proper C syntax (inline has to be placed before the return type).
PATCH 1/1 proper C syntax (inline has to be placed before the return type).
Signed-off-by Pierre Habouzit <[email protected]>
--- strbuf.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
strbuf.c +1 -1
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static void strbuf_begin(struct strbuf *strbuf_init (sb); } -static void inline strbuf_add (struct strbuf *sb,int ch) { +static inline void strbuf_add (struct strbuf *sb,int ch) {if (sb->alloc <= sb->len) { sb->alloc = sb->alloc *3 /2 +16 ; sb->buf =xrealloc (sb->buf, sb->alloc);
Signature · 1 line
1.4.1.1
Dear diary, on Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 04:41:09AM CEST, I got a letter where Pierre Habouzit <[email protected]> said that...
Quoted 10 lines
Signed-off-by Pierre Habouzit <[email protected]>--- strbuf.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)strbuf.c +0
-0
strbuf.c static void strbuf_begin(struct strbuf * · line 19
Quoted 8 lines
strbuf.c +1
-1@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static void strbuf_begin(struct strbuf *strbuf_init (sb); } -static void inline strbuf_add (struct strbuf *sb,int ch) { +static inline void strbuf_add (struct strbuf *sb,int ch) {if (sb->alloc <= sb->len) { sb->alloc = sb->alloc *3 /2 +16 ; sb->buf =xrealloc (sb->buf, sb->alloc);
Bogus, look at C99 A.2.2:
declaration-specifiers:
storage-class-specifier declaration-specifiers
type-specifier declaration-specifiers
type-qualifier declaration-specifiers
function-specifier declaration-specifiers
Signature · 5 lines
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)