Skip to contentSkip to conversation

proper C syntax (inline has to be placed before the return type).

PATCH In review Pierre Habouzit 2 participants 2 messages Jun 15, 2016

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 proper C syntax (inline has to be placed before the return type).

---
 strbuf.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
strbuf.c +1 -1
index 9d9d8be..c8174b4 100644
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static void strbuf_begin(struct strbuf *
 	strbuf_init(sb);
 }
 
-static void inline strbuf_add(struct strbuf *sb, int ch) {
+static inline void strbuf_add(struct strbuf *sb, int ch) {
 	if (sb->alloc <= sb->len) {
 		sb->alloc = sb->alloc * 3 / 2 + 16;
 		sb->buf = xrealloc(sb->buf, sb->alloc);
Signature · 1 line
1.4.1.1
#1 lore raw

Dear diary, on Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 04:41:09AM CEST, I got a letter where Pierre Habouzit <[email protected]> said that...

Quoted 10 lines
---
 strbuf.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
strbuf.c +0 -0
index 9d9d8be..c8174b4 100644

strbuf.c static void strbuf_begin(struct strbuf * · line 19

Quoted 8 lines
strbuf.c +1 -1
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static void strbuf_begin(struct strbuf *
 	strbuf_init(sb);
 }
 
-static void inline strbuf_add(struct strbuf *sb, int ch) {
+static inline void strbuf_add(struct strbuf *sb, int ch) {
 	if (sb->alloc <= sb->len) {
 		sb->alloc = sb->alloc * 3 / 2 + 16;
 		sb->buf = xrealloc(sb->buf, sb->alloc);

Bogus, look at C99 A.2.2:

declaration-specifiers:
storage-class-specifier declaration-specifiers
type-specifier declaration-specifiers
type-qualifier declaration-specifiers
function-specifier declaration-specifiers

Signature · 5 lines
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)