procps 2.0.13 with NPTL enhancements
I am ecstatic beyond words to announce the release of procps version 2.0.13. This release contains a number of NPTL-related enhancements, courtesy of Alexander Larsson of Red Hat. Some of the enhancements are generic in nature, and thus also benefit non-NPTL applications.
I encourage everyone to give this a try, especially 2.5 users.
Tarball, RPM packages, and CVS information is available at:
http://tech9.net/rml/procps/ http://sources.redhat.com/procps/
Change Log:
- fix top(1) -p flag behavior (Lars Holmberg)
- do not qsort the process list if we are not sorting (Alexander Larsson)
- read tgid from /proc/pid/status if it exists (Alexander Larsson)
- PROC_SKIPTHREADS flag for ps_readproc() to force only reading of (tgid != pid) to avoid lots of syscalls (Alexander Larsson)
- Look at PM->flags in ps_readproc() to avoid reading /proc files files that are not needed. (Alexander Larsson)
- Support FILLMEM, FILLCMD, FILLENV, FILLWCHAN for above. (Alexander Larsson)
- Fix wchan decoding bug (Alexander Larsson)
- Fix for ticks going backward and cleanup (Denis Vlasenko)
And other misc. cleanups and changes.
Enjoy,
Robert "Why the Hell am I maintaining this" Love
Any comment on the procps v3.1.8 located here:
http://procps.sourceforge.net/
Seems it is actively maintained...
-Phil
Quoted 4 lines · Robert Love
I am ecstatic beyond words to announce the release of procps version 2.0.13.
Robert "Why the Hell am I maintaining this" Love
Quoted 5 lines · Phil Oester
Any comment on the procps v3.1.8 located here:
http://procps.sourceforge.net/
Seems it is actively maintained...
It is a fork of the original procps tree.
The maintainer of that tree will tell you his is better. I do not want to argue it.
Robert Love
In article <1054138948.783.179.camel@localhost>,
Quoted 9 lines · Robert Love
Quoted 5 lines · Phil Oester
Any comment on the procps v3.1.8 located here:
http://procps.sourceforge.net/
Seems it is actively maintained...
It is a fork of the original procps tree.
Well, you could also argue that the current 2.0 tree is a retroactive fork of an older version of procps.
I don't understand why you don't work together.
Mike.
Signature · 2 lines
.. somehow I have a feeling the hurting hasn't even begun yet -- Bill, "The Terrible Thunderlizards"