Skip to contentSkip to conversation

tsc-disable_A6

RFC PATCH In review john stultz 2 participants 2 messages Jun 19, 2002 Documentation

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

RFC PATCH 1/1 tsc-disable_A6

Hey Marcelo, all,

Here is the next revision of my tsc-disable patch. Thanks to everyone
for providing feedback. I will re-submit this for the 2.4.20pre series, but wanted to get this out for additional comments as well as warn folks who might be trying this or my previous patch. This version reverts to the earlier implementation, which only changes config.in. I feel that defining CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC gives one the ability to discern between just having a TSC and having a usable TSC, and all the current code that uses CONFIG_X86_TSC assumes that it is usable. This way seems cleaner and has all the benefits of the last method. Additionally I added the previously forgotten Configure.help documentation, for which I should no doubt receive a ruler across the knuckles.

One semi-large (now documented in Configure.help :)caveat I found: on
systems which have glibc compiled for i686, kernels built with my old patch would not boot. This is because disabling the tsc makes rdtsc a privileged operation. When the kernel tries to run init, it hits the rdtsc in glibc and dies. Therefore in this version you must enable the option, then pass "notsc" to the kernel at boot. That way, if you run into problems you can just remove the "notsc" option and get your system running. Installing a non i686 optimized glibc solves this problem.

Next, at Benjamin and Kurt's suggestion, I'm going to start looking
into per-cpu TSC management, but for now this patch gives an immediate fix for a known problem (at some cost to performance, but slow numbers are better then invalid ones).

I know I'm going to get this comment, so I might as well deal with it
now. "Why bother with this patch when you could just compile the kernel for 386 the net effect would be the same?" Good question, actually. I almost decided against sending this patch out, but the ability to use processor optimizations other then CONFIG_X86_TSC seems useful on these large systems. Additionally having this issue explicitly documented in the kernel might help those who are wondering why their shiny NUMA Pentium 4 system can't seem to read its watch properly (rather then having someone say "just compile for 386" and having them think "but its a Pentium 4!").

comments and flames welcome.
-john

Documentation/Configure.help +18 -1
diff -Nru a/Documentation/Configure.help b/Documentation/Configure.help
@@ -233,7 +233,24 @@
   network and embedded applications.  For more information see the
   Axis Communication site, <http://developer.axis.com/>.
 
-Multiquad support for NUMA systems
+Multi-node support for NUMA systems
+CONFIG_X86_NUMA
+  This option is used for getting Linux to run on a NUMA multi-node box. 
+  Because multi-node systems suffer from unsynced TSCs, as well as TSC 
+  drift, which can cause gettimeofday to return non-monotonic values, 
+  this option will turn off the CONFIG_X86_TSC optimization. This 
+  allows you to then specify "notsc" as a boot option to force all nodes 
+  to use the PIC for gettimeofday. 
+  
+  WARNING!!! This option, along with specifying "notsc" at boot causes 
+  the rdtsc instruction to be a privledged op. Your glibc may be 
+  compiled for i686, in which case applications using that library will 
+  crash. Most likely your system won't even start init. If you system 
+  will not boot, remove the "notsc" option, then install a glibc that
+  does not depend on rdtsc before trying again. 
+  
+
+Multiquad support for NUMAQ systems
 CONFIG_MULTIQUAD
   This option is used for getting Linux to run on a (IBM/Sequent) NUMA 
   multiquad box. This changes the way that processors are bootstrapped,
arch/i386/config.in +24 -12
diff -Nru a/arch/i386/config.in b/arch/i386/config.in
@@ -80,20 +80,20 @@
    define_int  CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_USE_STRING_486 y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_ALIGNMENT_16 y
-   define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC y
+   define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE y
 fi
 if [ "$CONFIG_M586MMX" = "y" ]; then
    define_int  CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_USE_STRING_486 y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_ALIGNMENT_16 y
-   define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC y
+   define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE y
 fi
 if [ "$CONFIG_M686" = "y" ]; then
    define_int  CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5
-   define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC y
+   define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_PGE y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM y
@@ -101,14 +101,14 @@
 fi
 if [ "$CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII" = "y" ]; then
    define_int  CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5
-   define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC y
+   define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_PGE y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM y
 fi
 if [ "$CONFIG_MPENTIUM4" = "y" ]; then
    define_int  CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 7
-   define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC y
+   define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_PGE y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM y
@@ -116,12 +116,12 @@
 if [ "$CONFIG_MK6" = "y" ]; then
    define_int  CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_ALIGNMENT_16 y
-   define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC y
+   define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM y
 fi
 if [ "$CONFIG_MK7" = "y" ]; then
    define_int  CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 6
-   define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC y
+   define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_PGE y
@@ -134,14 +134,14 @@
 fi
 if [ "$CONFIG_MCYRIXIII" = "y" ]; then
    define_int  CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5
-   define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC y
+   define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_ALIGNMENT_16 y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM y
 fi
 if [ "$CONFIG_MCRUSOE" = "y" ]; then
    define_int  CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5
-   define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC y
+   define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y
 fi
 if [ "$CONFIG_MWINCHIPC6" = "y" ]; then
    define_int  CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5
@@ -152,14 +152,14 @@
 if [ "$CONFIG_MWINCHIP2" = "y" ]; then
    define_int  CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_ALIGNMENT_16 y
-   define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC y
+   define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE y
 fi
 if [ "$CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D" = "y" ]; then
    define_int  CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_ALIGNMENT_16 y
-   define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC y
+   define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM y
    define_bool CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE y
 fi
@@ -198,8 +198,20 @@
       define_bool CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC y
    fi
 else
-   bool 'Multiquad NUMA system' CONFIG_MULTIQUAD
+	bool 'Multi-node NUMA system support (Caution: Read help first)' CONFIG_X86_NUMA
+	if [ "$CONFIG_X86_NUMA" = "y" ]; then
+		bool 'Multiquad (IBM/Sequent) NUMAQ support' CONFIG_MULTIQUAD
+	fi
 fi
+
+if [ "$CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC" = "y" ]; then
+	if [ "$CONFIG_X86_NUMA" = "y" ]; then
+		define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC n
+	else
+		define_bool CONFIG_X86_TSC y
+	fi
+fi
+
 
 if [ "$CONFIG_SMP" = "y" -a "$CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG" = "y" ]; then
    define_bool CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK y
#1 lore raw
Quoted 12 lines · john stultz

Here is the next revision of my tsc-disable patch. Thanks to everyone
for providing feedback. I will re-submit this for the 2.4.20pre series, but wanted to get this out for additional comments as well as warn folks who might be trying this or my previous patch. This version reverts to the earlier implementation, which only changes config.in. I feel that defining CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC gives one the ability to discern between just having a TSC and having a usable TSC, and all the current code that uses CONFIG_X86_TSC assumes that it is usable. This way seems cleaner and has all the benefits of the last method. Additionally I added the previously forgotten Configure.help documentation, for which I should no doubt receive a ruler across the knuckles.

This patch looks OK.

Signature · 2 lines
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs