timekeeping: drop irq-context clocksource polling
PATCH 1/1 timekeeping: drop irq-context clocksource polling
Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is only checked when there has been and update, and no longer checks in interrupt context.
This also has a few small space and line cleanups.
Boot tested on i386, compile tested on x86_64 .. However, I couldn't find a !GENERIC_TIME that compiled without this change so it's untested..
--- include/linux/timekeeping.h | 10 ++++++++++ kernel/time/clocksource.c | 7 +++++++ kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 17 ++++++++--------- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
include/linux/timekeeping.h new file +10 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +#ifndef _LINUX_TIMEKEEPING_H +#define _LINUX_TIMEKEEPING_H + +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME +extern void timekeeping_change_clocksource (void ); +#else +static inline void timekeeping_change_clocksource (void ) { } +#endif + +#endif
kernel/time/clocksource.c +7 -0
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@#include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/sched.h> /* for spin_unlock_irq() using preempt_count() m68k */ #include <linux/tick.h> +#include <linux/timekeeping.h> /* XXX - Would like a better way for initializing curr_clocksource */ extern struct clocksource clocksource_jiffies;
@@ -279,6 +280,8 @@ int clocksource_register(struct clocksouclocksource_check_watchdog (c); +timekeeping_change_clocksource (); +return 0 ; }EXPORT_SYMBOL (clocksource_register);
@@ -297,6 +300,8 @@ void clocksource_change_rating(struct clclocksource_enqueue (cs); next_clocksource =select_clocksource ();spin_unlock_irqrestore (&clocksource_lock, flags); + +timekeeping_change_clocksource (); }#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
@@ -374,6 +379,8 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_override_clocksourcspin_unlock_irq (&clocksource_lock); +timekeeping_change_clocksource (); +return ret; }
kernel/time/timekeeping.c +8 -9
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@#include <linux/jiffies.h> #include <linux/time.h> #include <linux/tick.h> - +#include <linux/timekeeping.h> /* * This read-write spinlock protects us from races in SMP while
@@ -42,10 +42,8 @@ struct timespec wall_to_monotonic __attrEXPORT_SYMBOL (xtime); -static struct clocksource *clock;/* pointer to current clocksource */ -#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME /** * __get_nsec_offset - Returns nanoseconds since last call to periodic_hook
@@ -168,9 +166,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_settimeofday);* * Accumulates current time interval and initializes new clocksource */ -static void change_clocksource (void ) +void timekeeping_change_clocksource (void ) {struct clocksource *new; +unsigned long flags;cycle_t now;u64 nsec;
@@ -179,8 +178,10 @@ static void change_clocksource(void)if (clock == new)return ; +write_seqlock_irqsave (&xtime_lock, flags); + now =clocksource_read (new); - nsec =__get_nsec_offset (); + nsec =__get_nsec_offset ();timespec_add_ns (&xtime, nsec); clock = new;
@@ -192,11 +193,11 @@ static void change_clocksource(void)tick_clock_notify (); +write_sequnlock_irqrestore (&xtime_lock, flags); +printk (KERN_INFO "Time: %s clocksource has been installed.\n" , clock->name); } -#else -static inline void change_clocksource (void ) { }#endif /**
@@ -470,7 +471,5 @@ void update_wall_time(void) xtime.tv_nsec = (s64 )clock->xtime_nsec >> clock->shift; clock->xtime_nsec -= (s64 )xtime.tv_nsec << clock->shift; -/* check to see if there is a new clocksource to use */ -change_clocksource ();update_vsyscall (&xtime, clock); }
Signature · 1 line
--
Quoted 11 lines · Daniel Walker
Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is only checked when there has been and update, and no longer checks in interrupt context.
This also has a few small space and line cleanups.
Boot tested on i386, compile tested on
x86_64.. However, I couldn't find a !GENERIC_TIME that compiled without this change so it's untested..Signed-off-by Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
Err.. I think you need to be holding a write on the xtime_lock (as is done before calling update_wall_time()) when changing the clocksource.
-john
Quoted 132 lines
--- include/linux/timekeeping.h | 10 ++++++++++ kernel/time/clocksource.c | 7 +++++++ kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 17 ++++++++--------- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)Index:
linux-2.6.20/include/linux/timekeeping.h
===================================================================include/linux/timekeeping.h new file +10
-0@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +#ifndef _LINUX_TIMEKEEPING_H +#define _LINUX_TIMEKEEPING_H + +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME +extern void timekeeping_change_clocksource (void ); +#else +static inline void timekeeping_change_clocksource (void ) { } +#endif + +#endif Index:
linux-2.6.20/kernel/time/clocksource.c
===================================================================kernel/time/clocksource.c +7
-0@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@#include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/sched.h> /* for spin_unlock_irq() using preempt_count() m68k */ #include <linux/tick.h> +#include <linux/timekeeping.h> /* XXX - Would like a better way for initializing curr_clocksource */ extern struct clocksource clocksource_jiffies;@@ -279,6 +280,8 @@ int clocksource_register(struct clocksouclocksource_check_watchdog (c); +timekeeping_change_clocksource (); +return 0 ; }EXPORT_SYMBOL (clocksource_register);@@ -297,6 +300,8 @@ void clocksource_change_rating(struct clclocksource_enqueue (cs); next_clocksource =select_clocksource ();spin_unlock_irqrestore (&clocksource_lock, flags); + +timekeeping_change_clocksource (); }#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS @@ -374,6 +379,8 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_override_clocksourcspin_unlock_irq (&clocksource_lock); +timekeeping_change_clocksource (); +return ret; }Index:
linux-2.6.20/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
===================================================================kernel/time/timekeeping.c +8
-9@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@#include <linux/jiffies.h> #include <linux/time.h> #include <linux/tick.h> - +#include <linux/timekeeping.h> /* * This read-write spinlock protects us from races in SMP while @@ -42,10 +42,8 @@ struct timespec wall_to_monotonic __attrEXPORT_SYMBOL (xtime); -static struct clocksource *clock;/* pointer to current clocksource */ -#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME /** * __get_nsec_offset - Returns nanoseconds since last call to periodic_hook @@ -168,9 +166,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_settimeofday);* * Accumulates current time interval and initializes new clocksource */ -static void change_clocksource (void ) +void timekeeping_change_clocksource (void ) {struct clocksource *new; +unsigned long flags;cycle_t now;u64 nsec;@@ -179,8 +178,10 @@ static void change_clocksource(void)if (clock == new)return ; +write_seqlock_irqsave (&xtime_lock, flags); + now =clocksource_read (new); - nsec =__get_nsec_offset (); + nsec =__get_nsec_offset ();timespec_add_ns (&xtime, nsec); clock = new;@@ -192,11 +193,11 @@ static void change_clocksource(void)tick_clock_notify (); +write_sequnlock_irqrestore (&xtime_lock, flags); +printk (KERN_INFO "Time: %s clocksource has been installed.\n" , clock->name); } -#else -static inline void change_clocksource (void ) { }#endif /** @@ -470,7 +471,5 @@ void update_wall_time(void) xtime.tv_nsec = (s64 )clock->xtime_nsec >> clock->shift; clock->xtime_nsec -= (s64 )xtime.tv_nsec << clock->shift; -/* check to see if there is a new clocksource to use */ -change_clocksource ();update_vsyscall (&xtime, clock); }
Quoted 8 lines · john stultz
Quoted 7 lines · Daniel Walker
Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is only checked when there has been and update, and no longer checks in interrupt context.
This also has a few small space and line cleanups.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Boot tested on i386, compile tested on
x86_64.. However, I couldn't find a !GENERIC_TIME that compiled without this change so it's untested..Signed-off-by Daniel Walker <[email protected]>Err.. I think you need to be holding a write on the
xtime_lock(as is done before callingupdate_wall_time()) when changing the clocksource.
I added a write_seqlock_irqsave() on xtime_lock in change_clocksource() .. Did I need more (different) protection than that?
Daniel
Quoted 12 lines · Daniel Walker
Quoted 11 lines · john stultz
Quoted 10 lines · Daniel Walker
Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is only checked when there has been and update, and no longer checks in interrupt context.
This also has a few small space and line cleanups.
Boot tested on i386, compile tested on
x86_64.. However, I couldn't find a !GENERIC_TIME that compiled without this change so it's untested..
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Daniel Walker <[email protected]>Err.. I think you need to be holding a write on the
xtime_lock(as is done before callingupdate_wall_time()) when changing the clocksource.I added a
write_seqlock_irqsave()onxtime_lockinchange_clocksource().. Did I need more (different) protection than that?
Nope. You're ok there. I just missed it and then I tried to cancel my mail from being sent, but apparently it still got out. whoops! :)
-john
Quoted 8 lines · On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:25:19 -0700 john stultz <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 7 lines · Daniel Walker
Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is only checked when there has been and update, and no longer checks in interrupt context.
This also has a few small space and line cleanups.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Boot tested on i386, compile tested on
x86_64.. However, I couldn't find a !GENERIC_TIME that compiled without this change so it's untested..Signed-off-by Daniel Walker <[email protected]>Err.. I think you need to be holding a write on the
xtime_lock(as is done before callingupdate_wall_time()) when changing the clocksource.
The patch does add the appropriate locking to change_clocksource(), doesn't it?
It looks like a good change to me - we avoid taking the kernel-wide clocksource_lock every tick?
john stultz
Acked-byQuoted 14 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 11 lines · On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:25:19 -0700 john stultz <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 10 lines · Daniel Walker
Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is only checked when there has been and update, and no longer checks in interrupt context.
This also has a few small space and line cleanups.
Boot tested on i386, compile tested on
x86_64.. However, I couldn't find a !GENERIC_TIME that compiled without this change so it's untested..
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Daniel Walker <[email protected]>Err.. I think you need to be holding a write on the
xtime_lock(as is done before callingupdate_wall_time()) when changing the clocksource.The patch does add the appropriate locking to
change_clocksource(), doesn't it?
Yep. Sorry for the confusion, reading too hastily.
Quoted 2 lines
It looks like a good change to me - we avoid taking the kernel-wide
clocksource_lockevery tick?
Agreed.
-john
Quoted 2 lines · On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:03:16 -0700 Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
Boot tested on i386, compile tested on
x86_64.. However, I couldn't find a !GENERIC_TIME that compiled without this change so it's untested..
I'm scratching my head over this statement.
Do you mean that none of grep -lv GENERIC_TIME arch/*/Kconfig compile? Confused.
Oh well. If there's a problem I'll catch it.
Quoted 8 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 2 lines · On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:03:16 -0700 Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
Boot tested on i386, compile tested on
x86_64.. However, I couldn't find a !GENERIC_TIME that compiled without this change so it's untested..I'm scratching my head over this statement.
Do you mean that none of grep -lv
GENERIC_TIMEarch/*/Kconfigcompile? Confused.
Yeah .. I tested 2 or 3 ARM configs that didn't have GENERIC_TIME , but they failed .. I just assumed it was work in progress from the ARM tree ..
Daniel
Quoted 4 lines · On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:03:16 -0700 Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is only checked when there has been and update, and no longer checks in interrupt context.
I get a complete lockup on i386 SMP - before the kernel has printed anything.
I'm suspecting a recursive taking of xtime_lock.
Quoted 10 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 4 lines · On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:03:16 -0700 Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is only checked when there has been and update, and no longer checks in interrupt context.
I get a complete lockup on i386 SMP - before the kernel has printed anything.
I'm suspecting a recursive taking of
xtime_lock.
Looks like this path ,
arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c: time_cpufreq_notifier(); <-- takes xtime_lock
mark_tsc_unstable();
clocksource_change_rating(&clocksource_tsc, 0);
timekeeping_change_clocksource(); <-- takes xtime_lockI'm not sure why the time_cpufreq_notifier is taking the xtime_lock tho .
Daniel
Quoted 9 lines · Daniel Walker
Looks like this path ,
arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c:time_cpufreq_notifier(); <-- takesxtime_lockmark_tsc_unstable(); clocksource_change_rating(&clocksource_tsc, 0); timekeeping_change_clocksource(); <-- takes xtime_lockI'm not sure why the
time_cpufreq_notifieris taking thextime_locktho .
Simply because it fiddles with variables which are relevant for timekeeping.
tglx
Quoted 9 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 8 lines · Daniel Walker
Looks like this path ,
arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c:time_cpufreq_notifier(); <-- takesxtime_lockmark_tsc_unstable(); clocksource_change_rating(&clocksource_tsc, 0); timekeeping_change_clocksource(); <-- takes xtime_lock
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
I'm not sure why the
time_cpufreq_notifieris taking thextime_locktho .Simply because it fiddles with variables which are relevant for timekeeping.
loops_per_jiffy perhaps?
Quoted 10 lines · Daniel Walker
Quoted 9 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 8 lines · Daniel Walker
Looks like this path ,
arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c:time_cpufreq_notifier(); <-- takesxtime_lockmark_tsc_unstable(); clocksource_change_rating(&clocksource_tsc, 0); timekeeping_change_clocksource(); <-- takes xtime_lock
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
I'm not sure why the
time_cpufreq_notifieris taking thextime_locktho .Simply because it fiddles with variables which are relevant for timekeeping.
loops_per_jiffyperhaps?
Oh well, this is a leftover from the days where we tried to use TSC despite of frequency changes. It still modifies the scale factor of the tsc clocksource.
I agree that it can be removed as we switch off TSC anyway in that case.
tglx
Quoted 6 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Oh well, this is a leftover from the days where we tried to use TSC despite of frequency changes. It still modifies the scale factor of the tsc clocksource.
I agree that it can be removed as we switch off TSC anyway in that case.
That's what I was thinking .. However, I wanted to wait for John to comment on it also ..
Dainel