xfs_db: check for valid inode data pointer before dereferencing
PATCH 1/1 xfs_db: check for valid inode data pointer before dereferencing
From: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
When processing an inode, the code checks various flags to determine whether to output messages or not. When checking the CLI provided inode numbers to be verbose about, we fail to check if the inode data structre returned is valid or not before dereferencing it. Hence running xfs_check with the "serious errors only" flag, xfs_db will crash. Fix up the "should we output" logic to be safe.
--- db/check.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
db/check.c +16 -13
@@ -2619,6 +2619,7 @@ process_inode(xfs_qcnt_t ic =0 ;xfs_qcnt_t rc =0 ;xfs_dqid_t dqprid; +int v =0 ;static char okfmts[] = {0 ,/* type 0 unused */ 1 <<XFS_DINODE_FMT_DEV ,/* FIFO */
@@ -2653,15 +2654,16 @@ process_inode( bno =XFS_INO_TO_FSB (mp, ino); blkmap =NULL ; } + v = (!sflag || (id && id->ilist) ||CHECK_BLIST (bno));if (idic.di_magic !=XFS_DINODE_MAGIC ) { -if (!sflag || isfree || id->ilist ||CHECK_BLIST (bno)) +if (isfree || v)dbprintf (_ ("bad magic number %#x for inode %lld\n" ), idic.di_magic, ino); error++;return ; }if (!XFS_DINODE_GOOD_VERSION (idic.di_version)) { -if (!sflag || isfree || id->ilist ||CHECK_BLIST (bno)) +if (isfree || v)dbprintf (_ ("bad version number %#x for inode %lld\n" ), idic.di_version, ino); error++;
@@ -2669,7 +2671,7 @@ process_inode( }if (isfree) {if (idic.di_nblocks !=0 ) { -if (!sflag || id->ilist ||CHECK_BLIST (bno)) +if (v)dbprintf (_ ("bad nblocks %lld for free inode " "%lld\n" ), idic.di_nblocks, ino);
@@ -2680,21 +2682,22 @@ process_inode(else nlink = idic.di_nlink;if (nlink !=0 ) { -if (!sflag || id->ilist ||CHECK_BLIST (bno)) +if (v)dbprintf (_ ("bad nlink %d for free inode %lld\n" ), nlink, ino); error++; }if (idic.di_mode !=0 ) { -if (!sflag || id->ilist ||CHECK_BLIST (bno)) +if (v)dbprintf (_ ("bad mode %#o for free inode %lld\n" ), idic.di_mode, ino); error++; }return ; } +if (be32_to_cpu (dip->di_next_unlinked) !=NULLAGINO ) { -if (!sflag || isfree || id->ilist ||CHECK_BLIST (bno)) +if (v)dbprintf (_ ("bad next unlinked %#x for inode %lld\n" ),be32_to_cpu (dip->di_next_unlinked), ino); error++;
@@ -2704,27 +2707,27 @@ process_inode(*/ if ((((idic.di_mode &S_IFMT ) >>12 ) >15 ) || (!(okfmts[(idic.di_mode &S_IFMT ) >>12 ] & (1 << idic.di_format)))) { -if (!sflag || id->ilist ||CHECK_BLIST (bno)) +if (v)dbprintf (_ ("bad format %d for inode %lld type %#o\n" ), idic.di_format, id->ino, idic.di_mode &S_IFMT ); error++;return ; }if ((unsigned int )XFS_DFORK_ASIZE (dip, mp) >=XFS_LITINO (mp)) { -if (!sflag || id->ilist) +if (v)dbprintf (_ ("bad fork offset %d for inode %lld\n" ), idic.di_forkoff, id->ino); error++;return ; }if ((unsigned int )idic.di_aformat >XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE ) { -if (!sflag || id->ilist) +if (v)dbprintf (_ ("bad attribute format %d for inode %lld\n" ), idic.di_aformat, id->ino); error++;return ; } -if (verbose || id->ilist ||CHECK_BLIST (bno)) +if (verbose || (id && id->ilist) ||CHECK_BLIST (bno)) dbprintf(_("inode %lld mode %#o fmt %s " "afmt %s " "nex %d anex %d nblk %lld sz %lld%s%s%s%s%s%s%s\n"),
@@ -2844,20 +2847,20 @@ process_inode( } totblocks = totdblocks + totiblocks + atotdblocks + atotiblocks;if (totblocks != idic.di_nblocks) { -if (!sflag || id->ilist ||CHECK_BLIST (bno)) +if (v)dbprintf (_ ("bad nblocks %lld for inode %lld, counted " "%lld\n" ), idic.di_nblocks, id->ino, totblocks); error++; }if (nextents != idic.di_nextents) { -if (!sflag || id->ilist ||CHECK_BLIST (bno)) +if (v)dbprintf (_ ("bad nextents %d for inode %lld, counted %d\n" ), idic.di_nextents, id->ino, nextents); error++; }if (anextents != idic.di_anextents) { -if (!sflag || id->ilist ||CHECK_BLIST (bno)) +if (v)dbprintf (_ ("bad anextents %d for inode %lld, counted " "%d\n" ), idic.di_anextents, id->ino, anextents);
Signature · 6 lines
1.7.1 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list [email protected] http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 10 lines · Dave Chinner
From: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
When processing an inode, the code checks various flags to determine whether to output messages or not. When checking the CLI provided inode numbers to be verbose about, we fail to check if the inode data structre returned is valid or not before dereferencing it. Hence running
xfs_checkwith the "serious errors only" flag,xfs_dbwill crash. Fix up the "should we output" logic to be safe.Signed-off-by Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
Looks good,
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs