Skip to contentSkip to conversation

linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch failes

Buildroot Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn 3 participants 7 messages Jul 31, 2007 – Aug 1, 2007

lore
Share & tools
lore

Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn

author
#0 lore raw

Patch failed! Please fix linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch!
make: *** [buildroot/build_i486/linux-2.6.21.5/.patched] Error 1

Cheers,

Signature · 1 line
Cristian
author
#1 lore raw

Preceeded by this:

Applying linux-2.6.21.5-002-lzma-vmlinuz.01.patch using plaintext:
patching file arch/i386/boot/compressed/Makefile patching file scripts/gen_lzma_initramfs_list.sh patching file arch/i386/boot/compressed/lzma_misc.c patching file scripts/Makefile.lib

Applying linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch using plaintext:
patching file MAINTAINERS
patching file Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej

Quoted 2 lines · Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn

Patch failed! Please fix linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch!
make: *** [buildroot/build_i486/linux-2.6.21.5/.patched] Error 1

Conflicts between linux-2.6.21.5-002-lzma-vmlinuz.01.patch and linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch?

Cheers,

Signature · 1 line
Cristian
author
#2 lore raw
Quoted 14 lines · Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn

Preceeded by this:

Applying linux-2.6.21.5-002-lzma-vmlinuz.01.patch using plaintext:
patching file arch/i386/boot/compressed/Makefile patching file scripts/gen_lzma_initramfs_list.sh patching file arch/i386/boot/compressed/lzma_misc.c patching file scripts/Makefile.lib

Applying linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch using plaintext:
patching file MAINTAINERS
patching file Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines · Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn

Patch failed! Please fix linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch!
make: *** [buildroot/build_i486/linux-2.6.21.5/.patched] Error 1

Conflicts between linux-2.6.21.5-002-lzma-vmlinuz.01.patch and linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch?

Questions:

Is it really necessary to apply these patches? Even though .config shows?

# BR2_PACKAGE_LZMA_TARGET is not set
# BR2_PACKAGE_LZMA_HOST is not set
# BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_LZMA is not set
# BR2_avr32 is not set
# BR2_TOOLCHAIN_ATMEL_AVR32 is not set

Wouldn't it be a good idea for each successfully applied patch to have a target and a prequisite?

<patch name>: <patch name>.done

so that, if a patch fails and is fixed on the spot, remake skipps the already applied patches?

Cheers,

Signature · 1 line
Cristian
#3 lore raw

[Buildroot] linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patchfailes

Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Conflicts between linux-2.6.21.5-002-lzma-vmlinuz.01.patch and linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch?

Questions:

Is it really necessary to apply these patches? Even though .config shows?

# BR2_PACKAGE_LZMA_TARGET is not set
# BR2_PACKAGE_LZMA_HOST is not set
# BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_LZMA is not set
# BR2_avr32 is not set
# BR2_TOOLCHAIN_ATMEL_AVR32 is not set

Quoted 8 lines

Wouldn't it be a good idea for each successfully applied patch to have a target and a prequisite?

<patch name>: <patch name>.done

so that, if a patch fails and is fixed on the spot, remake skipps the already applied patches?

We are currently discussing the mess with separate patch strategies
for the kernel headers and the linux build.
I proposed that both the kernel-headers and the linux should use the same patch directories. This is only the case, if the kernel-headers and the linux version are the same today.

A long term approach could be to keep the kernel-headers for pre 2.6.19 kernels only and build the headers in the target/linux directory, with patches divided into groups of patches which are or are not applied depending on menu configurations.

Typically you would have
"core" patches - always applied
"architecture" patches - always applied if an architecture is selected
"board" patches - conditionally applied through a choice.

Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson

#4 lore raw
In reply to Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Quoted 24 lines · Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Quoted 14 lines · Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn

Preceeded by this:

Applying linux-2.6.21.5-002-lzma-vmlinuz.01.patch using plaintext:
patching file arch/i386/boot/compressed/Makefile patching file scripts/gen_lzma_initramfs_list.sh patching file arch/i386/boot/compressed/lzma_misc.c patching file scripts/Makefile.lib

Applying linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch using plaintext:
patching file MAINTAINERS
patching file Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines · Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn

Patch failed! Please fix linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch!
make: *** [buildroot/build_i486/linux-2.6.21.5/.patched] Error 1

Conflicts between linux-2.6.21.5-002-lzma-vmlinuz.01.patch and linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch?

Quoted 7 lines

Questions:

Is it really necessary to apply these patches? Even though .config shows?

# BR2_PACKAGE_LZMA_TARGET is not set
# BR2_PACKAGE_LZMA_HOST is not set
# BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_LZMA is not set

I do have lzma installed on my host so i do not need to build a separate lzma for the host. Still i want to use a vmlinux that is lzma compressed, so the linux-2.6.21.5-002-lzma-vmlinuz.01.patch is needed (vmlinux-lzma is a kernel-config anyway, so even if it is applied you don't have to use it).
I don't know what that atmel patch is supposed to do. For anything but atmel "boards" it should not be downloaded nor applied anyway.

Quoted 2 lines

# BR2_avr32 is not set
# BR2_TOOLCHAIN_ATMEL_AVR32 is not set

#5 lore raw

ons 2007-08-01 klockan 12:36 +0200 skrev Bernhard Fischer:

Quoted 33 lines · Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Quoted 24 lines · Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Quoted 15 lines

Preceeded by this:

Applying linux-2.6.21.5-002-lzma-vmlinuz.01.patch using plaintext:
patching file arch/i386/boot/compressed/Makefile patching file scripts/gen_lzma_initramfs_list.sh patching file arch/i386/boot/compressed/lzma_misc.c patching file scripts/Makefile.lib

Applying linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch using plaintext:
patching file MAINTAINERS
patching file Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines · Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn

Patch failed! Please fix linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch!
make: *** [buildroot/build_i486/linux-2.6.21.5/.patched] Error 1

Conflicts between linux-2.6.21.5-002-lzma-vmlinuz.01.patch and linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch?

Quoted 7 lines

Questions:

Is it really necessary to apply these patches? Even though .config shows?

# BR2_PACKAGE_LZMA_TARGET is not set
# BR2_PACKAGE_LZMA_HOST is not set
# BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_LZMA is not set

Quoted 8 lines

I do have lzma installed on my host so i do not need to build a separate lzma for the host. Still i want to use a vmlinux that is lzma compressed, so the linux-2.6.21.5-002-lzma-vmlinuz.01.patch is needed (vmlinux-lzma is a kernel-config anyway, so even if it is applied you don't have to use it).
I don't know what that atmel patch is supposed to do. For anything but atmel "boards" it should not be downloaded nor applied anyway.

Yes, once patching the kernel is configurable, this is the way to go.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines

# BR2_avr32 is not set
# BR2_TOOLCHAIN_ATMEL_AVR32 is not set

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot at uclibc.org
http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

#6 lore raw
In reply to Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Quoted 5 lines

Patch failed! Please fix linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch!
make: *** [buildroot/build_i486/linux-2.6.21.5/.patched] Error 1

I test built for an x86, but maybe only 2.6.22.1 got tested. I will revert the patches, and recheck tomorrow.

Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson