powerpc: fix invalid pointer usage in ucc_slow_init()
PATCH 1/1 powerpc: fix invalid pointer usage in ucc_slow_init()
In two places, ucc_slow_init() passes a physical address instead of the virtual address to functions that were expecting the latter, causing a kernel panic. us_info->regs contains the physical address of the UCC register set. The registers are ioremap'd to kernel space, and the virtual pointers are stored in us_regs. The code was using us_info->regs when it should have been using us_regs.
--- arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/ucc_slow.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/ucc_slow.c +2 -2
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ int ucc_slow_init(struct ucc_slow_info * us_info, struct ucc_slow_private ** ucc uccs->us_pram =qe_muram_addr (uccs->us_pram_offset);/* Init Guemr register */ -if ((ret =ucc_init_guemr ((struct ucc_common *) (us_info->regs)))) { +if ((ret =ucc_init_guemr ((struct ucc_common *) us_regs))) {printk (KERN_ERR "%s: cannot init GUEMR" , __FUNCTION__);ucc_slow_free (uccs);return ret;
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ int ucc_slow_init(struct ucc_slow_info * us_info, struct ucc_slow_private ** ucc/* Set UCC to slow type */ if ((ret =ucc_set_type (us_info->ucc_num, - (struct ucc_common *) (us_info->regs), + (struct ucc_common *) us_regs,UCC_SPEED_TYPE_SLOW ))) {printk (KERN_ERR "%s: cannot set UCC type" , __FUNCTION__);ucc_slow_free (uccs);
Signature · 1 line
1.5.0.2.260.g2eb065
Quoted 9 lines · Timur Tabi
In two places,
ucc_slow_init()passes a physical address instead of the virtual address to functions that were expecting the latter, causing a kernel panic.us_info->regscontains the physical address of the UCC register set. The registers are ioremap'd to kernel space, and the virtual pointers are stored inus_regs. The code was usingus_info->regswhen it should have been usingus_regs.Signed-off-by Timur Tabi <[email protected]>---
It's my understanding that there aren't any in kernel users of ucc_slow at the moment, is that true?
- k
Quoted 1 line · Kumar Gala
It's my understanding that there aren't any in kernel users of
ucc_slowat the moment, is that true?
Yes. I'm working on the first - a UART driver.
Quoted 5 lines · Timur Tabi
Quoted 1 line · Kumar Gala
It's my understanding that there aren't any in kernel users of
ucc_slowat the moment, is that true?Yes. I'm working on the first - a UART driver.
Ok, I'll pull it into my tree for 2.6.22 then.
- k
Kumar Gala
AppliedQuoted 8 lines · Timur Tabi
In two places,
ucc_slow_init()passes a physical address instead of the virtual address to functions that were expecting the latter, causing a kernel panic.us_info->regscontains the physical address of the UCC register set. The registers are ioremap'd to kernel space, and the virtual pointers are stored inus_regs. The code was usingus_info->regswhen it should have been usingus_regs.Signed-off-by Timur Tabi <[email protected]>
applied.
- k