Skip to contentSkip to conversation

CUR-DLS blacklisted? + IRQ trouble

DISCUSSION Pedro Venda 4 participants 7 messages Feb 15, 2004 – Feb 24, 2004 5 messages not in the archive ACPI

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi everyone,

i have two questions to which i haven't found answers anywhere, so i am asking here.

- - i have an ASUS CUR-DLS motherboard (dual P3) and the 2.4 and 2.6 kernels both say: "ASUS CUR-DLS detected: force use of acpi=ht" when starting disabling ACPI. i must do a acpi=force in order to be able to use it, which consequences i don't know. i looked through the acpi documentation and this board is NOT on the blacklist. i am asking why does the kernel disable ACPI on my mb by default? what's wrong with it? are there any known problems?

- - on the same machine, i have 2 nics. one of them is onboard (intel eepro/100) and the other is a realtek 8139. they used to work ok with some versions of the kernel, but now they only work together without ACPI. with acpi, the realtek displays the famous SIOCIFADDR "device is busy...". is this normal? what can be happening here?

thanks for your time.
regards,
pedro.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAL4I9eRy7HWZxjWERAl2jAJ9RTPnvBG2dkUuyAeCKunGPXppAJACgyNWc 6dcQRdyMzFUpnr+nZXwwJmM=
=Zyfj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#2 lore raw

Pedro,
We got that entry from UnitedLinux last August.

It is quite possible that the system is unjustly blacklisted, or that it was blacklisted out of convenience b/c nobody could figure out exactly what was wrong when ACPI on that system failed.

I'll be happy to look into it if you're willing to file a bug and help me debug to make a proper diagnosis.

thanks,
-Len
---
How to file a bug against ACPI:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Category: Power Management, Component: ACPI

Please attach dmesg -s40000 output (or serial console log if dmesg unavailable)
Please attach copy of /proc/interrupts if possible

Please attach the output from acpidmp, available in /usr/sbin/, or in pmtools:
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/

Please attach the output from dmidecode, available in /usr/sbin/, or here:
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/

Please attach the output from lspci -v

Quoted 35 lines · Pedro Venda

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi everyone,

i have two questions to which i haven't found answers anywhere, so i am asking here.

- - i have an ASUS CUR-DLS motherboard (dual P3) and the 2.4 and 2.6 kernels both say: "ASUS CUR-DLS detected: force use of acpi=ht" when starting disabling ACPI. i must do a acpi=force in order to be able to use it, which consequences i don't know. i looked through the acpi documentation and this board is NOT on the blacklist. i am asking why does the kernel disable ACPI on my mb by default? what's wrong with it? are there any known problems?

- - on the same machine, i have 2 nics. one of them is onboard (intel eepro/100) and the other is a realtek 8139. they used to work ok with some versions of the kernel, but now they only work together without ACPI. with acpi, the realtek displays the famous SIOCIFADDR "device is busy...". is this normal? what can be happening here?

thanks for your time.
regards,
pedro.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAL4I9eRy7HWZxjWERAl2jAJ9RTPnvBG2dkUuyAeCKunGPXppAJACgyNWc 6dcQRdyMzFUpnr+nZXwwJmM=
=Zyfj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Quoted 9 lines

-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Acpi-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel

-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#4 lore raw

hi len,

thanks for the reply. i'll file the bug report and say something in this ml when i do.

thanks again.
regards,
pedro.

Quoted 54 lines · Len Brown

Pedro,
We got that entry from UnitedLinux last August.

It is quite possible that the system is unjustly blacklisted, or that it was blacklisted out of convenience b/c nobody could figure out exactly what was wrong when ACPI on that system failed.

I'll be happy to look into it if you're willing to file a bug and help me debug to make a proper diagnosis.

thanks,
-Len
---
How to file a bug against ACPI:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Category: Power Management, Component: ACPI

Please attach dmesg -s40000 output (or serial console log if dmesg unavailable)
Please attach copy of /proc/interrupts if possible

Please attach the output from acpidmp, available in /usr/sbin/, or in pmtools:
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/

Please attach the output from dmidecode, available in /usr/sbin/, or here:
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/

Please attach the output from lspci -v

On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 09:29, Pedro Venda wrote:

hi everyone,

i have two questions to which i haven't found answers anywhere, so i am asking here.

- i have an ASUS CUR-DLS motherboard (dual P3) and the 2.4 and 2.6 kernels both say: "ASUS CUR-DLS detected: force use of acpi=ht" when starting disabling ACPI. i must do a acpi=force in order to be able to use it, which consequences i don't know. i looked through the acpi documentation and this board is NOT on the blacklist. i am asking why does the kernel disable ACPI on my mb by default? what's wrong with it? are there any known problems?

- on the same machine, i have 2 nics. one of them is onboard (intel eepro/100) and the other is a realtek 8139. they used to work ok with some versions of the kernel, but now they only work together without ACPI. with acpi, the realtek displays the famous SIOCIFADDR "device is busy...". is this normal? what can be happening here?

Quoted 3 lines

thanks for your time.
regards,
pedro.

-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Acpi-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel

Quoted 9 lines

-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Acpi-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel

#5 lore raw
In reply to a message not in the archive

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi len,

i tried to file the bug report with no success...

first it was too long, and then i kept getting "internal server error" from the bugzilla server, until i quit.

i have the whole post backed up on my desktop, so i can send it directly to you... or you can suggest something else.

[]

Len Brown wrote:

| Pedro,
| We got that entry from UnitedLinux last August.
|
| It is quite possible that the system is unjustly blacklisted, or that it
| was blacklisted out of convenience b/c nobody could figure out exactly
| what was wrong when ACPI on that system failed.
|
| I'll be happy to look into it if you're willing to file a bug and help
| me debug to make a proper diagnosis.
|
| thanks,
| -Len
| ---
| How to file a bug against ACPI:
|
| http://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Category: Power Management, Component: ACPI
|
| Please attach dmesg -s40000 output (or serial console log if dmesg
| unavailable)
| Please attach copy of /proc/interrupts if possible
|
| Please attach the output from acpidmp, available in /usr/sbin/, or in
| pmtools:
| http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/
|
| Please attach the output from dmidecode, available in /usr/sbin/, or
| here:
| http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/
|
| Please attach the output from lspci -v
|
|
|
| On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 09:29, Pedro Venda wrote:
|
| hi everyone,
|
| i have two questions to which i haven't found answers anywhere, so i am
| asking here.
|
| - i have an ASUS CUR-DLS motherboard (dual P3) and the 2.4 and 2.6
| kernels both say: "ASUS CUR-DLS detected: force use of acpi=ht" when
| starting disabling ACPI. i must do a acpi=force in order to be able to
| use it, which consequences i don't know. i looked through the acpi
| documentation and this board is NOT on the blacklist. i am asking why
| does the kernel disable ACPI on my mb by default? what's wrong with it?
| are there any known problems?
|
| - on the same machine, i have 2 nics. one of them is onboard (intel
| eepro/100) and the other is a realtek 8139. they used to work ok with
| some versions of the kernel, but now they only work together without
| ACPI. with acpi, the realtek displays the famous SIOCIFADDR "device is
| busy...". is this normal? what can be happening here?
|
| thanks for your time.
| regards,
| pedro.

- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Acpi-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel

| -------------------------------------------------------
| SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
| Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
| a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
| http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
| _______________________________________________
| Acpi-devel mailing list
| [email protected]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAOTZbeRy7HWZxjWERAl3xAJ4vjSrqzfkNsqUIJBJUPfNh7fR9+wCeNRc2 dfkBqul5JxyCRziCt5zohUk=
=2N1O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#7 lore raw

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:08:11 +0000 Pedro Venda <[email protected]> wrote:

| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
| Hash: SHA1
| 
| hi len,
| 
| i tried to file the bug report with no success...
| 
| first it was too long, and then i kept getting "internal server error"
| from the bugzilla server, until i quit.
| 
| i have the whole post backed up on my desktop, so i can send it directly
| to you... or you can suggest something else.

Hi,
We would like for the kernel bugzilla server to work also... so if it is still having problems, please let me know and I'll forward them. However, I just entered a comment into one bugzilla item, so maybe it's working OK now.

Thanks,
~Randy

| []
| 
| Len Brown wrote:
| 
| | Pedro,
| | We got that entry from UnitedLinux last August.
| |
| | It is quite possible that the system is unjustly blacklisted, or that it
| | was blacklisted out of convenience b/c nobody could figure out exactly
| | what was wrong when ACPI on that system failed.
| |
| | I'll be happy to look into it if you're willing to file a bug and help
| | me debug to make a proper diagnosis.
| |
| | thanks,
| | -Len
| | ---
| | How to file a bug against ACPI:
| |
| | http://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Category: Power Management, Component: ACPI
| |
| | Please attach dmesg -s40000 output (or serial console log if dmesg
| | unavailable)
| | Please attach copy of /proc/interrupts if possible
| |
| | Please attach the output from acpidmp, available in /usr/sbin/, or in
| | pmtools:
| | http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/
| |
| | Please attach the output from dmidecode, available in /usr/sbin/, or
| | here:
| | http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/
| |
| | Please attach the output from lspci -v
| |
| |
| |
| | On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 09:29, Pedro Venda wrote:
| |
| | hi everyone,
| |
| | i have two questions to which i haven't found answers anywhere, so i am
| | asking here.
| |
| | - i have an ASUS CUR-DLS motherboard (dual P3) and the 2.4 and 2.6
| | kernels both say: "ASUS CUR-DLS detected: force use of acpi=ht" when
| | starting disabling ACPI. i must do a acpi=force in order to be able to
| | use it, which consequences i don't know. i looked through the acpi
| | documentation and this board is NOT on the blacklist. i am asking why
| | does the kernel disable ACPI on my mb by default? what's wrong with it?
| | are there any known problems?
| |
| | - on the same machine, i have 2 nics. one of them is onboard (intel
| | eepro/100) and the other is a realtek 8139. they used to work ok with
| | some versions of the kernel, but now they only work together without
| | ACPI. with acpi, the realtek displays the famous SIOCIFADDR "device is
| | busy...". is this normal? what can be happening here?
| |
| | thanks for your time.
| | regards,
| | pedro.

-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#9 lore raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi

i am afraid it is still not working for me, i tried it just now.

i guess the problem is not with the bug's text size... i get an error message in a big red box saying: "A legal Architecture was not set."

just before the red box, i get this message:

Code Error

Bugzilla has suffered an internal error. Please save this page and send it to THE MAINTAINER HAS NOT YET BEEN SET with details of what you were doing at the time this message appeared.

URL: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/post_bug.cgi

regards,
pedro.

Randy.Dunlap wrote:
| On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:08:11 +0000 Pedro Venda <[email protected]> wrote:

|
| | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
| | Hash: SHA1
| |
| | hi len,
| |
| | i tried to file the bug report with no success...
| |
| | first it was too long, and then i kept getting "internal server error"
| | from the bugzilla server, until i quit.
| |
| | i have the whole post backed up on my desktop, so i can send it directly
| | to you... or you can suggest something else.
|
| Hi,
| We would like for the kernel bugzilla server to work also...
| so if it is still having problems, please let me know and I'll
| forward them.  However, I just entered a comment into one
| bugzilla item, so maybe it's working OK now.
|
| Thanks,
| ~Randy
|
| | []
| |
| | Len Brown wrote:
| |
| | | Pedro,
| | | We got that entry from UnitedLinux last August.
| | |
| | | It is quite possible that the system is unjustly blacklisted, or
that it
| | | was blacklisted out of convenience b/c nobody could figure out exactly
| | | what was wrong when ACPI on that system failed.
| | |
| | | I'll be happy to look into it if you're willing to file a bug and help
| | | me debug to make a proper diagnosis.
| | |
| | | thanks,
| | | -Len
| | | ---
| | | How to file a bug against ACPI:
| | |
| | | http://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Category: Power Management, Component:
ACPI
| | |
| | | Please attach dmesg -s40000 output (or serial console log if dmesg
| | | unavailable)
| | | Please attach copy of /proc/interrupts if possible
| | |
| | | Please attach the output from acpidmp, available in /usr/sbin/, or in
| | | pmtools:
| | | http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/
| | |
| | | Please attach the output from dmidecode, available in /usr/sbin/, or
| | | here:
| | | http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/
| | |
| | | Please attach the output from lspci -v
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 09:29, Pedro Venda wrote:
| | |
| | | hi everyone,
| | |
| | | i have two questions to which i haven't found answers anywhere, so
i am
| | | asking here.
| | |
| | | - i have an ASUS CUR-DLS motherboard (dual P3) and the 2.4 and 2.6
| | | kernels both say: "ASUS CUR-DLS detected: force use of acpi=ht" when
| | | starting disabling ACPI. i must do a acpi=force in order to be able to
| | | use it, which consequences i don't know. i looked through the acpi
| | | documentation and this board is NOT on the blacklist. i am asking why
| | | does the kernel disable ACPI on my mb by default? what's wrong
with it?
| | | are there any known problems?
| | |
| | | - on the same machine, i have 2 nics. one of them is onboard (intel
| | | eepro/100) and the other is a realtek 8139. they used to work ok with
| | | some versions of the kernel, but now they only work together without
| | | ACPI. with acpi, the realtek displays the famous SIOCIFADDR "device is
| | | busy...". is this normal? what can be happening here?
| | |
| | | thanks for your time.
| | | regards,
| | | pedro.
|
|
| -------------------------------------------------------
| SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
| Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
| a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
| http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
| _______________________________________________
| Acpi-devel mailing list
| [email protected]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAOquYeRy7HWZxjWERAtFvAJ98wCqfycixsBZ1EQpLHPbXpjW9xQCgs0sy Zkl6qSrGveGJxpBLnOkPE9U=
=fAn+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#11 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Pedro Venda

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi

i am afraid it is still not working for me, i tried it just now.

i guess the problem is not with the bug's text size... i get an error message in a big red box saying: "A legal Architecture was not set."

I had the same problem with mozilla. Using konqueror it worked.

Signature · 9 lines
Stefan Seyfried



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click