , +BD96801_WD_EN_MASK ,BD96801_WD_IF_EN ); + +return ret; +} + +static int bd96801_wdt_stop (struct watchdog_device *wdt) +{ +struct wdtbd96801 *w =watchdog_get_drvdata (wdt); + +if (!w->always_running) +return regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , +BD96801_WD_EN_MASK ,BD96801_WD_DISABLE ); +set_bit (WDOG_HW_RUNNING , &wdt->status); + +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct watchdog_info bd96801_wdt_info = { + .options =WDIOF_MAGICCLOSE |WDIOF_KEEPALIVEPING | +WDIOF_SETTIMEOUT , + .identity ="BD96801 Watchdog" , +}; + +static const struct watchdog_ops bd96801_wdt_ops = { + .start = bd96801_wdt_start, + .stop = bd96801_wdt_stop, + .ping = bd96801_wdt_ping, +}; + +static int find_closest_fast (int target,int *sel,int *val) +{ +int i; +int window =FASTNG_MIN ; + +for (i =0 ; i <8 && window < target; i++) + window <<=1 ; + + *val = window; + *sel = i; + +if (i ==8 ) +return -EINVAL ; + +return 0 ; +} + +static int find_closest_slow_by_fast (int fast_val,int *target,int *slowsel) +{ +int sel; +static const int multipliers[] = {2 ,4 ,8 ,16 }; + +for (sel =0 ; sel <ARRAY_SIZE (multipliers) && + multipliers[sel] * fast_val < *target; sel++) + ; + +if (sel ==ARRAY_SIZE (multipliers)) +return -EINVAL ; + + *slowsel = sel; + *target = multipliers[sel] * fast_val; + +return 0 ; +} + +static int find_closest_slow (int *target,int *slow_sel,int *fast_sel) +{ +static const int multipliers[] = {2 ,4 ,8 ,16 }; +int i, j; +int val =0 ; +int window =FASTNG_MIN ; + +for (i =0 ; i <8 ; i++) { +for (j =0 ; j <ARRAY_SIZE (multipliers); j++) { +int slow; + + slow = window * multipliers[j]; +if (slow >= *target && (!val || slow < val)) { + val = slow; + *fast_sel = i; + *slow_sel = j; + } + } + window <<=1 ; + } +if (!val) +return -EINVAL ; + + *target = val; + +return 0 ; +} + +static int bd96801_set_wdt_mode (struct wdtbd96801 *w,int hw_margin, +int hw_margin_min) +{ +int ret, fastng, slowng, type, reg, mask; +struct device *dev = w->dev; + +/* convert to uS */ + hw_margin *=1000 ; + hw_margin_min *=1000 ; +if (hw_margin_min) { +int min; + + type =BD96801_WD_TYPE_WIN ; +dev_dbg (dev,"Setting type WINDOW 0x%x\n" , type); + ret =find_closest_fast (hw_margin_min, &fastng, &min); +if (ret) { +dev_err (dev,"bad WDT window for fast timeout\n" ); +return ret; + } + + ret =find_closest_slow_by_fast (min, &hw_margin, &slowng); +if (ret) { +dev_err (dev,"bad WDT window\n" ); +return ret; + } + w->wdt.min_hw_heartbeat_ms = min /1000 ; + }else { + type =BD96801_WD_TYPE_SLOW ; +dev_dbg (dev,"Setting type SLOW 0x%x\n" , type); + ret =find_closest_slow (&hw_margin, &slowng, &fastng); +if (ret) { +dev_err (dev,"bad WDT window\n" ); +return ret; + } + } + + w->wdt.max_hw_heartbeat_ms = hw_margin /1000 ; + + fastng <<=ffs (BD96801_WD_TMO_SHORT_MASK ) -1 ; + + reg = slowng | fastng; + mask =BD96801_WD_RATIO_MASK |BD96801_WD_TMO_SHORT_MASK ; + ret =regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_TMO , + mask, reg); +if (ret) +return ret; + + ret =regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , +BD96801_WD_TYPE_MASK , type); + +return ret; +} + +static int bd96801_set_heartbeat_from_hw (struct wdtbd96801 *w, +unsigned int conf_reg) +{ +int ret; +unsigned int val, sel, fast; + +/* +* The BD96801 supports a somewhat peculiar QA-mode, which we do not +* support in this driver. If the QA-mode is enabled then we just +* warn and bail-out. +*/ +if ((conf_reg &BD96801_WD_EN_MASK ) !=BD96801_WD_IF_EN ) { +dev_warn (w->dev,"watchdog set to Q&A mode - exiting\n" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + + ret =regmap_read (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_TMO , &val); +if (ret) +return ret; + + sel = val &BD96801_WD_TMO_SHORT_MASK ; + sel >>=ffs (BD96801_WD_TMO_SHORT_MASK ) -1 ; + fast =FASTNG_MIN << sel; + + sel = (val &BD96801_WD_RATIO_MASK ) +1 ; + w->wdt.max_hw_heartbeat_ms = (fast << sel) /USEC_PER_MSEC ; + +if ((conf_reg &BD96801_WD_TYPE_MASK ) ==BD96801_WD_TYPE_WIN ) + w->wdt.min_hw_heartbeat_ms = fast /USEC_PER_MSEC ; + +return 0 ; +} + +static int init_wdg_hw (struct wdtbd96801 *w) +{ +u32 hw_margin[2 ]; +int count, ret; +u32 hw_margin_max =BD96801_WDT_DEFAULT_MARGIN , hw_margin_min =0 ; + + count =device_property_count_u32 (w->dev->parent,"rohm,hw-timeout-ms" ); +if (count <0 && count != -EINVAL ) +return count; + +if (count >0 ) { +if (count >ARRAY_SIZE (hw_margin)) +return -EINVAL ; + + ret =device_property_read_u32_array (w->dev->parent, +"rohm,hw-timeout-ms" , + &hw_margin[0 ], count); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + +if (count ==1 ) + hw_margin_max = hw_margin[0 ]; + +if (count ==2 ) { + hw_margin_max = hw_margin[1 ]; + hw_margin_min = hw_margin[0 ]; + } + } + + ret =bd96801_set_wdt_mode (w, hw_margin_max, hw_margin_min); +if (ret) +return ret; + + ret =device_property_match_string (w->dev->parent,"rohm,wdg-action" , +"prstb" ); +if (ret >=0 ) { + ret =regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_MASK , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_RST ); +return ret;
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c line 302
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +10
-0+ } + + ret =device_property_match_string (w->dev->parent,"rohm,wdg-action" , +"intb-only" ); +if (ret >=0 ) { + ret =regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_MASK , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_IRQ ); +return ret; + }
I don't see the devicetree bindings documented in the series.
I am also a bit surprised that the interrupt isn't handled in the driver. Please explain.
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +5
-0+ +return 0 ; +} + +static int bd96801_wdt_probe (struct platform_device *pdev)
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c line 317
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +10
-0+{ +struct wdtbd96801 *w; +int ret; +unsigned int val; + + w =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*w),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!w) +return -ENOMEM ; + + w->regmap =dev_get_regmap (pdev->dev.parent,NULL );
dev_get_regmap() can return NULL.
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c line 328
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +11
-0+ w->dev = &pdev->dev; + + w->wdt.info = &bd96801_wdt_info; + w->wdt.ops = &bd96801_wdt_ops; + w->wdt.parent = pdev->dev.parent; + w->wdt.timeout =DEFAULT_TIMEOUT ; +watchdog_set_drvdata (&w->wdt, w); + + w->always_running =device_property_read_bool (pdev->dev.parent, +"always-running" ); +
Without documentation, it looks like the always-running (from linux,wdt-gpio.yaml) may be abused. Its defined meaning is "the watchdog is always running and can not be stopped". Its use here seems to be "start watchdog when loading the module and prevent it from being stopped".
Oh well, looks like the abuse was introduced with bd9576_wdt. That doesn't make it better. At the very least it needs to be documented that the property does not have the intended (documented) meaning.
Quoted 21 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +21
-0+ ret =regmap_read (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , &val); +if (ret) +return dev_err_probe (&pdev->dev, ret, +"Failed to get the watchdog state\n" ); + +/* +* If the WDG is already enabled we assume it is configured by boot. +* In this case we just update the hw-timeout based on values set to +* the timeout / mode registers and leave the hardware configs +* untouched. +*/ +if ((val &BD96801_WD_EN_MASK ) !=BD96801_WD_DISABLE ) { +dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"watchdog was running during probe\n" ); + ret =bd96801_set_heartbeat_from_hw (w, val); +if (ret) +return ret; + +set_bit (WDOG_HW_RUNNING , &w->wdt.status); + }else { +/* If WDG is not running so we will initializate it */ + ret =init_wdg_hw (w);
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c line 359
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +10
-0+if (ret) +return ret; + } + +watchdog_init_timeout (&w->wdt,0 , pdev->dev.parent); +watchdog_set_nowayout (&w->wdt, nowayout); +watchdog_stop_on_reboot (&w->wdt); + +if (w->always_running) +bd96801_wdt_start (&w->wdt);
I think this needs to set WDOG_HW_RUNNING or the watchdog will trigger a reboot if the watchdog device is not opened and the watchdog wasn't already running when the module was loaded.
That makes me wonder what happens if the property is set and the watchdog daemon isn't started in the bd9576_wdt driver.
Quoted 31 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +16
-0+ +return devm_watchdog_register_device (&pdev->dev, &w->wdt); +} + +static struct platform_driver bd96801_wdt = { + .driver = { + .name ="bd96801-wdt" + }, + .probe = bd96801_wdt_probe, +}; +module_platform_driver (bd96801_wdt); + +MODULE_AUTHOR ("Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("BD96801 watchdog driver" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" ); +MODULE_ALIAS ("platform:bd96801-wdt" );Signature · 14 lines
2.43.2 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerRe: [RFC PATCH 5/6] watchdog: ROHM BD96801 PMIC WDG driver
Hi Guenter,
First of all, thanks for the review. It was quick! Especially when we speak of a RFC series. Very much appreciated.
Quoted 44 lines · Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:11:41PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote >> +static int
init_wdg_hw(struct wdtbd96801 *w)Quoted 43 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +43
-0+{ +u32 hw_margin[2 ]; +int count, ret; +u32 hw_margin_max =BD96801_WDT_DEFAULT_MARGIN , hw_margin_min =0 ; + + count =device_property_count_u32 (w->dev->parent,"rohm,hw-timeout-ms" ); +if (count <0 && count != -EINVAL ) +return count; + +if (count >0 ) { +if (count >ARRAY_SIZE (hw_margin)) +return -EINVAL ; + + ret =device_property_read_u32_array (w->dev->parent, +"rohm,hw-timeout-ms" , + &hw_margin[0 ], count); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + +if (count ==1 ) + hw_margin_max = hw_margin[0 ]; + +if (count ==2 ) { + hw_margin_max = hw_margin[1 ]; + hw_margin_min = hw_margin[0 ]; + } + } + + ret =bd96801_set_wdt_mode (w, hw_margin_max, hw_margin_min); +if (ret) +return ret; + + ret =device_property_match_string (w->dev->parent,"rohm,wdg-action" , +"prstb" ); +if (ret >=0 ) { + ret =regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_MASK , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_RST ); +return ret; + } + + ret =device_property_match_string (w->dev->parent,"rohm,wdg-action" , +"intb-only" );
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c line 302
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +6
-0+if (ret >=0 ) { + ret =regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_MASK , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_IRQ ); +return ret; + }I don't see the devicetree bindings documented in the series.
Seems like I have missed this WDG binding. But after reading your comment below, I am wondering if I should just drop the binding and default to "prstb" (shutdown should the feeding be skipped) - and leave the "intb-only" case for one who actually needs such.
Quoted 2 lines
I am also a bit surprised that the interrupt isn't handled in the driver. Please explain.
Basically, I just had no idea what the IRQ should do in the generic case. If we get an interrupt, it means the WDG feeding has failed. My thinking is that, what should happen is forced reset. I don't see how that can be done in reliably manner from an IRQ handler.
When the "prstb WDG action" is set (please, see the above DT binding handling), the PMIC shall shut down power outputs. This should get the watchdog's job done.
With the "intb-only"-option, PMIC will not turn off the power. I'd expect there to be some external HW connection which handles the reset by HW.
After all this being said, I wonder if I should just unconditionally configure the PMIC to always turn off the power (prstb option) should the feeding fail? Or do someone have some suggestion what the IRQ handler should do (except maybe print an error msg)?
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +5
-0+ +return 0 ; +} + +static int bd96801_wdt_probe (struct platform_device *pdev)drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c line 317
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +10
-0+{ +struct wdtbd96801 *w; +int ret; +unsigned int val; + + w =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*w),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!w) +return -ENOMEM ; + + w->regmap =dev_get_regmap (pdev->dev.parent,NULL );
dev_get_regmap()can return NULL.
Quoted 16 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c line 328
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +11
-0+ w->dev = &pdev->dev; + + w->wdt.info = &bd96801_wdt_info; + w->wdt.ops = &bd96801_wdt_ops; + w->wdt.parent = pdev->dev.parent; + w->wdt.timeout =DEFAULT_TIMEOUT ; +watchdog_set_drvdata (&w->wdt, w); + + w->always_running =device_property_read_bool (pdev->dev.parent, +"always-running" ); +Without documentation, it looks like the always-running (from linux,wdt-gpio.yaml) may be abused. Its defined meaning is "the watchdog is always running and can not be stopped". Its use here seems to be "start watchdog when loading the module and prevent it from being stopped".
Yes. You're right.
Quoted 3 lines
Oh well, looks like the abuse was introduced with
bd9576_wdt. That doesn't make it better. At the very least it needs to be documented that the property does not have the intended (documented) meaning.
I can raise my hand for a sign of an error here. I've been misreading the intended meaning of the always-running. Not sure if I've picked it from another driver (maybe GPIO watchdog), or if I've just misinterpreted the binding docs.
Do you suggest me to add a note in the BD9576 binding doc (there is no BD9576 specific binding doc for watchdog. I wonder whether this warrants adding one under watchdog or if the note can be added under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd9576...).
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 27 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +27
-0+ ret =regmap_read (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , &val); +if (ret) +return dev_err_probe (&pdev->dev, ret, +"Failed to get the watchdog state\n" ); + +/* +* If the WDG is already enabled we assume it is configured by boot. +* In this case we just update the hw-timeout based on values set to +* the timeout / mode registers and leave the hardware configs +* untouched. +*/ +if ((val &BD96801_WD_EN_MASK ) !=BD96801_WD_DISABLE ) { +dev_dbg (&pdev->dev,"watchdog was running during probe\n" ); + ret =bd96801_set_heartbeat_from_hw (w, val); +if (ret) +return ret; + +set_bit (WDOG_HW_RUNNING , &w->wdt.status); + }else { +/* If WDG is not running so we will initializate it */ + ret =init_wdg_hw (w); +if (ret) +return ret; + } + +watchdog_init_timeout (&w->wdt,0 , pdev->dev.parent); +watchdog_set_nowayout (&w->wdt, nowayout);
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c line 359
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +4
-0+watchdog_stop_on_reboot (&w->wdt); + +if (w->always_running) +bd96801_wdt_start (&w->wdt);I think this needs to set
WDOG_HW_RUNNINGor the watchdog will trigger a reboot if the watchdog device is not opened and the watchdog wasn't already running when the module was loaded.
I believe you're right. Seems I haven't properly tested this path.
Quoted 2 lines
That makes me wonder what happens if the property is set and the watchdog daemon isn't started in the
bd9576_wdtdriver.
My assumption is the dog starts barking. I'll see if I find the BD9576 break-out board from one of my boxes to wire it up and test this. If the always-running is not working it might be justified to just drop it from both drivers. I believe it'd be indication that no-one is really using the always-running with the upstream driver.
Thanks a ton!
Yours,
-- Matti
Signature · 5 lines
Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Guenter Roeck
maintainerRe: [RFC PATCH 5/6] watchdog: ROHM BD96801 PMIC WDG driver
Quoted 76 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Hi Guenter,
First of all, thanks for the review. It was quick! Especially when we speak of a RFC series. Very much appreciated.
Quoted 44 lines · Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:11:41PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote >> +static int
init_wdg_hw(struct wdtbd96801 *w)Quoted 43 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +43
-0+{ +u32 hw_margin[2 ]; +int count, ret; +u32 hw_margin_max =BD96801_WDT_DEFAULT_MARGIN , hw_margin_min =0 ; + + count =device_property_count_u32 (w->dev->parent,"rohm,hw-timeout-ms" ); +if (count <0 && count != -EINVAL ) +return count; + +if (count >0 ) { +if (count >ARRAY_SIZE (hw_margin)) +return -EINVAL ; + + ret =device_property_read_u32_array (w->dev->parent, +"rohm,hw-timeout-ms" , + &hw_margin[0 ], count); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + +if (count ==1 ) + hw_margin_max = hw_margin[0 ]; + +if (count ==2 ) { + hw_margin_max = hw_margin[1 ]; + hw_margin_min = hw_margin[0 ]; + } + } + + ret =bd96801_set_wdt_mode (w, hw_margin_max, hw_margin_min); +if (ret) +return ret; + + ret =device_property_match_string (w->dev->parent,"rohm,wdg-action" , +"prstb" ); +if (ret >=0 ) { + ret =regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_MASK , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_RST ); +return ret; + } + + ret =device_property_match_string (w->dev->parent,"rohm,wdg-action" , +"intb-only" );Quoted 8 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c line 302
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +6
-0+if (ret >=0 ) { + ret =regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_MASK , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_IRQ ); +return ret; + }I don't see the devicetree bindings documented in the series.
Seems like I have missed this WDG binding. But after reading your comment below, I am wondering if I should just drop the binding and default to "prstb" (shutdown should the feeding be skipped) - and leave the "intb-only" case for one who actually needs such.
Quoted 2 lines
I am also a bit surprised that the interrupt isn't handled in the driver. Please explain.
Basically, I just had no idea what the IRQ should do in the generic case. If we get an interrupt, it means the WDG feeding has failed. My thinking is that, what should happen is forced reset. I don't see how that can be done in reliably manner from an IRQ handler.
When the "prstb WDG action" is set (please, see the above DT binding handling), the PMIC shall shut down power outputs. This should get the watchdog's job done.
Quoted 8 lines
With the "intb-only"-option, PMIC will not turn off the power. I'd expect there to be some external HW connection which handles the reset by HW.
After all this being said, I wonder if I should just unconditionally configure the PMIC to always turn off the power (prstb option) should the feeding fail? Or do someone have some suggestion what the IRQ handler should do (except maybe print an error msg)?
Other watchdog drivers call emergency_restart() if the watchdog times out and triggers an interrupt. Are you saying this won't work for this system ? If so, please explain.
Thanks,
Guenter
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerRe: [RFC PATCH 5/6] watchdog: ROHM BD96801 PMIC WDG driver
Quoted 86 lines · Guenter Roeck
Quoted 76 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Hi Guenter,
First of all, thanks for the review. It was quick! Especially when we speak of a RFC series. Very much appreciated.
Quoted 44 lines · Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:11:41PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote >> +static int
init_wdg_hw(struct wdtbd96801 *w)Quoted 43 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +43
-0+{ +u32 hw_margin[2 ]; +int count, ret; +u32 hw_margin_max =BD96801_WDT_DEFAULT_MARGIN , hw_margin_min =0 ; + + count =device_property_count_u32 (w->dev->parent,"rohm,hw-timeout-ms" ); +if (count <0 && count != -EINVAL ) +return count; + +if (count >0 ) { +if (count >ARRAY_SIZE (hw_margin)) +return -EINVAL ; + + ret =device_property_read_u32_array (w->dev->parent, +"rohm,hw-timeout-ms" , + &hw_margin[0 ], count); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + +if (count ==1 ) + hw_margin_max = hw_margin[0 ]; + +if (count ==2 ) { + hw_margin_max = hw_margin[1 ]; + hw_margin_min = hw_margin[0 ]; + } + } + + ret =bd96801_set_wdt_mode (w, hw_margin_max, hw_margin_min); +if (ret) +return ret; + + ret =device_property_match_string (w->dev->parent,"rohm,wdg-action" , +"prstb" ); +if (ret >=0 ) { + ret =regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_MASK , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_RST ); +return ret; + } + + ret =device_property_match_string (w->dev->parent,"rohm,wdg-action" , +"intb-only" );Quoted 8 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c line 302
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c new file +6
-0+if (ret >=0 ) { + ret =regmap_update_bits (w->regmap,BD96801_REG_WD_CONF , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_MASK , +BD96801_WD_ASSERT_IRQ ); +return ret; + }I don't see the devicetree bindings documented in the series.
Seems like I have missed this WDG binding. But after reading your comment below, I am wondering if I should just drop the binding and default to "prstb" (shutdown should the feeding be skipped) - and leave the "intb-only" case for one who actually needs such.
Quoted 2 lines
I am also a bit surprised that the interrupt isn't handled in the driver. Please explain.
Basically, I just had no idea what the IRQ should do in the generic case. If we get an interrupt, it means the WDG feeding has failed. My thinking is that, what should happen is forced reset. I don't see how that can be done in reliably manner from an IRQ handler.
When the "prstb WDG action" is set (please, see the above DT binding handling), the PMIC shall shut down power outputs. This should get the watchdog's job done.
Quoted 8 lines
With the "intb-only"-option, PMIC will not turn off the power. I'd expect there to be some external HW connection which handles the reset by HW.
After all this being said, I wonder if I should just unconditionally configure the PMIC to always turn off the power (prstb option) should the feeding fail? Or do someone have some suggestion what the IRQ handler should do (except maybe print an error msg)?
Quoted 4 lines
Other watchdog drivers call
emergency_restart()if the watchdog times out and triggers an interrupt. Are you saying this won't work for this system ? If so, please explain.
Thanks Guenter. If it works with systems using other devices, then it should work (to the same extent) with systems using this PMIC. Thanks.
I'll add the IRQ handling to next version - but it may take a while as I'm currently having some problems with the IRQs in general, and because I'll wait for feedback from Mark to the regulator part.
Yours,
-- Matti
Signature · 5 lines
Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Guenter Roeck
maintainerRe: [RFC PATCH 5/6] watchdog: ROHM BD96801 PMIC WDG driver
Quoted 9 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Quoted 5 lines
Other watchdog drivers call
emergency_restart()if the watchdog times out and triggers an interrupt. Are you saying this won't work for this system ? If so, please explain.Thanks Guenter. If it works with systems using other devices, then it should work (to the same extent) with systems using this PMIC. Thanks.
You might also consider to just call panic(). What is what we do if the pretimeout panic governor is enabled.
That makes me wonder if it would make sense to introduce watchdog timeout governors, similar to the existing pretimeout governors. Maybe if I ever find the time to do it ...
Guenter
Quoted 14 lines
I'll add the IRQ handling to next version - but it may take a while as I'm currently having some problems with the IRQs in general, and because I'll wait for feedback from Mark to the regulator part.
Yours,
-- MattiSignature · 5 lines
Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerRFC PATCH 6/6 MAINTAINERS: Add ROHM BD96801 'scalable PMIC' entries
In reply to Matti VaittinenAdd maintainer entries for ROHM BD96801 a.k.a 'scalable PMIC'
--- MAINTAINERS | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
MAINTAINERS +4 -0
@@ -19111,17 +19111,21 @@ F: drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71828.c F: drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c F: drivers/mfd/rohm-bd718x7.c F: drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c +F: drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c F: drivers/regulator/bd71815-regulator.c F: drivers/regulator/bd71828-regulator.c F: drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c F: drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c +F: drivers/regulator/bd96801-regulator.c F: drivers/regulator/rohm-regulator.c F: drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.c F: drivers/watchdog/bd9576_wdt.c +F: drivers/watchdog/bd96801_wdt.c F: include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd71815.h F: include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd71828.h F: include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd718x7.h F: include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h +F: include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd96801.h F: include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h F: include/linux/mfd/rohm-shared.h
Signature · 14 lines
2.43.2 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerQuoted 7 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Another "oddity" is that the PMIC has two physical IRQ lines. When I last wrote this patch in 2021 I had some naming collison in debugfs for the IRQ domains. Back then I used:
irq_domain_update_bus_token(intb_domain, DOMAIN_BUS_WIRED); to work-around the issue. Now, when rebasing to v6.9-rc1 the naming collision was gone and things seemed to work. However, it'd be great if the IRQ code in MFD driver was reviewed by greater minds :)
It appears my statement "things seemed to work" is a bit too optimistic. I am afraid my approach of having two separate IRQ domains for one device (and DT-node) is just somehow fundamentally wrong. It'd be great to learn what's the correct "ideology" here.
It appears the naming collision is still there. My config just had the CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS disabled. Enabling it shows the same naming collison:
debugfs: File ':ocp:interconnect@48000000:segment@100000:target-module@9c000:i2c@0:pmic@60' in directory 'domains' already present!
If I'm not mistaken the debugfs file name is generated from the device-tree node path+name. This is a subtle hint that it is not expected there are more than 1 IRQ-domain / device. I guess this kind of makes sense if we can have more than 1 HWIRQ handled by a single domain (I don't recall having to ever write such domain/IRQ-controller before, but I think it should be possible).
I have now 3 new questions =)
1. Should we be able to have more than 1 IRQ domain / device?
2. Should regmap_irq support having more than 1 HWIRQ
3. If answer to 1 is "no" - should we protect against this somehow? (see why below).
When CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS is disabled, adding the two IRQ controllers with own IRQ domains (intb and errb here) to a single device is seemingly successful. I see no complaints / errors. Also, most of the IRQs seem to work - but not all. In my case trying to issue:
cat /proc/interrupts
will oops. Also, looking in the /sys/kernel/irq/ lists folders for all the "intb" and "errb" IRQs - but reading the files contained in these directories will cause an oops for all "errb" interrupts except for the first 16.
Finally, if I use the irq_domain_update_bus_token(intb_domain, DOMAIN_BUS_WIRED);
to add "-1" at the end of the "intb" - domain name resulting domains:
:ocp:interconnect@48000000:segment@100000:target-module@9c000:i2c@0:pmic@60 :ocp:interconnect@48000000:segment@100000:target-module@9c000:i2c@0:pmic@60-1
then it seems that reading the IRQ information from the /proc/interrupts works as expected. Here I am making a wild guess that the name of the domain is used as a key for some data-lookups, and having two domains with a same name will either overwrite something or cause wrong domain data to be fetched. (This is just guessing for now).
Any tips, hints or thoughts on this?
Yours,
-- Matti
Signature · 5 lines
Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 2 lines · Matti Vaittinen
1. Should we be able to have more than 1 IRQ domain / device?
2. Shouldregmap_irqsupport having more than 1 HWIRQ
I would expect each parent interrupt to show up as a separate remap_irq.
Quoted 5 lines
then it seems that reading the IRQ information from the
/proc/interruptsworks as expected. Here I am making a wild guess that the name of the domain is used as a key for some data-lookups, and having two domains with a same name will either overwrite something or cause wrong domain data to be fetched. (This is just guessing for now).
So if we arrange to supply a name when we register multiple domains things should work fine?
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerHi Mark,
Quoted 7 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 2 lines · Matti Vaittinen
1. Should we be able to have more than 1 IRQ domain / device?
2. Shouldregmap_irqsupport having more than 1 HWIRQI would expect each parent interrupt to show up as a separate
remap_irq.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
then it seems that reading the IRQ information from the
/proc/interruptsworks as expected. Here I am making a wild guess that the name of the domain is used as a key for some data-lookups, and having two domains with a same name will either overwrite something or cause wrong domain data to be fetched. (This is just guessing for now).So if we arrange to supply a name when we register multiple domains things should work fine?
Thanks for taking the time to look at my questions :)
I have been debugging this thing whole day today, without getting too far :) It seems there is something beyond the name collision though.
After I tried adding '-1' to the end of the other domain name to avoid the debugfs name collision I managed to do couple of successful runs - after which I reported here that problem seems to be just the naming. Soon after sending that mail I hit the oops again even though the naming was fixed.
Further debugging shows that the desc->action->name for the last 28 'errb' IRQs get corrupted. This might point more to the IRQ requester side - so I need to further study the BD96801 driver side as well as the regulator_irq_helper. I'm having the creeping feeling that at the end of the day I need to find the guilty one from the mirror :)
But yes, creating 2 regmap-IRQ controllers for one device seems to generate naming conflict in the debugfs - so unless I'm mistaken, with the current regmap-IRQ we can't have more than 1 regmap-IRQ entity for a single device.
Just please give me some more time to see if I find the cause of the corruption and I hope I can write more concrete description. For now it was enough for me to hear having more than 1 IRQ domain / device is not something on the "DON'T DO THIS" -list.
Yours,
-- Matti
Signature · 5 lines
Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerQuoted 15 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Hi Mark,
Quoted 12 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 2 lines · Matti Vaittinen
1. Should we be able to have more than 1 IRQ domain / device?
2. Shouldregmap_irqsupport having more than 1 HWIRQI would expect each parent interrupt to show up as a separate
remap_irq.Quoted 5 lines
then it seems that reading the IRQ information from the
/proc/interruptsworks as expected. Here I am making a wild guess that the name of the domain is used as a key for some data-lookups, and having two domains with a same name will either overwrite something or cause wrong domain data to be fetched. (This is just guessing for now).
This was wrong guessing.
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So if we arrange to supply a name when we register multiple domains things should work fine?
After my latest findings, yes, I think so. How to do this correctly is beyond me though. The __irq_domain_create() seems to me that the name is meant to be the dt-node name when the controller is backed by a real dt-node. Naming of the irq_domain_alloc_named_fwnode() sounds to me like it is only intended to be used when there is no real fwnode. All suggestions appreciated. Using the:irq_domain_update_bus_token(intb_domain, DOMAIN_BUS_WIRED);
feels like a dirty hack, and won't scale if there is more HWIRQs.
Quoted 6 lines
Thanks for taking the time to look at my questions :)
I have been debugging this thing whole day today, without getting too far :) It seems there is something beyond the name collision though.After I tried adding '-1' to the end of the other domain name to avoid the debugfs name collision I managed to do couple of successful runs - after which I reported here that problem seems to be just the naming. Soon after sending that mail I hit the oops again even though the naming was fixed.
Further debugging shows that the
desc->action->namefor the last 28 'errb' IRQs get corrupted. This might point more to the IRQ requester side - so I need to further study the BD96801 driver side as well as theregulator_irq_helper. I'm having the creeping feeling that at the end of the day I need to find the guilty one from the mirror :)
I was not wrong on this one. The regulator_irq_helper() duplicates memory for the data given in const struct regulator_irq_desc *d - but it does not duplicate the irq name pointed from the given regulator_irq_desc. Nor does the request_threaded_irq(). I passed some of the IRQ names from the stack in the BD96801 driver ... a bug I should've caught earlier.
Well, good thing is that now I can fix the regulator_irq_helper() to do:
drivers/regulator/irq_helpers.c +3 -0
@@ -352,6 +352,9 @@ void *regulator_irq_helper(struct device *dev, h->irq = irq; h->desc = *d; + h->desc.name =devm_kstrdup (dev, d->name,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!h->desc.name) +return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); ret =init_rdev_state (dev, h, rdev, common_errs, per_rdev_errs, rdev_amount);
I'll send a patch if this sounds like a correct thing to do.
Signature · 5 lines
Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 15 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Well, good thing is that now I can fix the
regulator_irq_helper()to do:drivers/regulator/irq_helpers.c +3
-0@@ -352,6 +352,9 @@ void *regulator_irq_helper(struct device *dev, h->irq = irq; h->desc = *d; + h->desc.name =devm_kstrdup (dev, d->name,GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!h->desc.name) +return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); ret =init_rdev_state (dev, h, rdev, common_errs, per_rdev_errs, rdev_amount);
Quoted 1 line
I'll send a patch if this sounds like a correct thing to do.
Sure.
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerHi dee Ho peeps,
Quoted 10 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Quoted 9 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Hi Mark,
Quoted 6 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 2 lines · Matti Vaittinen
1. Should we be able to have more than 1 IRQ domain / device?
2. Shouldregmap_irqsupport having more than 1 HWIRQI would expect each parent interrupt to show up as a separate
remap_irq.
...
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So if we arrange to supply a name when we register multiple domains things should work fine?
After my latest findings, yes, I think so. How to do this correctly is beyond me though. The
__irq_domain_create()seems to me that the name is meant to be the dt-node name when the controller is backed by a real dt-node. Naming of theirq_domain_alloc_named_fwnode()sounds to me like it is only intended to be used when there is no real fwnode. All suggestions appreciated. Using the:irq_domain_update_bus_token(intb_domain, DOMAIN_BUS_WIRED);
feels like a dirty hack, and won't scale if there is more HWIRQs.
I tried taking a look at this again.
If we wanted to support multiple HWIRQs / regmap-IRQ controller, it would require us to duplicate almost everything in the struct regmap_irq_chip for every new parent IRQ. The status/mask register information, IRQ type, etc. Naturally, it would require also duplicating lot of the data contained in the struct regmap_irq_chip_data. I am not sure if this could be done so the change is not reflected in the existing IRQ data initialization macros etc. Furthermore, some API changes would be required like changes to regmap_irq_get_domain().
I am a bit afraid this change, if implemented in regmap-IRQ, would be very intrusive and potentially impact large amount of callers. But more importantly, looking the amount of data that should be duplicated per new HWIRQ makes me think that an IRQ controller is really a product of a parent IRQ, not product of the device. Hence, assuming there is only one IRQ controller instance / device does not feel any more correct than assuming there is an IRQ controller instance / parent IRQ. Same thinking applies to IRQ domains.
Thus, forcing the regmap-IRQ to support multiple parents instead of having own regmap-IRQ instance / parent IRQ feels like fitting square item to a round hole. I am sure fixing all the bugs I caused would give donate a lot of EXP-points though :rolleyes:
Question is, should I still try?
Another option I see, is trying to think if irq-domain name could be changed. (This is what the RFC v3 does, [ab]using the irq_domain_update_bus_token()). I was a bit put off by the idea of 'instantiating' multiple domains (or regmap-IRQ controllers) from a single node, but more I think of this, more I lean towards it. Besides, this is not something completely odd, I think MFD devices do this anyways. (Instantiate multiple [sub]devices from single DT-node). I would love to get an opinion from someone who knows the 'fundamentals' of the IRQ domains, and possibly some pointer for the right approach.
Finally we might also consider adding own sub-node in DT for each parent IRQ - but this feels very wrong to me.
All in all, I am having very hard time trying to think how to proceed. The last option for me is to skip support for the ERRB IRQ from the BD96801 driver, which would leave this problem to the next person working with a device providing multiple physical IRQs.
Yours,
-- Matti
Signature · 5 lines
Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 12 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Quoted 11 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Quoted 4 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Quoted 4 lines
I would expect each parent interrupt to show up as a separate
remap_irq.So if we arrange to supply a name when we register multiple domains things should work fine?
After my latest findings, yes, I think so. How to do this correctly is beyond me though. The
__irq_domain_create()seems to me that the name is meant to be the dt-node name when the controller is backed by a real dt-node. Naming of theirq_domain_alloc_named_fwnode()sounds to me like
...
Quoted 8 lines
If we wanted to support multiple HWIRQs / regmap-IRQ controller, it would require us to duplicate almost everything in the struct
regmap_irq_chipfor every new parent IRQ. The status/mask register information, IRQ type, etc. Naturally, it would require also duplicating lot of the data contained in the structregmap_irq_chip_data. I am not sure if this could be done so the change is not reflected in the existing IRQ data initialization macros etc. Furthermore, some API changes would be required like changes toregmap_irq_get_domain().
I don't understand what the difficulty is here - we're creating multiple interrupt controllers so I'd expect to have to have full definitions of each, and since everything is referenced by name from the root regmap_irq_chip which gets registered it's just a case of supplying different names and all the helpers should be fine?
Quoted 4 lines
Thus, forcing the regmap-IRQ to support multiple parents instead of having own regmap-IRQ instance / parent IRQ feels like fitting square item to a round hole. I am sure fixing all the bugs I caused would give donate a lot of EXP-points though :rolleyes:
Right, my suggestion is to register multiple regmap_irq instrances - one per parent - and supply a name that allows all the display/debugfs stuff that currently uses the dev_name() to deduplicate. You'd end up sticking -primary, -secondary or whatever name was supplied onto the names we currently use.
Quoted 5 lines
Another option I see, is trying to think if irq-domain name could be changed. (This is what the RFC v3 does, [ab]using the
irq_domain_update_bus_token()). I was a bit put off by the idea of 'instantiating' multiple domains (or regmap-IRQ controllers) from a single node, but more I think of this, more I lean towards it. Besides, this is not
Yes, register mutliple controllers with different names.
Matti Vaittinen
maintainerQuoted 42 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 12 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Quoted 11 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Quoted 4 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Quoted 4 lines
I would expect each parent interrupt to show up as a separate
remap_irq.So if we arrange to supply a name when we register multiple domains things should work fine?
After my latest findings, yes, I think so. How to do this correctly is beyond me though. The
__irq_domain_create()seems to me that the name is meant to be the dt-node name when the controller is backed by a real dt-node. Naming of theirq_domain_alloc_named_fwnode()sounds to me like...
Quoted 8 lines
If we wanted to support multiple HWIRQs / regmap-IRQ controller, it would require us to duplicate almost everything in the struct
regmap_irq_chipfor every new parent IRQ. The status/mask register information, IRQ type, etc. Naturally, it would require also duplicating lot of the data contained in the structregmap_irq_chip_data. I am not sure if this could be done so the change is not reflected in the existing IRQ data initialization macros etc. Furthermore, some API changes would be required like changes toregmap_irq_get_domain().I don't understand what the difficulty is here - we're creating multiple interrupt controllers so I'd expect to have to have full definitions of each, and since everything is referenced by name from the root
regmap_irq_chipwhich gets registered it's just a case of supplying different names and all the helpers should be fine?Quoted 4 lines
Thus, forcing the regmap-IRQ to support multiple parents instead of having own regmap-IRQ instance / parent IRQ feels like fitting square item to a round hole. I am sure fixing all the bugs I caused would give donate a lot of EXP-points though :rolleyes:
Right, my suggestion is to register multiple
regmap_irqinstrances - one per parent - and supply a name that allows all the display/debugfs stuff that currently uses thedev_name()to deduplicate. You'd end up sticking -primary, -secondary or whatever name was supplied onto the names we currently use.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Another option I see, is trying to think if irq-domain name could be changed. (This is what the RFC v3 does, [ab]using the
irq_domain_update_bus_token()). I was a bit put off by the idea of 'instantiating' multiple domains (or regmap-IRQ controllers) from a single node, but more I think of this, more I lean towards it. Besides, this is notYes, register mutliple controllers with different names.
Thanks for the guidance Mark. The controller name is not a problem. Problem is that I don't see a (proper) way to supply a name for the IRQ domain which gets registered by regmap-IRQ. IRQ domain code picks the name for the domain by the device-tree node. Both of our IRQ controllers would be instantiated from same node => the IRQ domain will get same name => debugfs will conflict.
My "solution" was simply dropping the ERRB IRQ from the driver (for now at least). I did send that as a series without 'RFC' - but made a mistake and restarted the versioning from v1. I am currently working with 2 other PMICs, one of them does also provide similar setup of two IRQ lines. Thus, I think being able to provide a name (suffix?) for IRQ domain when registering it instead of just using the name of the DT node is something I should look into. It's just nice to know someone else thinks it is valid approach.
Thanks for the input!
Yours,
-- Matti
Signature · 5 lines
Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 11 lines · Matti Vaittinen
Quoted 2 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So if we arrange to supply a name when we register multiple domains things should work fine?
Thanks for the guidance Mark. The controller name is not a problem. Problem is that I don't see a (proper) way to supply a name for the IRQ domain which gets registered by regmap-IRQ. IRQ domain code picks the name for the domain by the device-tree node. Both of our IRQ controllers would be instantiated from same node => the IRQ domain will get same name => debugfs will conflict.
That's why I'm suggesting to add something - just put a name field in the struct.
Quoted 7 lines
My "solution" was simply dropping the ERRB IRQ from the driver (for now at least). I did send that as a series without 'RFC' - but made a mistake and restarted the versioning from v1. I am currently working with 2 other PMICs, one of them does also provide similar setup of two IRQ lines. Thus, I think being able to provide a name (suffix?) for IRQ domain when registering it instead of just using the name of the DT node is something I should look into. It's just nice to know someone else thinks it is valid approach.
Yes.