ppc/85xx: Fix bug in setup_mp code
PATCH 1/1 ppc/85xx: Fix bug in setup_mp code
Its possible that we try and copy the boot page code out of flash into a DDR location that doesn't have a TLB cover it. For example, if we have 3G of DDR we typically only map the first 2G. In the cases of 4G+ this wasn't an issue since the reset page TLB mapping covered the last page of memory which we wanted to copy to.
We now change the physical address of the reset page TLB to map to the true physical location of the boot page code, copy and than set the TLB back to its 1:1 mapping of the reset page.
--- cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c +29 -3
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@#include <ioports.h> #include <lmb.h> #include <asm/io.h> +#include <asm/mmu.h> #include "mp.h" DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR ;
@@ -209,8 +210,33 @@ void setup_mp(void)ulong fixup = (ulong)&__secondary_start_page;u32 bootpg =determine_mp_bootpg (); -memcpy ((void *)bootpg, (void *)fixup,4096 ); -flush_cache (bootpg,4096 ); +/* look for the tlb covering the reset page, there better be one */ +int i =find_tlb_idx ((void *)0xfffff000 ,1 ); -pq3_mp_up (bootpg); +/* we found a match */ +if (i !=-1 ) { +/* map reset page to bootpg so we can copy code there */ +disable_tlb (i); + +set_tlb (1 ,0xfffff000 , bootpg,/* tlb, epn, rpn */ +MAS3_SX |MAS3_SW |MAS3_SR ,MAS2_M ,/* perms, wimge */ +0 , i,BOOKE_PAGESZ_4K ,1 );/* ts, esel, tsize, iprot */ + +memcpy ((void *)0xfffff000 , (void *)fixup,4096 ); +flush_cache (0xfffff000 ,4096 ); + +disable_tlb (i); + +/* setup reset page back to 1:1, we'll use HW boot translation +* to map this where we want +*/ +set_tlb (1 ,0xfffff000 ,0xfffff000 ,/* tlb, epn, rpn */ +MAS3_SX |MAS3_SW |MAS3_SR ,MAS2_I ,/* perms, wimge */ +0 , i,BOOKE_PAGESZ_4K ,1 );/* ts, esel, tsize, iprot */ + +pq3_mp_up (bootpg); + }else { +puts ("WARNING: No reset page TLB. " +"Skipping secondary core setup\n" ); + } }
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.6
PATCH 1/1 ppc/85xx: Fix bug in setup_mp code
Quoted 47 lines · Kumar Gala
Its possible that we try and copy the boot page code out of flash into a DDR location that doesn't have a TLB cover it. For example, if we have 3G of DDR we typically only map the first 2G. In the cases of 4G+ this wasn't an issue since the reset page TLB mapping covered the last page of memory which we wanted to copy to.
We now change the physical address of the reset page TLB to map to the true physical location of the boot page code, copy and than set the TLB back to its 1:1 mapping of the reset page.
Signed-off-by Kumar Gala <[email protected]>--- cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c +13
-3@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@#include <ioports.h> #include <lmb.h> #include <asm/io.h> +#include <asm/mmu.h> #include "mp.h" DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR ;@@ -209,8 +210,33 @@ void setup_mp(void)ulong fixup = (ulong)&__secondary_start_page;u32 bootpg =determine_mp_bootpg (); -memcpy ((void *)bootpg, (void *)fixup,4096 ); -flush_cache (bootpg,4096 ); +/* look for the tlb covering the reset page, there better be one */ +int i =find_tlb_idx ((void *)0xfffff000 ,1 ); -pq3_mp_up (bootpg); +/* we found a match */ +if (i !=-1 ) { +/* map reset page to bootpg so we can copy code there */ +disable_tlb (i); + +set_tlb (1 ,0xfffff000 , bootpg,/* tlb, epn, rpn */ +MAS3_SX |MAS3_SW |MAS3_SR ,MAS2_M ,/* perms, wimge */ +0 , i,BOOKE_PAGESZ_4K ,1 );/* ts, esel, tsize, iprot */ + +memcpy ((void *)0xfffff000 , (void *)fixup,4096 );
cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c void setup_mp(void) · line 235
Quoted 10 lines
cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c +10
-0+flush_cache (0xfffff000 ,4096 ); + +disable_tlb (i); + +/* setup reset page back to 1:1, we'll use HW boot translation +* to map this where we want +*/ +set_tlb (1 ,0xfffff000 ,0xfffff000 ,/* tlb, epn, rpn */ +MAS3_SX |MAS3_SW |MAS3_SR ,MAS2_I ,/* perms, wimge */ +0 , i,BOOKE_PAGESZ_4K ,1 );/* ts, esel, tsize, iprot */
X-ES's mpc8572/8561 boards don't currently use 1 TLB to just map the 0xfffff000 region, we use same TLB that is used for flash (covering 0xf0000000-0xffffffff).
It looks like a fair number of other mpc85xx non-MP boards currently use the 0xfffff000 region for flash too. This patch wouldn't affect them, but I assume when those vendors produce a board with MP support, they'd like to keep the same memory map, in which case they'd run into the same issue as I'm having with not reserving the 0xfffffxxx region for BPTR use.
In any case, I was wondering if you'd be up for changing this patch to save/restore the TLB you're disabling instead of hardcoding the "restore". I could send a follow-up patch if you're OK with the concept too.
I feel like our use of the 0xfffff000 memory region is starting to make us the red headed stepchild of the mpc85xx MP family:)
Thanks,
Peter
PATCH 1/1 ppc/85xx: Fix bug in setup_mp code
Quoted 78 lines · Peter Tyser
Quoted 52 lines · Kumar Gala
Its possible that we try and copy the boot page code out of flash into a
DDR location that doesn't have a TLB cover it. For example, if we have
3G of DDR we typically only map the first 2G. In the cases of 4G+ this
wasn't an issue since the reset page TLB mapping covered the last page
of memory which we wanted to copy to.We now change the physical address of the reset page TLB to map to the
true physical location of the boot page code, copy and than set the TLB back to its 1:1 mapping of the reset page.Signed-off-by Kumar Gala <[email protected]>---
cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c| 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c +13
-3@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@#include <ioports.h> #include <lmb.h> #include <asm/io.h> +#include <asm/mmu.h> #include "mp.h" DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR ;@@ -209,8 +210,33 @@ void setup_mp(void)ulong fixup = (ulong)&__secondary_start_page;u32 bootpg =determine_mp_bootpg (); -memcpy ((void *)bootpg, (void *)fixup,4096 ); -flush_cache (bootpg,4096 ); +/* look for the tlb covering the reset page, there better be one */ +int i =find_tlb_idx ((void *)0xfffff000 ,1 ); -pq3_mp_up (bootpg); +/* we found a match */ +if (i !=-1 ) { +/* map reset page to bootpg so we can copy code there */ +disable_tlb (i); + +set_tlb (1 ,0xfffff000 , bootpg,/* tlb, epn, rpn */ +MAS3_SX |MAS3_SW |MAS3_SR ,MAS2_M ,/* perms, wimge */ +0 , i,BOOKE_PAGESZ_4K ,1 );/* ts, esel, tsize, iprot */ + +memcpy ((void *)0xfffff000 , (void *)fixup,4096 );cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c void setup_mp(void) · line 235
Quoted 10 lines
cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c +10
-0+flush_cache (0xfffff000 ,4096 ); + +disable_tlb (i); + +/* setup reset page back to 1:1, we'll use HW boot translation +* to map this where we want +*/ +set_tlb (1 ,0xfffff000 ,0xfffff000 ,/* tlb, epn, rpn */ +MAS3_SX |MAS3_SW |MAS3_SR ,MAS2_I ,/* perms, wimge */ +0 , i,BOOKE_PAGESZ_4K ,1 );/* ts, esel, tsize, iprot */ X-ES's mpc8572/8561 boards don't currently use 1 TLB to just map the
0xfffff000region, we use same TLB that is used for flash (covering 0xf0000000-0xffffffff).It looks like a fair number of other mpc85xx non-MP boards currently use
the0xfffff000region for flash too. This patch wouldn't affect them, but I assume when those vendors produce a board with MP support, they'd
like to keep the same memory map, in which case they'd run into the same
issue as I'm having with not reserving the 0xfffffxxx region for BPTR use.
Quoted 5 lines
In any case, I was wondering if you'd be up for changing this patch to save/restore the TLB you're disabling instead of hardcoding the "restore". I could send a follow-up patch if you're OK with the concept
too.
I'm fine w/the concept. I'm cleaning up some PCI code at this point so feel free to send me a patch to do this.
Quoted 3 lines
I feel like our use of the
0xfffff000memory region is starting to make
us the red headed stepchild of the mpc85xx MP family:)
:)
- k
PATCH 1/1 ppc/85xx: Fix bug in setup_mp code
In reply to Peter TyserFrom: Kumar Gala
Quoted 11 lines
Its possible that we try and copy the boot page code out of flash into
a DDR location that doesn't have a TLB cover it. For example, if we have 3G of DDR we typically only map the first 2G. In the cases of 4G+ this wasn't an issue since the reset page TLB mapping covered the last page of memory which we wanted to copy to.
We now change the physical address of the reset page TLB to map to the
true physical location of the boot page code, copy and than set the TLB back to its 1:1 mapping of the reset page.
Why should a boot page TLB still exist? And if it does exist, it may be serving a good purpose and shouldn't be touched.
Why not just pick an unused virtual address and map it to bootpg?
This TLB grabbing is giving me problems on my board where I have the original 1M bootpage mapped to CPC sram and I want to keep active.
-Ed
PATCH 1/1 ppc/85xx: Fix bug in setup_mp code
Hi Ed,
Quoted 9 lines · Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Kumar Gala
Quoted 7 lines
Its possible that we try and copy the boot page code out of flash into
a DDR location that doesn't have a TLB cover it. For example, if we have 3G of DDR we typically only map the first 2G. In the cases of 4G+ this wasn't an issue since the reset page TLB mapping covered the last page of memory which we wanted to copy to.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
We now change the physical address of the reset page TLB to map to the
true physical location of the boot page code, copy and than set the TLB back to its 1:1 mapping of the reset page.
Why should a boot page TLB still exist? And if it does exist, it may be serving a good purpose and shouldn't be touched.
I imagine Kumar assumed the bootpage was only used for its "intended" purpose? Our boards have a large flash mapped on top of the original bootpage, which caused problems for me too.
Quoted 1 line
Why not just pick an unused virtual address and map it to bootpg?
You can actually do what you describe since commit 5ccd29c3679b3669b0bde5c501c1aa0f325a7acb. The CONFIG_BPTR_VIRT_ADDR feature is enabled for the XPedite5370 in commit 48618126f78f05042dae428811809b594f747eb9.
Quoted 2 lines
This TLB grabbing is giving me problems on my board where I have the original 1M bootpage mapped to CPC sram and I want to keep active.
I believe reproducing 48618126f78f05042dae428811809b594f747eb9 for your board should be a workaround.
Best,
Peter
Kumar Gala
AppliedPATCH 1/1 ppc/85xx: Fix bug in setup_mp code
In reply to Kumar GalaQuoted 9 lines · Kumar Gala
Its possible that we try and copy the boot page code out of flash into a
DDR location that doesn't have a TLB cover it. For example, if we have
3G of DDR we typically only map the first 2G. In the cases of 4G+ this
wasn't an issue since the reset page TLB mapping covered the last page of memory which we wanted to copy to.
Quoted 8 lines
We now change the physical address of the reset page TLB to map to the true physical location of the boot page code, copy and than set the TLB back to its 1:1 mapping of the reset page.
Signed-off-by Kumar Gala <[email protected]>---
cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c| 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
applied to 85xx
- k