ab3100: fix off-by-one value range checking for voltage selector
PATCH RESEND 1/1 ab3100: fix off-by-one value range checking for voltage selector
We use voltage selector as an array index for typ_voltages. Thus the valid range for voltage selector should be 0..voltages_len-1.
Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>
Acked-by Mark Brown <[email protected]>
---
Simply update the changelog explaining that the reason for the limit is that it's an array index.
drivers/regulator/ab3100.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/regulator/ab3100.c +2 -2
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int ab3100_list_voltage_regulator(struct regulator_dev *reg, {struct ab3100_regulator *abreg = reg->reg_data; -if (selector > abreg->voltages_len) +if (selector >= abreg->voltages_len)return -EINVAL ;return abreg->typ_voltages[selector]; }
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int ab3100_get_voltage_regulator(struct regulator_dev *reg) regval &=0xE0 ; regval >>=5 ; -if (regval > abreg->voltages_len) { +if (regval >= abreg->voltages_len) {dev_err (®->dev,"regulator register %02x contains an illegal voltage setting\n" , abreg->regreg);
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.3
2010/7/26 Axel Lin <[email protected]>:
Quoted 5 lines
We use voltage selector as an array index for
typ_voltages. Thus the valid range for voltage selector should be 0..voltages_len-1.Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>Acked-by Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Acked-by Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Liam Girdwood
AppliedQuoted 9 lines · Linus Walleij
2010/7/26 Axel Lin <[email protected]>:
Quoted 5 lines
We use voltage selector as an array index for
typ_voltages. Thus the valid range for voltage selector should be 0..voltages_len-1.Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>Acked-by Mark Brown <[email protected]>Acked-by Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Applied.
Thanks
Liam
Signature · 3 lines
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer. http://www.slimlogic.co.uk