Skip to contentSkip to conversation

SELinux: more user friendly unknown handling printk

PATCH In review Eric Paris 3 participants 3 messages Jun 9, 2008 – Jun 10, 2008 SELinux security module

lore
Share & tools
lore

Eric Paris

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 SELinux: more user friendly unknown handling printk

I've gotten complaints and reports about people not understanding the meaning of the current unknown class/perm handling the kernel emits on every policy load. Hopefully this will make make it clear to everyone the meaning of the message and won't waste a printk the user won't care about anyway on systems where the kernel and the policy agree on everything.

---

 security/selinux/selinuxfs.c   |    5 -----
 security/selinux/ss/services.c |    7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
security/selinux/selinuxfs.c +0 -5
index ac1ccc1..f47c9c9 100644
@@ -352,11 +352,6 @@ static ssize_t sel_write_load(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 		length = count;
 
 out1:
-
-	printk(KERN_INFO "SELinux: policy loaded with handle_unknown=%s\n",
-	       (security_get_reject_unknown() ? "reject" :
-		(security_get_allow_unknown() ? "allow" : "deny")));
-
 	audit_log(current->audit_context, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_MAC_POLICY_LOAD,
 		"policy loaded auid=%u ses=%u",
 		audit_get_loginuid(current),
security/selinux/ss/services.c +7 -0
index dcc2e1c..c837982 100644
@@ -1110,6 +1110,7 @@ static int validate_classes(struct policydb *p)
 	const struct selinux_class_perm *kdefs = &selinux_class_perm;
 	const char *def_class, *def_perm, *pol_class;
 	struct symtab *perms;
+	bool print_unknown_handle = 0;
 
 	if (p->allow_unknown) {
 		u32 num_classes = kdefs->cts_len;
@@ -1130,6 +1131,7 @@ static int validate_classes(struct policydb *p)
 				return -EINVAL;
 			if (p->allow_unknown)
 				p->undefined_perms[i-1] = ~0U;
+			print_unknown_handle = 1;
 			continue;
 		}
 		pol_class = p->p_class_val_to_name[i-1];
@@ -1159,6 +1161,7 @@ static int validate_classes(struct policydb *p)
 				return -EINVAL;
 			if (p->allow_unknown)
 				p->undefined_perms[class_val-1] |= perm_val;
+			print_unknown_handle = 1;
 			continue;
 		}
 		perdatum = hashtab_search(perms->table, def_perm);
@@ -1206,6 +1209,7 @@ static int validate_classes(struct policydb *p)
 					return -EINVAL;
 				if (p->allow_unknown)
 					p->undefined_perms[class_val-1] |= (1 << j);
+				print_unknown_handle = 1;
 				continue;
 			}
 			perdatum = hashtab_search(perms->table, def_perm);
@@ -1223,6 +1227,9 @@ static int validate_classes(struct policydb *p)
 			}
 		}
 	}
+	if (print_unknown_handle)
+		printk(KERN_INFO "SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be %s\n",
+			(security_get_allow_unknown() ? "allowed" : "denied"));
 	return 0;
 }
 

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to [email protected] with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

#1 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Eric Paris

I've gotten complaints and reports about people not understanding the meaning of the current unknown class/perm handling the kernel emits on every policy load. Hopefully this will make make it clear to everyone the meaning of the message and won't waste a printk the user won't care about anyway on systems where the kernel and the policy agree on everything.

Looks good to me, applied.

Signature · 7 lines
James Morris
<[email protected]>

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to [email protected] with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
Acked-by on v1 1/1
#2 lore raw
In reply to Eric Paris
Quoted 8 lines · Eric Paris

I've gotten complaints and reports about people not understanding the meaning of the current unknown class/perm handling the kernel emits on every policy load. Hopefully this will make make it clear to everyone the meaning of the message and won't waste a printk the user won't care about anyway on systems where the kernel and the policy agree on everything.

Quoted 70 lines

---

 security/selinux/selinuxfs.c   |    5 -----
 security/selinux/ss/services.c |    7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
security/selinux/selinuxfs.c +0 -5
index ac1ccc1..f47c9c9 100644
@@ -352,11 +352,6 @@ static ssize_t sel_write_load(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 		length = count;
 
 out1:
-
-	printk(KERN_INFO "SELinux: policy loaded with handle_unknown=%s\n",
-	       (security_get_reject_unknown() ? "reject" :
-		(security_get_allow_unknown() ? "allow" : "deny")));
-
 	audit_log(current->audit_context, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_MAC_POLICY_LOAD,
 		"policy loaded auid=%u ses=%u",
 		audit_get_loginuid(current),
security/selinux/ss/services.c +7 -0
index dcc2e1c..c837982 100644
@@ -1110,6 +1110,7 @@ static int validate_classes(struct policydb *p)
 	const struct selinux_class_perm *kdefs = &selinux_class_perm;
 	const char *def_class, *def_perm, *pol_class;
 	struct symtab *perms;
+	bool print_unknown_handle = 0;
 
 	if (p->allow_unknown) {
 		u32 num_classes = kdefs->cts_len;
@@ -1130,6 +1131,7 @@ static int validate_classes(struct policydb *p)
 				return -EINVAL;
 			if (p->allow_unknown)
 				p->undefined_perms[i-1] = ~0U;
+			print_unknown_handle = 1;
 			continue;
 		}
 		pol_class = p->p_class_val_to_name[i-1];
@@ -1159,6 +1161,7 @@ static int validate_classes(struct policydb *p)
 				return -EINVAL;
 			if (p->allow_unknown)
 				p->undefined_perms[class_val-1] |= perm_val;
+			print_unknown_handle = 1;
 			continue;
 		}
 		perdatum = hashtab_search(perms->table, def_perm);
@@ -1206,6 +1209,7 @@ static int validate_classes(struct policydb *p)
 					return -EINVAL;
 				if (p->allow_unknown)
 					p->undefined_perms[class_val-1] |= (1 << j);
+				print_unknown_handle = 1;
 				continue;
 			}
 			perdatum = hashtab_search(perms->table, def_perm);
@@ -1223,6 +1227,9 @@ static int validate_classes(struct policydb *p)
 			}
 		}
 	}
+	if (print_unknown_handle)
+		printk(KERN_INFO "SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be %s\n",
+			(security_get_allow_unknown() ? "allowed" : "denied"));
 	return 0;
 }
 
Signature · 8 lines
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to [email protected] with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.