2.6.8-rc3-np1
http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.8-rc3-np1/
Patch is against 2.6.8-rc3-mm2 only at this stage due to significant memory management changes in there making it difficult to track Linus' tree as well.
Feedback on the scheduler would be much appreciated, as it might get a run in Andrew's tree soon.
Nick
Quoted 9 lines · On 4:52:14 am 08/09/04 Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.8-rc3-np1/
Patch is against 2.6.8-rc3-mm2 only at this stage due to significant memory management changes in there making it difficult to track Linus' tree as well.
Feedback on the scheduler would be much appreciated, as it might get a run in Andrew's tree soon.
Running great on my Toshiba laptop. No benchmark numbers but I played some DVDs, ogg files, emerged some pacakges. All very smooth.
\__ Jason Munro
\__ [email protected]
\__ http://hastymail.sourceforge.net/
Quoted 9 lines · Nick Piggin
http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.8-rc3-np1/
Patch is against 2.6.8-rc3-mm2 only at this stage due to significant memory management changes in there making it difficult to track Linus' tree as well.
Feedback on the scheduler would be much appreciated, as it might get a run in Andrew's tree soon.
I am trying to get it patched against rc4-mm1, but it seems there are some issues with the SMT bits - dependent_sleeper for example is still around although it was removed with all previous patches (and uses task_t.time_slice which is no longer there).
I assume you forgot to apply them? Possible to get a complete patch? If not, I'll see if I can get something going after some sleep.
Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Martin Schlemmer
This applied fine here with some tweaking. Removing the nmi fixes from the np patch allowed it to apply just fine with some offsets , but not fuzz.
Matt
Quoted 21 lines · Martin Schlemmer
Quoted 8 lines · Nick Piggin
http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.8-rc3-np1/
Patch is against 2.6.8-rc3-mm2 only at this stage due to significant memory management changes in there making it difficult to track Linus' tree as well.
Feedback on the scheduler would be much appreciated, as it might get a run in Andrew's tree soon.
I am trying to get it patched against rc4-mm1, but it seems there are some issues with the SMT bits -
dependent_sleeperfor example is still around although it was removed with all previous patches (and uses task_t.time_slice which is no longer there).I assume you forgot to apply them? Possible to get a complete patch? If not, I'll see if I can get something going after some sleep.
Thanks,
Quoted 3 lines · Matt Heler
This applied fine here with some tweaking. Removing the nmi fixes from the np patch allowed it to apply just fine with some offsets , but not fuzz.
Yeah, I got it to apply with one small reject I think. I assume you did build it? Do you have CONFIG_SCHED_SMT enabled?
Quoted 25 lines · Martin Schlemmer
Quoted 21 lines · Nick Piggin
Quoted 8 lines
http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.8-rc3-np1/
Patch is against 2.6.8-rc3-mm2 only at this stage due to significant memory management changes in there making it difficult to track Linus' tree as well.
Feedback on the scheduler would be much appreciated, as it might get a run in Andrew's tree soon.
I am trying to get it patched against rc4-mm1, but it seems there are some issues with the SMT bits -
dependent_sleeperfor example is still around although it was removed with all previous patches (and uses task_t.time_slice which is no longer there).I assume you forgot to apply them? Possible to get a complete patch? If not, I'll see if I can get something going after some sleep.
Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Martin Schlemmer
Quoted 13 lines · Martin Schlemmer
Quoted 9 lines · Nick Piggin
http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.8-rc3-np1/
Patch is against 2.6.8-rc3-mm2 only at this stage due to significant memory management changes in there making it difficult to track Linus' tree as well.
Feedback on the scheduler would be much appreciated, as it might get a run in Andrew's tree soon.
Quoted 8 lines
I am trying to get it patched against rc4-mm1, but it seems there are some issues with the SMT bits -
dependent_sleeperfor example is still around although it was removed with all previous patches (and uses task_t.time_slice which is no longer there).I assume you forgot to apply them? Possible to get a complete patch? If not, I'll see if I can get something going after some sleep.
Yeah, I've missed something. Thanks for the report. I'll fix it shortly.