ipw2200: Enable LED by default
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 ipw2200: Enable LED by default
Hi All,
As documented in 2005 in Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200, "The LED code has been reported to hang some systems when running ifconfig and is therefore disabled by default." We've however been carrying the following patch in our Ubuntu kernel for quite some time which enables the ipw2200 LED by default. This was a result of numerous user requests. We've seen no subsequent bug reports of systems hanging due to the the LED code being enabled by default. I'd therefore like to propose the following patch to enable the LED by default. This patch was originally authored by TJ. I apologize in advance that I do not have TJ's full first and last name for provenance.
Thanks,
Leann
Quoted 1 line
From
315246037a0edab4d626de6ccb68c73d3fe61ce3Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:29:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ipw2200: Enable LED by default
Enable LED by default and update the MODULE_PARM_DESC. The original reason for defaulting to disabled was documented in 2005 and noted, "The LED code has been reported to hang some systems when running ifconfig and is therefore disabled by default." This no longer appears applicable and users have been requesting this be enabled for several years.
--- Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200 | 2 +- drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200 +1 -1
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ Where the supported parameter are: led Can be used to turn on experimental LED code. - 0 = Off, 1 = On. Default is 0. + 0 = Off, 1 = On. Default is 1. mode Can be used to set the default mode of the adapter.
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c +2 -2
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int network_mode = 0;static u32 ipw_debug_level;static int associate;static int auto_create =1 ; -static int led_support =0 ; +static int led_support =1 ;static int disable =0 ;static int bt_coexist =0 ;static int hwcrypto =0 ;
@@ -12083,7 +12083,7 @@ module_param(auto_create, int, 0444);MODULE_PARM_DESC (auto_create,"auto create adhoc network (default on)" );module_param_named (led, led_support, int,0444 ); -MODULE_PARM_DESC (led,"enable led control on some systems (default 0 off)" ); +MODULE_PARM_DESC (led,"enable led control on some systems (default 1 on)" );module_param (debug, int,0444 );MODULE_PARM_DESC (debug,"debug output mask" );
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
Quoted 23 lines · Leann Ogasawara
Hi All,
As documented in 2005 in
Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200, "The LED code has been reported to hang some systems when running ifconfig and is therefore disabled by default." We've however been carrying the following patch in our Ubuntu kernel for quite some time which enables the ipw2200 LED by default. This was a result of numerous user requests. We've seen no subsequent bug reports of systems hanging due to the the LED code being enabled by default. I'd therefore like to propose the following patch to enable the LED by default. This patch was originally authored by TJ. I apologize in advance that I do not have TJ's full first and last name for provenance.Thanks,
LeannQuoted 1 line
From
315246037a0edab4d626de6ccb68c73d3fe61ce3Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:29:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ipw2200: Enable LED by default
Quoted 8 lines
Enable LED by default and update the
MODULE_PARM_DESC. The original reason for defaulting to disabled was documented in 2005 and noted, "The LED code has been reported to hang some systems when running ifconfig and is therefore disabled by default." This no longer appears applicable and users have been requesting this be enabled for several years.Originally-by TJ <[email protected]>
Does Originally-by also imply he has read the Certificate of Origin and that he agrees for his code to be used in that way? That is the purpose of the SOB anyway, but if you took his code, does that imply that he agrees to it too?
This is from Documentation/SubmittingPatches
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the right to submit it under the open source license indicated in the file; or
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source license and I have the right under that license to submit that work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part by me, under the same open source license (unless I am permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated in the file; or
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it.
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution are public and that a record of the contribution (including all personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with this project or the open source license(s) involved.
Luis
Quoted 54 lines
Signed-off-by Tim Gardner <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>Acked-by Stefan Bader <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Leann Ogasawara <[email protected]>---
Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200 | 2 +-drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c| 4 ++--2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200 +0
-0@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ Where the supported parameter are:led
Can be used to turn on experimental LED code.
- 0 = Off, 1 = On. Default is 0.
+ 0 = Off, 1 = On. Default is 1.mode
Can be used to set the default mode of the adapter.drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c +2
-3@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int network_mode = 0; static u32 ipw_debug_level; static int associate; static int auto_create = 1; -static int led_support =0 ; +static int led_support =1 ; static int disable = 0; static int bt_coexist = 0; static int hwcrypto = 0;@@ -12083,7 +12083,7 @@ module_param(auto_create, int, 0444); MODULE_PARM_DESC(auto_create, "auto create adhoc network (default on)"); module_param_named(led, led_support, int, 0444); -MODULE_PARM_DESC (led,"enable led control on some systems (default 0 off)" ); +MODULE_PARM_DESC (led,"enable led control on some systems (default 1 on)" ); module_param(debug, int, 0444); MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "debug output mask"); --1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 32 lines · Luis R. Rodriguez
Quoted 30 lines · Leann Ogasawara
Hi All,
As documented in 2005 in
Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200, "The LED code has been reported to hang some systems when running ifconfig and is therefore disabled by default." We've however been carrying the following patch in our Ubuntu kernel for quite some time which enables the ipw2200 LED by default. This was a result of numerous user requests. We've seen no subsequent bug reports of systems hanging due to the the LED code being enabled by default. I'd therefore like to propose the following patch to enable the LED by default. This patch was originally authored by TJ. I apologize in advance that I do not have TJ's full first and last name for provenance.Thanks,
LeannQuoted 1 line
From
315246037a0edab4d626de6ccb68c73d3fe61ce3Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:29:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ipw2200: Enable LED by defaultEnable LED by default and update the
MODULE_PARM_DESC. The original reason for defaulting to disabled was documented in 2005 and noted, "The LED code has been reported to hang some systems when running ifconfig and is therefore disabled by default." This no longer appears applicable and users have been requesting this be enabled for several years.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Originally-by TJ <[email protected]>Does Originally-by also imply he has read the Certificate of Origin and that he agrees for his code to be used in that way? That is the purpose of the SOB anyway, but if you took his code, does that imply that he agrees to it too?
I'd CC'd TJ on the initial email, so I'm hoping he will respond here to your inquiry. I can say that he had submitted the original form of the patch to the Ubuntu kernel-team mailing list back in March, 2009:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2009-March/005013.html
In that original submission he did provide his official SOB.
The patch was then applied with slight modification by Tim Gardner to the Ubuntu kernel. In forwarding this upstream, I wanted to give TJ the proper credit for originating the patch even though it's undergone some slight modification (ie the MODULE_PARM_DESC change). TJ had not officially signed off on this final form of the patch which is the reason I used "Originally-by:". If there is a better approach please let me know.
Thanks,
Leann
Quoted 85 lines
This is from
Documentation/SubmittingPatchesDeveloper's Certificate of Origin 1.1
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the right to submit it under the open source license indicated in the file; or
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source license and I have the right under that license to submit that work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part by me, under the same open source license (unless I am permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated in the file; or
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it.
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution are public and that a record of the contribution (including all personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with this project or the open source license(s) involved.
Luis
Quoted 54 lines
Signed-off-by Tim Gardner <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>Acked-by Stefan Bader <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Leann Ogasawara <[email protected]>--- Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200 | 2 +- drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200 +1
-1@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ Where the supported parameter are: led Can be used to turn on experimental LED code. - 0 = Off, 1 = On. Default is 0. + 0 = Off, 1 = On. Default is 1. mode Can be used to set the default mode of the adapter.drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c +2
-3@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int network_mode = 0;static u32 ipw_debug_level;static int associate;static int auto_create =1 ; -static int led_support =0 ; +static int led_support =1 ;static int disable =0 ;static int bt_coexist =0 ;static int hwcrypto =0 ;@@ -12083,7 +12083,7 @@ module_param(auto_create, int, 0444);MODULE_PARM_DESC (auto_create,"auto create adhoc network (default on)" );module_param_named (led, led_support, int,0444 ); -MODULE_PARM_DESC (led,"enable led control on some systems (default 0 off)" ); +MODULE_PARM_DESC (led,"enable led control on some systems (default 1 on)" );module_param (debug, int,0444 );MODULE_PARM_DESC (debug,"debug output mask" ); --1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 48 lines · Leann Ogasawara
Quoted 32 lines · Luis R. Rodriguez
Quoted 30 lines · Leann Ogasawara
Hi All,
As documented in 2005 in
Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200, "The LED code has been reported to hang some systems when running ifconfig and is therefore disabled by default." We've however been carrying the following patch in our Ubuntu kernel for quite some time which enables the ipw2200 LED by default. This was a result of numerous user requests. We've seen no subsequent bug reports of systems hanging due to the the LED code being enabled by default. I'd therefore like to propose the following patch to enable the LED by default. This patch was originally authored by TJ. I apologize in advance that I do not have TJ's full first and last name for provenance.Thanks,
LeannQuoted 1 line
From
315246037a0edab4d626de6ccb68c73d3fe61ce3Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:29:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ipw2200: Enable LED by defaultEnable LED by default and update the
MODULE_PARM_DESC. The original reason for defaulting to disabled was documented in 2005 and noted, "The LED code has been reported to hang some systems when running ifconfig and is therefore disabled by default." This no longer appears applicable and users have been requesting this be enabled for several years.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Originally-by TJ <[email protected]>Does Originally-by also imply he has read the Certificate of Origin and that he agrees for his code to be used in that way? That is the purpose of the SOB anyway, but if you took his code, does that imply that he agrees to it too?
I'd CC'd TJ on the initial email, so I'm hoping he will respond here to your inquiry. I can say that he had submitted the original form of the patch to the Ubuntu kernel-team mailing list back in March, 2009:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2009-March/005013.html
In that original submission he did provide his official SOB.
Quoted 7 lines
The patch was then applied with slight modification by Tim Gardner to the Ubuntu kernel. In forwarding this upstream, I wanted to give TJ the proper credit for originating the patch even though it's undergone some slight modification (ie the
MODULE_PARM_DESCchange). TJ had not officially signed off on this final form of the patch which is the reason I used "Originally-by:". If there is a better approach please let me know.
In that case I would just recommend to keep his original SOB, then it would go through you/tim whoever it goes through until it reaches Linus. But just my $0.02.
Luis
PATCH v2 1/1 ipw2200: Enable LED by default
Quoted 58 lines · Luis R. Rodriguez
Quoted 48 lines · Leann Ogasawara
Quoted 32 lines · Luis R. Rodriguez
Quoted 30 lines · Leann Ogasawara
Hi All,
As documented in 2005 in
Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200, "The LED code has been reported to hang some systems when running ifconfig and is therefore disabled by default." We've however been carrying the following patch in our Ubuntu kernel for quite some time which enables the ipw2200 LED by default. This was a result of numerous user requests. We've seen no subsequent bug reports of systems hanging due to the the LED code being enabled by default. I'd therefore like to propose the following patch to enable the LED by default. This patch was originally authored by TJ. I apologize in advance that I do not have TJ's full first and last name for provenance.Thanks,
LeannQuoted 1 line
From
315246037a0edab4d626de6ccb68c73d3fe61ce3Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:29:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ipw2200: Enable LED by defaultEnable LED by default and update the
MODULE_PARM_DESC. The original reason for defaulting to disabled was documented in 2005 and noted, "The LED code has been reported to hang some systems when running ifconfig and is therefore disabled by default." This no longer appears applicable and users have been requesting this be enabled for several years.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Originally-by TJ <[email protected]>Does Originally-by also imply he has read the Certificate of Origin and that he agrees for his code to be used in that way? That is the purpose of the SOB anyway, but if you took his code, does that imply that he agrees to it too?
I'd CC'd TJ on the initial email, so I'm hoping he will respond here to your inquiry. I can say that he had submitted the original form of the patch to the Ubuntu kernel-team mailing list back in March, 2009:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2009-March/005013.html
In that original submission he did provide his official SOB.
Quoted 7 lines
The patch was then applied with slight modification by Tim Gardner to the Ubuntu kernel. In forwarding this upstream, I wanted to give TJ the proper credit for originating the patch even though it's undergone some slight modification (ie the
MODULE_PARM_DESCchange). TJ had not officially signed off on this final form of the patch which is the reason I used "Originally-by:". If there is a better approach please let me know.
Quoted 3 lines
In that case I would just recommend to keep his original SOB, then it would go through you/tim whoever it goes through until it reaches Linus. But just my $0.02.
Re-sending and just replacing the Originally-by: with TJ's actual SOB.
Thanks,
Leann
Quoted 1 line
From
315246037a0edab4d626de6ccb68c73d3fe61ce3Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:29:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ipw2200: Enable LED by default
Enable LED by default and update the MODULE_PARM_DESC. The original reason for defaulting to disabled was documented in 2005 and noted, "The LED code has been reported to hang some systems when running ifconfig and is therefore disabled by default." This no longer appears applicable and users have been requesting this be enabled for several years.
--- Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200 | 2 +- drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Documentation/networking/README.ipw2200 +1 -1
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ Where the supported parameter are: led Can be used to turn on experimental LED code. - 0 = Off, 1 = On. Default is 0. + 0 = Off, 1 = On. Default is 1. mode Can be used to set the default mode of the adapter.
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c +2 -2
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int network_mode = 0;static u32 ipw_debug_level;static int associate;static int auto_create =1 ; -static int led_support =0 ; +static int led_support =1 ;static int disable =0 ;static int bt_coexist =0 ;static int hwcrypto =0 ;
@@ -12083,7 +12083,7 @@ module_param(auto_create, int, 0444);MODULE_PARM_DESC (auto_create,"auto create adhoc network (default on)" );module_param_named (led, led_support, int,0444 ); -MODULE_PARM_DESC (led,"enable led control on some systems (default 0 off)" ); +MODULE_PARM_DESC (led,"enable led control on some systems (default 1 on)" );module_param (debug, int,0444 );MODULE_PARM_DESC (debug,"debug output mask" );
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
Quoted 3 lines · Leann Ogasawara
propose the following patch to enable the LED by default. This patch was originally authored by TJ. I apologize in advance that I do not have TJ's full first and last name for provenance.
You've already got it. TJ is my full name.
Quoted 6 lines · TJ
Quoted 3 lines · Leann Ogasawara
propose the following patch to enable the LED by default. This patch was originally authored by TJ. I apologize in advance that I do not have TJ's full first and last name for provenance.
You've already got it. TJ is my full name.
Also from the SubmittingPatches documentation on the kernel:
then you just add a line saying
using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)
TJ is your full name?
Luis