see SAD info
Subsystems (2)
PATCH RESEND 1/1 see SAD info
Stephen,
Use this patch instead of the one i sent yesterday. As before, you will need to pull include/linux/xfrm.h from net-2.6 once Dave applies the kernel patch.
cheers,
jamal
[XFRM] see SAD info
i.e instead of something like ip xfrm state ls | grep -i src | wc -l do:
ip xfrm state count
And you get the count; you can also pass -s to the command line and get the hash info.
---
commit 7540e262b3d565e42c441524f9a236fb216af2dd
tree ee884918b8ea68daf3e70adc5c780cee26a78284
parent ab4c2f14fb93700c9aefeb02ed9918565ba332a1
author Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]> Thu, 03 May 2007 15:04:42 -0400 committer Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]> Thu, 03 May 2007 15:04:42 -0400
include/linux/xfrm.h | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ip/xfrm.h | 1 + ip/xfrm_state.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
include/linux/xfrm.h +74 -0
@@ -178,6 +178,18 @@ enum { XFRM_MSG_REPORT,#define XFRM_MSG_REPORT XFRM_MSG_REPORT + XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE, +#define XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE + + XFRM_MSG_NEWSADINFO, +#define XFRM_MSG_NEWSADINFO XFRM_MSG_NEWSADINFO + XFRM_MSG_GETSADINFO, +#define XFRM_MSG_GETSADINFO XFRM_MSG_GETSADINFO + + XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO, +#define XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO + XFRM_MSG_GETSPDINFO, +#define XFRM_MSG_GETSPDINFO XFRM_MSG_GETSPDINFO __XFRM_MSG_MAX };#define XFRM_MSG_MAX (__XFRM_MSG_MAX - 1)
@@ -256,11 +268,56 @@ enum xfrm_attr_type_t {XFRMA_COADDR ,/* xfrm_address_t */ XFRMA_LASTUSED ,XFRMA_POLICY_TYPE ,/* struct xfrm_userpolicy_type */ +XFRMA_MIGRATE , __XFRMA_MAX#define XFRMA_MAX (__XFRMA_MAX - 1) }; +enum xfrm_sadattr_type_t { +XFRMA_SADUNSPEC , +XFRMA_SADCNT , +XFRMA_SADHINFO , + __XFRMA_SAD_MAX + +#define XFRMA_SAD_MAX (__XFRMA_SAD_MAX - 1) +}; + +struct xfrmu_sadhinfo { +__u32 sadhcnt;/* current hash bkts */ +__u32 sadhmcnt;/* max allowed hash bkts */ +}; + +/* SPD Table filter flags */ +enum xfrm_spd_ftype_t { +XFRM_SPD_UNSPEC , +XFRM_SPD_HMASK =1 , +XFRM_SPD_HMAX =2 , +XFRM_SPD_ICNT =4 , +XFRM_SPD_OCNT =8 , +XFRM_SPD_FCNT =16 , +XFRM_SPD_ISCNT =32 , +XFRM_SPD_OSCNT =64 , +XFRM_SPD_FSCNT =128 , + __XFRM_SPD_MAX + +#define XFRM_SPD_MAX (__XFRM_SPD_MAX - 1) +}; +enum xfrm_spdattr_type_t { +XFRMA_SPD_UNSPEC , +XFRMA_SPDHMASK , +XFRMA_SPDHMAX , +XFRMA_SPDICNT , +XFRMA_SPDOCNT , +XFRMA_SPDFCNT , +XFRMA_SPDISCNT , +XFRMA_SPDOSCNT , +XFRMA_SPDFSCNT , + __XFRMA_SPD_MAX + +#define XFRMA_SPD_MAX (__XFRMA_SPD_MAX - 1) +}; +struct xfrm_usersa_info {struct xfrm_selector sel;struct xfrm_id id;
@@ -351,12 +408,27 @@ struct xfrm_user_report {struct xfrm_selector sel; }; +struct xfrm_user_migrate { +xfrm_address_t old_daddr; +xfrm_address_t old_saddr; +xfrm_address_t new_daddr; +xfrm_address_t new_saddr; +__u8 proto; +__u8 mode; +__u16 reserved; +__u32 reqid; +__u16 old_family; +__u16 new_family; +}; + +#ifndef __KERNEL__/* backwards compatibility for userspace */ #define XFRMGRP_ACQUIRE 1#define XFRMGRP_EXPIRE 2#define XFRMGRP_SA 4#define XFRMGRP_POLICY 8#define XFRMGRP_REPORT 0x20 +#endif enum xfrm_nlgroups {XFRMNLGRP_NONE ,
@@ -373,6 +445,8 @@ enum xfrm_nlgroups {#define XFRMNLGRP_AEVENTS XFRMNLGRP_AEVENTS XFRMNLGRP_REPORT,#define XFRMNLGRP_REPORT XFRMNLGRP_REPORT + XFRMNLGRP_MIGRATE, +#define XFRMNLGRP_MIGRATE XFRMNLGRP_MIGRATE __XFRMNLGRP_MAX };#define XFRMNLGRP_MAX (__XFRMNLGRP_MAX - 1)
ip/xfrm.h +1 -0
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@#define XFRMREP_RTA (x) ((struct rtattr*)(((char*)(x)) + NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_report)))) +#define XFRMSAPD_RTA (x) ((struct rtattr*)(((char*)(x)) + NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(__u32))))#define XFRM_FLAG_PRINT (fp, flags, f, s) \ do { \ if (flags & f) { \
ip/xfrm_state.c +80 -0
98 lines not on this page · raw message
Quoted 8 lines · On Thu, 03 May 2007 19:09:41 -0400 jamal <[email protected]> wrote:
Stephen,
Use this patch instead of the one i sent yesterday. As before, you will need to pullinclude/linux/xfrm.hfrom net-2.6 once Dave applies the kernel patch.cheers,
jamal
Using current xfrm.h from kernel headers, causes conflicts. Instead of XFRMA_SADCNT, it should be using XFRMA_SAD_CNT.
--- ip/xfrm_policy.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- ip/xfrm_state.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++--------------- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
ip/xfrm_policy.c +10 -8
@@ -780,8 +780,6 @@ int print_spdinfo( struct nlmsghdr *n, void *arg)__u32 *f =NLMSG_DATA (n);struct rtattr * tb[XFRMA_SPD_MAX +1 ];struct rtattr * rta; -struct xfrmu_spdinfo *si; -struct xfrmu_spdhinfo *sh;int len = n->nlmsg_len;
@@ -795,12 +793,14 @@ int print_spdinfo( struct nlmsghdr *n, void *arg)parse_rtattr (tb,XFRMA_SPD_MAX , rta, len);fprintf (fp,"\t SPD" ); -if (tb[XFRMA_SPDINFO ]) { -if (RTA_PAYLOAD (tb[XFRMA_SPDINFO ]) <sizeof (*si)) { +if (tb[XFRMA_SPD_INFO ]) { +struct xfrmu_spdinfo *si; + +if (RTA_PAYLOAD (tb[XFRMA_SPD_INFO ]) <sizeof (*si)) {fprintf (stderr,"SPDinfo: Wrong len %d\n" , len);return -1 ; } - si = (struct xfrmu_spdinfo *)RTA_DATA (tb[XFRMA_SPDINFO ]); + si =RTA_DATA (tb[XFRMA_SPD_INFO ]);fprintf (fp," IN %d" , si->incnt);fprintf (fp," OUT %d" , si->outcnt);fprintf (fp," FWD %d" , si->fwdcnt);
@@ -816,12 +816,14 @@ int print_spdinfo( struct nlmsghdr *n, void *arg)fprintf (fp,"\n" ); }if (show_stats >1 ) { -if (tb[XFRMA_SPDHINFO ]) { -if (RTA_PAYLOAD (tb[XFRMA_SPDHINFO ]) <sizeof (*sh)) { +struct xfrmu_spdhinfo *sh; + +if (tb[XFRMA_SPD_HINFO ]) { +if (RTA_PAYLOAD (tb[XFRMA_SPD_HINFO ]) <sizeof (*sh)) {fprintf (stderr,"SPDinfo: Wrong len %d\n" , len);return -1 ; } - sh = (struct xfrmu_spdhinfo *)RTA_DATA (tb[XFRMA_SPDHINFO ]); + sh =RTA_DATA (tb[XFRMA_SPD_HINFO ]);fprintf (fp,"\t SPD buckets:" );fprintf (fp," count %d" , sh->spdhcnt);fprintf (fp," Max %d" , sh->spdhmcnt);
ip/xfrm_state.c +16 -15
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ int xfrm_state_print(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n,fprintf (stderr,"Buggy XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY: too short XFRMA_POLICY len\n" );return -1 ; } - xsinfo = (struct xfrm_usersa_info *)RTA_DATA (tb[XFRMA_SA ]); + xsinfo =RTA_DATA (tb[XFRMA_SA ]); }xfrm_state_info_print (xsinfo, tb, fp,NULL ,NULL );
@@ -940,7 +940,6 @@ int print_sadinfo(struct nlmsghdr *n, void *arg)__u32 *f =NLMSG_DATA (n);struct rtattr *tb[XFRMA_SAD_MAX +1 ];struct rtattr *rta; -struct xfrmu_sadhinfo *si;__u32 *cnt;int len = n->nlmsg_len;
@@ -954,9 +953,9 @@ int print_sadinfo(struct nlmsghdr *n, void *arg) rta =XFRMSAPD_RTA (f);parse_rtattr (tb,XFRMA_SAD_MAX , rta, len); -if (tb[XFRMA_SADCNT ]) { +if (tb[XFRMA_SAD_CNT ]) {fprintf (fp,"\t SAD" ); - cnt = (__u32 *)RTA_DATA (tb[XFRMA_SADCNT ]); + cnt = (__u32 *)RTA_DATA (tb[XFRMA_SAD_CNT ]);fprintf (fp," count %d" , *cnt); }else {fprintf (fp,"BAD SAD info returned\n" );
@@ -964,18 +963,20 @@ int print_sadinfo(struct nlmsghdr *n, void *arg) }if (show_stats) { -if (!tb[XFRMA_SADHINFO ]) { - } -if (RTA_PAYLOAD (tb[XFRMA_SADHINFO ]) <sizeof (*si)) { -fprintf (fp,"BAD SAD length returned\n" ); -return -1 ; - } +if (tb[XFRMA_SAD_HINFO ]) { +struct xfrmu_sadhinfo *si; - si = (struct xfrmu_sadhinfo *)RTA_DATA (tb[XFRMA_SADHINFO ]); -fprintf (fp," (buckets " ); -fprintf (fp,"count %d" , si->sadhcnt); -fprintf (fp," Max %d" , si->sadhmcnt); -fprintf (fp,")" ); +if (RTA_PAYLOAD (tb[XFRMA_SAD_HINFO ]) <sizeof (*si)) { +fprintf (fp,"BAD SAD length returned\n" ); +return -1 ; + } + + si =RTA_DATA (tb[XFRMA_SAD_HINFO ]); +fprintf (fp," (buckets " ); +fprintf (fp,"count %d" , si->sadhcnt); +fprintf (fp," Max %d" , si->sadhmcnt); +fprintf (fp,")" ); + } }fprintf (fp,"\n" );
Signature · 5 lines
1.5.2.1 -- Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
Quoted 3 lines · Stephen Hemminger
Using current
xfrm.hfrom kernel headers, causes conflicts. Instead ofXFRMA_SADCNT, it should be usingXFRMA_SAD_CNT.
Yeah, that changed in the kernel header. If it compiles, it should be fine; thanks Stephen.
cheers,
jamal