ppc32: make perfmon.o CONFIG_E500 specific
PATCH 1/1 ppc32: make perfmon.o CONFIG_E500 specific
Subject says it all, there is no need to link perfmon.o on sub-architectures other than CONFIG_E500.
arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile +2 -1
@@ -15,8 +15,9 @@ extra-y += vmlinux.lds obj-y := entry.o traps.o irq.o idle.o time.o misc.o \ process.o signal.o ptrace.o align.o \ semaphore.o syscalls.o setup.o \ - cputable.o ppc_htab.o perfmon.o + cputable.o ppc_htab.o obj-$(CONFIG_6xx) += l2cr.o cpu_setup_6xx.o +obj-$(CONFIG_E500) += perfmon.o obj-$(CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND) += swsusp.o obj-$(CONFIG_POWER4) += cpu_setup_power4.o obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES) += module.o ppc_ksyms.o
arch/ppc/kernel/traps.c +2 -0
@@ -849,10 +849,12 @@ void AltivecAssistException(struct pt_re }#endif /* CONFIG_ALTIVEC */ +#ifdef CONFIG_E500 void PerformanceMonitorException (struct pt_regs *regs) {perf_irq (regs); } +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE void CacheLockingException(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
Quoted 2 lines · Marcelo Tosatti
Subject says it all, there is no need to link perfmon.o on sub-architectures other than
CONFIG_E500.
Hrm... Nobody has an implementation for 74xx ?
Ben.
I've got some untested code for 74xx (probably only 7450 for now), but it's several rungs down my priority list right now. :( Hopefully I will have time for it soon...
Andy
Quoted 16 lines · Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Quoted 3 lines · Marcelo Tosatti
Subject says it all, there is no need to link perfmon.o on sub-architectures other than
CONFIG_E500.Hrm... Nobody has an implementation for 74xx ?
Ben.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Quoted 3 lines · Andy Fleming
I've got some untested code for 74xx (probably only 7450 for now), but it's several rungs down my priority list right now. :
( Hopefully I will have time for it soon...
OK - you can then add the proper change for inclusion inside the #ifdef ?
Please apply the patch (or some variant of it).