videobuf-dma-sg.c : not need memset()
PATCH 1/1 videobuf-dma-sg.c : not need memset()
mem have malloc zero memory by kzalloc(), so it have not need to memset().
---
drivers/media/video/videobuf-dma-sg.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/media/video/videobuf-dma-sg.c +1 -1
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ static void *__videobuf_alloc(size_t size) mem = vb->priv = ((char *)vb)+size; mem->magic=MAGIC_SG_MEM ; -videobuf_dma_init (&mem->dma); + mem->dma.magic =MAGIC_DMABUF ; dprintk(1,"%s: allocated at %p(%ld+%ld) & %p(%ld)\n", __func__,vb,(long)sizeof(*vb),(long)size-sizeof(*vb),
Fingo,
Em Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:13:44 +0800
"Figo.zhang" <[email protected]> escreveu:
Quoted 13 lines
mem have malloc zero memory by
kzalloc(), so it have not need tomemset().Signed-off-by Figo.zhang <[email protected]>---
drivers/media/video/videobuf-dma-sg.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)drivers/media/video/videobuf-dma-sg.c +0
-0
drivers/media/video/videobuf-dma-sg.c static void *__videobuf_alloc(size_t size) · line 423
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/media/video/videobuf-dma-sg.c +1
-1@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ static void *__videobuf_alloc(size_t size) mem = vb->priv = ((char *)vb)+size; mem->magic=MAGIC_SG_MEM ; -videobuf_dma_init (&mem->dma); + mem->dma.magic =MAGIC_DMABUF ;
Technically, this patch is correct. However, I'm afraid that a future change at videobuf_dma_init could cause a breakage. IMO, if we do such change, the better would be to split videobuf_dma_init into two functions or to add a comment at the code warning that this should match the init done at videobuf_dma_init.
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/media/video/videobuf-dma-sg.c +0
-1dprintk(1,"%s: allocated at %p(%ld+%ld) & %p(%ld)\n", __func__,vb,(long)sizeof(*vb),(long)size-sizeof(*vb), --To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 2 lines
Cheers, Mauro