Device assignment & MSI enhancement
cover Device assignment & MSI enhancement
Hi Avi and Marcelo
Merry Xmas! And here is the v2 of patchset. Target at 2.6.29 for it contained a lot of fix and improvement of current device assignment and MSI feature.
Change from V1:
Addressed Marcelo's comments, and:
1. Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq(). In case to do this, I fetch one patch (irq_fifo) from original MSI-X patchset. Indeed a nice catch of Marcelo. :)
2. Unified kvm_set_irq() with ioapic_deliver(). It didn't save much, but duplicate is always bothering, and I have modified bitmask for vcpu to a real bitmap (maybe not all, just what I have seen).
And for V1:
1. Add gsi_msg mapping mechanism, which gsi can used to indicated a MSI interrupt.(Notice API/ABI changed a little, but we don't have userspace patch now, so it should be OK.)
2. Provide MSI disable capability.
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 11 ++- include/linux/kvm.h | 15 +++- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 26 +++++- include/linux/kvm_types.h | 17 ++++ virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 117 ++++++++++--------------- virt/kvm/ioapic.h | 23 +---- virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 184 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 212 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 8 files changed, 415 insertions(+), 190 deletions(-)
Sorry for the patchset size, it's too easy to grow fast, and I am a little too lazy to split them into more batches in the Xmas... :)
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
PATCH 1/15 KVM: Add MSI_ACTION flag for assigned irq
For MSI disable feature later.
Notice I changed ABI here, but due to no userspace patch, I think it's OK.
--- include/linux/kvm.h | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
include/linux/kvm.h +2 -1
@@ -544,6 +544,7 @@ struct kvm_assigned_irq {#define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_ENABLE_IOMMU (1 << 0) -#define KVM_DEV_IRQ_ASSIGN_ENABLE_MSI (1 << 0) +#define KVM_DEV_IRQ_ASSIGN_MSI_ACTION (1 << 0) +#define KVM_DEV_IRQ_ASSIGN_ENABLE_MSI (1 << 1)#endif
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 2/15 KVM: Use kvm_free_assigned_irq() for free irq
In reply to Sheng YangWhich is more convenient...
--- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 10 ++-------- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +2 -8
@@ -284,11 +284,7 @@ static int assigned_device_update_intx(struct kvm *kvm,return 0 ;if (irqchip_in_kernel (kvm)) { -if (!msi2intx && - adev->irq_requested_type &KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_MSI ) { -free_irq (adev->host_irq, (void *)kvm); -pci_disable_msi (adev->dev); - } +kvm_free_assigned_irq (kvm, adev);if (!capable (CAP_SYS_RAWIO ))return -EPERM ;
@@ -339,9 +335,7 @@ static int assigned_device_update_msi(struct kvm *kvm,if (irqchip_in_kernel (kvm)) {if (!msi2intx) { -if (adev->irq_requested_type & -KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_INTX ) -free_irq (adev->host_irq, (void *)adev); +kvm_free_assigned_irq (kvm, adev); r =pci_enable_msi (adev->dev);if (r)
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 3/15 KVM: Add support to disable MSI for assigned device
In reply to Sheng YangMSI is always enabled by default for msi2intx=1. But if msi2intx=0, we have to disable MSI if guest require to do so.
The patch also discard unnecessary msi2intx judgment if guest want to update MSI state.
--- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +10 -2
@@ -328,6 +328,15 @@ static int assigned_device_update_msi(struct kvm *kvm, adev->irq_requested_type &= ~KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSI ; adev->guest_irq = airq->guest_irq; adev->ack_notifier.gsi = airq->guest_irq; + }else { +/* +* Guest require to disable device MSI, we disable MSI and +* re-enable INTx by default again. Notice it's only for +* non-msi2intx. +*/ +kvm_free_assigned_irq (kvm, adev); +assigned_device_update_intx (kvm, adev, airq); +return 0 ; }if (adev->irq_requested_type &KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_MSI )
@@ -399,8 +408,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_assign_irq(struct kvm *kvm, } } -if ((!msi2intx && - (assigned_irq->flags &KVM_DEV_IRQ_ASSIGN_ENABLE_MSI )) || +if ((assigned_irq->flags &KVM_DEV_IRQ_ASSIGN_MSI_ACTION ) || (msi2intx && match->dev->msi_enabled)) {#ifdef CONFIG_X86 r =assigned_device_update_msi (kvm, match, assigned_irq);
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 4/15 KVM: Add a route layer to convert MSI message to GSI
In reply to Sheng YangAvi's purpose, to use single kvm_set_irq() to deal with all interrupt, including MSI. So here is it.
struct gsi_msg is a mapping from a special gsi(with KVM_GSI_MSG_MASK) to MSI/MSI-X message address/data.
Now we support up to 256 gsi_msg mapping, and gsi_msg is allocated by kernel and provide two ioctls to userspace, which is more flexiable.
--- include/linux/kvm.h | 12 ++++++++ include/linux/kvm_host.h | 16 ++++++++++ virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
include/linux/kvm.h +12 -0
@@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ struct kvm_trace_rec {#define KVM_CAP_USER_NMI 22#endif #define KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG 23 +#define KVM_CAP_GSI_MSG 24/* * ioctls for VM fds
@@ -427,6 +428,8 @@ struct kvm_trace_rec { struct kvm_assigned_pci_dev)#define KVM_ASSIGN_IRQ _IOR(KVMIO, 0x70, \ struct kvm_assigned_irq) +#define KVM_REQUEST_GSI_MSG _IOWR(KVMIO, 0x71, struct kvm_assigned_gsi_msg) +#define KVM_FREE_GSI_MSG _IOR(KVMIO, 0x72, struct kvm_assigned_gsi_msg)/* * ioctls for vcpu fds
@@ -547,4 +550,13 @@ struct kvm_assigned_irq {#define KVM_DEV_IRQ_ASSIGN_MSI_ACTION (1 << 0)#define KVM_DEV_IRQ_ASSIGN_ENABLE_MSI (1 << 1) +struct kvm_assigned_gsi_msg { +__u32 gsi; +struct { +__u32 addr_lo; +__u32 addr_hi; +__u32 data; + } msg; +}; +#endif
include/linux/kvm_host.h +16 -0
@@ -132,6 +132,10 @@ struct kvm {unsigned long mmu_notifier_seq;long mmu_notifier_count;#endif +struct hlist_head gsi_msg_list; +struct mutex gsi_msg_lock; +#define KVM_NR_GSI_MSG 256 +DECLARE_BITMAP (gsi_msg_bitmap,KVM_NR_GSI_MSG ); };/* The guest did something we don't support. */
@@ -319,6 +323,14 @@ struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel {struct pci_dev *dev;struct kvm *kvm; }; + +#define KVM_GSI_MSG_MASK 0x1000000ull +struct kvm_gsi_msg { +u32 gsi; +struct msi_msg msg; +struct hlist_node link; +}; +void kvm_set_irq (struct kvm *kvm,int irq_source_id,int irq,int level);void kvm_notify_acked_irq (struct kvm *kvm,unsigned gsi); void kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
@@ -326,6 +338,10 @@ void kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,void kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier (struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian);int kvm_request_irq_source_id (struct kvm *kvm);void kvm_free_irq_source_id (struct kvm *kvm,int irq_source_id); +int kvm_update_gsi_msg (struct kvm *kvm,struct kvm_gsi_msg *gsi_msg); +struct kvm_gsi_msg *kvm_find_gsi_msg (struct kvm *kvm,u32 gsi); +void kvm_free_gsi_msg (struct kvm *kvm,struct kvm_gsi_msg *gsi_msg); +void kvm_free_gsi_msg_list (struct kvm *kvm);#ifdef CONFIG_DMAR int kvm_iommu_map_pages(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t base_gfn,
virt/kvm/irq_comm.c +70 -0
73 lines not on this page · raw message
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +66 -0
90 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 5/15 KVM: Using gsi_msg mapping for MSI device assignment
In reply to Sheng YangConvert MSI userspace interface to support gsi_msg mapping(and nobody should be the user of the old interface...).
--- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 - virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
include/linux/kvm_host.h +0 -1
@@ -313,7 +313,6 @@ struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel {int host_irq;bool host_irq_disabled;int guest_irq; -struct msi_msg guest_msi;#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_INTX (1 << 0)#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSI (1 << 1)#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_INTX (1 << 8)
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +22 -13
@@ -92,20 +92,30 @@ static void assigned_device_msi_dispatch(struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev)int vcpu_id;struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic =ioapic_irqchip (dev->kvm); -int dest_id = (dev->guest_msi.address_lo &MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_MASK ) - >>MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_SHIFT ; -int vector = (dev->guest_msi.data &MSI_DATA_VECTOR_MASK ) - >>MSI_DATA_VECTOR_SHIFT ; -int dest_mode =test_bit (MSI_ADDR_DEST_MODE_SHIFT , - (unsigned long *)&dev->guest_msi.address_lo); -int trig_mode =test_bit (MSI_DATA_TRIGGER_SHIFT , - (unsigned long *)&dev->guest_msi.data); -int delivery_mode =test_bit (MSI_DATA_DELIVERY_MODE_SHIFT , - (unsigned long *)&dev->guest_msi.data); +struct kvm_gsi_msg *gsi_msg; +int dest_id, vector, dest_mode, trig_mode, delivery_mode;u32 deliver_bitmask;BUG_ON (!ioapic); +mutex_lock (&dev->kvm->gsi_msg_lock); + gsi_msg =kvm_find_gsi_msg (dev->kvm, dev->guest_irq); +if (!gsi_msg) { +printk (KERN_WARNING "kvm: fail to find correlated gsi_msg\n" ); +return ; + } +mutex_unlock (&dev->kvm->gsi_msg_lock); + + dest_id = (gsi_msg->msg.address_lo &MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_MASK ) + >>MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_SHIFT ; + vector = (gsi_msg->msg.data &MSI_DATA_VECTOR_MASK ) + >>MSI_DATA_VECTOR_SHIFT ; + dest_mode =test_bit (MSI_ADDR_DEST_MODE_SHIFT , + (unsigned long *)&gsi_msg->msg.address_lo); + trig_mode =test_bit (MSI_DATA_TRIGGER_SHIFT , + (unsigned long *)&gsi_msg->msg.data); + delivery_mode =test_bit (MSI_DATA_DELIVERY_MODE_SHIFT , + (unsigned long *)&gsi_msg->msg.data); deliver_bitmask =kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask (ioapic, dest_id, dest_mode);/* IOAPIC delivery mode value is the same as MSI here */
@@ -316,17 +326,16 @@ static int assigned_device_update_msi(struct kvm *kvm, {int r; + adev->guest_irq = airq->guest_irq; +if (airq->flags &KVM_DEV_IRQ_ASSIGN_ENABLE_MSI ) {/* x86 don't care upper address of guest msi message addr */ adev->irq_requested_type |=KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSI ; adev->irq_requested_type &= ~KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_INTX ; - adev->guest_msi.address_lo = airq->guest_msi.addr_lo; - adev->guest_msi.data = airq->guest_msi.data; adev->ack_notifier.gsi =-1 ; }else if (msi2intx) { adev->irq_requested_type |=KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_INTX ; adev->irq_requested_type &= ~KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSI ; - adev->guest_irq = airq->guest_irq; adev->ack_notifier.gsi = airq->guest_irq; }else {/*
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 6/15 KVM: Improve MSI dispatch function
In reply to Sheng YangPrepare to merge with kvm_set_irq().
--- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +4 -4
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static bool kvm_rebooting; #ifdef KVM_CAP_DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT #ifdef CONFIG_X86 -static void assigned_device_msi_dispatch(struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev) +static void assigned_device_msi_dispatch(struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev, u32 gsi) { int vcpu_id; struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void assigned_device_msi_dispatch(struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev)BUG_ON (!ioapic);mutex_lock (&dev->kvm->gsi_msg_lock); - gsi_msg =kvm_find_gsi_msg (dev->kvm, dev->guest_irq); + gsi_msg =kvm_find_gsi_msg (dev->kvm, gsi);if (!gsi_msg) {printk (KERN_WARNING "kvm: fail to find correlated gsi_msg\n" );return ;
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void assigned_device_msi_dispatch(struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev) } }#else -static void assigned_device_msi_dispatch (struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev) {} +static void assigned_device_msi_dispatch (struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev,u32 gsi) {}#endif static struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *kvm_find_assigned_dev(struct list_head *head,
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static void kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler(struct work_struct *work) assigned_dev->guest_irq, 1); else if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type &KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSI ) { -assigned_device_msi_dispatch (assigned_dev); +assigned_device_msi_dispatch (assigned_dev, assigned_dev->guest_irq);enable_irq (assigned_dev->host_irq); assigned_dev->host_irq_disabled = false; }
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 7/15 KVM: Using ioapic_irqchip() macro for kvm_set_irq
In reply to Sheng Yang--- virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
virt/kvm/irq_comm.c +1 -1
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ void kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, int irq, int level)* IOAPIC. So set the bit in both. The guest will ignore * writes to the unused one. */ -kvm_ioapic_set_irq (kvm->arch.vioapic, irq, !!(*irq_state)); +kvm_ioapic_set_irq (ioapic_irqchip (kvm), irq, !!(*irq_state));#ifdef CONFIG_X86 kvm_pic_set_irq (pic_irqchip (kvm), irq, !!(*irq_state));#endif
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 8/15 KVM: Merge MSI handling to kvm_set_irq
In reply to Sheng YangUsing kvm_set_irq to handle all interrupt injection.
--- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +- virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 77 +++--------------------------------- 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
include/linux/kvm_host.h +1 -1
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ struct kvm_gsi_msg {struct hlist_node link; }; -void kvm_set_irq (struct kvm *kvm,int irq_source_id,int irq,int level); +void kvm_set_irq (struct kvm *kvm,int irq_source_id,u32 gsi,int level);void kvm_notify_acked_irq (struct kvm *kvm,unsigned gsi);void kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier (struct kvm *kvm,struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian);
virt/kvm/irq_comm.c +83 -15
111 lines not on this page · raw message
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +6 -71
98 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 9/15 KVM: Split IOAPIC structure
In reply to Sheng YangPrepared for reuse ioapic_redir_entry for MSI.
--- include/linux/kvm_types.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++ virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 6 +++--- virt/kvm/ioapic.h | 17 +---------------- 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
include/linux/kvm_types.h +17 -0
@@ -53,4 +53,21 @@ struct kvm_pio_request { int rep; }; +union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry { +u64 bits; +struct { +u8 vector; +u8 delivery_mode:3 ; +u8 dest_mode:1 ; +u8 delivery_status:1 ; +u8 polarity:1 ; +u8 remote_irr:1 ; +u8 trig_mode:1 ; +u8 mask:1 ; +u8 reserve:7 ; +u8 reserved[4 ]; +u8 dest_id; + } fields; +}; +#endif /* __KVM_TYPES_H__ */
virt/kvm/ioapic.c +3 -3
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static unsigned long ioapic_read_indirect(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,static void ioapic_service (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,unsigned int idx) { -union ioapic_redir_entry *pent; +union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *pent; pent = &ioapic->redirtbl[idx];
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ void kvm_ioapic_set_irq(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int irq, int level) {u32 old_irr = ioapic->irr;u32 mask =1 << irq; -union ioapic_redir_entry entry; +union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry entry;if (irq >=0 && irq <IOAPIC_NUM_PINS ) { entry = ioapic->redirtbl[irq];
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ void kvm_ioapic_set_irq(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int irq, int level)static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,int gsi,int trigger_mode) { -union ioapic_redir_entry *ent; +union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent; ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[gsi];
virt/kvm/ioapic.h +1 -16
@@ -40,22 +40,7 @@ struct kvm_ioapic {u32 id;u32 irr;u32 pad; -union ioapic_redir_entry { -u64 bits; -struct { -u8 vector; -u8 delivery_mode:3 ; -u8 dest_mode:1 ; -u8 delivery_status:1 ; -u8 polarity:1 ; -u8 remote_irr:1 ; -u8 trig_mode:1 ; -u8 mask:1 ; -u8 reserve:7 ; -u8 reserved[4 ]; -u8 dest_id; - } fields; - } redirtbl[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS ]; +union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry redirtbl[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS ];struct kvm_io_device dev;struct kvm *kvm;void (*ack_notifier)(void *opaque,int irq);
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 10/15 KVM: Unified the delivery of IOAPIC and MSI
In reply to Sheng YangDuplicate code is always bothering...
--- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 3 ++ virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------- virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
include/linux/kvm_host.h +3 -0
@@ -330,6 +330,9 @@ struct kvm_gsi_msg {struct hlist_node link; }; +void kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, +union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *entry, +u32 *deliver_bitmask);void kvm_set_irq (struct kvm *kvm,int irq_source_id,u32 gsi,int level);void kvm_notify_acked_irq (struct kvm *kvm,unsigned gsi); void kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
virt/kvm/ioapic.c +31 -53
106 lines not on this page · raw message
virt/kvm/irq_comm.c +45 -30
98 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 11/15 KVM: Change API of kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask
In reply to Sheng YangIn order to use with bit ops.
--- virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 17 ++++++++--------- virt/kvm/ioapic.h | 4 ++-- virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 5 +++-- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
virt/kvm/ioapic.c +8 -9
@@ -153,22 +153,22 @@ static void ioapic_inj_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)kvm_vcpu_kick (vcpu); } -u32 kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,u8 dest, -u8 dest_mode) +void kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,u8 dest, +u8 dest_mode,u32 *mask) { -u32 mask =0 ;int i;struct kvm *kvm = ioapic->kvm;struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;ioapic_debug ("dest %d dest_mode %d\n" , dest, dest_mode); + *mask =0 ;if (dest_mode ==0 ) {/* Physical mode. */ if (dest ==0xFF ) {/* Broadcast. */ for (i =0 ; i <KVM_MAX_VCPUS ; ++i)if (kvm->vcpus[i] && kvm->vcpus[i]->arch.apic) - mask |=1 << i; -return mask; + *mask |=1 << i; +return ; }for (i =0 ; i <KVM_MAX_VCPUS ; ++i) { vcpu = kvm->vcpus[i];
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ u32 kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, u8 dest,continue ;if (kvm_apic_match_physical_addr (vcpu->arch.apic, dest)) {if (vcpu->arch.apic) - mask =1 << i; + *mask =1 << i;break ; } }
@@ -187,10 +187,9 @@ u32 kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, u8 dest,continue ;if (vcpu->arch.apic &&kvm_apic_match_logical_addr (vcpu->arch.apic, dest)) - mask |=1 << vcpu->vcpu_id; + *mask |=1 << vcpu->vcpu_id; } -ioapic_debug ("mask %x\n" , mask); -return mask; +ioapic_debug ("mask %x\n" , *mask); }static int ioapic_deliver (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,int irq)
virt/kvm/ioapic.h +2 -2
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ void kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm *kvm, int vector, int trigger_mode);int kvm_ioapic_init (struct kvm *kvm);void kvm_ioapic_set_irq (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,int irq,int level);void kvm_ioapic_reset (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic); -u32 kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,u8 dest, -u8 dest_mode); +void kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,u8 dest, +u8 dest_mode,u32 *mask);#endif
virt/kvm/irq_comm.c +3 -2
@@ -35,8 +35,9 @@ void kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, {struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; - *deliver_bitmask =kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask (ioapic, - entry->fields.dest_id, entry->fields.dest_mode); +kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask (ioapic, entry->fields.dest_id, + entry->fields.dest_mode, + deliver_bitmask);switch (entry->fields.delivery_mode) {case IOAPIC_LOWEST_PRIORITY : vcpu = kvm_get_lowest_prio_vcpu(ioapic->kvm,
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 12/15 KVM: Update intr delivery func to accept unsigned long* bitmap
In reply to Sheng YangWould be used with bit ops, and would be easily extended if KVM_MAX_VCPUS is increased.
--- arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 8 ++++---- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +- virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 4 ++-- virt/kvm/ioapic.h | 4 ++-- virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 6 +++--- 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c +4 -4
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static int __apic_accept_irq(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int delivery_mode, }static struct kvm_lapic *kvm_apic_round_robin (struct kvm *kvm,u8 vector, -unsigned long bitmap) +unsigned long *bitmap) {int last;int next;
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static struct kvm_lapic *kvm_apic_round_robin(struct kvm *kvm, u8 vector, do { if (++next == KVM_MAX_VCPUS) next = 0; - if (kvm->vcpus[next] == NULL || !test_bit(next, &bitmap)) + if (kvm->vcpus[next] == NULL || !test_bit(next, bitmap)) continue; apic = kvm->vcpus[next]->arch.apic; if (apic && apic_enabled(apic))
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static struct kvm_lapic *kvm_apic_round_robin(struct kvm *kvm, u8 vector, }struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_lowest_prio_vcpu (struct kvm *kvm,u8 vector, -unsigned long bitmap) +unsigned long *bitmap) {struct kvm_lapic *apic;
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static void apic_send_ipi(struct kvm_lapic *apic) }if (delivery_mode ==APIC_DM_LOWEST ) { - target =kvm_get_lowest_prio_vcpu (vcpu->kvm, vector, lpr_map); + target =kvm_get_lowest_prio_vcpu (vcpu->kvm, vector, &lpr_map);if (target !=NULL )__apic_accept_irq (target->arch.apic, delivery_mode, vector, level, trig_mode);
include/linux/kvm_host.h +1 -1
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ struct kvm_gsi_msg {void kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *entry, -u32 *deliver_bitmask); +unsigned long *deliver_bitmask);void kvm_set_irq (struct kvm *kvm,int irq_source_id,u32 gsi,int level);void kvm_notify_acked_irq (struct kvm *kvm,unsigned gsi); void kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
virt/kvm/ioapic.c +2 -2
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void ioapic_inj_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) }void kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,u8 dest, -u8 dest_mode,u32 *mask) +u8 dest_mode,unsigned long *mask) {int i;struct kvm *kvm = ioapic->kvm;
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ void kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, u8 dest,static int ioapic_deliver (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,int irq) {union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry entry = ioapic->redirtbl[irq]; -u32 deliver_bitmask; +unsigned long deliver_bitmask;struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;int vcpu_id, r =0 ;
virt/kvm/ioapic.h +2 -2
@@ -65,12 +65,12 @@ static inline struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic_irqchip(struct kvm *kvm) }struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_lowest_prio_vcpu (struct kvm *kvm,u8 vector, -unsigned long bitmap); +unsigned long *bitmap);void kvm_ioapic_update_eoi (struct kvm *kvm,int vector,int trigger_mode);int kvm_ioapic_init (struct kvm *kvm);void kvm_ioapic_set_irq (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,int irq,int level);void kvm_ioapic_reset (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic);void kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,u8 dest, -u8 dest_mode,u32 *mask); +u8 dest_mode,unsigned long *mask);#endif
virt/kvm/irq_comm.c +3 -3
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@void kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *entry, -u32 *deliver_bitmask) +unsigned long *deliver_bitmask) {struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,switch (entry->fields.delivery_mode) {case IOAPIC_LOWEST_PRIORITY : vcpu =kvm_get_lowest_prio_vcpu (ioapic->kvm, - entry->fields.vector, *deliver_bitmask); + entry->fields.vector, deliver_bitmask); *deliver_bitmask =1 << vcpu->vcpu_id;break ;case IOAPIC_FIXED :
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, u32 gsi, int level)struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic =ioapic_irqchip (kvm);struct kvm_gsi_msg *gsi_msg;union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry entry; -u32 deliver_bitmask; +unsigned long deliver_bitmask;BUG_ON (!ioapic);#endif
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 13/15 KVM: bit ops for deliver_bitmap
In reply to Sheng YangIt's also convenient when we extend KVM supported vcpu number in the future.
--- arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 7 ++++--- virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 24 +++++++++++++----------- virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c +4 -3
@@ -477,9 +477,10 @@ static void apic_send_ipi(struct kvm_lapic *apic)struct kvm_vcpu *target;struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; -unsigned long lpr_map =0 ; +DECLARE_BITMAP (lpr_map,KVM_MAX_VCPUS );int i; +bitmap_zero (lpr_map,KVM_MAX_VCPUS ); apic_debug("icr_high 0x%x, icr_low 0x%x, " "short_hand 0x%x, dest 0x%x, trig_mode 0x%x, level 0x%x, " "dest_mode 0x%x, delivery_mode 0x%x, vector 0x%x\n",
@@ -494,7 +495,7 @@ static void apic_send_ipi(struct kvm_lapic *apic)if (vcpu->arch.apic &&apic_match_dest (vcpu, apic, short_hand, dest, dest_mode)) {if (delivery_mode ==APIC_DM_LOWEST ) -set_bit (vcpu->vcpu_id, &lpr_map); +set_bit (vcpu->vcpu_id, lpr_map);else __apic_accept_irq (vcpu->arch.apic, delivery_mode, vector, level, trig_mode);
@@ -502,7 +503,7 @@ static void apic_send_ipi(struct kvm_lapic *apic) }if (delivery_mode ==APIC_DM_LOWEST ) { - target =kvm_get_lowest_prio_vcpu (vcpu->kvm, vector, &lpr_map); + target =kvm_get_lowest_prio_vcpu (vcpu->kvm, vector, lpr_map);if (target !=NULL )__apic_accept_irq (target->arch.apic, delivery_mode, vector, level, trig_mode);
virt/kvm/ioapic.c +13 -11
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ void kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, u8 dest,static int ioapic_deliver (struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,int irq) {union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry entry = ioapic->redirtbl[irq]; -unsigned long deliver_bitmask; +DECLARE_BITMAP (deliver_bitmask,KVM_MAX_VCPUS );struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;int vcpu_id, r =0 ;
@@ -205,22 +205,24 @@ static int ioapic_deliver(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int irq) entry.fields.delivery_mode, entry.fields.vector, entry.fields.trig_mode); -kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask (ioapic, &entry, &deliver_bitmask); -if (!deliver_bitmask) { -ioapic_debug ("no target on destination\n" ); -return 0 ; - } +bitmap_zero (deliver_bitmask,KVM_MAX_VCPUS );/* Always delivery PIT interrupt to vcpu 0 */ #ifdef CONFIG_X86 if (irq ==0 ) - deliver_bitmask =1 <<0 ; +set_bit (0 , deliver_bitmask); + else#endif +kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask (ioapic, &entry, deliver_bitmask); + +if (find_first_bit (deliver_bitmask,KVM_MAX_VCPUS ) >=KVM_MAX_VCPUS ) { +ioapic_debug ("no target on destination\n" ); +return 0 ; + } -for (vcpu_id =0 ; deliver_bitmask !=0 ; vcpu_id++) { -if (!(deliver_bitmask & (1 << vcpu_id))) -continue ; - deliver_bitmask &= ~(1 << vcpu_id); +while ((vcpu_id =find_first_bit (deliver_bitmask,KVM_MAX_VCPUS )) + <KVM_MAX_VCPUS ) { +clear_bit (vcpu_id, deliver_bitmask); vcpu = ioapic->kvm->vcpus[vcpu_id];if (vcpu) { if (entry.fields.delivery_mode ==
virt/kvm/irq_comm.c +8 -8
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,case IOAPIC_LOWEST_PRIORITY : vcpu =kvm_get_lowest_prio_vcpu (ioapic->kvm, entry->fields.vector, deliver_bitmask); - *deliver_bitmask =1 << vcpu->vcpu_id; +set_bit (vcpu->vcpu_id, deliver_bitmask);break ;case IOAPIC_FIXED :case IOAPIC_NMI :
@@ -63,11 +63,12 @@ void kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, u32 gsi, int level)struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic =ioapic_irqchip (kvm);struct kvm_gsi_msg *gsi_msg;union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry entry; -unsigned long deliver_bitmask; +DECLARE_BITMAP (deliver_bitmask,KVM_MAX_VCPUS );BUG_ON (!ioapic);#endif +bitmap_zero (deliver_bitmask,KVM_MAX_VCPUS );if (!(gsi &KVM_GSI_MSG_MASK )) {int irq = gsi;
@@ -111,16 +112,15 @@ void kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, u32 gsi, int level) entry.fields.delivery_mode =test_bit (MSI_DATA_DELIVERY_MODE_SHIFT , (unsigned long *)&gsi_msg->msg.data); -kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask (ioapic, &entry, &deliver_bitmask); +kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask (ioapic, &entry, deliver_bitmask); -if (!deliver_bitmask) { +if (find_first_bit (deliver_bitmask,KVM_MAX_VCPUS ) >=KVM_MAX_VCPUS ) {printk (KERN_WARNING "kvm: no destination for MSI delivery!" );return ; } -for (vcpu_id =0 ; deliver_bitmask !=0 ; vcpu_id++) { -if (!(deliver_bitmask & (1 << vcpu_id))) -continue ; - deliver_bitmask &= ~(1 << vcpu_id); +while ((vcpu_id =find_first_bit (deliver_bitmask,KVM_MAX_VCPUS )) + <KVM_MAX_VCPUS ) { +clear_bit (vcpu_id, deliver_bitmask); vcpu = ioapic->kvm->vcpus[vcpu_id];if (vcpu) kvm_apic_set_irq(vcpu, entry.fields.vector,
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 14/15 KVM: Using kfifo for irq recording
In reply to Sheng YangFor MSI-X, we have to deal with multiply IRQ with same IRQ handler, so it's necessary to record the IRQ that trigger the IRQ handler.
And this one is also useful for fixing kvm_free_assigned_irq().
--- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++ virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
include/linux/kvm_host.h +4 -0
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@#include <linux/preempt.h> #include <linux/marker.h> #include <linux/msi.h> +#include <linux/kfifo.h> #include <asm/signal.h> #include <linux/kvm.h>
@@ -313,6 +314,9 @@ struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel {int host_irq;bool host_irq_disabled;int guest_irq; +#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_IRQ_FIFO_LEN 0x100 +struct kfifo *irq_fifo; +spinlock_t irq_fifo_lock;#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_INTX (1 << 0)#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSI (1 << 1)#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_INTX (1 << 8)
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +27 -3
@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ static struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *kvm_find_assigned_dev(struct list_head *hstatic void kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler (struct work_struct *work) {struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *assigned_dev; +int irq; +u32 gsi; assigned_dev = container_of(work, struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel, interrupt_work);
@@ -109,14 +111,22 @@ static void kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)*/ mutex_lock (&assigned_dev->kvm->lock); -kvm_set_irq (assigned_dev->kvm, assigned_dev->irq_source_id, - assigned_dev->guest_irq,1 ); +handle_irq: +kfifo_get (assigned_dev->irq_fifo, + (unsigned char *)&irq,sizeof (int )); + + gsi = assigned_dev->guest_irq; + +kvm_set_irq (assigned_dev->kvm, assigned_dev->irq_source_id, gsi,1 );if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type &KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSI ) {enable_irq (assigned_dev->host_irq); assigned_dev->host_irq_disabled = false; } +if (kfifo_len (assigned_dev->irq_fifo) !=0 ) + goto handle_irq; +mutex_unlock (&assigned_dev->kvm->lock);kvm_put_kvm (assigned_dev->kvm); }
@@ -128,6 +138,9 @@ static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_intr(int irq, void *dev_id)kvm_get_kvm (assigned_dev->kvm); +kfifo_put (assigned_dev->irq_fifo, + (unsigned char *)&irq,sizeof (int )); +schedule_work (&assigned_dev->interrupt_work);disable_irq_nosync (irq);
@@ -201,6 +214,7 @@ static void kvm_free_assigned_device(struct kvm *kvm,pci_dev_put (assigned_dev->dev);list_del (&assigned_dev->list); +kfifo_free (assigned_dev->irq_fifo);kfree (assigned_dev); }
@@ -448,15 +462,25 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_assign_device(struct kvm *kvm,list_add (&match->list, &kvm->arch.assigned_dev_head); +spin_lock_init (&match->irq_fifo_lock); + match->irq_fifo =kfifo_alloc (sizeof (unsigned char ) * +KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_IRQ_FIFO_LEN , +GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, + &match->irq_fifo_lock); +if (!match->irq_fifo) + goto out_list_del; +if (assigned_dev->flags &KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_ENABLE_IOMMU ) { r =kvm_iommu_map_guest (kvm, match);if (r) - goto out_list_del; + goto out_fifo_del; } out:mutex_unlock (&kvm->lock);return r; +out_fifo_del: +kfifo_free (match->irq_fifo); out_list_del:list_del (&match->list);pci_release_regions (dev);
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 14/15 KVM: Replace host_irq_disable with a new flag
(I discard irq_fifo and change a method to fix this problem)
We can reused the field "state" later.
--- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 3 ++- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
include/linux/kvm_host.h +2 -1
@@ -311,13 +311,14 @@ struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel {int host_busnr;int host_devfn;int host_irq; -bool host_irq_disabled;int guest_irq;#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_INTX (1 << 0)#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSI (1 << 1)#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_INTX (1 << 8)#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_MSI (1 << 9)unsigned long irq_requested_type; +#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_IRQ_DISABLED (1 << 0) +unsigned long state;int irq_source_id;struct pci_dev *dev;struct kvm *kvm;
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +4 -4
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type &KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSI ) {enable_irq (assigned_dev->host_irq); - assigned_dev->host_irq_disabled = false; + assigned_dev->state &= ~KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_IRQ_DISABLED ; }mutex_unlock (&assigned_dev->kvm->lock);
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_intr(int irq, void *dev_id)schedule_work (&assigned_dev->interrupt_work);disable_irq_nosync (irq); - assigned_dev->host_irq_disabled = true; + assigned_dev->state |=KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_IRQ_DISABLED ;return IRQ_HANDLED ; }
@@ -152,9 +152,9 @@ static void kvm_assigned_dev_ack_irq(struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian)/* The guest irq may be shared so this ack may be * from another device. */ -if (dev->host_irq_disabled) { +if (dev->state &KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_IRQ_DISABLED ) {enable_irq (dev->host_irq); - dev->host_irq_disabled = false; + dev->state &= ~KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_IRQ_DISABLED ; } }
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
PATCH 15/15 KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
In reply to Sheng YangThanks to Marcelo's observation, The following code have potential issue:
if (cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work))
kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
In fact, cancel_work_sync() would return true either work struct is only scheduled or the callback of work struct is executed. This code only consider the former situation.
Also, we have a window between cancel_work_sync() and free_irq. This patch fixs them two.
--- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +22 -4
@@ -186,10 +186,28 @@ static void kvm_free_assigned_irq(struct kvm *kvm,if (!assigned_dev->irq_requested_type)return ; -if (cancel_work_sync (&assigned_dev->interrupt_work)) -/* We had pending work. That means we will have to take -* care of kvm_put_kvm. -*/ +/* +* We need to ensure: kvm_put_kvm() paired with kvm_get_kvm() in +* kvm_assigned_dev_intr, and no more interrupt after we cancelled +* current one. +* +* Here we have two possiblities for cancel_work_sync() return true: +* 1. The work is scheduled, but callback haven't been called. We need +* to call kvm_put_kvm() here. And IRQ is already disabled without +* doubt. +* +* 2. The callback have executed, here we don't need to call +* kvm_put_kvm(), but we may need to disable irq(e.g. for MSI). +* +* We judge the two condition according to if we have pending IRQs in +* irq_fifo. +*/ +if (kfifo_len (assigned_dev->irq_fifo) ==0 && + (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type &KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_MSI )) +disable_irq_nosync (assigned_dev->host_irq); + +if (cancel_work_sync (&assigned_dev->interrupt_work) && +kfifo_len (assigned_dev->irq_fifo) !=0 )kvm_put_kvm (kvm);free_irq (assigned_dev->host_irq, (void *)assigned_dev);
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 9 lines · Sheng Yang
Thanks to Marcelo's observation, The following code have potential issue:
if (
cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work))kvm_put_kvm(kvm);In fact,
cancel_work_sync()would return true either work struct is only scheduled or the callback of work struct is executed. This code only consider the former situation.
Quoted 5 lines
Also, we have a window between
cancel_work_sync()andfree_irq. This patch fixs them two.Signed-off-by Sheng Yang <[email protected]>---
Still got trouble here. Something can happened after kfifo_len check.
Review
Quoted 7 lines
(quoted diff) +6
-0+ if (kfifo_len(assigned_dev->irq_fifo) == 0 && + (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type & KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_MSI)) + disable_irq_nosync(assigned_dev->host_irq); + + if (cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work) && + kfifo_len(assigned_dev->irq_fifo) != 0) kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
I think just disable_irq for all is OK, though it would result in nested disable sometime.
How about this:
--
From: Sheng Yang <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 19:45:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Thanks to Marcelo's observation, The following code have potential issue:
if (cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work))
kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
In fact, cancel_work_sync() would return true either work struct is only scheduled or the callback of work struct is executed. This code only consider the former situation.
Also, we have a window between cancel_work_sync() and free_irq. This patch fixs them two.
--- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +21 -4
@@ -186,10 +186,27 @@ static void kvm_free_assigned_irq(struct kvm *kvm,if (!assigned_dev->irq_requested_type)return ; -if (cancel_work_sync (&assigned_dev->interrupt_work)) -/* We had pending work. That means we will have to take -* care of kvm_put_kvm. -*/ +/* +* We need to ensure: kvm_put_kvm() paired with kvm_get_kvm() in +* kvm_assigned_dev_intr, and no more interrupt after we cancelled +* current one. +* +* Here we have two possiblities for cancel_work_sync() return true: +* 1. The work is scheduled, but callback haven't been called. We need +* to call kvm_put_kvm() here. And IRQ is already disabled without +* doubt. +* +* 2. The callback have executed, here we don't need to call +* kvm_put_kvm(), but we may need to disable irq(e.g. for MSI). +* +* We judge the two condition according to if we have pending IRQs in +* irq_fifo. And we disable irq here anyway, and it may resulted in +* nested disable, but it's fine, for we are going to free it. +*/ +disable_irq_nosync (assigned_dev->host_irq); + +if (cancel_work_sync (&assigned_dev->interrupt_work) && +kfifo_len (assigned_dev->irq_fifo) !=0 )kvm_put_kvm (kvm);free_irq (assigned_dev->host_irq, (void *)assigned_dev);
--
1.5.4.5
PATCH 15/15 KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Thanks to Marcelo's observation, The following code have potential issue:
if (cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work))
kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
In fact, cancel_work_sync() would return true either work struct is only scheduled or the callback of work struct is executed. This code only consider the former situation.
Also, we have a window between cancel_work_sync() and free_irq. This patch fixs them two.
--- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 + virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
include/linux/kvm_host.h +1 -0
@@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel {#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_MSI (1 << 9)unsigned long irq_requested_type;#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_HOST_IRQ_DISABLED (1 << 0) +#define KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_IRQ_GOT_KVM (1 << 1)unsigned long state;int irq_source_id;struct pci_dev *dev;
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +30 -4
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static void kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)mutex_unlock (&assigned_dev->kvm->lock);kvm_put_kvm (assigned_dev->kvm); + assigned_dev->state &= ~KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_IRQ_GOT_KVM ; }static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_intr (int irq,void *dev_id)
@@ -126,7 +127,15 @@ static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_intr(int irq, void *dev_id)struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *assigned_dev = (struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *) dev_id; +/* +* In kvm_free_device_irq, cancel_work_sync return true if: +* 1. work is scheduled, and then cancelled. +* 2. work callback is executed. +* +* We need to call kvm_put_kvm() for the former, but not the later. +*/ kvm_get_kvm (assigned_dev->kvm); + assigned_dev->state |=KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_IRQ_GOT_KVM ;schedule_work (&assigned_dev->interrupt_work);
@@ -173,10 +182,27 @@ static void kvm_free_assigned_irq(struct kvm *kvm,if (!assigned_dev->irq_requested_type)return ; -if (cancel_work_sync (&assigned_dev->interrupt_work)) -/* We had pending work. That means we will have to take -* care of kvm_put_kvm. -*/ +/* +* We need to ensure: kvm_put_kvm() paired with kvm_get_kvm() in +* kvm_assigned_dev_intr, and no more interrupt after we cancelled +* current one. +* +* Here we have two possiblities for cancel_work_sync() return true: +* 1. The work is scheduled, but callback haven't been called. We need +* to call kvm_put_kvm() here. And IRQ is already disabled without +* doubt. +* +* 2. The callback have executed, here we don't need to call +* kvm_put_kvm(), but we may need to disable irq(e.g. for MSI). +* +* We judge the two condition according assigned_dev->state. And we +* disable irq here anyway, and it may resulted in IRQ nested disable, +* but it's fine, for we are going to free it. +*/ +disable_irq_nosync (assigned_dev->host_irq); + +if (cancel_work_sync (&assigned_dev->interrupt_work) && + assigned_dev->state &KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_IRQ_GOT_KVM )kvm_put_kvm (kvm);free_irq (assigned_dev->host_irq, (void *)assigned_dev);
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.5
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 8 lines · Sheng Yang
Thanks to Marcelo's observation, The following code have potential issue:
if (
cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work))kvm_put_kvm(kvm);In fact,
cancel_work_sync()would return true either work struct is only scheduled or the callback of work struct is executed. This code only consider the former situation.
Why not simply drop the reference inc / dec from irq handler/work function?
Just make sure that there is no queued/executing work left behind on vm shutdown. Don't think an additional reference is necessary. Or am I missing something?
Quoted 1 line
Also, we have a window between
cancel_work_sync()andfree_irq.
This one looks OK.
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 10 lines · Marcelo Tosatti
Quoted 8 lines · Sheng Yang
Thanks to Marcelo's observation, The following code have potential issue:
if (
cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work))kvm_put_kvm(kvm);In fact,
cancel_work_sync()would return true either work struct is only scheduled or the callback of work struct is executed. This code only consider the former situation.
Quoted 6 lines
Why not simply drop the reference inc / dec from irq handler/work function?
Just make sure that there is no queued/executing work left behind on vm shutdown. Don't think an additional reference is necessary. Or am I missing something?
And maybe drop this issue from the patchset and fix it separately, since it is a bugfix.
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
In reply to Marcelo TosattiQuoted 6 lines · Marcelo Tosatti
Quoted 5 lines · Sheng Yang
Thanks to Marcelo's observation, The following code have potential issue:
if (
cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work))kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
In fact,
cancel_work_sync()would return true either work struct is only scheduled or the callback of work struct is executed. This code only consider the former situation.Why not simply drop the reference inc / dec from irq handler/work function?
Sorry, I don't know the answer. After checking the code, I also think it's a little strange to increase refernce count here, and I think we won't suppose work_handler can release the kvm struct.
Maybe Avi knows? Or Amit and Weidong?
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 11 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 7 lines
if (
cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work))kvm_put_kvm(kvm);In fact,
cancel_work_sync()would return true either work struct is only scheduled or the callback of work struct is executed. This code only consider the former situation.Why not simply drop the reference inc / dec from irq handler/work function?
Quoted 6 lines
Sorry, I don't know the answer. After checking the code, I also think it's a little strange to increase refernce count here, and I think we won't suppose
work_handlercan release the kvm struct.Maybe Avi knows? Or Amit and Weidong?
Not sure what the reasoning was, but it does seem like reference counting can be safely dropped from interrupt_work.
Signature · 1 line
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
In reply to Sheng YangQuoted 11 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 10 lines · Marcelo Tosatti
Quoted 8 lines · Sheng Yang
Thanks to Marcelo's observation, The following code have potential issue:
if (
cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work))kvm_put_kvm(kvm);In fact,
cancel_work_sync()would return true either work struct is only scheduled or the callback of work struct is executed. This code only consider the former situation.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Why not simply drop the reference inc / dec from irq handler/work function?
Sorry, I don't know the answer. After checking the code, I also think it's a little strange to increase refernce count here, and I think we won't suppose
work_handlercan release the kvm struct.
At the time of developing that code, this was my observation:
I see from the call chain kvm_put_kvm->...->kvm_arch_destroy_vm, no locks are taken to actually destroy the vm. We can't be in ioctls, sure. But shouldn't the mutex be taken to ensure there's nothing else going on while destroying?
At least with the workqueue model, we could be called asynchronously in kernel context and I would have held the mutex and about to inject interrupts while everything is being wiped off underneath. However, the workqueue model tries its best to schedule the work on the same CPU, though we can't use that guarantee to ensure things will be fine.
---
So I had to get a ref to the current vm till we had any pending work scheduled. I think I put in comments in the code, but sadly most of my comments we stripped out before the merge.
Amit
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 33 lines · On Monday 29 December 2008 13:42:22 Amit Shah wrote:
Quoted 12 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 11 lines · Marcelo Tosatti
Quoted 9 lines · Sheng Yang
Thanks to Marcelo's observation, The following code have potential issue:
if (
cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work))kvm_put_kvm(kvm);In fact,
cancel_work_sync()would return true either work struct is only scheduled or the callback of work struct is executed. This code only consider the former situation.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Why not simply drop the reference inc / dec from irq handler/work function?
Sorry, I don't know the answer. After checking the code, I also think it's a little strange to increase refernce count here, and I think we won't suppose
work_handlercan release the kvm struct.At the time of developing that code, this was my observation:
I see from the call chain kvm_put_kvm->...->kvm_arch_destroy_vm, no locks are taken to actually destroy the vm. We can't be in ioctls, sure. But shouldn't the mutex be taken to ensure there's nothing else going on while destroying?
At least with the workqueue model, we could be called asynchronously in kernel context and I would have held the mutex and about to inject interrupts while everything is being wiped off underneath. However, the workqueue model tries its best to schedule the work on the same CPU, though we can't use that guarantee to ensure things will be fine.
Quoted 5 lines
---
So I had to get a ref to the current vm till we had any pending work scheduled. I think I put in comments in the code, but sadly most of my comments we stripped out before the merge.
Not quite understand...
The free assigned device in the destroy path of VM, so as free irq. And we got cancel_work_sync() in free irq which can sync with the execution of scheduled work. And now before cancel_work_sync(), we disable the interrupt so that no more schedule work happen again. So after cancel_work_sync(), everything(I think it's irq handler and schedule work here) asynchronously should quiet down.
Or I miss something?
Signature · 2 lines
regards Yang, Sheng
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 4 lines · Sheng Yang
The free assigned device in the destroy path of VM, so as free irq. And we got
cancel_work_sync()in free irq which can sync with the execution of scheduled work. And now beforecancel_work_sync(), we disable the interrupt so that no more schedule work happen again. So aftercancel_work_sync(), everything(I think it's irq handler and schedule work here) asynchronously should quiet down.Or I miss something?
Suppose the work_struct gets scheduled, but is delayed somewhere in the scheduler. Some kill -9s the VM, and it starts getting destroyed. cancel_work_sync() can no longer truly cancel the work, so it has to schedule and wait for its completion.
So now we have kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler() running in a partially destroyed VM. It may work or not, but it's a fragile situation (changing the order of destruction of components will likely break things) and it's easy to avoid by keeping the reference count elevated.
Signature · 2 lines
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 15 lines · On Monday 29 December 2008 21:37:52 Avi Kivity wrote:
Quoted 8 lines · Sheng Yang
The free assigned device in the destroy path of VM, so as free irq. And we got
cancel_work_sync()in free irq which can sync with the execution of scheduled work. And now beforecancel_work_sync(), we disable the interrupt so that no more schedule work happen again. So aftercancel_work_sync(), everything(I think it's irq handler and schedule work here) asynchronously should quiet down.Or I miss something?
Suppose the
work_structgets scheduled, but is delayed somewhere in the scheduler. Some kill -9s the VM, and it starts getting destroyed.cancel_work_sync()can no longer truly cancel the work, so it has to schedule and wait for its completion.
Quoted 5 lines
So now we have
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler()running in a partially destroyed VM. It may work or not, but it's a fragile situation (changing the order of destruction of components will likely break things) and it's easy to avoid by keeping the reference count elevated.
OK, got it. Thanks for explaining!
Signature · 2 lines
regards Yang, Sheng
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
In reply to Sheng YangQuoted 41 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 33 lines · On Monday 29 December 2008 13:42:22 Amit Shah wrote:
Quoted 12 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 11 lines · Marcelo Tosatti
Quoted 9 lines · Sheng Yang
Thanks to Marcelo's observation, The following code have potential issue:
if (
cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work))kvm_put_kvm(kvm);In fact,
cancel_work_sync()would return true either work struct is only scheduled or the callback of work struct is executed. This code only consider the former situation.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Why not simply drop the reference inc / dec from irq handler/work function?
Sorry, I don't know the answer. After checking the code, I also think it's a little strange to increase refernce count here, and I think we won't suppose
work_handlercan release the kvm struct.At the time of developing that code, this was my observation:
I see from the call chain kvm_put_kvm->...->kvm_arch_destroy_vm, no locks are taken to actually destroy the vm. We can't be in ioctls, sure. But shouldn't the mutex be taken to ensure there's nothing else going on while destroying?
At least with the workqueue model, we could be called asynchronously in kernel context and I would have held the mutex and about to inject interrupts while everything is being wiped off underneath. However, the workqueue model tries its best to schedule the work on the same CPU, though we can't use that guarantee to ensure things will be fine.
Quoted 5 lines
---
So I had to get a ref to the current vm till we had any pending work scheduled. I think I put in comments in the code, but sadly most of my comments we stripped out before the merge.Not quite understand...
Quoted 8 lines
The free assigned device in the destroy path of VM, so as free irq. And we got
cancel_work_sync()in free irq which can sync with the execution of scheduled work. And now beforecancel_work_sync(), we disable the interrupt so that no more schedule work happen again. So aftercancel_work_sync(), everything(I think it's irq handler and schedule work here) asynchronously should quiet down.Or I miss something?
Thats right. As long as you disable the irq and cancel pending work before freeing the data structures those paths use.
There is one remaining issue: kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler can re-enable the interrupt for KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSI case. Perhaps you need a new flag to indicate shutdown (so the host IRQ won't be reenabled).
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 51 lines · On Monday 29 December 2008 23:20:57 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Quoted 41 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 33 lines · On Monday 29 December 2008 13:42:22 Amit Shah wrote:
Quoted 12 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 11 lines · Marcelo Tosatti
Quoted 9 lines · Sheng Yang
Thanks to Marcelo's observation, The following code have potential issue:
if (
cancel_work_sync(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work))kvm_put_kvm(kvm);In fact,
cancel_work_sync()would return true either work struct is only scheduled or the callback of work struct is executed. This code only consider the former situation.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Why not simply drop the reference inc / dec from irq handler/work function?
Sorry, I don't know the answer. After checking the code, I also think it's a little strange to increase refernce count here, and I think we won't suppose
work_handlercan release the kvm struct.At the time of developing that code, this was my observation:
I see from the call chain kvm_put_kvm->...->kvm_arch_destroy_vm, no locks are taken to actually destroy the vm. We can't be in ioctls, sure. But shouldn't the mutex be taken to ensure there's nothing else going on while destroying?
At least with the workqueue model, we could be called asynchronously in kernel context and I would have held the mutex and about to inject interrupts while everything is being wiped off underneath. However, the workqueue model tries its best to schedule the work on the same CPU, though we can't use that guarantee to ensure things will be fine.
Quoted 4 lines
---
So I had to get a ref to the current vm till we had any pending work scheduled. I think I put in comments in the code, but sadly most of my comments we stripped out before the merge.Not quite understand...
Quoted 8 lines
The free assigned device in the destroy path of VM, so as free irq. And we got
cancel_work_sync()in free irq which can sync with the execution of scheduled work. And now beforecancel_work_sync(), we disable the interrupt so that no more schedule work happen again. So aftercancel_work_sync(), everything(I think it's irq handler and schedule work here) asynchronously should quiet down.Or I miss something?
Quoted 7 lines
Thats right. As long as you disable the irq and cancel pending work before freeing the data structures those paths use.
There is one remaining issue:
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handlercan re-enable the interrupt forKVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSIcase. Perhaps you need a new flag to indicate shutdown (so the host IRQ won't be reenabled).
Is it already covered by disable_irq_no_sync() before cancel_work_sync()? I've noted this in my comment: the irq may be disabled nested(once for MSI and twice for INTx), but I think it's fine for we're going to free it.
Signature · 2 lines
regards Yang, Sheng
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 8 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 4 lines
There is one remaining issue:
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handlercan re-enable the interrupt forKVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSIcase. Perhaps you need a new flag to indicate shutdown (so the host IRQ won't be reenabled).Is it already covered by
disable_irq_no_sync()beforecancel_work_sync()? I've noted this in my comment: the irq may be disabled nested(once for MSI and twice for INTx), but I think it's fine for we're going to free it.
The problem is that the irq can be re-enabled inkvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler:
context 1 | context 2
disable_irq_nosync
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler enable_irqcancel_work_sync
free_irq
So between cancel_work_sync and free_irq kvm_assigned_dev_intr can run and schedule work.
I guess it is OK to take the kvm mutex in kvm_free_assigned_irq (but better verify), so it can:
mutex_lockassigned_dev->irq_requested_type = 0;mutex_unlock
disable_irq_nosynccancel_work_syncfree_irq
So that the work handler won't re-enable the interrupt.
Other than that the latest patchset looks good.
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 15 lines · On Wednesday 31 December 2008 00:45:51 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Quoted 9 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 4 lines
There is one remaining issue:
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handlercan re-enable the interrupt forKVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSIcase. Perhaps you need a new flag to indicate shutdown (so the host IRQ won't be reenabled).Is it already covered by
disable_irq_no_sync()beforecancel_work_sync()? I've noted this in my comment: the irq may be disabled nested(once for MSI and twice for INTx), but I think it's fine for we're going to free it.The problem is that the irq can be re-enabled in
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler:
Quoted 9 lines
context 1 | context 2
disable_irq_nosync
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handlerenable_irqcancel_work_sync
free_irq
Um... My understanding is a little different...
Before context1 execute disable_irq_nosync(), in irq handler, disable_irq_nosync() would also been executed. So only one enable_irq() is not really enable irq here, which can cover the window at all. That's what I means nested disable irq...
Signature · 2 lines
regards Yang, Sheng
Quoted 17 lines
So between
cancel_work_syncandfree_irqkvm_assigned_dev_intrcan run and schedule work.I guess it is OK to take the kvm mutex in
kvm_free_assigned_irq(but better verify), so it can:
mutex_lockassigned_dev->irq_requested_type= 0;mutex_unlock
disable_irq_nosynccancel_work_syncfree_irqSo that the work handler won't re-enable the interrupt.
Other than that the latest patchset looks good.
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 26 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 15 lines · On Wednesday 31 December 2008 00:45:51 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Quoted 9 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 4 lines
There is one remaining issue:
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handlercan re-enable the interrupt forKVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSIcase. Perhaps you need a new flag to indicate shutdown (so the host IRQ won't be reenabled).Is it already covered by
disable_irq_no_sync()beforecancel_work_sync()? I've noted this in my comment: the irq may be disabled nested(once for MSI and twice for INTx), but I think it's fine for we're going to free it.The problem is that the irq can be re-enabled in
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler:Quoted 9 lines
context 1 | context 2
disable_irq_nosync
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handlerenable_irqcancel_work_sync
free_irq
Quoted 6 lines
Um... My understanding is a little different...
Before context1 execute
disable_irq_nosync(), in irq handler,disable_irq_nosync()would also been executed. So only oneenable_irq()is not really enable irq here, which can cover the window at all. That's what I means nested disable irq...
You're right. There have been two disable_irq calls.
OK, looks good to me.
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 28 lines · On Friday 02 January 2009 08:10:37 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Quoted 27 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 15 lines · On Wednesday 31 December 2008 00:45:51 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Quoted 9 lines · Sheng Yang
Quoted 4 lines
There is one remaining issue:
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handlercan re-enable the interrupt forKVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSIcase. Perhaps you need a new flag to indicate shutdown (so the host IRQ won't be reenabled).Is it already covered by
disable_irq_no_sync()beforecancel_work_sync()? I've noted this in my comment: the irq may be disabled nested(once for MSI and twice for INTx), but I think it's fine for we're going to free it.The problem is that the irq can be re-enabled in
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler:Quoted 8 lines
context 1 | context 2
disable_irq_nosync
kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handlerenable_irqcancel_work_sync
free_irqUm... My understanding is a little different...
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Before context1 execute
disable_irq_nosync(), in irq handler,disable_irq_nosync()would also been executed. So only oneenable_irq()is not really enable irq here, which can cover the window at all. That's what I means nested disable irq...You're right. There have been two
disable_irqcalls.OK, looks good to me.
So Avi, can you check in the patchset?
Thanks.
Signature · 2 lines
regards Yang, Sheng
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 2 lines · Sheng Yang
So Avi, can you check in the patchset?
I had some comments about simplifying the userspace interface (or is that another patchset?)
Signature · 1 line
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
Quoted 5 lines · On Monday 05 January 2009 21:27:00 Avi Kivity wrote:
Quoted 1 line · Sheng Yang
So Avi, can you check in the patchset?
I had some comments about simplifying the userspace interface (or is that another patchset?)
Oh, I means another patchset while Marcelo reply to the old thread. The patchset titled "[PATCH 0/3] Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq".
Signature · 2 lines
regards Yang, Sheng
Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: Fix racy in kvm_free_assigned_irq
In reply to Amit ShahQuoted 3 lines · Amit Shah
I see from the call chain kvm_put_kvm->...->kvm_arch_destroy_vm, no locks are taken to actually destroy the vm. We can't be in ioctls, sure. But shouldn't the mutex be taken to ensure there's nothing else going on while destroying?
Locks are useless to guard against something happening concurrent with destruction, since we're about to destroy the lock.
Quoted 4 lines
At least with the workqueue model, we could be called asynchronously in kernel context and I would have held the mutex and about to inject interrupts while everything is being wiped off underneath. However, the workqueue model tries its best to schedule the work on the same CPU, though we can't use that guarantee to ensure things will be fine.
---
So I had to get a ref to the current vm till we had any pending work scheduled.
I think that's the right thing to do.
Quoted 2 lines
I think I put in comments in the code, but sadly most of my comments we stripped out before the merge.
Pity.
Signature · 2 lines
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.
Quoted 13 lines · On Thursday 25 December 2008 17:09:24 Sheng Yang wrote:
Hi Avi and Marcelo
Merry Xmas! And here is the v2 of patchset. Target at 2.6.29 for it contained a lot of fix and improvement of current device assignment and MSI feature.
Change from V1:
Addressed Marcelo's comments, and:
1. Fix racy inkvm_free_assigned_irq(). In case to do this, I fetch one patch (irq_fifo) from original MSI-X patchset. Indeed a nice catch of Marcelo.
Quoted 5 lines
:)
2. Unified
kvm_set_irq()withioapic_deliver(). It didn't save much, but duplicate is always bothering, and I have modified bitmask for vcpu to a real bitmap (maybe not all, just what I have seen).
Forgot to mention, I didn't change API for guest to disable MSI which is a part of Marcelo's comments, for I think single interface named "update" with some flags represent the current bit state is enough for now...
Signature · 2 lines
regards Yang, Sheng
Quoted 30 lines
And for V1:
1. Add
gsi_msgmapping mechanism, which gsi can used to indicated a MSI interrupt.(Notice API/ABI changed a little, but we don't have userspace patch now, so it should be OK.)2. Provide MSI disable capability.
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 11 ++- include/linux/kvm.h | 15 +++- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 26 +++++- include/linux/kvm_types.h | 17 ++++ virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 117 ++++++++++--------------- virt/kvm/ioapic.h | 23 +---- virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 184 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 212++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 8 files changed, 415 insertions(+), 190 deletions(-)
Sorry for the patchset size, it's too easy to grow fast, and I am a little too lazy to split them into more batches in the Xmas... :)
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html