helpful heirarchy check errors
PATCH 1/1 helpful heirarchy check errors
This patch makes the hierarchy violations errors more helpful by adding object class and permissions that were violated instead of just the types. Additionally it makes assertion violations not fatal so that all the violations can been seen before the checking fails.
helpful-hierarchy-check-errors/libsepol/src/hierarchy.c renamed from libsepol/src/hierarchy.c +30 -34
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@#include <sepol/policydb/conditional.h> #include <sepol/policydb/hierarchy.h> #include <sepol/policydb/expand.h> +#include <sepol/policydb/util.h> #include "debug.h"
@@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ typedef struct hierarchy_args {/* This tells check_avtab_hierarchy to check this list in addition to the unconditional avtab */ cond_av_list_t *opt_cond_list;sepol_handle_t *handle; +int numerr; } hierarchy_args_t;/* This merely returns the string part before the last '.'
@@ -81,7 +83,6 @@ static int check_type_hierarchy_callbackhierarchy_args_t *a;type_datum_t *t, *t2;char *key; -int rc; a = (hierarchy_args_t *) args; t = (type_datum_t *) d;
@@ -100,21 +101,20 @@ static int check_type_hierarchy_callbackreturn 0 ; } - rc =0 ; t2 =hashtab_search (a->p->p_types.table, parent);if (!t2) {/* If the parent does not exist this type is an orphan, not legal */ ERR (a->handle,"type %s does not exist, %s is an orphan" , parent, a->p->p_type_val_to_name[t->value -1 ]); - rc =1 ; + a->numerr++; }else if (t2->flavor ==TYPE_ATTRIB ) {/* The parent is an attribute but the child isn't, not legal */ ERR (a->handle,"type %s is a child of an attribute" , a->p->p_type_val_to_name[t->value -1 ]); - rc =1 ; + a->numerr++; }free (parent); -return rc; +return 0 ; }/* This function only verifies that the avtab node passed in does not violate any
@@ -146,12 +146,9 @@ static int check_avtab_hierarchy_callbacif (parent) { t =hashtab_search (a->p->p_types.table, parent);if (!t) { -/* If the parent does not exist this type is an orphan, not legal */ -ERR (a->handle,"type %s doesn't exist, %s is an orphan" , - parent, - a->p->p_type_val_to_name[k->source_type -1 ]); +/* This error was already covered by type_check_hierarchy */ free (parent); -return 1 ; +return 0 ; }free (parent);
@@ -188,11 +185,9 @@ static int check_avtab_hierarchy_callbacif (parent) { t2 =hashtab_search (a->p->p_types.table, parent);if (!t2) { -ERR (a->handle,"type %s doesn't exist, %s is an orphan" , - parent, - a->p->p_type_val_to_name[k->target_type -1 ]); +/* This error was already covered by type_check_hierarchy */ free (parent); -return 1 ; +return 0 ; }free (parent);
@@ -254,10 +249,13 @@ static int check_avtab_hierarchy_callbac }/* At this point there is a violation of the hierarchal constraint, send error condition back */ -ERR (a->handle,"hierarchy violation between types %s and %s" , - a->p->p_type_val_to_name[k->source_type -1 ], - a->p->p_type_val_to_name[k->target_type -1 ]); -return 1 ; +ERR (a->handle,"hierarchy violation between types %s and %s : %s { %s }" , + a->p->p_type_val_to_name[k->source_type -1 ], + a->p->p_type_val_to_name[k->target_type -1 ], + a->p->p_class_val_to_name[k->target_class -1 ], +sepol_av_to_string (a->p, k->target_class, d->data & ~av)); + a->numerr++; +return 0 ; } static int check_cond_avtab_hierarchy(cond_list_t * cond_list,
@@ -267,6 +265,7 @@ static int check_cond_avtab_hierarchy(cocond_list_t *cur_node;cond_av_list_t *cur_av, *expl =NULL ;avtab_t expa; +hierarchy_args_t *a = (hierarchy_args_t *)args;for (cur_node = cond_list; cur_node !=NULL ; cur_node = cur_node->next) {if (avtab_init (&expa))
@@ -281,12 +280,8 @@ static int check_cond_avtab_hierarchy(co rc =check_avtab_hierarchy_callback (&cur_av->node->key, &cur_av->node-> datum, args); -if (rc ==0 ) -continue ; -/* error condition */ -cond_av_list_destroy (expl); -avtab_destroy (&expa); -return rc; +if (rc) + a->numerr++; }cond_av_list_destroy (expl);avtab_destroy (&expa);
@@ -302,12 +297,8 @@ static int check_cond_avtab_hierarchy(co rc =check_avtab_hierarchy_callback (&cur_av->node->key, &cur_av->node-> datum, args); -if (rc ==0 ) -continue ; -/* error condition */ -cond_av_list_destroy (expl); -avtab_destroy (&expa); -return rc; +if (rc) + a->numerr++; }cond_av_list_destroy (expl);avtab_destroy (&expa);
@@ -350,7 +341,8 @@ static int check_role_hierarchy_callbackERR (a->handle,"role %s doesn't exist, %s is an orphan" , parent, a->p->p_role_val_to_name[r->value -1 ]);free (parent); -return 1 ; + a->numerr++; +return 0 ; }if (ebitmap_or (&eb, &r->types.types, &rp->types.types)) {
@@ -360,12 +352,10 @@ static int check_role_hierarchy_callback }if (!ebitmap_cmp (&eb, &rp->types.types)) { -ebitmap_destroy (&eb);/* This is a violation of the hiearchal constraint, return error condition */ ERR (a->handle,"Role hierarchy violation, %s exceeds %s" , a->p->p_role_val_to_name[r->value -1 ], parent); -free (parent); -return 1 ; + a->numerr++; }ebitmap_destroy (&eb);
@@ -390,6 +380,7 @@ int hierarchy_check_constraints(sepol_ha args.expa = &expa; args.opt_cond_list =NULL ; args.handle = handle; + args.numerr =0 ;if (hashtab_map (p->p_types.table, check_type_hierarchy_callback, &args)) goto bad;
@@ -403,6 +394,11 @@ int hierarchy_check_constraints(sepol_haif (hashtab_map (p->p_roles.table, check_role_hierarchy_callback, &args)) goto bad; +if (args.numerr) { +ERR (handle,"%d total errors found during hierarchy check" , args.numerr); + goto bad; + } +avtab_destroy (&expa);return 0 ;
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to [email protected] with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
Quoted 6 lines · Joshua Brindle
This patch makes the hierarchy violations errors more helpful by adding object class and permissions that were violated instead of just the types. Additionally it makes assertion violations not fatal so that all the violations can been seen before the checking fails.
This looks good to me.
Karl
Quoted 185 lines
diff -purN -x.svn
trunk/libsepol/src/hierarchy.cbranch/helpful-hierarchy-check-errors/libsepol/src/hierarchy.chelpful-hierarchy-check-errors/libsepol/src/hierarchy.c renamed from libsepol/src/hierarchy.c +30
-35@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@#include <sepol/policydb/conditional.h> #include <sepol/policydb/hierarchy.h> #include <sepol/policydb/expand.h> +#include <sepol/policydb/util.h> #include "debug.h" @@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ typedef struct hierarchy_args {/* This tells check_avtab_hierarchy to check this list in addition to the unconditional avtab */ cond_av_list_t *opt_cond_list;sepol_handle_t *handle; +int numerr; } hierarchy_args_t;/* This merely returns the string part before the last '.' @@ -81,7 +83,6 @@ static int check_type_hierarchy_callbackhierarchy_args_t *a;type_datum_t *t, *t2;char *key; -int rc; a = (hierarchy_args_t *) args; t = (type_datum_t *) d;@@ -100,21 +101,20 @@ static int check_type_hierarchy_callbackreturn 0 ; } - rc =0 ; t2 =hashtab_search (a->p->p_types.table, parent);if (!t2) {/* If the parent does not exist this type is an orphan, not legal */ ERR (a->handle,"type %s does not exist, %s is an orphan" , parent, a->p->p_type_val_to_name[t->value -1 ]); - rc =1 ; + a->numerr++; }else if (t2->flavor ==TYPE_ATTRIB ) {/* The parent is an attribute but the child isn't, not legal */ ERR (a->handle,"type %s is a child of an attribute" , a->p->p_type_val_to_name[t->value -1 ]); - rc =1 ; + a->numerr++; }free (parent); -return rc; +return 0 ; }/* This function only verifies that the avtab node passed in does not violate any @@ -146,12 +146,9 @@ static int check_avtab_hierarchy_callbacif (parent) { t =hashtab_search (a->p->p_types.table, parent);if (!t) { -/* If the parent does not exist this type is an orphan, not legal */ -ERR (a->handle,"type %s doesn't exist, %s is an orphan" , - parent, - a->p->p_type_val_to_name[k->source_type -1 ]); +/* This error was already covered by type_check_hierarchy */ free (parent); -return 1 ; +return 0 ; }free (parent);@@ -188,11 +185,9 @@ static int check_avtab_hierarchy_callbacif (parent) { t2 =hashtab_search (a->p->p_types.table, parent);if (!t2) { -ERR (a->handle,"type %s doesn't exist, %s is an orphan" , - parent, - a->p->p_type_val_to_name[k->target_type -1 ]); +/* This error was already covered by type_check_hierarchy */ free (parent); -return 1 ; +return 0 ; }free (parent);@@ -254,10 +249,13 @@ static int check_avtab_hierarchy_callbac }/* At this point there is a violation of the hierarchal constraint, send error condition back */ -ERR (a->handle,"hierarchy violation between types %s and %s" , - a->p->p_type_val_to_name[k->source_type -1 ], - a->p->p_type_val_to_name[k->target_type -1 ]); -return 1 ; +ERR (a->handle,"hierarchy violation between types %s and %s : %s { %s }" , + a->p->p_type_val_to_name[k->source_type -1 ], + a->p->p_type_val_to_name[k->target_type -1 ], + a->p->p_class_val_to_name[k->target_class -1 ], +sepol_av_to_string (a->p, k->target_class, d->data & ~av)); + a->numerr++; +return 0 ; } static int check_cond_avtab_hierarchy(cond_list_t * cond_list,@@ -267,6 +265,7 @@ static int check_cond_avtab_hierarchy(cocond_list_t *cur_node;cond_av_list_t *cur_av, *expl =NULL ;avtab_t expa; +hierarchy_args_t *a = (hierarchy_args_t *)args;for (cur_node = cond_list; cur_node !=NULL ; cur_node = cur_node->next) {if (avtab_init (&expa))@@ -281,12 +280,8 @@ static int check_cond_avtab_hierarchy(co rc =check_avtab_hierarchy_callback (&cur_av->node->key, &cur_av->node-> datum, args); -if (rc ==0 ) -continue ; -/* error condition */ -cond_av_list_destroy (expl); -avtab_destroy (&expa); -return rc; +if (rc) + a->numerr++; }cond_av_list_destroy (expl);avtab_destroy (&expa);@@ -302,12 +297,8 @@ static int check_cond_avtab_hierarchy(co rc =check_avtab_hierarchy_callback (&cur_av->node->key, &cur_av->node-> datum, args); -if (rc ==0 ) -continue ; -/* error condition */ -cond_av_list_destroy (expl); -avtab_destroy (&expa); -return rc; +if (rc) + a->numerr++; }cond_av_list_destroy (expl);avtab_destroy (&expa);@@ -350,7 +341,8 @@ static int check_role_hierarchy_callbackERR (a->handle,"role %s doesn't exist, %s is an orphan" , parent, a->p->p_role_val_to_name[r->value -1 ]);free (parent); -return 1 ; + a->numerr++; +return 0 ; }if (ebitmap_or (&eb, &r->types.types, &rp->types.types)) {@@ -360,12 +352,10 @@ static int check_role_hierarchy_callback }if (!ebitmap_cmp (&eb, &rp->types.types)) { -ebitmap_destroy (&eb);/* This is a violation of the hiearchal constraint, return error condition */ ERR (a->handle,"Role hierarchy violation, %s exceeds %s" , a->p->p_role_val_to_name[r->value -1 ], parent); -free (parent); -return 1 ; + a->numerr++; }ebitmap_destroy (&eb);@@ -390,6 +380,7 @@ int hierarchy_check_constraints(sepol_ha args.expa = &expa; args.opt_cond_list =NULL ; args.handle = handle; + args.numerr =0 ;if (hashtab_map (p->p_types.table, check_type_hierarchy_callback, &args)) goto bad;@@ -403,6 +394,11 @@ int hierarchy_check_constraints(sepol_haif (hashtab_map (p->p_roles.table, check_role_hierarchy_callback, &args)) goto bad; +if (args.numerr) { +ERR (handle,"%d total errors found during hierarchy check" , args.numerr); + goto bad; + } +avtab_destroy (&expa);return 0 ; --
Quoted 5 lines
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to [email protected] with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to [email protected] with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.